'At What Point Will You Be Satisfied?': Ron Johnson Grills OMB Director On Biden's Projected Taxes 

She reminds me of the Governor of Georgia, Stacey Abrams.

@@josemorrasge8100 ..both remind me of hungry hungry hippos

& perversely by doing so , they end up massively negatively stereotyping the "diverse" demographic .

@@mjones4083 that is an excellent point, that you rarely hear. They most often hurt the very people they claim to be helping, and are most worried about. Because too much is never enough, as in this video. And, too outrageous is never outrageous enough. Keep in mind that the very nature of "progressivism" is to constantly change, mostly simply for the sake of change, otherwise you've become a conservative.

@@UVBluesman Thank you for your comment . I have never seen the point of changing anything that actually works well and as such do not do "change for changes sake" . & change seems to happen so quickly nowadays that there is no time for proper reflection /adjustment and as such can turn out to "progressive levelling down " - with disastrous consequences . Diversity hire is a (troubling ) example of this.

She should not be in this position

Your racism is showing. This young lady is a victim.

Probably had a pass on doing homework because she was oppressed by those racist Whites.

​@Tom how is she a victim? She went to one of the best universities and paid by taxpayers. I get it now, you're being sarcastic. Maga 2024

She's States facts. Facts bother maga. The top 1% controls over 60% of the wealth in America. Probably much more. They pay far less in taxes because of GOP loopholes created to help them. Anyone would be a complete moron to think the top 1% are being mistreated.

They probably edited that part out

or say inflation is racist.

Wait for it

Or an actuarial or accountant by any stretch of the imagination.

She is just basically a face in a picture on the wall. Color her face white and with her credentials she would not be there ,

Prior to the video she said the top 1% should pay their fair share. It is reasonable to ask her what that share should be.

@@johnschuh8616 I am white

No I'm not.. And I do know what I know

She tried to answer twice but he stopped her each Time, so...

​@@23Toyboy23 stop trolling. Lmao

Democrats suck at math.

She knows the answer. Shes obfuscating.

@@23Toyboy23 because she was not answering!!

Right. What is all this bullshit about taxing the rich? I thought they had just settled on taxing us poor folks by printing more money.

Bingo

Just like gamblers. Only with someone else's money. Spending more than you take in is something most people will not do. But credit cards are much in demand.

Problem is GOP allowed Trump three debt ceiling increases in 4 years. This ran up our national debt in four years more than the previous 20 years. Now they want Dem leadership to make up for his spending. Same thing that has been going on for 40 years. Republicans run up our debt and then they want Democrat leadership to lower it, so next Republican President can run it up again. It is all in the books.

I agree 100. Doesn't matter if u are rich or poor. We are all overtaxed. Somebody needs to address the spending problem Washington dc has. We are over 30 trillion dollars in debt

this is totally true but maybe the answer isn't that simple

Nobody is going to post situations, or watch them, where lucid and informative answers were given. That doesn't sound like clickbait to me. It is odd that there aren't any legal sanctions or penalties for appearing like a crook, or a moron.

because the facts are not on their side.

And dumbest

but harold and lloyd aren't running this committee they are too smart

Diversity hires, black, female check

Disagree. They're not even that smart

Spot on! 👍

Exactly. Left leaning people of color. Biden's people.

There is a lot of unqualified on each side,not only ones that you seem to imply that have melaninated skin

You mean f##king black!

@@bigron8346 you understood,so what's the problem?My thoughts

Don't say that in Cori Bush's fanclub on here, they stated "she's a national hero" when I pointed out her blatant racial agenda to drive a stake further between our people of this nation.

He actually said his numbers were from an analysis.

They're used to using "my truth" not The Truth.

She is the government, you believe her cause she's black? His job is to make sure the government is following legislations laws

@@markportnoy6290 Definition of ANALYSIS: DETAILED EXAMINATION OF THE ELEMENT(S) STRUCTURE OF SOMETHING . Try again BOT 🤡🙄

She left out 0ne Democrat talking point, Donald Trump

All those countries she claims have it worse, doubled down on the stupid ideas of biden is why it is worse. They never got out of the paris accords, they never dropped the iran deal.

She does... but her job is Black lesbian reparation rhetoric, not actually running a country...

Clearly she's just a figurehead, not an actual manager.

Kinda reminds you of AOC ...... doesn't it??? And that was AOC's major.........LOL.

@@savannah505 AOC should demand her money back for her degree in economics. Clearly she got nothing.

And I remember they were doing that same thing ten years ago.

🤣🤣🤣🤣

D's are never satisfied, enough is never enough. Only when all Americans are impoverished, will they be satisfied. Quite simply, they are nuttier than a Payday bar.

If Katie Porter brings her white board, Johnson the man that pretends totalks to his phone when he’s caught lying. She’d eat Johnson and spit em out. He’s an asshat

LMAO it’s getting to be that way.

Tosha

She’s a f***ing liar, denialist, and downright idiot. Just towing the Biden line. Lie, and keep lying, no matter what facts she is presented with.

Metrics? Uh... metrics.... uh... METRICS ARE RACIST !

"Num-bahs? Ain't nobody got time fo' num-bahs 'n' shee-iit

I'm the 50th thumbs up.

That's a gimmick Democrats love to use, project it out 10 years to justify any bill 'in their own Mind ' when the actual numbers are in, it's doubled

She's good enough for the Biden voters.

Well, she knows she would sound ridiculous admitting that in public, so she'd likely say 99%, and throw in a judgement that 1% should be enough for "the rich" to live on....excluding of course, any politicians or wealthy beuracrats!

She wants to say "all the whytes money!"

Lefty politicians are like TV evegalists to their constituents. Silver-tongue them to death to get elected and become millionaires in the process

what is the percent they should pay? yes?

What do you think?

@george hatzimanolakis by the way. I'm not the one that needs to know this stuff. Apparently they should know.

@@williammills8953 why should they? The truth is that there is no magic percent. The truth is also, how much would taxation be if nobody scammed it. Do we have a debt problem? Only if we can't cut where we most definitely can. Also, It doesn't matter if it your job or not, if you post it, there will be dudes like me who like to make fun of people for not having an answer "you or the politician like". Picture a scenario where the government successfully takes 10% tax from everyone and they have enough money to fix a lot of schools and build public housing. In 5 years, will that 10% be required? I bet you after 10 years, you can cut more than you started with because so much help was just given. This is a hypothetical, there is no right answer here.

With properly prepared questions, if they give a yes or no answer, it isn't as though that is the end of it. The senators get to ask the real questions in private sessions. This stuff is 100% political. A good prosecutor is always setting a trap. At a certain level, if you can't stonewall the questions, you aren't up to the job.

Hahahahaha

U must be a Graduate of Trump Academy;Maybe you received a Scholarship from the Trump Foundation

@@tommyanderson4274 …you voted for a pedophile? Why would you vote for a pedophile?…he’s not going to make it legal, poor you.

Indeed, and maybe we could STOP growing both entitlements without any work requirement and STOP. growing the already massive federal bureaucracy without any ability to EVER get rid of any of them. They are arguing, right now, in other hearings about federal employees who, now that the pandemic has finally been declared over, don’t want to return to their offices. As has been pointed out, employees in the private sector who don’t show up to work get fired. Now there are plans, in multiple sectors to spend millions trying to figure out why people don’t want to return to work. It’s absurd, of course they won’t want to get out of their pjs if they are allowed to get away with that and you’re fired is a lot cheaper than all this snowflakery.

it's actually exactly half, they're over spending by a trillion because they are missing half of their revenue which equates to over spending by half

She jumped to 2033 in her deficit reduction malarkey, that's just guessing, isn't real.

Making you total debt $55,000, She doesn't seem to be able to grasp that math.

that makes sense by your numbers because eventually the debt grows by nothing

🎯

@@samfrancisco8095 but it's a $5,000 deficit reduction!!!! LOL

No they don't

That's right. That's why I ask what is all this bullshit about taxing the rich? I thought they had just settled on taxing us poor folks by printing more money. They do it over and over.

A state in Africa did exactly the same bread at the market is 20,000 what ever the money is. Inflation and devalue of there currencies

But, what American haters don’t realize is, where America goes, so goes the world. As bad as it is here it’s worse in other parts. Besides. I’m not interested in the Global thing. I’m interested in what’s happening to My Country

that would be correct but the point was, your printing doesn't effect my inflation which is mostly accurate

Says the guy who looks like he works at walmart.

@@kurtwilliams1859 working at Walmart is still better compared to your mom working on her knees.

That might be too much for her, she cant even give a numeric determination of "fair share" so I am pretty sure she doesn't actually understand numbers and is just parroting whenever she uses them.

No, republicans never ask good faith questions. It’s never based in actual information. He literally told her he didn’t want her to see the numbers he found somewhere but wanted her to respond to a question that wasn’t based in accurate information.

​@@kurtwilliams1859 says the guy who hasn't left his mommys basement except to get his nappy changed EVER.

maybe but even 99% tax would leave them with more than what the majority of people have. So on the way to that percent, we can eventually find a way to make all americans productive with equal accessibility to reach that ability.

We're already taxed substantially more than when we were under British rule. We should've revolted when the gold standard was terminated. We should revolt now.

You are assuming they desire to be productive.

Already is, sadly....

Too late they have already. God help us.

They already have. Now the scaministration is going to run us to the brink of hell

That's the plan.

Not "going to" , it already is and has been doing so ever since it got into power .Nothing can be clearer than that .

Lol Shalanda

Perhaps we put a limit to borrowing against investments then.

@@mick8888V Perhaps we just go full J. Stalin?

Well with rising interest rates and depressed stock values, that plan may not be working out so well these days.

Yeah...let's just try taxing the bastards anyway and see if that ol Boogeyman of unemployment rise is real. Worth trying something different than the last 60 years.

You had me until "Waist vs WASTE." Work on that.

Data is massaged in many fashions to support endless intentions.

FAA admin nominee: never flew a plane Transportation secretary: was fed agent and mayor vice president: smoked weed with Tupac? Homeland security: wants to remove all hurdles to entering US President: Blackmailed into supporting phase 1 of WWIII Treasury sec: tells israel to get its money out of SVB bank before it fails next day before US citizens remove theirs Nuclear secretary assistant: Man who dresses as woman and steals womens luggage US military: pays to cut your dick off and put a dress on At this point we can only assume they want us to try to revolt so they have pretext to remove 1st and 2nd ammednment

@@disconductorder I hate that everything you just wrote is a 100% accurate.

@@disconductorder the question I have is whether the US military would turn on its own people if a revolt were to take place. The final nail in the coffin of the Soviet Union was their military refusing to turn on its own people.

@@Mazzpp98 Some would, I think most wouldn't. That is one of the reasons our current government is going full speed ahead to woke-ify the military. They want to purge all normal and patriotic people.

To bad Milton freedman is still alive,Mr Johnson and Milton would be able to answer every question, and could have a real conversation

ditto

75% on those making over a billion and 55% for those over 2 million. That's a good start to swing this ship around.

In the early to mid 1900‘s it was a 97% tax rate. For the ultra rich.

@@roryfleming2320 That 97% was only on part of the income, not all of it. Is that what you propose as their "fair share"?

@@mick8888V 75/55 % on everything or just the over 1 billion/2 million?

@@wdtaut5650 there should be a windfall tax and a capital gains tax.

Had the same thought. Was looking to see if anyone had already made this comment.

When you have to borrow money to pay the interest on the money you borrowed they have a financial term for it. It is called BANKRUPT.

Its been the Democrat way since their inception, their idea of "lowering the deficit" is by not spending as much as they wanted. So instead of raising the debt by 25T over 10 years it only goes up by 22T....just like my wife says "see, I saved you money"!!

Got it!!

@@gregs42768 I saved 38% on this unnecessary expenditure, honey. We can never have enough of these requiring us to now rent a storage unit to keep it all. She spent your paper gain on your investments. Realistically, you didn't lose as much in your portfolio because she already spent it before the drop.