Funny Higgins cant remember what he testified under oath what he said and did (even after reviewing it), however he vividly remembers the detailed shape and size of a glass he saw while drinking heavily - Jamison & Gingers
The things these people remember compared to what they don’t is hilarious 😂.. they really think they sound good to the jury and in reality they sound like fools and liars
@ThirstyKaren Why are you so petty as to roleplay as Karen in various comments? It does not do anything but make more people view those who would vote guilty as immature and incapable of intelligent discussions.
Karen was F’n with fat Brian and he was infatuated with her, then she cut him off and he was pissed, thought he was going to score with beautiful Karen and he got played, Lmbo
I’ve never seen a judge sustain so many weak objections. And it kinda looks like the witness pauses because he knows there will be an objection and the judge will save his sorry ass.
People should really watch what they say my entire family are Federal agents and or officers and they are honest and good people Jesus I believe is the only one who can JUDGE
And this is not at all an anomaly. Small town cops frame people all the time. Happened to me, thank god for VIDEO. In court police are assumed to be telling the truth, which is ridiculous since, as demonstrated here, they are LIARS.
Lally is an absolute joke!!! Guy just objects and Auntie Bev just gives him everything!! Nothing about this trial has been fair for the defense or the defendant as of when objections are made! All of this has been proven and said in another hearing.
My biggest takeaway is all the red faces and how much booze plays a part in these people's lives, starting with the judge. Seriously. They all have that red face and that anxious demeanor. All that sighing and telling them to hurry up is because they've been away too long from their last drink and are getting anxious for the next. They go to events only as an excuse to drink. If invited to a wedding, their first thought is what they'll be drinking. They drink and happen to notice that they're bowling. If they're drinking, a baseball game happens to break out in front of them. In every single damn picture, they have drinks and encourage underage drinking. Their faces are plastered and out of focus. They seriously need to question their life style choices.
Jail is for misdemeanor crimes and sentences less than 1 year. This BATF agent needs a lengthy PRISON sentence. There's a big difference between jail and prison.
Even if he had nothing to do with it, which we know he does, he shouldn’t be working in law enforcement for his actions. I know that there are probably officers that do worse things than him, but he’s the one who got caught. In what world is this okay? One of the saddest parts is that he knows that he won’t face any repercussions for breaking the federal law in regard to his job, ignoring the court order by tossing the phone, lying under oath and likely helping his friends cover up a murder, if he isn’t the one who committed the murder. Actually, o don’t think he did it because I think the Alperts would have sold him out with a quickness. It’s the kid. Also, while I’m venting, they could have said it was an accident because it probably was and the kid might have gotten like 5 years or less in prison, but they decided to blame someone else and let the murderer walk Scott free. It’s so effing annoying.
He threw the phone in the dumpsters at the fbi headquarters because he knows darn well that the contents of every dumpster there literally gets destroyed or incinerated. It’s not like any old dumpster that just gets taken to a landfill.
Personally what i think looks the worst (for aunt bev) is when he (more than once) looks directly AT THE JUDGE like she was a savior/mom & not the jury. Ive never seen a witness do that before. Kinda looks bad. Sus.
Auntie Bev's dad is an attorney also & he's representing one of the Albert's in this trial. I can't remember which one, but they're dodgy af. It's easy to Google if one of yall consider it noteworthy. It's part of why ppl are saying she should've recused herself.
Remember, Auntie Beverage was assigned a different case, but ordered another jr judge to take it because she wanted this particular case, she’s sketchy as fk.
THE ONLY TAKEAWAY I HAVE ON THE WHOLE DAY WITH THIS GUY is the following: He testified he left from the Alberts house went directly to the Canton Pd. THAT specifically puts him in the house when John was in the house. SO WHEN they present the phone records of his movement app that shows his arrival time, consistent with Jens phone record time of when she said she saw them pull up, he went over 80 feet walking, consistent w distance to the door, then walked up flight of stairs then over 30 more feet and other activity. So he is now locked in...see the police dept is just over a mile from the house. So that means with the log of when he used key card arriving at pd at 127 pm he was at the house till well over 1 am which puts him AT THE HOUSE WHEN JOHN was. He is not locked into saying he never saw John. MOST ALL the cross is to set up what they say so when all the same witnesses are called for defense after they present all the evidence of the phone app showing his EVERY single step per the phone records, regardless they will all deny the phone records as they continue to do, the jury will see he is locked in. THE questioning of them after all defense evidence is presented will be much more eventful. WHEN he is presented with the phone app measurement activity showing his arrival time and all the walking and going up stairs time was exactly when he already testified now to when he was there, when he left, going straight to pd and his logged by pd system arrival. THE phone search of hos long to die in snow will be verified by 2 experts...and as well as the movement app. He either is not aware of the phone movement app or he feels so confident the judge will not let the judge use it as admissable evidence, regardless they will hear the experts they will KNOW he already said he was at the house when app shows so was John, and now he has testified that he had access all thru the pd. SO WHEN THEY SHOW the video of her tail light intact at 5 am, and HOPEFULLY the footprints at her tail light seen at 630 state provided evidence that kr could not have made, as 530 video shows there was not that much snow on the ground when she left with JEN and then hour later when much more snow fell and there was deep all the way through the newly fallen snow AT HER TAIL LIGHT....it will be come clear that someone not kr broke that tail light and he will be seen so much more as guilty guilty guilty and the da as colluding with ignoring such evidence that should have prevented this case from ever coming to trial and prosecute the ones who all so far have lied and outright called phone company records VICIOUS LIES ...instead of using the evidence to prosecute cops for lying in reports he chose to enjoin the corruption. THEN have audacity to tell media literally called the lawyers and kr conspiring to harass witnesses because they are sharing the evidence in national tv episodes. MILLIONS saw the video showing her taillight intact and heard about the google search that the phone co gave them. HARASSING the defendant and lawyers I hope the lawyers sue the da for literally accusing the lawyers of crimes in one news report. SO that is my takeaway...as to the texts all it did was show he had motive, his texting kr while she is loving on her man and ignoring him KNOWING JOHN knew about the kiss which obviously she may have done to make him jealous doing right in front of his camera, but there she was...kissing on her man after he knew she had kissed him and they worked it out....and he was not mad at her there he was all loving on her and her on him..and there was JOHN she did not so much as glance in his direction. She assured John he meant nothing to her.....wanted to work it out with him..and in JOHNS face did not even say hi to him. Showing John....he was her true interest...and Johns response to that...texting his friends gf while she is with him!!! flirting with her while she is trying to be with her man and work it out....ummmwelllll he texted to her. THEN he texts John if he is coming?? WHY would he want the very man who he was caught kissing on his gf and he knew he knew to come to the party? Weird. TRYING to dismiss everything did not go over well with the jury and JUST WAIT...all the lies he said once all the evidence is revealed...he will look sooooo bad to the jury....you will hear soooo many objections from the da then. WONT MATTER if the judge who is in fact corrupt blocking animal control records impounding them after they learn 4 people claim to have been attacked by same dog, if she does not allow 3rd party culprit defense....wont matter. CAUSE they will see how corrupt the court is if they don't let it in. THAT will not set right w the jury..all they need is reasonable doubt. AND that has already been created and they have not even presented their evidence yet! ONE OF THE FAMILY MEMBERS SHOULD RUN STRAIGHT TO THE FBI AND ASK FOR IMMUNITY CAUSE...THIS CASE WILL ONLY GET BIGGER and louder.. FIRST ONE TO THE DOOR GETS THE DEAL!
@ThirstyKaren I have watched the video many times. Along with the vehicle moving forward you can see the tire marks in the snow that go right to John’s car. I would assume she was going fast enough for the brake assist.
How is she getting away with this? Someone needs to report her to the court so they can get a judge who wasn’t the babysitter for the Albert’s at one time.
That judge is an absolute bias tyrant!! It almost feels like she’s trying to aid them in covering up as much as possible. She’s a weasel! Never should sit on another trial!
This doesn't seem to be justice here. The defense has to fight the government and government employees plus a judge that wont let them ask simple questions. Glad i dont live there. This is not justice.
Judge is quick to protect a Fed Agent that used govt property for a personal reason. Jax Sheriff just fired officers for running tags for a personal reason. MA justice seems shady
How could she not? At LEAST TEN people have perjured themselves Plus everything else and defense hasn’t even put case on Even w Aunt Bev in their pocket they have less than nothing C u next Tuesday……Bev
So much wrong with the canton crew , it’s becoming obvious they are covering for each other . This guy higgins has admitted drink driving , using FBI facilities for his personal use. And destroying his phone & SIM card . The arrogance is off the scale
@@karliann1 the important thing to remember is they are not the jury , linch mob mentality has always existed. They seem not to want a fair trial or bother to wait for the defence to make their case , people who do that don’t understand what justice is all about ,imo
I never knew that in a murder investigation a witness or anyone involved in the case was allowed to pick and choose what texts they felt like. That phone and other people's phones should have been confiscated and extracted by a officer who was in charge of the investigation. Who is he to select what they was allowed to take. He should have been charged for destroying evidence part of a murder case.
They were being accusatory because you looked guilty Higgins. Taking out a sim card and throwing both in separate bins on the Military vase where he thought it was safe for him. Such blatant and crazy behaviour from a detective who DEFINITELY knows better.
I just watched Trial 4 at Netflix, innocent man served 20 years in prison set up by three corrupt Boston cops. Two was given leniency, the third was given immunity and then awarded a retirement.
Look at Lank, he assaulted those two brothers on behalf of Chris Albert ....who dared to complain and then were charged and Chris was not ....they were found not guilty and successfully sued Lank for hundreds of thousands of dollars!! Lank was then promoted!! Aunty Bev would not allow in the fact that the brothers were found not guilty in to court ....her reasoning being "Just because they were found not guilty doesn't mean they are, there are many reasons for that verdict" .....yet it was a jury that found them not guilty in just 10 mins of deliberations!! She also did not allow in the fact that they successfully sued Lank!!
I call caca , " I threw it away " Who does not us the old phone to try and trade in for the upgrade . A cop on a cops salary just throws a phone away , because he did not like it . Something smells fishy and it ain't no fish . So veteran po;ice officer has no concept of chain of custody , very convenient .
@@coopmilieu7188 I still have the iphone 3 , I still have the old razor and the undestructable nokia ...That cane with the game snake . Then there is the reason he threw it away . "I didn't like it " WHAT ?
The truth never changes and when it’s fax surrounding the death of your supposed friend who is a Boston police officer and was found on your other friends front lawn I would think you would remember every single fact from every single day I know I would
She won't!! She has had all of this information all along, fought the Defence in getting the evidence they need ....was then forced to allow Jens cell phone provider information....only AFTER she was overuled by the SJC!! She kept denying access to all of the other phone data ....until the Defence proved through the Feds that they knew what was on the phones!! She has been actively aiding in the Cover Up ....she wasn't even supposed to be on this case ....and then forced her way onto it!!
@@kirks7143 I knew something was off with her and her rulings. The defense has to pull teeth just to ask certain questions. I really hope she’s investigated after this case cause she doesn’t even try to hide her bias . And the way she words things is gross too .. “ I’ll let him have it “ over Lalleys objection .. she’ll let them have it ?? I thought objections are based on law not what she wants and doesn’t want answered
That is always a possibility. Exhaust the finances of the defendant or try to. I DID see someone online claiming to be juror @ 3 in livestream about the trial like someone is trying to defame a juror..not sure if is random troll or if someone is planning to tamper with witnesses cause they dont like the body language of that juror. I can only imagine how they have feel disgusted about some of these witnesses...they trying to act like people are stupid. JEN contradicting all kinds of records calling the lawyer vicious liar basically for having phone records that say she googled how long to die in the snow....like they cant unhear that and her saying so what is says that....calling phone records lies. STATE who uses phone records for evidence now acting like is not valid evidence not gonna sit well w jury. with all the butt calls on facial recognition phones, destroying throwing away phones...mannnnnnn wait till they present the defense.....I and others screen shot any user claiming to be juror online so the user can be looked up by the feds for trying to tamper with jury to taint a jury with identity theft online.
Thank God, they’re all such horrible liars so now the truth is coming out to be honest. I was really hoping that this guy would do the right thing and tell the truth and save himself but maybe he’s more involved and he’s not able to do that.
If the judge thinks it’s ok to use public resources for personal gain by employees with access to those resources then she does it herself and believes that, that administrative law is a bunch of hooey.
If these have been the prosecutions witnesses...what will the defense testimonies reveal that already has been established? Seems like the defense has been making their case from the get go. What a miserable cast of characters the prosecution has presented.
I don’t know any of these people, and I don’t know what happened. I’ll even admit that Higgins seems like an honest guy, if I didn’t know he was lying. It is EXCRUCIATING to hear a grown, intelligent man in law enforcement to say under oath that he thought it was acceptable to get rid of a phone that he had during the time that a person was murdered, when he saw the person on the night that he was murdered. It’s disgusting. And disrespectful to the court! 🙄
Every single time we watch an interview with a witness or a suspect, law enforcement takes their phone and does it whatever they do to the entire phone they don’t say oh when it’s convenient for you, give us only the information that you think is relevant to this case, especially when there was already a court order for his entire phone
I have never seen a judge behave like she is a member of the prosecution team. She might as well lose the damn robes and go sit at the table with them. These are important questions and the answers (when the judge rarely allows them) need to be heard. The jury needs to hear these things and Higgins is Clearly not being honest….which this “judge “ seems to think is irrelevant.This is ridiculous. Like most everyone watching this, we just want the truth. The judge seems to not care about that.
This case should be called " The Blue Line Butt Dial Trial", or the " Craft Trial". Can't Remember A Fckn Thing. Show me what I said before because I want to change it now.
You would think anyone could go to that kiosk in the public lobby of the FBI building and extract their selected information to provide to LE, when asked.
The fact he has a lawyer is huge! Not only that but there's a Victim \Witness advocate as well. They only are appointed for legit victims and or actual witnesses to a crime - not just someone who was somewhere and can speak to how things were before and after having not personally witnessed a crime. Im pretty sure he's in the process of working with the feds and things are gonna work out for the people who did this crime and those who pushed this narrative. Think he witnessed JO dead there and likely even saw the beatdown and said im outta here.
Any wise person in his position would have an attorney, as he was present in the same home where John O'Keefe was murdered. I'm certain that this is not any appointed attorney. It's a private attorney that Higgins hired and is paying to represent him. I'm not so sure I agree with your last paragraph. Higgins had been carrying on a 'fling' with the defendant prior to John's death, therefore he may be far more involved in John's death than you/we think.
He took a proffer with the feds. But do tell, you're saying having the advocate doesn't mean he was not there and still can be an accessory?. Thank you.
@@markstone1619I don't rule that out, I just began this case last week and wow I've been shocked to say the least. I thought the BK Idaho case was fucked, this takes that for sure. Yes they could have been and he chose to only highlight these text and it certainly showed motive I thought more on his part than hers
@@keli449so from all I've experienced there is only a Vitctims advocate when you are a victim to a crime - you have been wronged / harmed / your property that type of stuff. Now in Mass its called a Victims/ Witness advocate and my understanding of that leads me to believe he witnessed the actual crime or was there and knew he was dead. I don't believe you have an advocate who has been mg simply a state witness in th sense you take the stand and have things to say which may or may not be a crime, but truly a witness to crimes and or the victim part which I can't think why or how he's a victim unless they forced him to help carry the body via threats and he felt baised on what just happened they very well could mean it so he helped. The only way I see that advocate being part of this. Dude hired an lawyer, why? Why didn't anyone else?
Higgins wasn't working that case so he should have provided his phone and pulled a stunt. I know when I had a warrant for my phone I couldn't do what he did. They took my phone and the cop who was investigating the case against,took whatever they thought was relevant to the case against me.
I hate This Judge we as people and more importantly the defendant deserves the right to know if this person is guilty of those acts!! If by the grace of Christ she’s found guilty then the appeals will work out a doubt overturn all of the shenanigans that this trial has been.
These objections are sickening! This case makes my blood boil and I’m embarrassed to reside in Massachusetts. These witnesses are without a doubt GUILTY AF
The defense needs to start objecting to every decision Bev makes to preserve the records because without an objection, won’t be useful during a potential appeal.
I live in that area and no one locally is surprised at how shady those people are. The real fireworks are going to begin once this fraudulent case is over. 💥
This is a great example of the type of scumbag in law enforcement that would lock you in a cage for many years if you did exactly what he did (lied to law enforcement and destroyed evidence).
