well to be fair. rioters can be protesters. and in this case they are pro·test·er noun: a person who publicly demonstrates strong objection to something if you riot lets say because your sports team won a game you would not be a protester at all. here in this situation you can infact be both.
Why did the guy have to resist arrest, he was so calm and polite until they tried to put handcuffs. Cops legally can arrest someone who's drunk in order to protect them and the public. Each year, about 10,000+ people die from drunk driving crash. Whether cop is allowed to use his gun within that 2 second time frame of the suspect turning and firing the taser is up in the air. But for protestors to paint this guy as some innocent unarmed black man just "sleeping" is wrong.
Yeah it is, he was scared, he was drunk, he has been living in 2020 where everything before you is unfolding, his conscience mind was intoxicated and his subconscious was terrified, that would explain why he would have possesion of the police taser but still had the fear reaction of running away instead of firing it, he only pointed the weapon at the cop from behind while running from a cop with his gun out, it's the same way cops use defense in court where they say that it might seem it was it was murder to the naked eye, but in their PERCEPTION, they were in fear of their life, perception throws the intent out, which results in a lot of acquittals for cops.
According to your logic it’s okay to shoot someone in the back after getting beat up by a man who was just asleep outnumbered 2 to 1 because he was “drunk” I’ve talked to lawyers and the sobriety test fails 85% of people who take it even the people who aren’t drunk
Jose rosario yea everything is a matter of perception. In Hind sight, I think the real argument is should they even have called the police in the first place for something so trivial. Especially knowing how the cops are around us brothas... then again, he wasn’t just sleeping behind the wheel, he was also obviously drunk. He even admitted it. Worse case scenario it’s some employees knock on the window to wake him up and he gets startled, then hits the gas. What if the car was in reverse? What if he tazzed the officer in the face (which is potentially a fatal blow)? There are just so many safty variables, might as well just comply.
@@Cappadonna72 but you're no longer "just fleeing" which is argument here. He was pointing a weapon at an officer and he got what he deserved. Rest in pieces, comrade.
@RU-vid Veterinarian "Deescalation" means the cops should have drove him home like a taxi, and got his order in the drive thru also.( excuse #2= what's the big deal passing out drunk behind the wheel? My god, all he did was risk lives by driving drunk, then fighting with cops, then taking their tazers,then pointing it at them like it was a gun....so what's the big freaking deal?
On one hand they say tasers are non-lethal weapons. On the other hand they say they are allowed shoot people holding a taser. This is a contradiction. You can't have it both ways.
@@ProR2D2 While true that tasers are considered non-lethal, if the gentleman had actually hit the officer with the taser and it was effective, it could potentially incapacitate the officer. At that time the guy could then take away the officers duty weapon and shoot him and the assisting officer.
@@cajunbatman No you're an ignorant moron, simple as that. This was a justified shooting 100%. You can't just steal a cop's weapon, run away and shoot at them with it. You can see the taser being discharged before he got shot. People like you is the reason why I can't 100% support BLM
@@cajunbatman if you disagree with me, you're a racist. What a beautiful argument. If BLM can't acknowledge differences from this situation to that of George Floyd, @panzer is correct, there will continue to be resistance against BLM and it isn't based in racism - it's based in logic, which you're lacking.
The video is there of the struggle. For you info, he was NOT fighting the officers. He was trying to get away, there's a difference. Secondly, even if he punched the cop in the face, then kicked him. And then, called his mother a bad name. The cop can not use deadly force, unless he fears for his life. The man was running away. The taser that the suspect had, can not cause deadly force to the cop. So the cop can not use deadly force on the man. Think!
@@Git2gether2023 I call BS! you cant "try to get away from someone" without fighting. Grappling is considered fighting, punching and kicking is considered fighting, He had the wits about him to grab a weapon (the taser). He knew what he was doing. An officer CAN use deadly force if there is a thread of serious bodily harm to them or the community. Serious bodily harm doesn't have to cause death.
Right. “If” he hits him in the chest. If he doesn’t, officer goes down, possibly has his gun stolen and then turned on him. Cop did right thing. Sad that it was fatal, but that’s a split second decision that also could’ve been life or death for the officer as well
samuel banuelos When Hong Kong rioters is setting remote-control bombs to kill police personnel, fire-bombing all public facilities, touching a man alive, uses bricks to attack killing an old man, take over, damaging their international airport ! The USA media’s and politicians like Pompeo egged them on and describes the rioters as “ Peaceful Protestors.” Nancy Pelosi describes Hong Kong as “ A beautiful sight to behold “ when the city is burning. They all accused the Hong Kong police of brutality when all these rioting have go on for a year and not a SINGLE rioters had been kill by the police! JUST IMAGINE what will happen to those Hong Kong rioters if they had done in USA what they did in Hong Kong!
Two officers on the scene one was still getting up off the ground while the other tries to apprehend him. No one is looking at the fact this man was resisting. DUI, resisting arrest, assault on officers cause he was fighting them, stole their weapon (taser), threaten to shoot with the weapon and then trying to flee the scene. Who in the wrong? What the officers supposed to do? They tried to tase him in another video but he was fight so what to do?
Aleshia Arnold and Tess Castaneda first of all it looks like there was one officer at the scene and if there is another officer he is way behinds I he couldn’t have done anything , and assuming things is kinda dumb.
I bet you're the type of person that says : "what police brutality? I'm sure the officer killed them as a misunderstanding" but call abortion murder lmao you people make no sense
Tasers are non-lethal weapons. Are you saying is ok for police you shoot you for carrying and pointing non-lethal weapons at them? Or are you saying that if a taser ends in the hands of a civilian it magicaly becomes lethal? cuz niether of the 2 make sense.
100% justified, the man probably did that just because his life was worth no more than the fame he would gain by doing something stupid to basically get himself shot
100% agree. If the police didn’t show up and the guy suddenly woke up, drove off, crashed into a family and killed them all the media would’ve been blaming the police for not showing up to the call for service.
When you are aggressive with the police start attacking the police and you steal there teaser and then point the teaser at the officer what do you expect to happen could have been avoided I subscribed to Brandon Tatum he's an ex police officer out of Tucson Arizona he's a smart conservative black man and he has video of this
Yeah, body cam footage showed it all... 20 or so minutes of calm talking and evaluating leading up to a drugged out realization The officer used his taser, many people claim, why not use it, he did, tasers use cartridges, they often are 1 to 2 shots.
2:43 So tell me this, GENIUS: A SUSPECT has STOLEN a COP'S TASER WEAPON!! HOW IN THE HELL IS THIS COP SUPPOSED to pull out HIS TASER IF THE SUSPECT STOLE IT FIRST !!??????
He has not stolen. But has taken from them.... Your mindset is full of prejudice. If someone is under any type of influence he or she won't act reasonably but a professional is trained to handle this without taking human life. After all they can always call for back up like in police chase . Even in WAR ZONE you think twice before taking a human life based on the convention of GENEVA
John Edwards if you were a cop and someone pointed a taser at you that person obviously wants to hurt you. It’s just the only weapon the have available is a taser. You’ve seen people that get tasered? They seize up in pain, if that cop got tasered and seized up the suspect who already wants to hurt you could get on top of you, grab your gun and shoot you or stab you etc. is the cop supposed to just take it and see what happens just because it’s a taser? Come on bro.
Whatever but for a crime as petty as this, a gun is not needed. But I'm sure the cop did not do that on purpose. Probably he just got overwhelmed when he saw the taser in his hands.
He wasn't sleeping - He was passed out in a running car in the drive-thru. He stole the cop's Taser, ran away with it, swung the Taser around behind him & fired the Taser at the cops. Then the cop shot him.
Tyrone Foster the man had the officers taser and could’ve easily taser him then taken his gun... Drunk guy running around with gun vs no drunk guy running around with gun... which would you choose
Or....she disagreed with the Mayors decision to fire the cop. I think the Mayor acted in a way to minimize another major riot. Too many unknowns right now. W as the suspect searched before the altercation? Did the officer in pursuit have continuous eye contact with the suspect to be able to know with certainty that he didn’t pull a firearm while running away? There was a time when the response to an incident like this was, “ an investigation is under way”.
Yea lets all get drunk .. Go to sleep in the drive thru. Fail a breathalyzer resist arrest and run and theaten a cop with a tazer. And then burn down the joint for being slow. You are a damned idiot.
"Just shoot him with a taser not a gun! They have tasers for a reason!" Jumping to conclusions I see. He missed the part where the culprit was dumb enough to steal the officers taser.
White Rabbit he literally resisted arrest, fought 2 officers, stole the taser, tried to shoot an officer with a taser. He chose is outcome. He could’ve easily cooperated and he wouldn’t of been killed. The cops are justified and shouldn’t been sentenced jail time.
The guy who was shot did the following Was driving drunk Passed out on the middle of a drive thru restaurant parking lot Resisted arrest Fought the cops Stole a taser issued by a government agency Assaulted police Ran from police Turn around and pointed a weapon at police .
a tazer is not a gun; obviously haven't encountered either. imagine thinking shooting and killing someone because they had a tazer is okay. lord help us.
Interviewee: “ shoot him with a taser” You mean the taser gun that brooks stole from the officer and was pointing at him? Like do people think anymore?? Literally Brooks was in the wrong 100%, man what has this country come to. EDIT: Also, watch the full body cam footage that was released and you will know why the cop's action was justified.
@@B3Band O.o you realize there were 2 officers there right? Not the entire police force? And also the taser that wasn't stolen was already used and failed? Thinking is hard, huh.
Because running away doesn't warrant the use of deadly force. Even if the black guy was pointing a tazer at the cop as he ran, that isn't lethal. The US Constitution specifies all citizens may not have their life, liberty, or property taken without due process. Cops can't just wantonly kill citizens. Bottom line: there are way too many police killings of blacks, way too trigger happy. Until recently, they are almost never prosecuted.
BlakesGamez because the police don’t need to take someone’s life unless the criminal is gonna take there life, than they have the right to use lethal force
If the system breaks down the consequences will still be very painful. But the bigger the system grows the more disastrous the results of its breakdown will be, so if it is to break down it had best break down sooner rather than later. - Industrial Society and Its Future by Theodore J. Kaczynski
Guess we should have just let this dude roam free afterwards. Even though he assaulted a cop and stole his weapon he totally wouldn't have hurt anyone else for some reason.
@@usmarine2100 First of all, a dui is not a felony. Resisting arrest is not a felony. Also, no matter what you've done. A cop can't shoot you in the back!
Not only that this kid just assumes the Taser won’t hurt the officer because he has a vest assuming the taser even hits his vest. It’s really unfortunate that so many young people are this STUPID!!
Actually he SHOOTS the taser AT him, but this video conveniently stops at the aiming part. Wow. Blatant disinformation from a seemingly respectable news organization. Just wow.
@@yunniechann1703 Nothing wrong? not saying i agree with the shooting but he was driving intoxicated and resisted being detained and took a tazer from a police officer.
I question that bring a taser, not saying they are wrong but all I see is. Glowing rectangle, kinda like what we all have in our pocket, I could be wrong but tasers don't normally glow...
Notice how they didn't show the first part of the scuffle when he was wrestling with the officers? And he failed the sobriety test? Yeah, he was asleep cuz he passed out! The media is throwing gas on this fire
@xocre8tiv1 I fully support this. I lean right and still think Fox is cancerous. Regardless of political views everybody has to realize mainstream media pushes a narrative that only further divides people.
that is suspect! they're trying to twist the narrative, rayshard was wrong for that but also, it wouldn't be hard for the officer to just turn around and get back in his car
@God hates IiberaIs Obsession with "liberals" is 100% a mental disorder. Shooting was not justified and Chief knows protocol for opening fire was not followed. A cop chasing someone is not in danger. Someone running away (drunk or not), (NON-lethal taser or not) is no longer a threat to an officer. He will be held accountable just like Walter Scotts shooter.
ones a drunk criminal. the other is a trained professional with a firearm and body armor. You would think that one would be more prone to thinking clearly and reasonably, but naw, i guess police are glorified civvies with bang bang toys.
Enforcing BAD LAW Is why we have bad police. An endless Drug War - BAD LAWS -DRUG LAWS for 70 years, corrupted the police and devastated neighborhoods; BAD LAW makes sure TAXES are passed to the poor -the poor today are TAX POOR. BAD LAW regulations keep the people from working their way up the ladder. Abolish BAD LAW and free the people.
Then want to shoot said cop with taser thinking it was somehow a good idea. I mean he was drunk, apparently, but still. Not the best decision. Not really sure why it's even considered an option. Cop maybe needed a back up taser too.
Have none of you been drunk before? You do pretty stupid things when you’re drunk. Yeah, he did some pretty stupid stuff including being drunk in the first place; doesn’t mean he deserved to die because of it
the mayor of Atlanta should resign for making statements like that the cops are wrong she should watch the body cam first because brooks took the gun off the cops
Unfortunately that’s what the disciples of Saul Alinsky and socialist communist people want! They want us to weaken ourselves let the country rip itself apart
@Josh Hadley are you sure about that because conservatives have been letting them push them around for years now. Theh had the house senate and presidency and did nothing to stop tech companies and legacy media from Censorship and spreading misinformation.
CelticRot If you take a cops taser and AIM it at the cop, YES the cop can shoot... don’t even act like the guy who got shot is innocent.. he was drunk, fought the cop while he was getting arrested, stole the taser and aimed it at cop..
exactly, nowadays you can steal police weapons and point them at police, you can beat a police officer, and you can destroy police property, and it’s ok
@God hates IiberaIs if they could not prove felony charges they wouldnt present them also polotical leaning does not matter in criminal law. You use the word leftist as a term that says they dont care about laws they social issues if thats the case work for the aclu. Your conspiratorial statements are boring and your a racist pig.
@God hates IiberaIs again another racist claim blm stands for black lives matter and i know you might say all live matter but as we have seen consistently to the police and certain politicians black lives are not equal to whites. Also the aclu is not a leftist organization they actually do alot of good work and probably have acquired you a raise at your job and fought hard for people of all races.
Maybe he wanted to exchange recipes? Share fashion tips? Discuss the climate change initiative? Oh, I know, He wanted to discuss his great love of Italian opera!
That's why he shot him. I can't believe he was fired after that. It's protocol to go lethal if you lose your taser for that specific reason. Imagine fighting someone and trying to steal their weapons and then being fired when you defend yourself.
@@user-kq2we1ex3h It's okay for rashard to be aggressive but not the cops, he was so drunk he passed out in the wendy's drive though, and yes the white teen deserves the same treatment.
@Dr. Murdoch You're confusing malicious intent with self preservation. This situation was entirely self preservation. The police have been brutalizing protesters with rubber bullets and tear gas, which is banned in war btw. They're not exactly a shining example of morality.
@Brent 21 Tasers can be lethal. Say the cop gets the prongs in his face and eats concrete. Or another successful shot with the taser and the officer loses control of his gun and rashard takes it and shoots at police. Would that be okay too?
@Ricochetrabitt a drunk sleeping man behind a wheel blocking traffic is a DUI. he also started running and tried deploying a taser at a police officer. are we watching the same video?
The cop chasing him had a taser out then switches it to his left hand then grabs his gun with his right lol.. watch closely before you make assumption. Notice two cop cars so many he had the other cops taser, you can clearly see the officer switch his taser to the left and go for his gun. Just saying
Well yeah thats dumb, however with multiple cops on the scene even if he used the non-lethal weapon on the likely armored cop, he still posed a very small threat to them
Not rioters but peaceful freedom protesters and its a beautiful sight. Ask Trump, as that was what he call the HK rioters. Pelosi can confirm that, I am sure.
"just shoot him with a taser, they have vests and tasers for a reason." Umm idk if you saw the video, but the suspect appears to have TAKEN the taser from the police. so he may not have even had it. And if someone is that brazin to struggle with the police, forcefully take one of the officers tools, and then turn around and point that said tool at an officer, those actions are showing extreme hostility and malice towards him. Say the officer would have stood there and just taken a shot from this man's taser, would the suspect have then taken the officer's gun? Would the suspect have not gotten into his car and sped down the street and possibly ran someone over or wrecked into an innocent family, causing them to lose their life? We need to start teaching people to respect the police and not just pointing fingers at police when they defend themselves and the public. Its unfortunate this black man died, but it could've easily been an officer that dies or a number of other innocent bystanders if the actions by that officer hadn't been taken
there are two cops there, so even if the cop was hit by a taser nothing would have happened. the standard for deadly force is imminent threat of death. The word imminent means ‘the last moment in time before an action becomes unstoppable.’ In other words, for police to use deadly force they have to prove they were on the verge of death. The graham standard is over, the courts have thrown it out. this is the new standard. Prove that this cop was on the verge of immediate death. You cant, so it is unjustified use of force.
cman weavster Also, when you justify police use of force, you cannot use the word ‘if’. The word ‘if’ implies a lack of imminence. Police can only use deadly force with imminence.
@@Melthornal well it's pretty damn safe to say, that IF the suspect had cooperated with police, instead of POINTING WHAT IS TECHNICALLY REFERRED TO AS 'LESS LETHAL' tazer, meaning it can still kill, but not as likely to as a standard firearm, then that shows malice and total disregard for the officers safety. Police across the country encounter these situations every single day. They dont have the luxury of letting every scenario play out to its end to see what a suspects end intentions are, bc by then itll be too late for a number of them. You're obviously not a cop or you wouldnt have this "well wait until the guy kills someone to know what his intentions are" attitude. He was under arrest. He fled and fought the police. He took one of their tasers, then ran to his car and pointed the LESS LETHAL weapon back at the cop. You cannot tell me that the guy wasnt going to hop in his car, and speed through the streets in an effort to get away. That puts other innocent people in danger. Haven't you ever seen a suspect run from police and slam into an innocent families car? I guess they shouldve waited until someone died to use deadly force then, bc that's what you're saying. Unbelievable
@@Melthornal when I'm driving home and my car is low on gas, i fill it up bc IF I run out of fuel, I'll be stranded along the road, so I protect myself from that by stopping to fuel up, so I know I'll make it home. I dont wait until I run out of fuel to know for sure I shouldve gotten gas. My gas gauge, and my Low Fuel light comes on, warning me of the imminent danger. It doesnt mean I wont make it home, I may very well do so, but for the ppl that encounter that situation almost on a daily basis, for them to ignore all the signs and warnings and not to fuel up, it's only a matter of time until you run out of fuel and stranded alongside the road. Police dont have that luxury when it comes to life and death, once you're dead, it's too late. That's their job and they have to do it everyday. You're the type of person that says, well just bc your low fuel light is on, doesn't mean you wont make it to your destination, and you're right, but it's just a matter of time until you do run out one day and dont make it home. It's not fair that you side with the evil doers and totally fault the ones that protect their communities on a daily basis and put their lives on the line. If that black man had called the police if someone was pointing a gun at HIM, they wouldve responded and protected that black man.
@@cmanweavster8357 Police are expected to die on the job. It is part of their job. Being afraid of death is not, according to SCOTUS, or to anyone else, a reason for a police officer to fire their weapon.
How’s the cop supposed to see that it’s a taser in a split second and decide that it’s not a threat against his life. The guy pulled what looked and was shaped like a gun
but why shoot to kill why not to injure remember cops have bullet prof vest while the civilians has skin as their protection a tazer or getting shot in the gut or in a non fatal area to subdue the person would have been better responce but hey "Qualified immunity" why not
gee, taser or firearm. I can't seem to make up my mind which is more lethal, hmm. One could be shot multiply while the other can be used once. I wonder... meh ACAB
Honestly, if two cops can't properly grapple with an intoxicated person who was asleep just moments ago, AND have a weapon stolen from them, they should be behind a desk rather than having a gun.
@UCFFyTVYEQK8wyH4GTBHKsqA I cant tell if this is troll or not. If it is great bait, hopefully you catch some fish, should be entertaining. Edit: Damn, the channel removed the troll comment, I'm sad
@@uprisingbeast8754 play stupid games, win stupid prizes. If he just went along he would be alive with no issue at all. Dont resist arrest, there is no point to do it ever. If its false arrest just sue.
Interviewed Guy: instead of shooting, do a taser. Me: yeah he should have just used the taser. Also me: (Watches the body cam video) Me to interviewed guy: So have you even seen the video ?
@Claudette J ??? Did you not see them in a scuffle? He had his taser out and somehow it was taken from him during that scuffle. I'm sure he didn't just allow him to do so. 🤦🏿♂️
@Claudette J I never said anything about defunding... clearly you are not in law enforcement so I don't expect you to understand. All imma say yea it could have went another way but that does not mean his shoot is not justifiable. And I believe it is.
@Brady Carrigan Yep. The taser hit him and he fell into that car. I've watched all available video and this was justified. Resisted a DUI arrest, stole his taser, ran and fired it at him.
Are you dumb you probably commit arson and theft too assaulting or pointing any deadly weapon at a police officer is a crime and you will be shot no matter the distance
I don’t see anything wrong here. Why would someone grabbed an officer’s taser , ran and aimed at them like nobody’s business like there’s not some kind of consequences to their actions. I’m not being racist but you do sh*t like that you’re certainly gonna get dropped for good.
@@Thanatos35 "weapon" is too vague. Tasers are nonlethal. He didn't deserve to die for this. The officer should be punished for allowing his taser to be taken in addition to this killing...
The one guy who said "he can just tased the guy rather than shooting him" like dude he stole the taser from the cop. How will the cop tased him if at the first place he stole the cop's taser. Ps. There were 2 officers didn't saw it at first. We have different reactions and feelings on how the cop should react and we can't say what he did is right for shooting him fatally. It's also bad that the protesters burned a food chain that will cost the livelihood of the workers (it's already tough enough cause of the corona). I dont want to be rude and to be disrespectful towards all cause i know we have different perspectives and ideology. I really hope that in couple of days or weeks America will have peace and go back to be one of the greatest country. Every each one of us matters in this world full of chaos.
The other cop that was there. It was two cops and they couldn't subdue a single drunk, unarmed man. Completely incompetent. Or you know, don't let a suspect grab your weapon.
@@user-kq2we1ex3h I don't care what colour you are or what the other persons job is. If someone's pointing a gun at you and you then point a taser at them your gonna get shot
@@thomasjensen5042 Yes he did. Because his non-lethal was taken by the guy he shot, who was stupid enough to point that taser back at the guy chasing him with a gun I might add.
I get that point sort of but at the same time, even tho the guy turned around to point the taser at the cop, he never stopped running. So to say his intentions were to turn around and go for the officer's gun is pretty far reaching. If anything he wanted to disable the cop so he could get away
It's no longer justified for cops to kill people. People are in Fear for their lives from cops so they are going to fight the police because when they follow the police orders they still get killed.
Some One the needle would have pierced his eyeball don’t you think. Oh yeah. I’m sure the criminal was thinking that he’ll use the minimum amount of force to escape and aim center mass right?
Micah dui, resisting arrest, stealing police issued taser, fleeing scene, aiming weapon at officer. I respect your opinion and dont think he shouldve been killed for it, but i believe the cop had to respond the way he did because of the escalating situation
I don't care how mad you get what did Wendy's have to do with that man getting shot why would you burn down and destroy your own City that you reside in I don't understand is it because I'm a conservative person is that why I don't understand
Justin Dorsch this is the "progressive" way of thinking. ignore facts, pull racist card no matter what, worship criminals, loot and burn down innocent businesses
No, I disagree. I think it's justifiable when he turn to shoot the taser to shoot him, not before. Before world result in shooting a man running away in the back.
@@christophertom5552 shot in the back or in the front, where was the lethal threat? if a taser is lethal, cops should not have them. if they are not, then there was no justifiable homicide. i'll let you pick.
Did George Floyd point a weapon? Did Brianna Taylor point a weapon? While she was in her bed asleep. Did Armaud Arbury, point a weapon? While he was jogging in his own neighborood. Did Terrence Crutchfied, point a weapon, while he was just trying to get help. Because his truck broke down. Did Rodney King, point a weapon? Did Treyvon Martin, point a weapon?
show the whole video,show the whole story and stop trying to incite people. show where he was fighting/hitting them. when are criminals going to be help accountable for what they do and the decisions they make,it's their fault because they are the ones the decided to break laws and then decided to fight rather than have the day in court.
Really poor coverage by the media. I'm all for protesting and fighting for Black Lives, but this isn't it. Unlike the Floyd case, the man in this video took a cops Taser, ran away, pointed it at the cops. In that scenario, you'd want to defend yourself and those around you. This is self-defense, the video is nothing but the truth here.
They still have appropriate measures and procedures to follow and are supposed to be trained the police as a whole is full of cowards with guns and complexes most of them shouldn't even be able to become cops I don't agree with this killing because his life was not in danger and I also don't agree with the man pointing the taser that was definitely a terrible idea that cost him his life from just falling asleep in a drive thru to getting shot and killed and instant news coverage this whole thing was really senseless lord watch over your people who knows what else will happen smh
@@blueflameSM I'm not saying what they did to George Floyd was right in any way but I'm not saying he was a good man. He robbed houses and held a gun to a pregnant womans stomach. And just before he was killed he was drunk and trying to give a fake twenty to a cashier (that's why the police were called). Once again I'm not saying that killing him was right because it was a different circumstance with him being on the ground and this guy running away, I'm just saying that George Floyd wasn't innocent.
sure, why would the officer run closer to him then? Don't defend it, it's stupid policing. Should've got back in his car and followed the suspect while calling in backup instead of shooting
Second off why would he steal a tazer after breaking the law by being passed out in a drive through lane? Honestly this case had nothing to do with race.
shakemaster what if he would’ve had a gun? Tased the one cop and somehow got his gun? He got his taser... then 2 police officers. Dead. But we should just let that happen huh?
shakemaster a taser is deadly, when you get teased you are locked up for a few seconds the man could have turned around and pulled the officers gun ou and shot the officer so yes in many states a taser face considered a lethal weapon
Okay so let’s go w ur theory...only other option is killing him or letting him run away and run the license plate catch him later....u still going to go with shoot him to death?
@@ushyamamoto7098 Lmfao... are you so stupid that you think a license plate is all people need to figure out where a criminal is hiding? You know he could just not go home right?
