Audi Q3 S-Line - Turtle Pipes - Test Drive | Everyday Driver 

Japanese cars build cheaper and they r rust buckets. Body panels made put of cheap materials. They just copy German manufacturers. Interior is like 1800

In north america, people lease german luxury cars but when they need to keep a car until it is crap out, it will be either a honda or toyota, period.

@mannysinghparhar What are you smoking bro lol?

What Japanese car is better than the best German cars?

Except nothing in this video was a proper review of the Q3. 80% of the video was just pointless comparison to a Macan which is not even in the same segment and space. Go watch other better reviews and you will see where the difference in value or not so much value is.

I just don’t get the fascination with crossover SUVs. Just because people think they need to sit up high. I will forever be a sedan or sports car guy.

@@chrissimmons9969 until bright ass LED headlights are in your face. As much as Sedan styling in Audi's are better, i despise sitting down low cause everyone else has bright ass LEDs and driving at night causes problems and immense eye fatigue. Worst offenders are Tesla drivers, most of them have high beams on. But most compact sedan in a similar size to Q3 dont have the trunk space, there is a reason why crossovers were invented to solve the market problem.

GTI has horrendous infotainment controls....

David, pass on the Q3. Trust me. DM me on IG and I can go into more detail. Cheers!

What about styling?

@@anthonyfarnan5935 ....no? Styling is subjective, but this just looks like a bloated and stretched A3 avante S-line. Or worse: aside from the grille it doesn't look any different to the VW Tiguan. The biggest strength of the A3 styling is that the new headlights and body molding help it hide the rounded profile edges that Audi products have (and also that you can get the S3 and RS3 instead). When they put it in SUV form you're reminded of it again. The CX-5, even before the 2022 refresh, is well sculpted and unique and elegant (and the term "bloated" does not apply, without question). There's a reason why most car reviewers love the Mazda styling right now, and that Mazda owners get giddy and look back at their cars regardless of if it's a Miata or a Mazda3 or any of the SUVs: it's because it's actually good. But even if the Audi styling appeals to you more, is it worth the extra cost? The Mazda still has better reliability, better handling, significantly more torque (with the same HP on regular gas, but also more HP if you put premium in the Mazda), and better fuel economy using a transmission with less gears. Not only that, but we are dealing with a FULLY LOADED CX-5 at the price of the Audi: leather interior, heated seats and steering wheel, ventilated seats, memory seating and mirrors, 360 cam, wireless charging, etc. If you add features to the Audi to match what the CX-5 has you're looking at MSRP of +5k more.

@@markcoopers1930 I don’t think there would be any car designers who think the CX-5 looks better than this.

@@anthonyfarnan5935 I mean you're wrong, but ok 😂. If your own eyes aren't convincing you feel free to watch these guys or really any other car review RU-vidr out there (TH, TSP, SG, KK, DD, RR, etc) talk about the CX-5. Make sure to be on the next live stream and ask away as well.

@@markcoopers1930 no doubt the CX-5 gets good reviews. But that has nothing to do with styling. It looks tall and narrow. The Q3 looks far better in the flesh. Buyers aren’t cross shopping a CX-5 with a Q3 anyway. Completely different price points.

Because the GV70 looks like it was designed by a 12 year old

I am not spending money on anything made by Hyundai

Not in the same class.

What do u mean

While you are technically correct, this Q3 is quite close to the Macan in size and the latest versions of the Q5 are nearly the size of the Cayenne. Thanks for watching.

@@TestDriveVideos Still not in the same space. No other reviewers are comparing a Q3 to a porsche. Q3 is in the same space as BMW X1, Volvo XC40 and the Lexus NX250/UX250 level. Porshce is a step beyond Q3, price point is also beyond a Q3. Macan is near the price of a an SQ5. And neither of any of those vehicles uses the same platform. Macan uses Audi Q5 MLB platform while a Q3 is European short wheel base Tiguan MQBA2. Your review talks a lot of trash rather than the actual vehicle. Awful review.

On the car they tested (S-line Premium+) it’s actually extendable.

A lot BMWs are on airport rental lol so are koreans and toyotas. Shit people evne use lexus these days as Uber. So what is your point.

@@441meatloaf None of those are on my buy list. How about that?

@@wicked_smaaht How about what? It proves nothing about what you've said. Let me guess since you dont drive any of those brands, you must own an American truck/suv. And they aren't any better, american cars have terrible reliability, even worse than germans.

And all those you mentioned along with some entry level compact SUV’s are far better than the Q3.

@@audiophanatic4331 porsche Macan is not an entry level suv. The only one that is entry is ux250 and that car cost more on a base price than the audi q3. It's not anymore premium. So you don't even have a clue what the entry lux market is