Austal USA at SNA 2023: Steel ships, Coast Guard OPC and Expeditionary Medical Ship EMS

Подписаться 96 тыс.

Просмотров 40 тыс.

50% 1

Austal USA booth at SNA 2023. Washington DC-based naval warfare commentator Chris Cavas interviews Austal USA's Larry Ryder on the latest programs of the company including its transition to steel ships production:
- US Coast Guard Offshore Patrol Cutter OPC
- Navajo-class Towing and Salvage ships T-ATS
- AFDM dry dock
- Expeditionary Medical Ship EMS
=====================
For new videos every week, subscribe here! ru-vid.com?su...
Follow us on Twitter: / navalnewscom
Follow us on LinkedIn: / navalnews
Like us on Facebook: navalnewscom
Check out our daily naval defense news coverage at: www.navalnews.com/
NAVAL NEWS is fully focused on naval topics. We cover the latest naval defense shows & events. We also report on naval technology from all over the world. Navalnews.com is updated daily with in-depth features, industry, and naval forces news round-ups, event coverage, video reports and more. Our top of the line site is responsive across all mobile and desktop devices.

Опубликовано:

16 янв 2023

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 45

@mattheww2797 Год назад

The small medical ships make a lot of sense, quick an agile they can be forward based and respond to a crisis a lot quicker than the current large hospital ships can

@willw8011 Год назад

I doubt those have the range to be effective. Also having a lot of little ships will cost more than having a few larger ships. The USA is not going to do many large amphibious landing at the same time, because it requires way too much specialty equipment to do just one at a time. Aluminum, salt water, and steel also like to create really bad corrosion that takes way too much maintenance.

@seanpruitt6801 Год назад

@@willw8011I can see having one large hospital ship and three or four maybe five small hospital ships. They are cheap and effective.

@willw8011 Год назад

@@seanpruitt6801 Hospitals and hospital ships need to be large due to all of the specialty equipment. The current 2 hospital ships were modified from oil tanker designs. The ship builder just added some bulkheads and elevators. These ships are full service hospitals. The little aluminum beer cans for hospital ships are modified from the small cargo/ vehicle transports designed to being equipment right to the shoreline. These will not be large enough to be hospital ships. Ships to evacuate wounded to a hospital ship... maybe, but not hospital ships. BTW, USN retired T-ESD-1 and 2 only after 10 years. Those could be converted to hospital ships or new ships of the same size built as hospital ships. The last 20 years of USN's build strategy and all of their decisions make no sense.

@seanpruitt6801 Год назад

@@willw8011 the montford point is not being retired. It was rejected by congress. I can see the point if having fast hospital ships with large hospital ships as well. But I think we should be more concerned with putting more destroyers in the water instead of building hospital ships and extend the life of comfort and mercy.

@randyross5630 Год назад

Makes no sense to me. They are losers or they wouldn't need a medical ship, let the weak perish so only the Strong are Left, Such as I.

@LoanwordEggcorn Год назад

The hospital ship is a great use case for large Aluminum catamarns. Should be more faster and more stable than a monohull. Good choice.

@josephbryan42 Год назад

Visited the facility today. I applied for project manager position. Hire me. 💙💙

@watermirror Год назад

Had Independence were only made the usual 46kph max, their hulls might not have cracked. Or say 65kph reinforced with Kevlar to ensure crack resistant. Or faster but shorter such as their MRV-80

@tc1uscg65 7 месяцев назад

Nice to see the CG getting new ships. But sad to see the 210's (and 270s') be replaced. I served on the Diligence hull 616 (when in Key West) and Resolute (St Pete) hull 620. For what the 210's did, these replacements are overkill, but for the 270's, just a little over but a whole lotta ship over all. Glad to see they did a rebid. But I'm sure having an X-Comdt onboard had NOTHING to do with it. 😇

@Beagle21 2 месяца назад

The Coast Guard's new OPC should have included stern recovery for the small boats.

@Hillsidedojo Год назад

Great, now let's build some icebreakers.

@richinoable Год назад

former Austal USA President Craig Perciavalle, current director of financial analysis Joseph Runkel and former director of the firm’s Littoral Combat Ships program, William Adams, sought to artificially reduce cost estimates for Navy shipbuilding projects by tens of millions of dollars I hope you working folks got some of that filthy lucre

@Paranoid-loser 11 месяцев назад

I work for Austal and we are constantly changing presidents due to them messing with the money

@deanwood1338 Год назад

Love Austal designs of ships…. But the whole aluminium thing has always bugged me.

@dan7564 Год назад

I hate Australs ships, because of the whole aluminium thing. The LCS ships are cracking because of it and the new Australian OPV's they were making out of it have issues because of poor coal from china apparently. No idea why, when china buys better quality coal from us, and we also have a massive steel industry.

@deanwood1338 Год назад

@@dan7564 aluminium and ships have always had issues. Same as aluminium and tanks.

@YaMumsSpecialFriend Год назад

If memory serves, the Australian OPV’s were made from aluminium sourced from Chinese mills and was amazingly found to be below standard and unusable. Down goes the delivery schedule and all the flow on delays to subsequent planned works. It really seems an obvious and glaring red flag with screaming sirens type proposition to be sourcing supposedly high grade aluminium (or steel or whatever) for military use from a potentially, likely even, hostile nation. Beggars belief tbh. At what stage in the last 2-3 decades has the CCP demonstrated anything but duplicity and two facedness re it’s military expansionism and intention of regional and eventually world dominance as replacement to the U.S.A? What an easy 5:45 gift to give them this contract.

@Legion-xq8eo Год назад

@@YaMumsSpecialFriend that’s a fact. The two steel mills by me are closed now but what I found out is that most US coal and steel went to China while Chinese steel and coal got shipped cheaply to America

@sebastienleblanc2708 Год назад

We need ice breaking coast guard boats in Canada... Davie, Levis...

@rollout1984 Год назад

Eisenhower warned us about this. Austal hasn't delivered a good product and continues to win contracts.

@dnguyen9747 Год назад

My thoughts exactly. They are failing upward.

@rael5469 Год назад

2:50 Gosh.....bring it up to ramming speed.

@dnguyen9747 Год назад

Austal must have one heck of a lobbying group or "something else" to get away with the disaster that is LCS and then now awarded contract for steel construction, something they don't have experience with. Amazing how an Australian company can be given so much and have gotten away with so much.

@richinoable Год назад

former Austal USA President Craig Perciavalle, current director of financial analysis Joseph Runkel and former director of the firm’s Littoral Combat Ships program, William Adams, sought to artificially reduce cost estimates for Navy shipbuilding projects by tens of millions of dollars. Oh well, it's just the military and tax munny. Trump voters don't enlist or pay taxes, so it's okay

@josephbryan42 Год назад

I want to work here. Hire me. Thx

@Paranoid-loser 11 месяцев назад

They are always hiring

@willw8011 Год назад

The US Government building more of the Independence class LCS, even though those are cracking and need way too much maintenance. The US Congress will never admit that they should have never bought the 2 LCS class ships, which cannot do anything other than patrol the water with their little pop-guns. There needs to be an investigation in both of those programs, because there was some corruption somewhere or lots of people hold position way above their merit.

@dnguyen9747 Год назад

It is called everything politicians want to direct money into their constituents (lobbyist and donors) at the expense of the American people. Happened to M1 tanks, Army said we have enough, Congress forced them to accept more tanks and these went into straight into storage.

@willw8011 Год назад

@A Perpetual Guardsman with a flashlight Yes, the US Government/ Navy can... and the US Government/ Navy can also force the companies to pay for the damages due to their fraudulent claims of testing the equipment. The equipment is defective and the companies lied about it, so IMO the US Navy should make an example of those companies. The US Navy could bankrupt those companies and throw the leaders in prison for fraud.

@jojosanchez3584 Год назад

What kind of coast guard we Don't have water cannon

@andrewmackay8811 Год назад

Are you referring to the gun mount on the front that looks like a 5inch?

@blackwatch6649 8 месяцев назад

57mm, not a five-inch@@andrewmackay8811

@joemajarucon9090 5 месяцев назад

Aluminum, again? Haven’t we learned anything. Does anyone remember the Belknap vs Kennedy collision? The Falklands? The recent cracks on the LCS? More wasted money!

@user-qk6uq6rl9g Год назад

中国は、病院船も攻撃しそうだから個艦防衛ミサイル位積んだ方が良さげです‼️笑🤣

@skenzyme81 Год назад

Nice designs. Who will actually build them? It takes highly skilled workers to build these ships. Will they be forced off the job en masse when the next inevitable virus panic comes?

@dnguyen9747 Год назад

No worries Trump will have Russia build our ships.

@mondo9148 Год назад

No one in the defense contracting industry stopped working. We worked through the pandemic to continue building ships and continued producing for the federal government.