This was a protest ep that was made in retaliation against a 1994 law that prohibited techno raves and labeled the music as a "succession of repetitive beats."
I love this kind of productions of AE where, I guess, they layer part by part in more studio traditional way. Diferent of today's productions where they jam and extract. I find the first ones more humanly possible haha
@@vogelvogeltje yeah, back when i bought this on vinyl, (mid nineties?) there was no internet. i always played it at 33rpm. i still prefer it at that speed.
It can be either 45 or 33 as per the artists! From the autechre wikipedia page-> The record came wrapped in a seal, on which was printed a legal warning: "Flutter has been programmed in such a way that no bars contain identical beats and can therefore be played at both forty five and thirty three revolutions under the proposed new law. However we advise DJs to have a lawyer and musicologist present at all times to confirm the non repetitive nature of the music in the event of police harassment."
