That's because the reality hasn't actually changed. Only now we want to pretend we don't risk ww3 by poking Russian when arming Ukrainians. Think about it if you're kid gets killed in combat do you really make the distinction between a fighter plan provided skirting law or a straght up ally of your enemy. We arm Ukraine knowing they will use it to kill Russians and then act like we aren't provoking war. It didn't work on Japan in ww2.... not going to work this time. The best we can hope for is not getting a cyber equivalent of pearl harbor. If anyone understood how vulnerable both our economy and infrastructure is they wouldn't be poking Russia. Putin is old. The idea that we can't back down is stupid. He is old enough we don't have to deal with him much longer if we just delay ww3.
@@AitkenSteele I didn't come here specifically, just randoming through episodes. However the second the joke came up I knew what I'd see down here. That said, Slava Ukraini.
I'm gonna defer to Stephen Hawking on this: "If machines produce everything we need, the outcome will depend on how things are distributed. Everyone can enjoy a life of luxurious leisure if the machine-produced wealth is shared, or most people can end up miserably poor if the machine-owners successfully lobby against wealth redistribution. So far, the trend seems to be toward the second option, with technology driving ever-increasing inequality." The only reason automation is scary is because we've decided that if you don't have a job, you don't get to participate in society. _We don't actually have to do that._
And because even though productivity constantly rises, we still insist on 40 hours week as a full time job. Cut every job down to 20 hours with the same pay, eliminate jobs that just exist because they were artificially created, lean full on automation and we'd be better off as a society. Fewer hours worked means even more productivity (because you're fresh, you can concentrate, you don't check social media every 5min), it means being healthier and having fewer sick days, it means spending more time with your kids helping them into becoming better people.
Hero of the Beach Wouldn’t automation strengthen the evolution of an oligarchical socialism where the citizens lose all control to corporations and are treated like children?
James Ortiz isn’t that capitalism already. I believe the goal is that automation wipes out poverty and leaves humans to engage to greater intellectual feats and working further towards the better plentiful of society. Granted. Yes. You do run the risk of a new, far more insidious social and economic caste system. What alternatives are there?
Pretty sure she had no idea what he said and was just repeating the sounds. Task? No, not task. Tusk? No, not tusk. Tosk? What's a tosk? He's definitely saying tosk. Oh well, he said repeat...
My cousin’s kid would definitely do that. After watching a few episodes of Peppa Pig she developed a British accent & picked up some Brit slang much to the annoyance of her Irish grandmother
im 19 and live in the US, and im picking up british slang from my gaming groups and youtube videos, this is not something that only affects children, and god damn is it hilarious to me
@@smac919 Excatly. In a future world where all humans are unemployed homeless bums he will apply for a job, get it and become so good that a robot will be fired. This will be the turning point of evolved human workers reclaiming their lost jobs and the robots will be like: "meh, so I guess I can shutdown."
@@aliexpress96 Usain Bolt donates his brain to science at death, and it is placed into a bio-cybernetic interface fluid allowing it to command and conquer the US regional automated vehicle exchange network (RAVEN) which controls all self driving cars and trucks - requiring his ESSENCE to preform faster than any car on the current or future roadways/skyways. Just FYI. This kind of confusion can happen to those of us not aware of the intricacies of time travel, so don't feel bad about the absurdity of your question.
@Rohan Chowdhury He is the president; you want him to not talk about the president of the country he is working and living in or you think it is possible to discuss social, judicial and economic problems without talking about the political reality which is governing the country?
Wrong , there will be new job , this is nothing new how many % of the people where working in agriculture in 1870 just in the USA ? answer 50% IN 2008 2% , just saying times changes and so are we and the working market . Fearmongering .
@@calebcorrea7556 some planes are literally called air buses though, but yeah helicopter is no car and flying cars will probably not be called cars too.
"What do you want to be when you grow up?" "A good person, mostly. Content with a nice family. I'd like to travel and have a lot of different experiences." "No lol. I mean how are you going to sell your labor?"
I believe when John Lennon was asked that, the conversation went something like: "What do you want to be when you grow up?" "To be happy" "You don't understand the question" "You don't understand Life"
@@freeman7079 it's not propaganda unless it's government funded news casting. please, go ahead and find HBO's salary check from the United States Government.
One of the reasons is that the left keep pushing the minimum wage higher and higher. No one will pay 15 dollars to a person. If they can pay 1 to someone in china
@@pardalxxx It doesn't matter what minimum wage is in the US, other countries will always pay lower wages and companies will always try to save cents on the dollar, US corporations are money making machines and only care about the bottom line. People should be entitled to a living wage and thats what workers get in countries like Germany, you are clearly against the working class.
I think theres no consensus about how much is the minimum wage. Some cities are 8 others 15. What I know is that the machines does a better job and increasing the MW is not helping those workers. And its not the big companies. Check what happend with car wash businesses
@@pardalxxx Minimum wage is certainly helping people in Australia without destroying jobs or the economy, thats right wing propaganda. There is going to be a need to adapt to new industries and training as old ones come to the end of their life, coal for instance is not an energy of the future.
In the movie "Elysium" with Matt Damon, the police are robots. They are walking down the street scanning people's faces and stop when they get to him because he's on parole something. They search his backpack and break his arm with a baton lol
That's a reference to Putin having territorial ambitions over owning Ukraine's land again. Ukraine was prime real estate in the Soviet Union because of its capacity for agriculture and its ice-free ports in the Black Sea.
@James Mara You realized that all of them have TV Shows before Trump got into office. They still find any materials even after Trump is out. The only thing Trump gives them is the example of how low is the bar.
In capitalism, there is no such thing as "stealing a job", because you don't "own" your job. Your job owns you - and it will throw you out, the very minute someone better and/or cheaper is willing to take "your" job.
@@whensomethingcriesagain I consider it a neutral observation of how the system works. That you can't "own" a job is just a logical conclusion of that.
@Mike do you really want to live incarcerated by a robot that will get bored of you after a week, only getting fed when it's convenient for your owner and destined to die from a treatable disease because the vet is too expensive?
Sucks that we even have to see automation as a bad thing. We should rejoice in “losing” and freeing up our time but unfortunately we have to earn the right to live
@@Mysteri0usChannel In the end everyone's just "leeching off" off the earth's resources, and subsequently the sun. Justifying life only by the extraction of those resources means justifying life only by its exhaustion of the environment. So either there's more to the right to live or we all might as well die too.
im bich slapping the whole world... political registry. do you know who you are voting? from all partys. i hawe a playlist now go play. Wit out info of participans woting is a broken unneeded Part of capitalism out of purpose towards democracy. A complete shame.
i wonder how re distribution of shares (wtf is lol) for the ........ aint a thing when most of the population is out off a fysicall job. part time is so fucking steady.
@@LIITEMIES I did, and I agree but it's broken and unrelated to this comment. I saw you post nearly the exact same thing on another comment that was completely unrelated. Like I said, your point is good I'm just confused as to why you post it as a reply and not a singular comment.
Ever since they took HBO off Dish, I’ve had been unable to get the full 30 minutes of my English rat bastard’s fix. Big sad. At least there’s still RU-vid.
@@Raythe No, it's because this is just "main story" segment, without the "quick recap" of recent events at the start of the show. HBO doesn't have commercials.
In addition to automation the people who keep saying that other countries are "stealing" jobs never take into account that the businesses in their own borders actively choose to move production out of country due to contempt for the expense of hiring locals, their native country's own laws concerning worker pay and/or treatment, inherent contempt for workers as an expense to be managed that takes away from a profit margin, and above all else simply to get out of paying their taxes by moving money around.
John, Andrew Yang goes into depth about this exact topic. I know other media think he is simply a joke, but I think while unsustainable in our current era, his ideas are far before their time. I think your program could give him a just and balanced investigative report. Instead of how both sides of the mainstream media fear him and label him a crackpot.
It's simply the nature of a free global market. When competition can come from anywhere in the world, the best, cheapest products win with consumers, and the cheapest labor allows the companies who make them to succeed and grow. Location is no longer an issue, as goods and talent can be sourced and moved from anywhere. It's a mistake to think of this as anyone's "fault," it is simply the world we live in.
@@danielshults5243 The 'fault' implied here is by inherently bigoted people who ignore this very obvious aspect of the changing job market and convince an entire voter base that the problem is solely caused predominantly by one outside country and then stirs up hatred for people from that country, until eventually the president is shutting down the government and declaring a national emergency in order to force funding for a wall across the southern border.
I know this is insignificant, but I was so happy when he mentioned my country's name. As it is a very small country unknown to most of the world and for them to chose it instead of the other 140 that they could have chosen just made me feel like my country was a little special (even though they were mocking it). I'm so proud to be a citizen of Zanadu.
i was searisouly expecting him to be like "and thsi problem is so bad that I'M being replaced by a robot" -robot with a cardboard cutout of his face aperes and speaks in the clasic robot voice- hEllO I am YouR hOSt
Teller jobs have increased, but teller jobs now pay substantially less than they did in 1980. We need to consider standard of living and societal losses as much as monetary losses. This is about more than just money
Also, the problem is, these automatizations are taking jobs of well...average joe. If Joe pulls a lever every day for the past 20 years and you remove the lever, what he will do? The only thing he knew is to pull a lever. Yes, automatization is creating jobs, but these jobs are for new generations or middle-upper class (coding, designing etc). What happens with working class or old people? Especially with absolutely horrible safety nets.
Do they actually make less or are they making the same, as the cost of living continually rises? This is how wage stagnation works. And it's interesting that you note the 80's because that's when the neoliberal program of wage stagnation and corporate welfare really got into high gear.
I'd be honored if some fellow John Oliver fans who appreciate 80s power ballads would check out my acoustic piano & vocal performances of AGAINST ALL ODDS by Phil Collins, EYE OF THE TIGER by Survivor, and PURPLE RAIN by Prince on my YT channel in tribute to the legends. Live acoustic with no autotune. Thanks and keep on rocking.
NoName DrumGuy I'm not going to debate the merits of anyone's music. But let's start off by saying that ballerina is right out. Having choreography in your shows doesn't make you a ballerina just because you took serious ballet lessons as a kid. Second- you can layer all the EDM and Hot Topic/Evanescence-inspired steam punk outfits you want over your autotuned covers of Nu Metal songs, but at the end of the day: A Mormon who plays the violin cannot not be a rockstar. Not even if you do all the things mentioned above. I am being a little facetious, but not much. Again, this is not about the quality of her music. It just isn't rock and roll. "Rock star" is not a compliment. It's a job description. David Bowie and Klaus Noomi were both awesome. Only one was a rock star.
Nope. Vanessa Carlton is closer (well, pop star ballerina, not rock). She did at least train at a highly professional level in ballet. Even then, there is a difference in being a professional ballet dancer or a "ballerina". Though misused, the term actually applies to a rare sort of pedigree at the top of her particular style in the ballet world. Please stop calling anyone who took Dolly Dinkle classes at age 5 a "ballerina".
I saw her live and I was 100% thinking the same thing. One of the most incredible performances I've ever seen. Her choreography is unbelievable considering she's doing it all while playing the violin. And yes it is real. She accidentally dropped her violin on stage.
I am a robotic engineer, and John pictured the most accurate representation of the situation that I have seen from someone who does not work in the field. Thank you for that!
Virgo Queen www.npr.org/2011/04/22/135634400/science-diction-the-origin-of-the-word-robot Instead of being Veruca Salt, why don’t you just research it yourself? I guess you’re too busy on instagram?
Hello from Czech Republic. I've been asked about this word a few times during my life so I did some research in linguistics and the closest english term is "serf"...which in real terms is a feudal tag for slave bound to land.
Andrew Yang is the only candidate talking candidly about this major issue. Was a Bernie fan in 2016, but after hearing Yang's Joe Rogan interview my eyes were really opened. Minimum wage and free college won't be useful when automation hits, and it will hit hard. Yang Gang to secure the bag and secure American jobs!
There is no way that can be done without a fight. And when you look at the issue you should not think it as an American problem, people are exploited all over the world. Even if they throw you a bone time to time - it is done by over exploiting other workers in other corners of the world. There is no American vs Russian vs German vs Chinese. There is Worker vs Exploitators. Remember this when the capital brings about the next world war.
The occupation done by humans keeps changing all the time.Yes ppl will lose jobs but that doesn’t mean u should stop automation which will have far more dire consequences than losing jobs.Issues like poverty can never be completely solved,we can only reduce the impact it has on the poorest ppl in the country.Our only hope for this is education only cuz every policy implemented will start becoming outdated due to the current progress rate of humans.Even if America wants to implement some really good plan,it will affect it economically which will lead to the country falling behind...leading to larger loss of soft power,influence,etc....so u see we have to come up with something on a global scale...
Automation scares me. Currently I feel very vulnerable in my position. Dont get me wrong automation made my job easier but it no longer feels fulfilling. To keep it short I work in a NOC for a fairly large company. Automation is capable of finding and dispatching issues before you can blink an eye. A few years ago that was not the case. For example on an average night we may have 5 or 6 people staffed. I'm convinced we could cut staffing down to 2 people a night on average because of how much automation handles now for us. Give it a few years and won't need anyone.
Holy Koolaid shouldn’t you be making another video debunked psychics or cults or something? I mean, John Oliver is great inspiration and all, but he’s just a sideshow compared to you. Get back to work! (No sarcasm intended, just humor and admiration)
All of those are things that I do as a Customer Service Representative all day!! Thank you for making me feel validated when certain people from previous generations do not understand why I’m happy where I’m at.
im bich slapping the whole world... political registry. do you know who you are voting? from all partys. i hawe a playlist now go play. Wit out info of participans woting is a broken unneeded Part of capitalism out of purpose towards democracy. A complete shame.
i wonder how re distribution of shares (wtf is lol) for the ........ aint a thing when most of the population is out off a fysicall job. part time is so fucking steady.
@@LIITEMIES Wow, do you know how to speak English, or use a keyboard? I've never seen a more confusing post in my life. At the individual word, sentence, and paragraph level, this is the most ridiculous attempt at writing I've ever seen in my life.
Wish he'd addressed the potential for human civilization to shift away from job-oriented livelihood. The advent of mass automation could very well, over time, lead us to a place where we don't need to work to survive, live, or even thrive. Human pursuits could be based on interest, passion, art, entertainment, scientific advancement, and voluntary craftsmanship. This would, of course, take a massive shift in economic and societal paradigms, but this is where I see it leading. Well, either that, or a dystopian nightmare. Honestly not sure which is more of a fantasy.
You know how the nutjobs like to yell "that's communism"? Well, the utopian and often overtly "communist" texts I used to read as a kid made exactly these predictions all the time. Sadly no sign of moving in that direction... whereas old-school dystopian sci-fi often feels like it was used as a mission statement. My money's on the dystopia.
There is an inherent issue in this though. When we don't have work, or some set schedule for things that we need to do (eg. School, taking kids to school, jobs, etc) we lose the structure in our life and more easily fall to depression. We become lazy and start to hate ourselves for that. I think that's partly why this generation is so depressed. It's difficult to know how we could handle that when we reached that point.
From a business perspective. Automation is the shit! It separates time from money which allows you to generate tons of profits. In turn you use those to educate folks and create charities.
18:48 Hi, I’m a stagehand, trust me, there is actually very little left to automate in a cost-effective manner. It’s very non-routine, despite everything being some form of routine.
I'm surprised you didn't talk about the even bigger effect this has on income inequality. When automation makes the average worker 10 times more productive what happens to their salary? Nothing, the company just increases executive pay and takes the rest in profit. We've already seen this happen and it's only going to get worse.
@@owenkeller2748 It kinda doesnt. Prices of many goods have stayed stable pegged to inflation for years. In other cases they have gone up. Salaries though have not risen in 30 years which makes good more expensive for consumers
Yet the average consumer is able to afford a smart phone... A device that provides, texting/calling, emails, internet etc. Rewind “30 years” and then explain to me how all of the devices needed would work out less expensive than what an iPhone costs.
Andrew Yang is running for president and this is his tentpole issue. We need to start having a serious conversation about what happens when the millions of Americans are suddenly without jobs. I don't think Yang will get the nomination but I'm super glad he's in the race to bring up this conversation
@Brion StrongholdLuddite? No. Retarded? No. Socialist? Debatable. Electable? Absolutely not. And that last part is the ONLY thing ANYONE needs to know about ANY Democrat in 2020. If you have zero chance of winning, GTFO. Only the grownups need apply. I really wish more of John Oliver's audience would tune in to Bill Maher, but sadly there seems to be very little crossover between the two audiences. And only the type of people in Maher's audience are living in reality. Oliver makes LOTS of great points, but tries to remain mostly neutral. Neutrality is a serious problem in the era of Trump. People need to be biased. Biased towards facts, biased towards pragmatism, and biased towards winning, but biased just the same. And neither Yang nor his supporters are any of those. Still, stick with insults that are valid. He's no idiot, he's just not electable.
@Brion Stronghold >Yang's a luddite are you slow perhaps? he's proposing a solution when technology will take over the majority driver jobs as opposed to try and stop technology to keep people in the workforce, as a luddite would do.
There's a city called Fuckett in Thighland. It's English's use of TH and PH as digraphs for the sounds of þ and F, that leads to this misunderstanding. PH and TH in Romanized Thai both make sounds closer to P and T, than to F and þ. But still distinctly different from standalone P and T, in ways English speakers aren't accustomed to hearing.
What economists tend to completely miss about modern automation with their comparisons to the past is what exactly is being automated. Previous automation largely replaced muscle power for doing physical work, and extremely narrow computational tasks. Automation has never before threatened the usefulness of the human brain before. Now, AI is increasingly moving into areas that were exclusively human only a decade ago. What makes "this time different" is that humans no longer have a total monopoly on intelligence. It's still going to be a long time before someone develops a human level AGI, but you don't need that to replace the majority of jobs. The average human worker will not have the extensive education and technical knowledge to take advantage of the new jobs created by AI, of which there will be far fewer than jobs that are automated away.
I've been getting into computer programming and one example of this I think people don't fully understand is how programmers are trained to program such that we don't need to program the same things. Fundamentally, the only thing a human can really do that is indefinitely "workable" is come up with ideas of things that *don't exist* and make them exist. Being able to come up with solutions to problems that don't exist, nobody asked for, but everyone wants is an extremely *human* thing that is far more rewarding than making roughly same 5 machines or writing roughly the same 5 programs with some variation..maybe even making 5 different neural nets every day if you're all fancy every day 5 days a week.. The problem with the *fear of automation* or anyone's push against it is that the *people that hate the job the most* are the ones that are being innovative enough to find ways to automate it. . Look at that guy who doesn't want their son to be a lumberjack, THOSE are the types of people *all humans* can become if we don't limit ourselves to thinking in a bubble of 1 career path for life. Only when we are able to break the chains society places on us that label us as one thing or another can we truly open our mind enough to fix the MANY problems that the world faces when you have thousands of different career paths unknowingly and often unwillingly screwing up the world because it's just them doing what they know how to do. People call them "Renascence Men & Women" but I like to call them what they really are... "Human beings".
I think the point is that people in that day thought the same thing, that certain jobs or tasks were safe or that they’d be completely wiped out which just hasn’t been the case. There will always be a need for humans, whether that’s inherent to the job or simply people’s preference or comfort level… as that changes, which it inevitably will, more jobs will be created to circumvent that issue.
"Previous automation largely replaced muscle power for doing physical work and extremely narrow computational tasks. Automation has never before threatened the usefulness of the human brain before." "The average human worker will not have the extensive education and technical knowledge to take advantage of the new jobs created by AI, of which there will be far fewer than jobs that are automated away." So, it was fine when we were putting non-college educated blue collar workers out of the job, while also not putting in any effort to fund retraing for them so they could be gainfully employed elsewhere, but now that white collar workers are on the chopping block, it's a problem?
@@br-ig3pr yes? I thought that was a pretty objectively good thing to do. We, as a society and generally as a species, want less labor intensive tasks and more mentally intensive ones since that’s what advances society. Either that or it would help with the labor intensive tasks requiring less people and time to complete the task. This isn’t a class warfare thing, it’s helping laborers so we’ll need less laborers and can do more shit. If you’re going from the “top” rather than the bottom you’re stifling that growth unless done in a very particular manner.
~20 years ago in elementary school we read a story set some time in the future where everyone typically worked half an hour per week, basically checking up on the machines, and spent the rest of the time with the family or education etc. This is what we should strive after imho. Automation isn't the problem, but rather ensuring a good distribution of the benefits. Automation today is done to increase profits, this needs to change, somehow.
Gnaal, problem is: every single media sells the opposite idea. Any individual who at leasts watches the Venus Project comes to that perception of what you just wrote. Hopefully you get to the top comment.
The thing is 99% of jobs are going to be automated at some point in the future. Then we can all chill and do other stuff. But the problem is the transitioning process. What's gonna happen when 50% of the population is working and the other 50% isn't. Are 50% on welfare while the other 50% is working? How much are we supposed to pay those on welfare? If you pay them too much, noone is going to want to work. If you pay them too little, there is going to be a civil war because over 50% are poor. I thought about this many times and I'm yet to think of a solution for this.
@@windosa2006 I think there are a few solutions to this, but my favorite is this, and hear me out: Universal Basic Income. What if, instead of welfare as it's structured now, everyone, that's EVERYONE, who is a citizen over 16 gets a monthly or weekly stipend. Let's say the amount is $1000/month. This isn't a whole lot of money. 12,000 a year is definitely hard to live on (though possible, if you have roommates and flexible eating habits), so most people will want to find a job to increase their quality of living. We will still have jobs that are worth a little, or a lot. And we will still have rich people and poor people. The disparity just won't be as large. If you're asking "how will the government get enough money to give everyone $1000/month!? How much are these working people being taxed?" - I invite you to consider the question yourself. How does how much the jobs are taxed change people's behavior when the choice is still not working and getting the minimum, or working and receiving a bit more income? How do you feel about our current circumstance with billions of dollars in offshore accounts, just because collecting that much money is a status symbol?
But then people might start to question why the system is set up to screw over a majority of the people. Better to make people think they fail because they're not good enough.
@@BlitzkriegOmega Yeah. Considering historically humans have demonstrated remarkable flexibility in how we see groups of people according to economic pressures. People always find some other rationalization.. but at the end of the day, there are enough people who believe whatever rich people say to shape ethics accordingly.
I'm a teacher in the Netherlands. A lot of teachers are talking about this subject and are working out how to change the ckass so we prepare the kids for the future. They've calling it 21st century skills. This video gave me a better perspective on the subject, I'll try to pass it on to the kids, thanks! :D
"That's a fact! What is that fact based on? Nothing, other than my total conviction that is true." If your president can do stuff like that, so do you, John!
It is a fact Ricardo, If your bored take a tour for a manufacturing plant an ask how many jobs USED to run a section of the process. You'll soon see how automation is maximizing profits for companies by reducing jobs.
For those who didn't undestand the joke: Trump gives his opinions, that are based on nothing, like they are facts. I'm saying that it's all right for others to do that, since the president trivialized that kind of behaviour. Please, try reading a book once in a while so you can understand a simple comment and don't take everything you read on youtube so seriously :)
I was absolutely certain Yang would be featured here. What a tragically neglected opportunity: "the best thing would be if America were in the hands of someone nimble and forward-thinking . . . like 2020 presidential candidate Andrew Yang, who's been championing this cause for years."
Yang isn't what this piece is about and he doesn't have the power to do anything right now. So when they get back to politicians and elections they may mention him.
@Black Rod C3PO would worry too much and is really a people pleaser. I wouldn't put much past R2D2. I bet he's the mastermind, good or evil as he sees fit. 🤖 He looks harmless and cute. Not sure about BB-8.
"Work a series of non routine tasks that require social intelligence, complex critical thinking, and creative problem solving." Updating my resume right now as a electrical technician in the automation industry. Thanks John. Haven't thought about it since I started this career but these traits hit spot on with what I do on a daily basis.
That mascot doing it with a bell was when I appreciated them. Though dead mermaids were also cool. Reminds me of Seth Meyers "shout out to our graphic department!" after showing a picture of Trump with his head up his own ass :-D.
I work in IT, 10 years ago I was just doing operator and data center tasks like racking and cabling servers. Now, I do virtualization implementing and supporting converged and hyperconverged tech (having a single server rack of equipment deploy hundreds of virtual servers and workstations). We write and utilize scripts in powershell and python to deploy the virtual servers. I'll be transitioning soon to cloud engineering in which I won't work with any physical hardware at all. Automation in a nutshell.
yeah, Andrew Yang is enjoying some serious love from the RU-vid algorithm today, he's got all the top comments on this very heavily viewed video... I'd be honored if some John Oliver & Andrew Yang fans who appreciate 80s power ballads would check out my acoustic piano & vocal performances of AGAINST ALL ODDS by Phil Collins, EYE OF THE TIGER by Survivor, and PURPLE RAIN by Prince on my YT channel in tribute to the legends. Live acoustic with no autotune. Thanks and keep on rocking.
i just wish he wasnt so regressive on the topic of education. he seriously sees college as private job training and not of public benefit to society. he needs to wake up on that
The bad news is your job has been automated by a robot. The good news is we have an opening for a robot repair person. The bad news is we are working on a line of robot repairing robots. We do not foresee more good news in the immediate future.
But who will repair the robot repairing robots? And who will repair the robot repairing robot repairing robots? And who will repair the robot repairing robot repairing robot repairing robots??? And who will.....
@Corpsefoot Gaming Of course someone with robotic army, who has the power of destroying anyone with one click can claim the ownership of the sun. If you disagree, you disappear. Maybe only alien can stop him.
Russia has the best hookers, according to Trump. When things get too hot in DC, he is going to retire to a nice gold-plated dacha on the Black Sea, with a private golf course, a "full service" spa, wall-to-wall cable news and multiple fast food outlets. And lots of paintings of him. And rubber sheets...very important.
Better now then when they're in college and $200,000 in debt (the average college cost is going to be double that if we keep allowing them to inflate prices like they do). It's going to happen either way, might as well warn them as soon as possible.
@@arealpatriot2177 Only in Russia. In my country it's marked as disputed territory. On Google maps in Ukraine it's recognised as Ukrainian. TV Rain was shown in both countries, but was thrown out of Ukraine after showing a map of Russia that included Crimea. According to them, Russian law requires that media use maps that show Crimea as a part of Russia. So Google has to tailor the maps for each country.
It would be a dream, if we were not capitalistic that much. Without a net like UBI it will wreck economy on the long run. Robots don't buy stuff, already Henry Ford knew that.
@@Priestofgoddess I wouldnt put to much hope in the UBI. People on social security barely get enough to get by. Imagine if that was everyone in the country.
Lone Star i think a ubi and social security and the minimum wage would work better if they were tied to a cpi and also took into account inflation. that way u wouldn't have the problem of trying to raise it when the cost of living changes over time. doubt the government would ever go for it though
Do you not get to pick your major? If you do, choose one with a good outlook, not a dying industry, and, most likely, you'll be fine. If you can handle it, double major if you think one isn't enough. If your school has a "make your own major" type of thing, look at emerging industries and pick classes structured around one of them. Is it just that your college doesn't even have these classes or something?
Part of the problem is hyper-specialization. The broader a topic is, the more profit incentive is in place to replace it. So people just need much deeper training for jobs today than they used to. That's only going to get worse.
American schooling is 2-3 years behind the equivalent european education...europeans with a high school diploma are like Americans in their junior year of college. I also wouldn't be surprised to find that the asian education systems were closer to the europeans than us. America needs to step up to the plate and do better.
@@faktafakta316 Obviously, AI can cause huge problems. If you make it right, though, and all it does is remove need for work, then some people might get bored and become troublemakers for fun, and some might be depressed ; but I believe that if people were brought up right, it would mostly be eliminated. ASI will probably be able to deal with any such problems.
I know a lot of nations, so yeah. (don't try me I am bad in stress situations and forget everything) But on my best days I can name every nation in mainland north AND south America. Just perhaps not the super small ones. Africa is definitely my weakest spot.
speedy01247 Africa is easy, the easiest are the coastal countries. Kinda stupid because i learned all the countries in Asia, Europe and Africa, but weirdly not the Americas
@@scrotiemcboogerballs2133 No, human resource management. By the time I do pay off my student loans, everything's probably going to be automated already ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
@@arealpatriot2177 we'll see ..... the field will be disrupted diagnostics is the first to go... human interaction will be last.... but if you arent diagnosing or prescribing.... will you get paid???? Youre good now great field but this is in the future like 50 years..... prolly wont be there
This is precisely why whenever a recruiter asks me about my carrer plan, my answer is "I don't have a carrer plan. What do you guys need me to do?" Also, I do NOT want to work a job that requires social intelligence. Why the heck do you think I got into programming?
