@@user-vl4bs4it2k только дурь из нас говорит , что ,,,аварцы''' это азиатские авары и т.д. Они начитались кое чего. Для настоящих аваров Дагестана считаться потомками неких кочевников, будь у них даже множество империй, это опуститься вниз от своего уровня. Мы знаем, кто мы и чьи потомки. Мы никогда себя не называем, и не называли аварцами или аварами. Это советское прозвище, или русское имперское, которым они нас прозвали ложно по названию одного ханства. МЫ МА'АРУЛАЛ. МА'АРУЛАЛ, это народ, который никогда не знал покорности и жил ВОЛЬНЫМИ ОБЩЕСТВАМИ ( БО ), И ИХ СОЮЗАМИ, а не в ханстве. Мы их истребили.
These Avars not Huns. These are Caucasian Ma'arulal. Their language is not in Turkic family of Altai. Their language family is Dagestan-Noah. Turkic Avars are mix with Mongols, we see them as Rourans or Juan-Juan in the history.
Yes, we are Huns and descendants of the Avar Khaganate, but we are by no means Turks, we do not consider ourselves Turks, but many have forgotten their history, but we have always been and always will be. Avars!
We are Avars, our ancestors were in Asia and held the Turks there as slaves for decades, and even more then the slaves rebelled when they Avars fought the Chinese tribes. And for this reason, the Avrams had to leave Asia and the Turks followed them with a large Army to kill their masters, and that’s how the Avars split into two parts: some went to Europe and others, returning home along the road, remained in different lands. The Avars were not Turks, if they were like them. The Avars captured Asia and kept the inhabitants of the Türks as slaves, and secondly, if they were from the same people, why did the Turks attack them and expel them from Asia?