Avery Broderick Public Lecture: Images from the Edge of Spacetime 

Star collapses do something else we produce beastars will produce black holes when they die and produce black hole looks like this is a massive star something like 40 or 50 times when this star died its core collapses into a black hole that black hole it consumes star collisions in those beans produce the cameras that we detect here on Earth and eventually the death of the star ends with the same sort of supernova. Took about 15 or 20 seconds time a 40 solar mass star will actually die in Pretty in a comparably amount of time so this is an incredible satellite look for signs that somebody was violating the tree and performing a test which would a flash of memory without lights with great and they detected many flashes are family and fortunately for when we saw this Camry what we finally determined that we were seeing flashes of these dying stars from other galaxies we've now quit up dedicated telescopes job is to look for a gamma ray burst and to tell us when one has happened as quickly as possible so we can try and study them spacecraft a tailored telescope is it will sit there waiting for us to go off somewhere.

@@rodneyadderton1077 Stars do not collapse . Stars loose MASS from ejection of matter , Not radiating light.

Boy does this guy gotta work on his delivery!!

Ddaonjngpxphpxpdp pvpzpzzckbv LP

Frank1fm Actually just curiosity and a few college physics courses. I thought it was great.

Try some Sean Carroll or Frank Wilczek

They always are for some reason

My burning question: Why is the speaker wearing ruby slippers?

Hear, hear!

hahhahaha i agree

He was riveting except for his telescope size. 8 meters kinda jarred me as far as a home tripod mount.

@@mikelouis9389 I thought I heard bs... lol

Some insightful commentors out there... but for every gem... there's going to be alot of crap as well. RU-vid allows anyone with an account (and a pulse) to air their thoughts... it's all free... and you get what you pay for🙄 Great presentation though! I learned something about radio astronomy I didn't know before😊

Science fiction is just that , science fact is now where near science fiction , but assholes like nut case hawking`s with their ego driven science have put modern science back in the realm of druids. Stop putting hypothesis forward as the fucking truth .

Love your comment!

It was pretty amzing.

@@mikelouis9389 yes it was and I liked your original comment because it's fairly possible that matter around black hole(accretion disc)is from stars that venture a little bit to close to black hole. Greetings from Pearl of Adriatic 🌅

38:30"

Spencer. There IS a reason, and you KNOW what it is. Reflect. Courage, man! Venture over the event horizon of your latent self, into "… that undiscovered ‘country‘..." wherein lies your brilliant, ideal self capable of comprehending ALL!

What passion? He was as dull as a dry sock =3

My poor fellow, you haven't heard enough science talks.

@@Kuiriel lol so true:)

Not dull just very layer back. But his love of the topics he covered is evident if your not blind and mean spirited. Good luck being a bitchy never happy human being

@@edgeofenlightenment7088 chill dude ppl are just joking. But if that is mean spirited.....

This is a good question... anybody?

One of the explanations has to do with the expansion of the universe which happened so rapidly that black hole could not form. Personally, I'm not a fan of the inflationary models of the universe so I don't know about that one. The best answer has to do with the curvature of space time. At the beginning of the universe you just can't get space time to curve in such a way that a black hole can form because of the way all the forces were balanced at that time. However, The initial universe had to be balanced in a very particular way so that a black hole didn't form. And that is a mystery!

The instant before the big bang happened the laws of physics did not exist. So there was no Gravity, or Space, or Time, there was no mass, no particles, no light. So the possibility of a Black Hole before the big bang is nil. In the moments after the Big Bang the laws of physical universe began to formulate and eventually balance, but by that time the universe was already rapidly expanding away from itself.

Martingoldfire *Thought, not "thunk".

@@Oners82 Nope, it's "thunk". I wasn't trying to say it correctly, but rather to use a well known expression from way back. Google is your friend :-)

Can confirm, it is "thunk".

No pun intended right? Amazing pun by the way lol

@@Oners82 it's an old joke about the unnecessary complexity of English irregular verbs: drink drank drunk, sink sank sunk...think thank thunk.

Dang yes pedantic. But no he won't figur out quantum gravity

At 45 minutes 48 seconds on the dot, fingers crossed green stick technologies picks up the ball with those quartz crystal memory chips. Much joy to the leaps and bounds of tech and how far it's come along. I myself appreciate that dragon speech program and all it's done.

Look behind you it’s me

did he sell you weed

Because it is likely nearby where they are doing this. The PI is in Canada, although I’m not sure where.

@@DoggoWillink In Waterloo Ontario

if he wants to map the surface of the black hole event horizon he must also map all the mass under the influence of the black hole and then relate that all down to the black holes "surface" and current telescopes are plenty capable of that ... they are just too lazy to gather the data and plug it into a computer and have it spit out the answer of this is what you would see if you could see it ... because this is what the end result of all the data gathered at this time point will resolve down to .... so he could essentially take a kiddies pool and drop a grain of sand in it and then measure the ripples ... then place grid over the pool that has holes for every piece of mass in the scale he wants to map and then move that grid in the same motion as the area of observation and record the ripples as they happen .. and poof he has done the same thing ... for a few thousand bucks with substantially more accurate and larger range of data ...

"I mean studying the event horizon can‘t tell us about the singularity itself: the singularity " Could you name someone who believes that there is such a thing as a singularityas a physical object to be studied? physics.stackexchange.com/questions/225831/why-does-a-singularity-need-to-exist-at-the-center-of-a-black-hole Infinities doesn't exist. When a theory predicts an infinite amount of something, the theory is wrong and needs to be corrected. " Do you think for progress it would be more helpful, if theoretical physicists learned philosophy, or if philosophers learned maths / theoretical physics?" What has philosophy got to do with the study of the truth about the natural world? Perhaps you could cite one philosophical prediction about the natural world that turned out to be supported by testable evidence? Exactly how much did philosophy contribute to landing a man on the moon or rovers on Mars, or Hayabusa2 on an asteroid? Science and philosophy split a long time ago, and they aren't ever getting back together again. Science got remarried to evidence and philosophy is still fondly gazing at it's own reflection in a mirror.

Yes. But it's rare for a planet to be scattered by any ordinary star, so to encounter a BH would be even more rare.

Dylan Childs They can’t. We have Common Core now, dumbing them down so they all learn exactly the same thing, no more, no less, and as slowly and painfully as possible.

So much stifled potential.

There is no color, but there is crazy.

@Mike Louis When I heard that, I thought I had misheard. I repeated that bit and yes, he did say 8 meter. Wow. Perhaps he meant 8 centimeter and the centi got dropped.

@@Atanu I think it is the same scope I have, which means it is an eight inch telescope.

@@DonH_Zeroth57 Thanks. So it's not 8 cms but 8 inches. Then I wonder why he said 8 meters.

@@Atanu sometimes when public speaking I get a little tongue tied and twisted, so likely just a mistake. And in relation to the entire talk, it was a small one.

@@DonH_Zeroth57 Quite understandable. It was a very trivial slip and anyone should see past it to the overall excellent presentation. Thanks. Cheers.

seems they been lying about costs

Apart from the cost of setting up a station on the moon... d'you remember that they mailed the petabytes of data back, on hard disks? I'm pretty sure ya can't just Fedex a big ol' box of disks back from the moon, every month or so...

when communicating with the space probe you know exactly the frequency you're trying to get, so it's easy to pick out of the background noise.

look at the universal temperature plot ... and then the order of the universe ... the schawrzzchild scale he is talking about is mapping out what lies outside of our observable universe ... and is literally plotting what he is trying to do within our observable universe ... essentially it is the distance of influence of each segment of the universe ... and as there are billions upon billions of these the more readings taken the more accurate the plotting of inside and outside the observable universe will be ... which can also be obtained on a much smaller scale more accurately and more readily and more cost effectively ... if they just bothered to try ...

finite as in what we can observe infinite as in there is more beyond what we cant see ...

Thank you 0623kaboom 😊 I really appreciate your help! Thank you!

Claim's with out evidence can be dismissed without evidence , you claim is as outrageous as religion. Black holes do not exist , Black is not part of the electro magnetic spectrum, Holes can never have mass. Here is the actual evidence against the label , Black joles, why when they where named over 200 years ago does a an ignorant christian get to name them. Black holes are just stars that do not radiate. Not holes solid objects. The black disc in the EHT image is the size of the dark star not the hole that cannot exist. John Michell (/ˈmɪtʃəl/; 25 December 1724 - 21 April 1793) was an English natural philosopher and clergyman who provided pioneering insights in a wide range of scientific fields, including astronomy, geology, optics, and gravitation. Considered "one of the greatest unsung scientists of all time",[1] he was the first person known to propose the existence of Dark Stars not black holes in publication, the first to suggest that earthquakes travel in waves, the first to explain how to manufacture artificial magnets, and the first to apply statistics to the study of the cosmos, recognizing that double stars were a product of mutual gravitation. He also invented an apparatus to measure the mass of the Earth. He has been called both the father of seismology and the father of magnetometry. The term “black hole“ was itself coined in 1968 by the Princeton physicist John Wheeler, who worked out further details of a black hole's properties. The most common black holes are probably formed by the collapse of massive stars. Stars do not collapse, they explode. Your entire post is nothing more than Psychotic Psycho Babble.

@SmoothRide Gravitational interactions

Hawking radiation?

You might wery well have a point there. Or Gateway to another dimension. For sure Black wholes has a bigger purpose. Could be big bang was the birth from a black wholes energy in another dimension. Dark matter seems to be out og this World and I like your veuw.