Тёмный

Avro Lancaster B Mk.II - The Forgotten Lancaster 

UK Aircraft Explored
Подписаться 13 тыс.
Просмотров 140 тыс.
50% 1

Here we shall look at a Radial Engine powered Lancaster B Mk.II Bomber.
Please note - In the video, I mention the Bristol Hercules Mk.14, it should be Mk.16.
Also, I said that the Merlin engine is an in-line engine. I should have said The Merlin is a Supercharged, geared, pressure liquid cooled V-Engine, fitted with a two-speed Supercharger.
I'm sorry about this. Thanks for watching. Bryan
As always, we shall be referring to wartime Air Ministry Manuals.
Textual extracts from Air Ministry Air Publications are Crown Copyright and transcribed with the kind permission of the National Archives, London. All colour diagrams are based on original Air Ministry Air Publications mono illustrations and transcribed into colour by Bryan Atkinson with the permission of the National Archives, London.
Chapters:
0:00 Introduction
0:12 First, a Big Thank you
1:03 How many Lancaster IIs were built?
1:22 Why was the Lancaster II Built?
2:01 The Lancaster Mk. II Prototype
2:29 Armstrong Whitworth Factory
3:01 First Production Batch
3:36 Second Production Batch
4:05 The Packard Merlin
4:37 Sent for Trials
4:46 No. 61 Squadron Tests
5:50 Lancaster B Mk. II's first Operation
6:09 A Height Problem
7:06 No. 115 Squadron RAF
8:06 Don't mix the Engines!
8:51 No. 514 Squadron RAF
9:12 The Royal Canadian Air Force
9:22 No. 426 (Thunderbird) Squadron RCAF
9:44 No. 408 (Goose) Squadron RCAF
9:58 No. 432 (Leaside) Squadron RCAF
10:59 The Lancaster Mk. II in more Detail
11:27 The Bristol Hercules Engine
11:53 The Power Egg
12:04 The Engine Firewall & Exhaust Manifold Ring
12:18 The Engine Cowlings
12:37 Differences in the Cockpit
12:49 Lancaster Mk. I Instrument Panel
12:52 Lancaster Mk. II Instrument Panel
13:16 Comparing the Flight Engineer’s Panels
13:56 The Pilot's Auxiliary Panel
14:37 The FN.64 Mid Lower Gun Turret
15:22 The Bulged Bomb Bay
15:42 Carrying the 8,000lb Bomb
16:02 Differences in Bomb Loads
16:31 D-Day and only two Squadrons left
16:53 Lancaster B Mk. II, LL735
The material contained in this video is intended for historical, reference, and entertainment value only, and is not to be construed as usable for aircraft or component restoration, maintenance, or use.
Consort for Brass - Classical Rousing by Kevin MacLeod is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence. creativecommons.org/licenses/...
Source: incompetech.com/music/royalty-...
Artist: incompetech.com/
Photographs Used:
San Diego Air & Space Museum Archives, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
Royal Air Force official photographer, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
Breeze (Mr), Royal Air Force official photographer, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
RAF Chedburgh, Royal Air Force official photographer, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
Vickers Wellington
Press Agency photographer, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
Beaufighter
SDASM, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
Handley Page Halifax
Australian official photographer, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
Avro Lancaster S Sugar
Press Agency photographer, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
British Ministry of Information via Australian armed forces, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
Ministry of Information official photographer, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
Ministry of Aircraft Production (MAP), Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
Royal Air Force official photographer, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
Royal Canadian Air Force official photographer, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
Press Agency photographer, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
D Day
Hampton, J A (Lt), Royal Navy official photographer, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
Saunders Roe SR/A1
British official photographer, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
Metrovick Beryl Jet Engine
Barmaglot, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
U Boat
HQ Coastal Command, Royal Air Force official photographer, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
Whitley Bomber
Hensser H (F/O), Royal Air Force official photographer, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
Handley Page Halifax
Bellamy W (Mr), Royal Air Force official photographer, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
8,000lb Super Cookie
Royal Air Force official photographer, Clark N S (Fg Off), Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
The below photographs are included with the kind permission of Harold A Skaarup:-
Avro Lancaster Mk. II (Serial No. DS723), coded EQ-B, No. 408 Squadron, RCAF. (No. 408 Squadron Photo)
Avro Lancaster B Mk. I (Serial No. R5727), was built in the UK and flown to Victory Aircraft in Malton, Canada in August 1942 to serve as a pattern for the other Lancasters to be built in Canada. These photos shown the FN.64 Mid Lower Gun Turret as fitted to the Lancaster Mk.I (CFJIC-DND Photos, PL-1182, PL-1174, PL-1175, and PL-1180 via Don Smith)
#lancasterbomber #avrolancaster #ukaircraftexplored

Опубликовано:

 

29 июн 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 404   
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Please note: In the Video I say Bristol Hercules Mk.14 - it should be 16. Sorry about this. I have corrected the captions. Also, I say that the Merlin engine is an in-line engine. I should have said The Merlin is a Supercharged, geared, pressure liquid cooled V-Engine, fitted with a two-speed Supercharger. I'm sorry about this. I seriously thought about deleting the video and re uploading, but all my views and comments would be lost. Thanks for watching everyone! Bryan
@colvinator1611
@colvinator1611 Год назад
It doesn't matter about the hiccups Brian. You're doing a great job for history.
@jbepsilon
@jbepsilon Год назад
I wouldn't stress over the inline thing. AFAICS the WWII aircraft engine literature typically talks about radials vs. inlines, with inlines implying liquid cooled engines with cylinders behind each others, including in multiple cylinder banks like in a V engine. And yes, even including weird/exotic things like the Napier Sabre with it's H configuration.
@DavidRLentz
@DavidRLentz Год назад
No worries, mate. In my own jot- tings, I continue amending and editing, an ongoing process I call "tightening up the knowledge". Some might be simply changing a 14 to a 16. Others might be rather more involved. Still more could include a correction a reader provides.
@martyn6792
@martyn6792 Год назад
Thanks for bringing this to us, I didn't know that any Lancaster used anything other than Merlin engines, nor that some had a lower turret. Don't worry about minor discrepencies, it doesn't spoil the experience
@patchthesinclair5896
@patchthesinclair5896 Год назад
I understood your reference to in line to apply to the crankshaft and as such is correct enough⚡👍
@garynew9637
@garynew9637 Год назад
I have stood next to to G for George at the ripe age of 12. I was in awe. AWM, Canberra 1964.
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Thanks for sharing
@BrackenDog10
@BrackenDog10 Год назад
My uncle was the bomb aimer on LL640. Unfortunately their aircraft was shot down in March 1944 and he did not survive. He is buried in the Rheinberg War Cemetery along with nearly all other members of the crew.
@peggyundjack
@peggyundjack Год назад
Visited the Rheinberg war cemetery a few times, well cared for. RiP all that lie in there.
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Thanks for sharing - Heroes all
@barnbersonol
@barnbersonol Год назад
Fair dues to the Germans. They did generally treat dead airmen pretty well.
@russellherbert9670
@russellherbert9670 Год назад
Sad, heroes all
@KP-viking88
@KP-viking88 Год назад
My Great Uncle was on DS678 (115 sqdn). His Lanc was shot down March 44 as well, grave has been lost over time but I went to his rededication ceremony a few years ago.
@Anglo_Saxon1
@Anglo_Saxon1 Год назад
I like how the Air Ministry even made sure they had a workable radial engined version of the Lancaster just on the offchance that the Merlin's weren't available for what ever reason.You've really got to hand it to the British engineers.It seems as though there was nothing that they overlooked during the war.Brilliant.
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
That's certainly very true Karl. With all the research I have done over the years, one thing that has always struck me was the amazing depth of detail that took place during the design and construction process of each aircraft type. Also in the operation of all types of aircraft during the war. The entire aviation industry did its best to work as a team. Not all things worked out right, but they certainly worked hard to provide our forces with the best equipment possible at the time. The other thing, of course, was that during that time, technology was constantly changing. Thanks for watching.
@jhorrorfan2116
@jhorrorfan2116 Год назад
​@@ukaircraftexplored6556 reminds me of how the air ministry requested an alternative powerplant for the Hampden incase Pegasus engines weren't available. Thus the Napier Dagger powered Handley Page Hereford was built. Served with one Operational squadron and competed in a single raid before being relegated to training squadrons. The dagger was terribly unreliable. It wasn't underpowered and the specifications in some areas did exceed the Hampden, it was just Hopelessly unreliable
@d165354
@d165354 Год назад
My Grandad (Eric Ilett ) was an inspector on Lancasters during the war. Mainly round Chadderton / Woodford factories, but i do remember my dad saying that he was sent to "help sort problems out at Bristols for a while ??? " so i presume that grandad was one of the team sent from AVROs to Bristols to look into using these engines ( but could be completely wrong ) All my family were AVRO except me......i joined the navy and served in submarines.....well.....one has to rebel Thanks for all these excellent videos, .....the Lanc has always been close to the family. cheers everyone ...mike ilett.
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Very interesting and thank you for sharing
@ralphscholer7345
@ralphscholer7345 Год назад
An extraordinary channel and very brilliant narrated. Now as a Modell builder I 'm learning a lot of RAF Airpower in WW II. My grandpa was a radio operator in a ME - 110 G Night fighter. He told me, that British Pilots had flying excellent maneuvers and where highly trained for Operations in completely darkness!
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 11 месяцев назад
Thanks for your comments, I'm pleased you have found the video interesting
@chrisweeks6973
@chrisweeks6973 Год назад
Thank you for putting this up. My dad was an AID inspector with AWA for over 30 years and worked on the B Mk. II and a whole lot of other types/makes (eg Whitley, Lancaster, Lincoln, Meteor, Hunter, Javelin, Argosy, Sea Slug, etc) over the years until the company closed its doors in the 1960's. AWA had plants at Whitley (where we lived), Baginton and at Bitteswell; dad worked at all three locations over the years and was also seconded to various Bomber Command stations during the war, overseeing retrofits. I still have his factory-issued copy of Flight and The Aeroplane 1947 reviews of the AW 52 Flying Wing, plus the company's Handling Notes on the Hawker Sea Hawk and the Meteor Night Fighter series, Mks.11 to 14. So, lots of memories for me; thanks again.
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Thanks for sharing and for watching
@AdmV0rl0n
@AdmV0rl0n Год назад
within minutes of watching your video - I can see you deserve many more watchers. Top stuff.
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Thanks 👍
@petehall889
@petehall889 Год назад
An excellent description, as always and packed with information - thank you! Nice to see the letters QR of 61 Squadron on many of the profiles. My father's second tour of operations with 61 Sqn was mainly flying Mk1s and later the odd Mk111 from RAF Syerston. His log shows that he flew Mk11s on ops twice - the first, a 6 hour flight on 7th Feb 1943 to Lorient in Lanc 11 serial no.612, carrying 1x4000 pounder and 10 S.B.C.s. The second op of 9hrs 20mins to Milan on 14th Feb 1943 in Lanc 11 serial no.613, carrying 14 S.B.C.s. Both operations attracted the award of a photographic 'gong' for getting good aiming point photos. I still have these, each with a nice drawing of a Lanc with the names of the crew displayed. On the Milan raid, my father's log mentions that there was a fighter attack, which was claimed damaged and driven off. My father, Sqn.Ldr. Geoffrey Hall DFC & Bar passed away in September 1986 - he never spoke much about his experiences, except in letters to his father. They make fascinating reading, but there is so much more I would like to ask him now!
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
That is very interesting, thanks so much for sharing.
@peggyundjack
@peggyundjack Год назад
Thoroughly enjoyed this and all of your video’s. Well researched, looking forward to the next one.
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Much more to come! Thanks for watching!
@ModelNerd
@ModelNerd Год назад
I really enjoy your detailed videos and the insight they provide - thanks for taking the time to make them. I also really appreciate that you list your media sources at the end - it's very helpful. I came here while thinking about the Airfix Mk II I'm going to build - now I think I'm going to do it in the prototype scheme :)
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
You're very welcome, much more on the way!
@Mark13091961
@Mark13091961 Год назад
Superbly done and much appreciated. Between yourself and Neville Wheeldons channel Im learning so much more about an aircraft I thought I knew well. Thank you 👍🏻
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
You're very welcome - Great to hear!
@nikepat2112
@nikepat2112 25 дней назад
Very interesting, my dad was a flight engineer with 408 Goose Squadron. I seem to remember his plane was B-Bunny but i could be wrong. He was an Englishman flying with the Canadians and was originally billeted with Patrick Moore during basic training and they remained friends post-war.
@mikeburnitt403
@mikeburnitt403 Год назад
Thank you for taking the time to make this video, I have always been interested in the oddball aitcraft and your video has explained a lot.
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Glad it was helpful!
@FinsburyPhil
@FinsburyPhil Год назад
As thorough and informative as ever. Many thanks.
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Glad it was helpful!
@12jsteve
@12jsteve Год назад
Absolutely fascinating- I had no knowledge of the radial powered Lancasters until quite recently and then up popped your excellent tutorial! Many thanks 👍
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Glad you enjoyed it
@mpersad
@mpersad Год назад
Another superbly researched, scripted and illustrated video. Thank you.
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Many thanks!
@colvinator1611
@colvinator1611 Год назад
Excellent video, thanks a lot. It's so important to keep our history and heritage alive.
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
I couldn't agree more!
@RobWhittlestone
@RobWhittlestone Год назад
Fascinating! So impressive the innovation and the rapid manufacturing during wartime. Such impressive engineering in those beautiful engines. I think we would have a hard time matching that in today's computerized world where many skills have been lost. Or maybe I'm not up to date with today's manufacturing best practice. Great video, great illustrations. Many thanks. Subscribed. Rob in Switzerland.
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Thank you so much for subscribing, I have many videos coming and thanks for watching
@terryofford4977
@terryofford4977 Год назад
Brilliant descriptive Video of the Lancaster aircraft great technical detail gave added value with the technical descriptives and diagrams, a Wonderful and well produced item. Terry Offord
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
That's very nice of you Terry, I really appreciate your kind words. Yes, my colour diagrams and planning do take a great deal of time, hence I often can't get a video out each week. Still, rest assured, I have many more videos planned. So please check my channel for the latest when posted. Thanks for watching.
@christopher5723
@christopher5723 Год назад
This showed up in my recommended videos this morning, have to say I'm disappointed that youtube has been hiding your channel for so long. I've been working my way through your other videos and have thoroughly enjoyed them. There's so many military aircraft channels, but so few go into anywhere the kind of detail that you do on your channel.
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Thanks for your kind words Christopher, I put a great deal of work into these videos, and really want to help to keep UK aviation history alive. I can only hope that in time You Tube will put my videos in front of more aviation minded people, who would appreciate my content. Thanks so much for sharing and watching. Onwards and Upwards!
@davidrees1279
@davidrees1279 Год назад
A most interesting video. My highest compliments! I am a fan of the Lancaster B ll despite it's shortcomings. My highest regards.
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Thanks, I'm glad you enjoyed it
@gordonwallin2368
@gordonwallin2368 Год назад
Cheers from the Pacific West Coast of Canada.
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Thanks for watching Gordon!
@michaelfairgray6760
@michaelfairgray6760 Год назад
Thanks for the great Video. It was very interesting filling in some information I did know about the Lancaster,
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Glad you enjoyed it!
@stuartlorraine9428
@stuartlorraine9428 Год назад
The series for the Lancaster and Spitfire have been great (I have to say I have yet to fully view all the videos). I hope we will see more videos of other aircraft in due course. Great work!
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Yes, I am working on other aircraft, so watch this space! Thanks for watching, you are appreciated.
@modeltraingeek6544
@modeltraingeek6544 Год назад
This was extremely interesting I have just a few moments ago ordered the airfix model of this Lancaster variant thank you great work
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Glad it was helpful!
@paulschumacher1263
@paulschumacher1263 Год назад
Thanks. A wealth of information! I have always liked the Mk. II, and was overjoyed when Airfix, a few years ago, put out a model of one. I love the radial engine look. And also the ventral turret. Thanks again.
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Thanks for sharing! Hope your model goes well.
@kimchipig
@kimchipig Год назад
Thank you for another amazing video, Bryan. The Hercules was a very advanced engine, in many respects the ultimate air cooled piston engine. Just the Hercules and its sleeve valve system would make for an excellent video.
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Great point! Thanks for watching
@androidemulator6952
@androidemulator6952 Год назад
"Radial engined Lancasters?? , no such animal...." oops , learn something new every day. Thanks for the video !. :)
@JohnRodriguesPhotographer
@JohnRodriguesPhotographer Год назад
There was a B17 powered by Allison V12 also
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
You're very welcome!
@andrewporrelli8268
@andrewporrelli8268 Год назад
Excellent video presentation on the wonderful MK-II Lancaster! My Grandfather was kia in DS816 JI-O. June 15, 1944. The black and white image of the mk-II flying you used often in this video is LL734 JI-O, of 514 Squadron. It replaced my Grandad and crewmates a/c after it was lost. 514 converted to mk-IIIs by June 1944. Shared your video on the 514 facebook page. Cheers, 514 Page Admin. P.s. interestingly, 514 was equipped with 2 x MK-IIs with the venteral turrett fitted.
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Thanks for watching
@Hunter-gq9er
@Hunter-gq9er Год назад
Brilliant video thank you for sharing. Very interesting. 👍
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Glad you enjoyed it, thank you
@jamescurnick1637
@jamescurnick1637 Год назад
Brilliant video...thanks👍
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Glad you enjoyed it
@declanoleary1
@declanoleary1 Год назад
Highly informative, well done
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Glad you enjoyed it!
@ivormott7309
@ivormott7309 Год назад
I recently finished building a Lancaster B.II (Airfix) and as stated in your video it was based at Waterbeach, Cambridgeshire in November 1944. The particular one was 'Fanny Ferkin II'. A highly unusual Lanc also with the pretty ineffective ventral turret operated by periscope! I wanted to do that kit as it is such an unusual version of the legendary plane :)
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
It certainly was. Thanks for watching!
@adriaanboogaard8571
@adriaanboogaard8571 Год назад
Great video. I did make me remember a story on a Post WWII repurposed Lancaster for passengers that crashed into a mountain in poor visabilaty at high altitude because we didn't know about or understand the Jet stream.. they were flying head on with it and descended too soon . It was a mystery until it started resurfacing at the bottom of a Glacier. I have a foggy memory of Rottary Engine's. I do watch lots of these videos and could be incorrect about the Engine
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Yes, it was a BSAA Avro Lancastrian named 'Star Dust' it was fitted with Rolls-Royce Merlin engine. It sadly crashed in 1947. Thanks for watching and sharing.
@noahwail2444
@noahwail2444 Год назад
Thank you so much for this.
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
You are so welcome!
@christianbuczko1481
@christianbuczko1481 Год назад
Ive not heard of this aircraft before, the idea behind it is pretty amazing in its own right to be able to continue even if merlins couldnt be used.
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Glad you found it interesting, thank you.
@stevenclarke5606
@stevenclarke5606 Год назад
Very interesting and informative, I had no idea that these Lancaster versions ever existed.
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Glad you enjoyed it!
@j-p6422
@j-p6422 Год назад
Great video, thank you!
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
My pleasure!
@SteveMrW
@SteveMrW Год назад
Very informative, thank you.
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Glad it was helpful!
@nineteenandfortyone
@nineteenandfortyone Год назад
Thanks for a very interesting video an a bomber I had not known about. It is always interesting to see different designs of powerplants other than the American engines I have been familiar with.
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Glad you liked it. Thank you.
@kengoold7157
@kengoold7157 Год назад
that's really interesting , could never imagined a radial engine Lancaster. thanks
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Glad you liked it!
@basfinnis
@basfinnis Год назад
Interesting stuff. Thanks 👍
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
No problem 👍
@draganjagodic4056
@draganjagodic4056 Год назад
Excellent visuals and explanations. Seemed logical to me that these must have existed too. P.S. Subscribed. Such interesting and good technical explanations.
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Welcome aboard and thank you for watching
@paulkirkland3263
@paulkirkland3263 10 месяцев назад
Very interesting, thank you.
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 10 месяцев назад
Glad you enjoyed it
@Steve-GM0HUU
@Steve-GM0HUU Год назад
👍Thanks for video. Although I knew that a number of Lancasters were in service with radials, all I could remember was that they were Bristol engines. I really like the detailed drawings.
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Thank you, you're very welcome. Much more to come!
@paulbrooker5203
@paulbrooker5203 Год назад
Built a model of this Lanc , just a bit different, very informative video, thanks.
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Glad you liked it!
@andrewdrabble8939
@andrewdrabble8939 Год назад
Very informative video. Being an aeroplane buff myself too, I knew of the radial engined Lancs but along with the Blenheim remains a relatively forgotten aircraft
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Thanks for the info and for watching!
@andrewdrabble8939
@andrewdrabble8939 Год назад
@@ukaircraftexplored6556 The Short Stirling also falls into the same category as the others in that aeroplane is forgotten too
@CrusaderSports250
@CrusaderSports250 Год назад
And the in line engined Wellington, another rarity, often not forgotten just unknown, the mid lower gun turret was a brilliant idea just needing better visibility, it would have definitely woken a few nightfighters up.
@mycroft1905
@mycroft1905 Год назад
Very interesting and informative. Thanks for posting. It would have been helpful to have some comparative horsepower ratings for the different powerplants discussed in this presentation. Cheers.
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Thanks for sharing. I have to say when creating a video like this, it is a bit of a juggling act to decide how far to go with data, etc. Anyway, the maximum power ratings are as follows - Bristol Hercules XVI. 'M' Gear - 1,675 bhp. 'S' Gear - 1,455 bhp. Rolls-Royce Merlin XX. 'M' Gear - 1,240 bhp. 'S' Gear - 1,175 bhp. I hope this helps.
@harrybrown3657
@harrybrown3657 Год назад
Excellent detail (I had always assumed that all Lancasters were powered by the merlin engines) ☺ The story of the Mustang P51 and it's eventual change to merlin engines and licence to build in America was one I actually was aware of! Fascinating stuff, And so much depended on these developments and the people behind them.
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Glad you liked it!
@Simon_Nonymous
@Simon_Nonymous Год назад
A great video - thank you. The interchangeability of engines 'just in case' was a very good idea not only for production numbers, but as some of the projected power outputs weren't achieved as planned I think? The Halifax Mk I/III was a very good example of using both engines, plus the Wellington Mk II used Merlins. There was even an experimental Beaufighter with Merlins but it didn't fare well, and wasn't put into production. I must brace myself to make my Airfix Lancaster B.II soon!
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Thank you very much!
@chitlika
@chitlika Год назад
some merlin Beau were operational but as yoy say they wernt loved
@salvelegio1425
@salvelegio1425 Год назад
It’s not forgotten at all. I am grateful to all involved with these aircrafts. To those who build them and especially to those brave men who flew them. Love from Sweden.
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Thanks
@salvelegio1425
@salvelegio1425 Год назад
Dear@@ukaircraftexplored6556, Of cause I had no idea about all the technical details concerning the beautiful Lancaster. However, thinking of all inventions that made it happen’d and all those brave men and women who built it and later flew it. It made my eyes strangely wet and I can tell you Sir, forever grateful. Swede by birth but a Britton at heart. Thanks for posting!
@jonbaker326
@jonbaker326 Год назад
Great video...... I didn't even know there was a radial engined Lancaster.... You learn something new every day!
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Glad I could help!
@uslines
@uslines Год назад
Beautiful and effective aircraft. Saw one at our airshow in Australia. Ex usaf here.
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Thanks
@gordonmacaulay4848
@gordonmacaulay4848 Год назад
Thanks again for a very informative and interesting video. I did know a little about the radial engined Lancaster from a visit to the " Wellington museum" in Moreton in the March. Although dedicated to the Wellington bomber there's a cut away Hercules engine and a photo of a Lancaster fitted with them. I find it difficult to understand that the very complex engine with the parts to operate the "sleve valves" , could be produced and built under war time conditions easier than setting up more RR Merlin plants
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Thanks for sharing and for watching
@myaccountmychoice4662
@myaccountmychoice4662 Год назад
Great video. My uncle was a gunner on one of the Lanc's over Germany way back when. Sadly he never made it back one night.
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
I'm sorry to hear that, and thanks for watching.
@myaccountmychoice4662
@myaccountmychoice4662 Год назад
@@ukaircraftexplored6556 No worries. I actually just stumbled onto your channel. now subd. Great content. He died to defend his loved ones like so many others. Channels like yours keep what they did in peoples minds and therefore they and their sacrifices will never be forgotten. Thank you. Also as a pilot it is really nice to learn more about these old birds. Its been a life long dream to fly a WW2 warbird, or for that matter even just ride in one.
@daystatesniper01
@daystatesniper01 Год назад
Superb video no b/s just plain facts well done good Sir
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Thanks and I'm so glad you liked it
@josh656
@josh656 Год назад
Great channel
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Thanks Josh. Much more to come!
@patrickibex
@patrickibex 3 месяца назад
Nice informative video.. on the BII
@timmorodgers4271
@timmorodgers4271 Год назад
These videos really are very good! I read that some crews liked the Hercules Lancs because there was very little exhaust glare at night compared to the Merlin powered variants, they also had a faster rate of climb. (edit, I might be wrong on the rate of climb, I'll have to check my "Lancaster at war" books)
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Thanks for watching!
@pommunist
@pommunist Год назад
Flying along in the dark, with a nice pair of Bristol's either side of you. No wonder 115 Sqd felt safer.
@johnjephcote7636
@johnjephcote7636 Год назад
Many Canadians regretted the removal of their ventral guns. When one thinks of the night fighters later on, creeping up below undetected...
@kellyshistory306
@kellyshistory306 9 месяцев назад
I've read conflicting things about the Lancaster II in terms of performance. Many books claim it "underperformed" compared to the Merlin powered Lancasters, but a lot of the first hand accounts from 426 "Thunderbird" squadron RCAF which flew the type talk about it flying higher than normal lancasters and performing quite well. I suspect the issue may have been the engines; the earlier Mark IIs had the Bristol Hercules VI engine while later marks had the Hercules XVI. I've read the XVI was more "Automatic" and required less tinkering to fly at full efficiency, so I suspect that the poor initial performance of the Lanc II was the earlier marks with the VI engines, while the higher performance you read about in first hand accounts come from the later production models with XVI's. Just a hypothesis of mine however.
@jamesmcguinness3981
@jamesmcguinness3981 Год назад
Wow cheers love it
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Thanks, glad you enjoyed it!
@buffplums
@buffplums Год назад
Fascinating had no idea there was a radial engined Lanc.
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Your welcome!
@keithnordstrom7392
@keithnordstrom7392 Год назад
Very interesting and informative, thank you. Makes me wonder if the MkII might have been a more survivable option for the dambuster raid, but I suspect they may not have been able to cope with the payload. Much appreciated.
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
You are very welcome!
@grahamepigney8565
@grahamepigney8565 Год назад
Doubt whether the trype os engine would have mad much if any difference to the casualties in the raid on the Chastise mission. Plus the Mk II could only carry lighter bombload that the Mk I. Given the nature of the losses on the Dams raid different engines would have made little or no difference. Halifaxes with Merlins were superior to the Hercules engined Halifaxes further suggesting that Mk II would not have been any more survivable.
@ericadams3428
@ericadams3428 10 месяцев назад
Not sure where the idea that the Merlin engined Halifax was superior came from, the Hercules variants came about because of the the poor performance of the Merlin variants and the mark III and later mark VI with the improved Hercules 100 engines were far better. The problems with the Merlin in the Halifax came about because Handley Page ignored Rolls Royce's advice and used their own nacelles instead of the RR power egg like Avro.
@jadall77
@jadall77 Год назад
When he stops to plug his video it is pretty cool how all the stuff works on the bomber the turrets but also that turret in night bombers can be replaced with a radar and he has videos about that too.
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Thanks for watching
@jamesmcguinness3981
@jamesmcguinness3981 Год назад
Wow l❤ this so much thanks so much
@johnjephcote7636
@johnjephcote7636 Год назад
I read that the Beryl, following the removal from the S.R. flying boat, was used to power Donald Campbell's Bluebird jet boat.
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 11 месяцев назад
Yes, that's correct
@scrubsrc4084
@scrubsrc4084 Год назад
I do enjoy going through the lanc registration book and finding out about the ones that appear in pictures.
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Thanks for watching
@philhibberd6667
@philhibberd6667 Год назад
They have one of these engines in museum in Coventry - Prince Philip asked them what aircraft it was from and rudely told them it was not from a Lancaster. Gutless museum staff didn't explain to him that it was indeed from a radial-engined Lanc.
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Thanks for sharing
@tonytrott9789
@tonytrott9789 Год назад
My father was a flight engineer on these with 115 squadron. he was shot down on a mine laying mission to la rochelle. He evaded capture.
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Thanks for sharing
@allandavis8201
@allandavis8201 Год назад
Wow, what an interesting and very informative episode, I had never heard about the Saunders Roe jet powered flying boat or the engine that powered it, I do consider myself a bit of a military aviation nerd, buff or armchair historian and to have never even heard about the flying boat I can honestly say that you have added another page to my knowledge bank, thanks for making my day, I learnt something new. 😀👍🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇺🇦
@crustyoldfart
@crustyoldfart Год назад
I remember as a teenager in the late 40's and early 50's that there was a model aircraft kit available from Kiel Kraft kits of the Saunders-roe jet powered flying boat. If my memory serves me well it was to be powered by a Jetex solid fuel powered model rocket engine. In the real world I think that this flying boat was the last gasp of the flying boat era. Their only real advantage was that flying boats did not need runways, and the trend in those days was that higher speed aircraft needed longer runways which were expensive to build. For other reasons the flying boat was a technological dead end, especially in the jet age.
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Good 'ol Jetex - I could never get mine to work, all I got was putt putt. Perhaps it was damp. Anyway, I must have been doing something wrong!
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
I'm so pleased you have found my video informative. I'm all about promoting UK aviation history. If you have any ideas you'd like to see me cover, please let me know. Thanks so much for watching!
@crustyoldfart
@crustyoldfart Год назад
@@ukaircraftexplored6556 JETEX - they could be a bit tricky, right enough. I could only afford the smallest one the Jetex 50. The solid fuel pellet was ignited by a fuse which had to be carefully fashioned in a spiral round the pellet, held in place against the pellet with a metal gauze disc then passed through the ejection hole to permit a match to be applied. The fuse strings were quite delicate - they could crumble with rough handling and it was tricky getting them through the ejection hole. The whole assembly was held together with a toggle clip. You needed skilled hands and everything had to be kept clean.
@crustyoldfart
@crustyoldfart Год назад
@@ukaircraftexplored6556 Informative without doubt -an exhaustive presentation in fact. Regarding other possible subjects : The Fairly Battle might be one. It was a horrible concept, since the Battle was about twice the weight of a Spifire, and powered by the same Merlin. Regarding Lancasters, I had the pleasure of knowing a veteran pilot from 101 Squadron based in Ludford Magna. These were the guys which carried an eighth crew member who spoke German like a native and which broadcasted a voice signal designed to confuse the enemy night fighters. The radio signal was also used by the said fighters to home in. Needless to say the scheme was not popular with the Lancaster aircrews. My friend, who completed nearly two tours was lucky to have survived.
@brownydwbrown7485
@brownydwbrown7485 Год назад
My friend's Father was a Tail gunner in 426 Squadron in "Linton on Ouse "...With the Bristol Hercules engines. 1944/45...guessing here ( Mark X ) guessing again...
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Could have been the Hercules Mk.VI or XVI engine. Thanks for sharing!
@neillambton4065
@neillambton4065 Год назад
What a real shame they never kept one in a museum somewhere.
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
I totally agree, Neil
@Chris1553
@Chris1553 Год назад
The Hercules was used because in 1941 the Merlin engine was in such demand it was feared demand would outstrip production, it had 1752 hp and the service ceiling was lower at 15000 ft whereas the Merlin Lanc has a service ceiling of around 20,000 ft but later Merlin versions had a ceiling of around 24,000 ft
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Thanks for watching
@subliutenant
@subliutenant Год назад
I knew vaguely about the MkII Lancaster and had heard of the operational height problems but really enjoyed this informative video! It's a wonder that this aircraft wasn't adapted to carry out long range anti submarine and coastal defence duties. Extra fuel tanks and the addition of 50 cal. machine guns, 20 mm canon and depth charges, would have made this Lancaster a formidable sub and ship killer.
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Yes, it could have been. Thanks for watching
@dafyddllewellyn6636
@dafyddllewellyn6636 Год назад
Late in WW2, Harris rounded up the Herculese-engined Lancasters and assigned them to Group 3 of Bomber command, which was using the Gee-H precision-bombing apparatus and did not need Pathfinders. They were able to destroy a lot of the synthetic fuel plants, because of their high accuracy; and also demonstrated this in a precision attack on Trier on December 19, 1944 , in "impossible" weather, which destroyed a centre of concentration of German armour and thus contributed to the failure of "the battle of the bulge". (Ref: "Bomber Harris" ISBN 0-385-11258-0 PP 266/267). The Herculese-powered aircraft were considerably faster at low level than the Merlin XX - engined versions; their bombing altitude was 20,000 feet, versus about 25,000 feet for the Merlin. This presumably reflects that the superchargers of the Herculese were optimised for lower altitudes than those of the Merlin XX, which developed a maximum of 1,240 HP at 12,000 feet in low supercharger gear. The Hercules 16 produced 1375 HP at 4000 feet.
@tempestnut
@tempestnut Год назад
@@dafyddllewellyn6636 Interesting. Finding accurate information on the Hercules has been difficult. The Halifax with the Merlin was a dog and the RR Heritage trust book on the Halifax explains exactly why and does some comparisons with the Lancaster show a huge difference in performance and showing that the Halifax at cruise height and speed was on the point of stall. It’s somewhat of a paradox that when the engine were reversed the Halifax III was the better performing aircraft and could attain a higher altitude. Which begs the question are we comparing apple with apples.
@dafyddllewellyn6636
@dafyddllewellyn6636 Год назад
@@tempestnut One needs to know a lot more than the history books show; The propeller has a major effect, and the cooling drag can be a major factor. The Herculese in the Lancaster II was evidently considerably affected by how the pilot used the cooling gills; getting that wrong could mean you did not have sufficient fuel for the return flight. The wing aspect ratio is also critical. Getting it all optimised was not always possible in the rush of war. For example, the Lancaster was a conversion of the Avro Manchester, by using available Merlin engine "power eggs" that had been developed for (I think) a Merlin-powered version of the Wellington. Early Lancasters had rather pointed propeller-blade tips, but later these were changed to "Paddle" blades, which gave better performance at altitude. All these developmental changes need to be taken into account, to make valid comparisons, so you are correct about "oranges and apples".
@robinwells8879
@robinwells8879 Год назад
I drink occasionally in the Chequers pub in Sutton near Ely. We have the site of the old Mepal aerodrome nearby and the pub was frequented by the crews of that New Zealand squadron. There are a number of pictures of the planes and crews and I have always been confused by the mix of in line and radial powered planes. This may explain how I get confused. I must look again soon!🍺🍻
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Thanks for watching
@paulmillard1130
@paulmillard1130 Год назад
I really enjoyed this most interesting study .I would like to see details of the sleeve valve arrangement if possible . Many thanks.
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Great suggestion and thanks for watching
@Glicksman1
@Glicksman1 Год назад
The following was recently discovered in a very old, dusty, forgotten RAF archive: “In February, 1944, the First Air Board of The Royal Air Ministry, commenced a study under the supervision of Maj. Gen. Alastair Stanley: Various RAF bomber officers were assembled to determine the manner and frequency whereby RAF bombers had been struck by German anti-aircraft guns and by Luftwaffe interceptors. After exhaustive study, it was determined that the bombers were hit more frequently by a factor of three on their Dark Green upper-side parts than on their Dark Earth parts, and more frequently yet on their Matte Black underside parts by a factor of five. A recommendation to the Air Ministry was then made suggesting that all RAF aircraft operating at night over Nazi-controlled territory be henceforth painted Dark Earth overall, eliminating all Matte Black and Dark Green paint entirely in order to reduce such strikes in the future. (see comparison charts annexed hereto) This study was generously submitted to and shared with the U. S. Eighth Army Air Force which, upon further reflection thereof, issued a general order that in order to prevent being struck by German anti-aircraft guns or by Luftwaffe interceptors whatsoever, no paint of any colour (or “color” as the Yanks say it) whatsoever would henceforth be applied to the surfaces of their aircraft.” At least with regard to the American aircraft, this was done. An official report of the result of such has not yet been discovered, but we’re assiduously looking for it. It is not presently known what happened to this study or the people who performed it, but we do know that neither it nor they were, until most recently, ever heard of again.
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Thank you so much for sharing and for watching
@Glicksman1
@Glicksman1 Год назад
@@ukaircraftexplored6556 My pleasure, We're still looking for that report about the unpainted American aircraft.
@derekfromtauranga6012
@derekfromtauranga6012 Год назад
My late uncle from NZ flew Merlin powered Lancaster’s in WW2. He flew many sorties over Europe and was lucky to survive the war uninjured. He also ferried new aircraft from Halifax in Canada to the UK as well as being a flight instructor. He said the Merlin engines were better than the Packard built Merlin’s but I don’t remember why that was. I would assume the Merlin powered Lancasters could operate at a higher ceiling due to the 2 stage super charging which supplied more air to the engine thus more horsepower at those high altitudes. I think the Rolls Royce Merlin contributed to the winning of WW2 especially in the Spitfires.
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Thanks for sharing
@wilburfinnigan2142
@wilburfinnigan2142 4 месяца назад
derekfromtauranga Sorry ole Bean you are wrong !!!! All Lancaster Mk Bi's & Mk BIII used the Merlin 20 series engines that were SINGLE STAGE 2 SPEED superchargers !!! NOT the 2 stage 60 series engines, why their service ceiling was barely 20,000 ft. This is the MISTAKE most people make is ALL merlins were 2 stage and not true, of the 20,000 $hitfires built only7,000 were Merlin 60 powered, 2 stage supercharges the rest of the 13,000 were all the SINGLE STAGE 2 speed supercharged, the facts of history less the hype lies and just BS stories !!!
@cherudge
@cherudge Год назад
My great uncle’s Mk 2 DS650 crashed on the Scottish boarder and all the crew were killed. The accident was never explained. I wonder now if it was engine failure? My Grandad was shot down in a Mk 3 returning from Druisburg, taken POW. Brian we found his first hand account of this very recently if you are interested? It describes being attacked by night fighters, his time as a POW and his liberation.
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Thanks for sharing
@RemusKingOfRome
@RemusKingOfRome Год назад
Oh! it looks so strange .. I keep thinking Halifax when i see those engines. :D
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
I know what you mean!
@leedorey1490
@leedorey1490 Год назад
My grandad flew on Lancs from RAF Foulsham 43 onwards. He was a navigator.
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Thank you
@typhoon2827
@typhoon2827 Год назад
So forgotten, Airfix have had a model kit of it for ages.
@vincentlefebvre9255
@vincentlefebvre9255 Год назад
I have the mk II. It's a very good kit.
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Enjoy your build, if you buy one!
@walteralter9061
@walteralter9061 Год назад
Brilliant graphics! I'm now a fan. One day humans will think in diagrams rather than words, lol!
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
You and me both!
@walteralter9061
@walteralter9061 Год назад
@@ukaircraftexplored6556 But seriously, those diagrams of systems and sub-systems are beautifully done and must represent a lot of hours on your part. They set a standard that I hope will be imitated on all machinery oriented presentations. The prize winner will be a diagram of the mind in terms of levers and pulleys. :)
@pibbles-a-plenty1105
@pibbles-a-plenty1105 Год назад
Just a light dusting of technical details but of interest to this armchair airman. Thanks!
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
You're very welcome. Thanks for watching
@cliffordpedley3216
@cliffordpedley3216 Год назад
Hi there I had just dropped on your channel I thought it was strange because I saw a Lancaster on Friday 27/08/22 flying over worksop towards Doncaster I had took twice it was really low but it locked fantastic I no the vulcan bomber hear in Doncaster
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Thanks for sharing
@jeffgreenfield7025
@jeffgreenfield7025 Год назад
Ive got several Lancaster bomb control switch panels! Came over to the US with a model train set i picked up. Took a bit to figure out what they were from.
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Thanks for watching and sharing
@bruceday6799
@bruceday6799 Год назад
The Canadians out west are rebuilding another Lanc. They might be interested in or helpful of your parts.
@1joshjosh1
@1joshjosh1 Год назад
Safe to say that was good. I don't subscribe to much. To the angerment of my son. But I will subscribe to this. You have won a new fan. 👍👍👍👍
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
That's really great, thank you so much for subscribing. Remember, there are many more videos to come!
@1joshjosh1
@1joshjosh1 Год назад
@@ukaircraftexplored6556 Looking forward to it UKae. ! 👍
@steveshutler8708
@steveshutler8708 Год назад
Hi I'm Steve I'm lost for words ❤️❤️❤️👍👍👍
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Thank you very much. Please keep watching, I have many more videos in the pipeline!
@richphillips4519
@richphillips4519 Год назад
My Grandfather was with thunderbirds MK11 DS707 Skippered by The Berlin Kid Roger Coloumbe Gramps was MUG Coloumbe Flew M11s He did twelve trips to the Big City in MK 11s Given him the title of the Berlin Kid .DS 707 was scapped in 1946 only to be resurected in 2012 when a Flasher unit was sold on E.Bay from DS 707 P for Peter .
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Thanks for sharing
@laurentviton7507
@laurentviton7507 Год назад
Some Mk IIs were fitted with a single .50 Browning in place of the FN 64 turret , as seen on some flying with 408 Goose (RCAF) Squadron for example .
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
I will look into that. Thank you
@angusclark8330
@angusclark8330 Год назад
No one, but no one offers this type of authenticity and detail on a topic some might think was closed decades ago. The fact is, men were sent out to live or die in planes that were essentially experimental or cheap knock offs depending how one views the civil service dealing with them. The Handley Page Hampden, as a f'rinstance, should have been retired after the first two or three attempts to bomb Germany, but many crews were sacrificed to Imperial propaganda that Britain can hand it out, before that changed to Britain can take it. Luckily we persisted, but it was a close run thing.
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Thanks for sharing!
@paulvincent7938
@paulvincent7938 Год назад
Interesting video. I understand that some Halivax B.VIs were fitted with Hercules 100s in 1945 which ended up with better altitude performance than the Lancaster 1... idle speculation wonders if the Lancaster B.II with that engine would have been better for the RAF!
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Thanks for watching
@ericadams3428
@ericadams3428 10 месяцев назад
The mark VI with Hercules 100 did not enter service until Feb 45.
@martyndeyoung8207
@martyndeyoung8207 Год назад
An oft-forgotten version - thanks for your historical research. Do you have something similar about the last of the Lancaster family, the Shackleton? I remember them flying in Singapore in the late '60s when my father was stationed at Changi
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Thanks, the Shackleton is certainly an aircraft for consideration
@lespagnolmichel7774
@lespagnolmichel7774 Год назад
Thanks for this video, the first one I've ever seen about the Lancater B Mk. II. I have a question about a specific Lancaster from 514 squadron that crashed in my village of Iwuy (France 59141) during the night of the 15/16th june 1944 this was LL 690 JI -J. I just would like to know if it is possible to know if this bomber was equipped with the FN.64 Mid Lower Gun Turret ? I can see there was one on LL 624 JP - L and according your video on some other ones but I wonder about LL 690, JI- J, thanks for your help.
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Thanks for sharing
@tarjei99
@tarjei99 Год назад
The most interesting information would be range since it might be useful for anti-submarine work.
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Thanks for watching
@blairrighton6270
@blairrighton6270 Год назад
this is indeed an anorak channel, good work, this also raises a question with me if they ever thought about adopting the Napier Sabre engine as a possible option for the Lancaster, let alone the RR Griffon... anyone out there know?
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Thanks for watching
@kenstevens5065
@kenstevens5065 Год назад
At 5.37 the underside view shows the three colour light visual IFF system just aft of the dorsal turret. Rarely seen I presume it was to try and catch out any night intruders trying to sneak in on the circuit.
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 11 месяцев назад
Thanks for watching
@Jollyboy164
@Jollyboy164 Год назад
Does anyone else remember seeing a Lancaster with jet engines. I saw it in 1955 at Defford aerodrome .Worcestershire.I think they named it the Lancastrian.
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Watch this space! And thanks for watching
@christopherkroussoratsky2014
It would be nice if you could do a similar video on the Merlin powered Halifax and Wellington and Beaufighter.
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
I will look into that - watch this space!
@ronjon7942
@ronjon7942 Год назад
Ah, very good subject. I’ve been studying Bomber Command and the three heavies, and have been curious about the Hercules’ version of the Lanc. I’ve yet to understand why the Hercules was so good for the Halifax, but not the Merlin, and vice-versa for the Lancaster - assuming this is true and not some unsubstantiated claim.
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
I thought I'd try creating a different type of video, hope you liked it and thanks for watching.
@ericadams3428
@ericadams3428 Год назад
It's true enough, the reasons for Merlin's problems in the Halifax were the HP designed nacelles which went against the advice of Roll Royce rather than the preferred RR power egg and as a result had reduction gear vibration problems in addition to airflow issues over the wing. The Hercules performance in the Halifax increased when improvements were made to them but the Lancaster production of the Hercules variant ceased after 300 were made, long before the improved Hercules variants were available with improved supercharging timing.
@kellybreen5526
@kellybreen5526 Год назад
@@ericadams3428 Which might be more of an answer to why the Stirling was so good at low level but unable to get much past 15000 feet. Maybe the ceiling issue which is always blamed on the shortened wings had as much to do with the engines as it did the airframe. I don't think that the question has ever been asked.
@SAHBfan
@SAHBfan Год назад
@@kellybreen5526 - Interesting point. I'm sure the reduced power as the altitude increased couldn't of helped.
@ericadams3428
@ericadams3428 10 месяцев назад
The improvements to the Hercules carried on long after Stirling development was abandoned.
@Yosemite-George-61
@Yosemite-George-61 Год назад
There is one thing y'all forget... survivability... People get hang up on altitude, range, speed, payload, size of bomb bay etc. Merlin powered Lancs were death traps, I have in my books the accounts of German pilots shooting down 4 Lancs in less than 20 minutes ! They aimed at the wings to give the crews a chance... exept one time when the said pilot broke his leg on landing after taking fire from a rear gunner, he was mad that night so it choose to hose the fuselage, the Lanc immediately caught fire and exploded, nobody survived. After, he felt bad about it. Furthermore, show me pictures of Lancs comming back with the kind of damage a B-17 or a Wellington could sustain... There aren't any out there... lastly, an English RAF officer told me a few years back, the best English bomber was the Hallifax Mark V ... "Real" bombers, have radial engines...
@ukaircraftexplored6556
@ukaircraftexplored6556 Год назад
Thanks for sharing and for watching
@andrewporrelli8268
@andrewporrelli8268 Год назад
I wholehartedly agree. Veteran I spoke to who flew both the Merlin and Hercules versions of the Lancaster said the MK-II faired much better at dealing with damage. In 514 Squadron, on one occasion, all the cooling fins of a mk-II were blown off leaving the drop point and it was still running when it landed at Waterbeach, much to the amazment of the ground crews. One 514 Lanc had its nose blown clean off by bombs from above, and flew like a "sock" all the way to Waterbeach. Unfortunatly, the bomb aimer was killed.
@davidlawrencebanks4610
@davidlawrencebanks4610 Год назад
The fuel tanks were the target for German fighters. The fuel tanks on the Lancs whether Radial or online engines were the same.... In the wings. Your argument is based on nothing more than hot air my friend. Lancs were never known as death traps... Where do you get this drivell from lol
@jbepsilon
@jbepsilon Год назад
@@davidlawrencebanks4610 Well, it's true, to a small extent. Radial engines don't have the pressurized cooling system which is very prone to battle damage, that liquid cooled engines had. So there is a survivability advantage. Of course there are many other ways to get shot down as well. If your wing full of fuel and fuel vapor is exploding you're going down regardless of what engine you have. As for death traps, after the German U-boat service the UK Bomber Command had the highest KIA rate of any service (in the European theater at least). But I'd say that's more due to the way they were deployed rather than any particular difference compared to, say, a B-17.
@Yosemite-George-61
@Yosemite-George-61 Год назад
@@davidlawrencebanks4610 My dear friend, you have failed to note that in front of those fuel tanks there are 4 engines, the Merlin having the the reputation of catching fire at the slightest hit, some times they were kind enough to do it without any external help. The Bristols feared a bit better but no where near the Cyclones and Wasps that would sit there and keep runnin with missing cylinders. That's why there are numerous accounts of German pilots running out of ammo while shooting at a B-17 that somehow keeps flying, all the while there are numerous accounts of said pilots setting a Merling powered Lanc on fire with just a few 20mm shells... so that's why your beloved Lanc is a death trap... and that's why you're full of hot air when you argue otherwhise...
Далее
Avro Lancastrian - Jet Powered Lancaster Story
22:55
Просмотров 199 тыс.
Avro Lancaster - How the Bombsight Mk XIV Worked
24:45
С Анджилишей на тусе💃
00:15
Просмотров 167 тыс.
Avro Lancaster - The Fuselage
21:24
Просмотров 11 тыс.
Jack Currie   The Lancaster Legend
27:04
Просмотров 404 тыс.
How Pratt & Whitney Changed Aviation
18:18
Просмотров 708 тыс.
Avro Lancaster - FN.20 Rear Gun Turret
18:12
Просмотров 58 тыс.
Avro Lancaster - Landing a Heavy Bomber at Night
13:53
Avro Lancaster - In The Movies
13:38
Просмотров 98 тыс.