"Most biologists favour the “Molecular Soup” model, which suggests that molecules bumping into each other at random over hundreds of millions of years, led to the inevitability of the creation of DNA.
However consider this, life as we know it is, among other things, dependent on at least 2000 different enzymes. Which are catalysts, that speed up the rate of chemical reactions that take place within cells. They are vital for life.
We’re talking about MACHINE-like functions that take place within the building blocks of life itself.
In the words of Fred Hoyle, the chances of higher life forms might have emerged in a molecular soup is comparable to the chance that a tornado sweeping through a junkyard and assembling a fully functional jumbo jet.
Francis Crick, the co-discoverer of DNA, believed that due to the complexity of DNA, it couldn’t have statistically formed in the manner of a molecular soup given the earth’s age. He believed that it must have formed elsewhere and made its way here via panspermia.
Panspermia meaning the fertilization of a planet via the remnants of another planet’s debris which collide onto the earth. OR, as Crick personally believed, that an intelligent civilization intentionally seeded life onto this planet.
However, as Graham Hancock puts it, both these explanations are told from a ‘material reductionist’ perspective. They wish to view the world as mechanistic. It’s true when you consider how biologists, geologists and physicists view the universe as a mechanical entity. Life being just the accidental process of machine like cells that accidentally sprung consciousness into existence."
-Original Content @TheAngryHippy
/ @theangryhippie
String Theory
ru-vid.com?redi...
Modal Vibrational Phenomena
ru-vid.com?redi...
Cymatics
ru-vid.com?redi...
Cymascope
ru-vid.com?redi...
Anthroposophy
ru-vid.com?redi...
Cymascope Machines
ru-vid.com?redi...
The Dark Matter Fractal Field Theory
ru-vid.com?redi...
Morphic Resonance
ru-vid.com?redi...
23 июл 2020
