Ghost Red Card for Abidal? Ballack&Anelka dives didn't got the any card? 3 Penalty dissallowed for Barca? Ohh okay And also in second leg, CHELSHIT players preffers targetting Barca hand players than try to score a goals😂😂😂
Ok this is bullshit if you watch both the matches you should know that barca also had many bad decisions and also Chelsea But the media shows that Chelsea was robbed because of the hate barca gets
Only 2 team with agree goal line technology Real Madrid and Athletico Bilbao and rest of team refuse include barcelona. Now they angry on this match what the Jokes
@@satya313the match against PSG Pen. Not given Red card Hakimi hitting Lewa without the ball with no yellow The match against real Madrid A goal is disallowed No pen. Given and much more And before u say cry about it first have a reason
You can’t hit a player in the back of the leg, with your foot, when they have a a chance on goal and not expect a red card. You blind bias Barcelona fan.
Real against psg onside nuno mendes ref: offside man city not a pen ref: pen pen for mancity ref: not a pen in the final alaba handball inside the box nothing, the ref was a benzema cousin , in vini goal benzi touch the ball and he was offside and it was a goal a explain to me vardid fan
@@marcusatenko9673 oh really? Literally every single game in the premier league has a controversial referring decision. Either it's a red card, penalty non given, offside goals....etc. so please don't embarrass yourself.
Barcelona against Chelsea, a refereeing for Barcelona, three cents for Chelsea did not count the result was 3-1 for Chelsea, he won the Champions' League.
The araujo red card is justifiable considering the fact araujo tried to get the Ball when Bracola was the final man, it’s an instant red card The no goal is also a no goal considering the fact around half the ball went in and not all of it Not a Real Madrid fan or anything but I’m saying from what I’m seeing from my pov The hand ball and Messi goals should’ve been counted tho
You can’t argue against goal line technology, it’s 100% accurate, Araujo was the last man that’s always a red card, Cubarsi hit Vazquez foot - no discussions here
Laliga doesn't have goal line technology,cause it's 'top expensive' Cubarsi didn't hit his legs, vesquez ran into Cubarsi and dived. Araujo wasn't the last man, he had Cubarsi by his side, and if that was a red card then Gundogan definitely should have gotten a penalty. Barcelona haters are going crazy with this one.
It happened right with barca fans because when roanldo score a goal then reffere also was blind then barca fans start trolling him and now it si happening with them
Araujo should have allowed ter stegen to be tested It was not like a 90 minute run They had 2 goals lead and wouldn't have been worse if 1 had been conceded with 11 players
Its a valid penalty for Lucaz and the ball didn't pass the goal line. More like Xavi knows only to complain. If he spent more time in actually managing the team, it would help them.
The first one was a penalty The second one the owner refuses to add the goal line technology cause money is short (The tech is 3mil) He got a 3mil rase on his salary the third one was a one on one it was araujo's fault Dont be blind plz
By the way first one is 100% a penalty no way they are complaining to ref that it is not a pen when he clearly tripped vasquez up and he stuck his leg out for too long so it was waiting to happen
Ok for those who don’t get the Araujo one I can explain In the UCL quarter finals Barca was playing PSG and I think around minute 34 PSG had a chance and there were two players dembele I think and Araujo Araujo pushes dembele and fouls but Araujo got a red card bc when there are 2 last players the guy who tackles like Araujo did gets a red card Write in the replies how many words I wrote I hope that helped :)