After marriage, he can add the name of hes lovely lady to hes own. From the film Barry Lyndon (1975) produced and directed by Stanley Kubrick (1928 - 1999)
This represents a tonal shift in the film. Pre Intermission, Barry is written as a sympathetic protagonist. After the intermission, he is written and presented as the villain.
Poppycock! Your analysis is far too simplistic. He shows a lot of humanity when Byan dies, as well as honor in the final duel by shooting at the ground!
I'm surprised your kind even finds movies like this one. Isn't the definition of sigma 'man who succeeds inspite of society', anyway? that's the opposite of what Barry is, after he gets lucky and becomes part of polite society he spends his entire existence squandering the wealth he came into pathetically trying to be part of them until it leads to his ruin.
Yeah, really; it was right at that point that I first started to really dislike the character. (After all, how could anyone treat pretty Marisa Berenson so appallingly?) He should've been grateful for what he was lucky enough to get & been more careful to hold onto it.
This is an interesting moment because for me it’s both off putting and satisfying. Barry has finally made it, he’s victorious. He’s become wealthy from very little and is truly in control. But he’s also clearly become a dick at this point.
There is an opinion, it was not a Kubrick's choice but the Warners' studio precondition to choose from box-office top five actors at that time and Ryan would never make it on Stanley's if it was his will. I personally think Ryan did hell of a good job and his looks draw huge amount of viewers' empathy.
@@robsmithadventures1537 Ha! I beieve they kept on marching proudly in that battle scene while their less fortunate fellows were falling on the ground.
@@ДенисПикулин-ж9ч correct Kubrick would not have chosen him but it was a happy accident because he unintentionally came off as a moron and that was perfect for the story. It was a criticism of a society that rewards precisely the wrong qualities in human beings. Not much has changed. In fact it might be worse now.
Just compare this scene with the social media reality we live in nowadays: partner is nothing more than a beautiful object on a photo, another thing next to ferrari, expensive holidays in Maldives etc forming pleasant background of someone's life.
err no. I am not attracted to any man or woman who smokes in a closed compartment. Dating coaches are frauds for the most part. As for honest women, it is one thing to be attracted to a lovable rogue and another to be suffocated to tdeath.
Indeed, I ALWAYS respond to polite requests by my loved ones with being domineering and as unkind as humanly possible. It never fails to gradually drive a wedge between us and ruin the relationship in the long run.
@@snippsnapp123 The idea is that women constantly test a man for signs of wimpyness. For evolutionary reasons, women prefer strong men, the famous "bad boys" that are featured in EVERY SINGLE ROMANCE novel enjoyed by women (like 50 Shades of Grey and Twilight, both also written by women). She was nagging him and attempting to censor his behavior, he responded with a "nah" but it wasn´t tense, it wasn´t defensive, but relaxed. From my experience with women, from my understanding of women, I can tell you that´s the sort of thing that gets them going.
