Тёмный

Battle of Zoom: Nikon P1000 vs. Celestron Ultima80 - who wins the Ultra Zoom battle? 

Practical Science
Подписаться 8 тыс.
Просмотров 155 тыс.
50% 1

Battle of Zoom: Nikon P1000 vs. Celestron Ultima80 - who wins the Ultra Zoom battle??
In this epic showdown, we pit two titans of zoom capability against each other: the Nikon P1000 and the Celestron Ultima80. 📷🔭 Who will emerge victorious in the battle for supreme magnification?
Join us as we delve into the specs, features, and real-world performance of these powerful tools for capturing the cosmos. From lunar landscapes to distant galaxies, we'll push these cameras to their limits to determine which one reigns supreme.
Whether you're a seasoned astrophotographer or a curious amateur, this comparison will help you make an informed decision on which zoom champion suits your needs best.
Watch now to witness the clash of the zoom titans and discover which one emerges as the ultimate winner! 🌌🏆
🔍 Equipment Links ( Buy here ) ~
📸 Nikon Coolpix P1000: amzn.to/3Sj7wGv
Celestron Ultima 20-60x80mm Angled Zoom Spotting Scope - amzn.to/3tFyZde
Celestron Ultima 22-66x100mm Angled Zoom Spotting Scope - amzn.to/3REo6QT
Other equipment used:
iPhone11: amzn.to/3pT4L0T
DIGITEK® (DPTR 605 VD) (183 cm) Professional Heavy Duty Tripod: amzn.to/3rPjxdr
Manfrotto MVH500A-Fluid Video Head 60mm Half Ball -Black:amzn.to/45uLntp
Note: Below are my affiliate links, when you buy from them I get a small commission which will help me run the channel :) Thank you !!
For business enquiry:
Mail me: krishnadebo1958@gmail.com
#ZoomBattle, #NikonP1000, #CelestronUltima80, #ZoomComparison, #Astrophotography, #CameraShowdown, #ZoomChampions, #CameraVersus, #PhotographyGear, #TechComparison

Опубликовано:

 

28 сен 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 108   
@dima1353
@dima1353 29 дней назад
The diameter of the objective lens on a telescope is a characteristic of the transmittance, it is the same as the diameter of the aperture, but it is not the same as the filter thread size on a camera lens. The diameter of the aperture on a Nikon is 500/8 = 62.5 mm - this is a 2/3 of a stop behind. In fact, this telescope has a focal length of 480 and an aperture of f/6. So potentially the telescope is ahead because of the lower diffraction impact. But in practice these telescopes have simpler designs and just may not be as sharp as nikon lens. This is a very interesting question. It can be explored if you attach a camera with a pixel size comparable to Nikon to the telescope - for example, Pentax Q. The problem with the phone is that it looks through the eyepiece. But perhaps if you use a telephoto module, or a phone model with a large number of pixels on the main module - you will be able to find the limit of the optical resolution of the telescope.
@Pracitcalscience
@Pracitcalscience 29 дней назад
Beautiful explanation sir🙏
@manyu5002
@manyu5002 29 дней назад
Let's just pretend we understood this.
@Pelgram
@Pelgram 11 дней назад
I was just going to say that 😁
@arooobine
@arooobine 3 месяца назад
Very helpful! People saying the P1000 wins, but the point is not by a huge margin. The cheaper scope is a solid option for people who don't want to break the bank. And, it has the benefit of never needing batteries (when used with your eye)
@huzaifazkansa
@huzaifazkansa 2 месяца назад
Camera win in all things because in fisheye they win then in future fisheye become more like 3D then 4D it then it them the camera win only because there sensor is big only .
@canalzoomoptico5100
@canalzoomoptico5100 2 месяца назад
Exactly!!!👍🏻
@Phezox
@Phezox 7 месяцев назад
Very good comparison! You needed to lower the exposure a bit on the Nikon P1000 and the image would appear a bit sharper and better.
@Pracitcalscience
@Pracitcalscience 7 месяцев назад
Agreed 🙏
@zmjadigital8329
@zmjadigital8329 3 месяца назад
Could you record a video to help out and share on your account?
@IamProfessorO
@IamProfessorO Месяц назад
Is the P1000 and COOLPIX P1000 the same thing?
@Pracitcalscience
@Pracitcalscience 29 дней назад
Absolutely sir, they're same🙏
@Schwertmaid
@Schwertmaid 3 месяца назад
Comparing a telescope with a camera is quite adventurous, but not uninteresting. If I want to take photos, I take my P1000; if I just want to observe, I take my Celestron Ultima80. But most of the time I also want to record what I observe, so I prefer the P1000 ;-)
@GH-cd6oq
@GH-cd6oq 2 месяца назад
perv
@АлексейБеляев-т1д
@АлексейБеляев-т1д 2 месяца назад
Это не фотоаппарат, а по сути гибрид фотоаппарата и телескопа
@besovereign2032
@besovereign2032 5 дней назад
use a phone?
@1titoguacho
@1titoguacho 2 месяца назад
I own the p1000 and is way mare compact that the ultima80.. I love the p1000 not for quality pictures… for the convenience of you can see from far far far away !!!!😊😊
@mr.boniato6402
@mr.boniato6402 4 месяца назад
so 60x Celestron is the same as 125x on Nikon?
@Pracitcalscience
@Pracitcalscience 4 месяца назад
Can't be sure, but the observation is really confusing 🙏
@news7908
@news7908 4 месяца назад
Yes 😂
@rayhanahmedrahat4313
@rayhanahmedrahat4313 3 месяца назад
The base focal length is higher on the telescope. That's why it looks the same. Camera need a wide focal length as well as telephotos. On the other hand, telescope has one purpose only that is to see far way. You can see the telescope started already zoomed in.
@anastazymegre2585
@anastazymegre2585 20 дней назад
Dzięki za pokazanie faktycznego powiększenia P1000.
@Pracitcalscience
@Pracitcalscience 20 дней назад
🙏
@arturkandla5438
@arturkandla5438 4 месяца назад
Owning P1000, decent camera for bird photos, master the cam far enough you get some decent images.
@notondmcoficial
@notondmcoficial Месяц назад
NIKON e a melhor sem dúvidas!
@baraj062
@baraj062 2 месяца назад
Made in ne yazıyor üstünde nerede üretilmiş
@alfo6085
@alfo6085 2 месяца назад
If you try this hand held, the P1000 will be far superior.
@himalayanroadsofindia
@himalayanroadsofindia Месяц назад
Very helpful!
@Pracitcalscience
@Pracitcalscience Месяц назад
🙏
@愛白兔-h4m
@愛白兔-h4m 3 месяца назад
I'm using Pentax telescope, brilliant ❤️❤️❤️!!! Hahaha!!!
@WarburgGellerwassen
@WarburgGellerwassen 10 дней назад
Nikon win
@elztim5461
@elztim5461 2 месяца назад
I just saw your video with Celestron SkyMaster 25x70, and the viewing distance and object in it are almost the same as Celestron Ultima80. Why so??? Can u make a comparation between monoculars and binoculars?
@Pracitcalscience
@Pracitcalscience 2 месяца назад
Hope this will be helpful 🙏 ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-Bo2HfMwph-A.html
@3dfxvoodoocards6
@3dfxvoodoocards6 6 месяцев назад
Excelent video
@Pracitcalscience
@Pracitcalscience 6 месяцев назад
🙏
@jadeblack7979
@jadeblack7979 4 месяца назад
you did an excellent comparison thank you very { p1000 } :
@Pracitcalscience
@Pracitcalscience 4 месяца назад
🙏
@ananthapadmanabhan8795
@ananthapadmanabhan8795 Месяц назад
I am thinking of getting one for research purposes in my neighbourhood.. 😀
@3dfxvoodoocards6
@3dfxvoodoocards6 5 месяцев назад
300 $ is the price for a 90/900 mm Bresser or Skywatcher achromat with tripod and mount or even 102/1000 mm Bresser achromat with steel tripod and EQ3 mount, which I guess have a clearly better image quality.
@3000d
@3000d 2 месяца назад
I think you miss the weight difference
@jumdas1049
@jumdas1049 27 дней назад
Celestron ultima wins
@user.asleep
@user.asleep 3 месяца назад
Now stack up the telescope in front of the camera to get the ultra ultimate zoom
@yizhakshachar
@yizhakshachar 2 месяца назад
thank you for the video. So my conclusion is that the Celstron telescope is better the Nikon camera internal telescope. So I guess the best is to get a real telescope like that Celestron and attach to it an adaptor so I can attach with a good cellphone. Can I get those adaptors to work with a DSLR camera?
@Pracitcalscience
@Pracitcalscience 2 месяца назад
You need a t-ring to attach your dslr to the eyepiece of the spotting scope 🙏
@yizhakshachar
@yizhakshachar 2 месяца назад
@@Pracitcalscience thank you, I'll check into it. It's just that I already have Canon 5d mark II, Canon 70D and Sony rx1. So all I need to get a good telescope, first I'll check your channel to learn more about optics.
@rdbjrseattle
@rdbjrseattle 27 дней назад
Add 2x Zoom of phone with 60x zoom of spotting scope you have 120x zoom vs P1000. Keep adding phone zoom.
@alisonb4898
@alisonb4898 2 месяца назад
Why is the Celestron showing about the same results but with less than half the zoom ?
@VITOLLFOTOGRAFIA
@VITOLLFOTOGRAFIA Месяц назад
Bigger lens focal aperture brings more magnification with less zoom.
@shibag5814
@shibag5814 23 дня назад
Ultima 80 is the best.
@no.idea.08
@no.idea.08 Месяц назад
wow
@ferhatcan1090
@ferhatcan1090 2 месяца назад
Nikon
@cameraprepper7938
@cameraprepper7938 Месяц назад
You need a better tripod.
@lightcatcher590
@lightcatcher590 7 месяцев назад
Thank you for this video, very interesting. So the 125x of Nikon is like 60x of Celestron? There is another video on RU-vid that suggests the same thing, digital devices tend to show objects further than traditional optics. Nikon wins thank to digital zoom, I've got TS 110ED and the power like 125 is very sharp, I'm curious if the additional digital magnification of Nikon is good enough to match the telescopes like mine. It seems that Nikon should double its optical power by digital zoom to be eqal to 125x of telescopes. What do you think? Will you do a comparison with your telescope at 125x or something like such a power? Am l right as far as visible power is concerned?
@Pracitcalscience
@Pracitcalscience 7 месяцев назад
Completely agreed with you. I will definitely try to make the comparison in the future 🙏
@Baldis1981
@Baldis1981 6 месяцев назад
125x - это не увеличение, это разница между 24 mm и 3000 mm на широком и длинном конце камеры.
@lightcatcher590
@lightcatcher590 4 месяца назад
@eljay5009 It's true but it gives some aditional détails if optical zoom is very sharp because human eyes can't see perfectly the very small details. One must have a good basic image in order to use digital zoom, if it's not the case, the digital zoom gives almost nothing.
@lucamusumeci675
@lucamusumeci675 Месяц назад
Io posseggo ultima 80 e mi trovo bene ,secondo me dovevi fare il confronto con un telescopio che arriva a 125 ×. Ad esempio skywatcher 127 ,certo il diametro e più grande ma a parita di ingrandimenti non penso che la p 1000 vince ,comunque bel video ,ho un video di un vulcano sul mio canale ripreso con ultima 80 distanza 50 km
@aiqalosky9449
@aiqalosky9449 7 месяцев назад
How about 4k recording can go 125x? Quality is ok?
@Pracitcalscience
@Pracitcalscience 7 месяцев назад
Till 125X(max optical zoom), it's fine, but digital zoom is horrible.
@jayesh5131
@jayesh5131 5 месяцев назад
Thanks 🙏​@@Pracitcalscience
@Pracitcalscience
@Pracitcalscience 5 месяцев назад
You're welcome. God bless 🙏
@hakanavucan_KWCADDE
@hakanavucan_KWCADDE 2 месяца назад
How much i iphone? ;)
@misaelescobarruiz1193
@misaelescobarruiz1193 3 месяца назад
Más alcance la nikon
@vaanarasam2092
@vaanarasam2092 2 месяца назад
@Pracitcalscience
@Pracitcalscience 2 месяца назад
🙏
@shameg2488
@shameg2488 3 месяца назад
Both Zoom is different
@Siwq007
@Siwq007 2 месяца назад
Celesta - 400 euro Nikon 1200 euro.
@ds8680
@ds8680 23 дня назад
Don't be silly. Don't comp[are apple with pears. Celestron can't make pictures or movies
@bamsemh1
@bamsemh1 Месяц назад
P1000 is only 400$...
@EChunter
@EChunter Месяц назад
Well Celestron is garbage so not really a good comparison , at all .
@savageaxis7721
@savageaxis7721 13 дней назад
In terms of optical quality, Celestron was the clear winner - thanks for the great confrontations :) that is, the Celestron 60x optical zoom is equal to 125x Nikon optics...
@Pracitcalscience
@Pracitcalscience 13 дней назад
🙏
@wizardddmax
@wizardddmax 2 месяца назад
Nikon p1000. Это фото и видео, много режимов. Фото туманностей и планет. Видео в 4к. + мобильность. Однозначная победа 😊
@daudches
@daudches Месяц назад
Yes I like Nikon p1000
@LISTEDGames
@LISTEDGames День назад
If you're cheeky you can also use the inbuilt zoom of the iphone !
@JavierSilva.Th.M
@JavierSilva.Th.M 5 месяцев назад
P1000 win!!
@МомчилБ
@МомчилБ 4 месяца назад
​@eljay5009in my opinion the Nikon wins too. If you look at the pictures from a bigger screen ( PC or TV) you will see that the iphone one might look sharper, but it actually has less detail. Also the digital zoom of the Nikon is pretty much crop. You can do the same with the other picture with a software( i did that) and saw that P1000's image quality is way better.
@philipchesleyiii
@philipchesleyiii 4 месяца назад
​@@МомчилБ There is a T-ring adapter for the Ultima. You can use any camera with it. So don't use a cellphone.
@Aneliuse
@Aneliuse 4 месяца назад
Ok saved me 5 minutes
@mike-drain
@mike-drain 9 дней назад
To do a proper comparison it would be better to take still photos. They would then be steady and higher pixel resolution.
@django1248
@django1248 4 месяца назад
Could you tell me the name of the tripod used for the P1000. Also did you use a quick release plate, if so, what was the it?. Thanks.
@Pracitcalscience
@Pracitcalscience 3 месяца назад
Manfrotto MVH500A-Fluid head with a video tripod 🙏
@canjeero
@canjeero 4 месяца назад
CU + iPhone can cost some money too 😁
@Clint3571
@Clint3571 3 месяца назад
It would be helpful to do a digital zoom on the Ultima to make the video image the same size as the zoomed Coolpix so we can tell the quality apart.
@rayhanahmedrahat4313
@rayhanahmedrahat4313 3 месяца назад
It's a telescope. It doesn’t have digital zoom.
@Clint3571
@Clint3571 3 месяца назад
@@rayhanahmedrahat4313 Understood. I am proposing to digitally zoom the video with video editing software to make the image the same size as the Coolpix for comparison. Most people are comparing these two images on a small phone screen so it is difficult to see the image quality difference.
@DeepAscension
@DeepAscension 3 месяца назад
​@@rayhanahmedrahat4313use the iPhone zoom.... 😅
@jayhoss7724
@jayhoss7724 6 дней назад
Nice video! Thanks for sharing . I’m going with the cheaper one. Just for hobby use.
@Pracitcalscience
@Pracitcalscience 6 дней назад
🙏
@Ded_Maza
@Ded_Maza 4 месяца назад
Вообще для себя Sony ZV-E10 стоит брать или не стоит тратить и для дома (семейных каких-то посиделок дома или на улице под шашлычок) достаточно Canon EOS R100 с головой ? Просто в разбежке цен можно для R100 еще оптики докупить. Кто подскажет ? боюсь что R100 (условно) будет снимать также как мой пиксель или жены хонр. (формат изображения) RAW есть у обоих телефонов ! Просто что-то загорелось вместо Nubia Red Magic 9 Pro фотик взять ! Вот уже 4 день инет в поисках инфы переворачиваю
@hendersonribeirobrandina2120
@hendersonribeirobrandina2120 2 месяца назад
What's the name of the song used in your video? Thanks
@m2k288
@m2k288 2 месяца назад
Yanlış bir tercih yapmamam konusunda bana yardımcı oldunuz teşekürler emeğinize sağlık sizden ricam aparatı nerden nasıl alabilirim marka model yardımcı olurmusunuz
@Pracitcalscience
@Pracitcalscience 2 месяца назад
I have procured these from Amazon 🙏
@besovereign2032
@besovereign2032 5 дней назад
what is the attachment for the iPhone called?
@Pracitcalscience
@Pracitcalscience 5 дней назад
Cell phone adapter sir🙏
@CarmySCL
@CarmySCL 18 дней назад
The telescopes also reach 1000x optical zoom😊
@besovereign2032
@besovereign2032 5 дней назад
which ones?
@spaideman7850
@spaideman7850 Месяц назад
p900?
@golfAsia
@golfAsia 5 месяцев назад
니콘 P1000 오토모드에서 10m, 20m, 50m, 100m, 200m, 300m, 500m, 1km, 2km, 5km 실제 인물 화질이 궁금합니다. 골프장, 야구장, 축구장, 야간 공연장 등에서 인물이 어느정도 화질이 나오는지 테스트 영상이 궁금합니다. 많은 이들이 제일 궁금해 할 내용인 것 같은데요~ 영상 제목을 이라고 만들면 될 것 같은데요. 인물 대신 털, 눈섭 까지 있는 큰 곰, 사슴 인형 같은 것도 괜찮겠네요 ~ 실제 야구장 축구장 골프잘(볼 날아가서 떨어지는 것 촬영 가능한지), 공연장 실제 영상이면 더 좋겠네요. 영상에서는 거리가 얼마인지가 중요한데 거리 보다는 중을 얼마 했는지에 초점이... 참, 메모리는 최대 512 까지 인식 사용 가능한가요?
@daudches
@daudches Месяц назад
Nikon p1000 Very worth it. the pictures captured are very beautiful
@M19806
@M19806 2 месяца назад
P 1000 is the best
@sivaj1408
@sivaj1408 7 месяцев назад
Good comparison
@Pracitcalscience
@Pracitcalscience 7 месяцев назад
🙏
@deepseasearch
@deepseasearch 23 дня назад
Thanks for such a useful comparison! The P1000 is undoubtedly a more versatile tool. In this "academic" test, it loses a little in detail. Even taking into account that the telescope’s light passes through two optical systems. The telescope itself + a smartphone and the image is still better. But the flexibility of settings, mobility and versatility of Nikon certainly outweigh the achievements of the telescope. Thanks for this useful video. I watched it with pleasure.
@Pracitcalscience
@Pracitcalscience 23 дня назад
🙏
@홍콩보낸다
@홍콩보낸다 4 месяца назад
NIKON
@babojago
@babojago 2 месяца назад
Scope is better because you can you use it when you have already camera. Optical zoom in both is close the same for me.
Далее
What can you see through a $10k telescope?
11:05
Просмотров 1 млн
NIKON P1000. 3 года использования.
21:23
Meni yerga urdingda
00:20
Просмотров 360 тыс.
$1,000 vs. $10,000 Telescope (Same Picture)
9:04
Просмотров 635 тыс.
Nikon P1000 vs. Sony RX10 IV
22:18
Просмотров 168 тыс.
Fixing the Nikon P1000s Camera Shake
12:25
Просмотров 32 тыс.
Meni yerga urdingda
00:20
Просмотров 360 тыс.