Man this is so good. I've done a few drafts similar to this. Really love the way of thinking. Jakob was great! Really interesting sleeper pick for sure.
Haha yeah! It did hurt hearing Jakob saying Zeke didnt move the needle. But I probably would have taken Downs there too for the double. If you only had the 2 RBs smash Zeke tho.
Great vid. Definitely dont mind these types of builds. It mimics best ball dynasty constructions ive heard - i dont play in any.. but In BB dyno you want ~6 RBs who are guaranteed points and even high cieling guys. Then you pray and spray at WR, like 20 deep. You catch all the spike weeks at WR and your trusty RBs chug along, you dont want zeros at RB, unlike in managed we dont mind sitting on backups and rookies. This is kinda that but at a much tighter scale in the 18 rounds.
The man from Manitoba! (I'm also from Manitoba) and he has the same favorite stack as me. Nabers with Richardson back stack. I had an early draft, before the schedule was released, that had that stack in the 10 spot and I got Andrews in the 6! I almost cried with joy when I looked at the team again after the schedule release.
If you're a good drafter being able to adapt how the board falls and hitting the RBs or WRs later in the draft because you can identify the good one's is what separates.. i like zero RB and do it the most dont get me wrong but only doing that doesnt separate you in my opinion
Ya Richardson is going as the 6th QB… for a dude who has already been injured twice in 4 games… one injury ended his season to the point he never took another team rep… he just threw in May, then couldn’t throw in June because of soreness, the type of soreness that lead to an MRI… Huge leap of faith on a guy who is Daniel Jones who runs better
no but i like to know where the guys go in best ball bc it helps me know who the sharps are on. i just wrote a piece for fantasy life on my top ten redraft picks. you can get guys like nabers in the 6th, but knowing that drafters w skin in the game can highlight those values
Even though he did switch teams (to a better offense) and signed a big contract, I would consider him still young RB. I personally think he is a better RB than A. Jones and should have no problem filling his role...hoping a lot of “pro’s” are sleeping on him, 😉.
Idk why I have in my head that last season was a scratch for him because he was frustrated and injured. Am I crazy? Just the year before he won the rushing title. I feel like everyone is totally out on him and I don’t get it.
Realized you were in the same WW at the end of our draft earlier. How many WW are you thinking you'll do? Did another where someone took Gerrit Prince in the last round. I have never heard of him but he was cut by the Chiefs two days ago. A true galaxy brain move. Going Metcalf in the second to take Barkley in the third is kind of funny in this one. Try to differentiate to end up just swaping rounds you take the players
whew, been building like this most of the summer but with ETN more as rb2 and different late round plays. glad i wasn't duped, but could feel the beads of sweat forming lol.
@@DepositKingdom I don't even consider it all that much of a zig. Just as described, it's adapting hyperfragile to these wild zero-RB times. I just think of it was balanced drafting, but that doesn't sound nearly as sexy as "hyper deadzone." (And I do a fair amount of hero-RB as well...just let the draft come to me.)
i don't consider it balanced, it's just tilted in another direction than default construction by adp. i think it's sub optimal when you look at the 2v2s on deadzone rbs/later wr & vice versa, so it's definitely a big zig.
@@DepositKingdom I know it's bestball, but JUST looking at 2v2s when you have positional draft capital to consider is being too reductive to me. If I drafted 3 WRs in the first three, I'm just going to be more inclined to take that 4th round RB (the "legendary" part of the stream discussion sums up my thoughts). I'm drafting like I drafted right, thus far, and drafting for upside at a position of need.
this is pretty specific to underdog adp but i think where it applies to redraft is being more willing to go rb early bc so many of the young wrs go later on other sites, so it's an even stronger strategy
So Burrow at pick 100 wasn't what you were wanting? Pretty sure that's way behind adp and a "win" there. Why did you pass on him? I'm confused and you never addressed it.
ya it's a good question...because we already had arich, and because we had multiple other stacking options available (lawrence w engram/etienne, tua w waddle), and we specifically wanted to attack the rbs in this range as part of the strategy jakob outlined, it gave us flexibility to push qb, which ended up being a great choice since we got tua as a wild value
