"Before the end of this war I'm going to kill you" | The Patriot | CLIP 

10+

11

@@lindaoneil5085 you must be a Trumper, like I am. Hope that you are not 'safe and effective', like I am as well.

0..... but I'm a brit and with the redcoats......plus on a non-jokey side it has terrible factual inaccuracies and a lot of it is bollox's

@@andygrimshaw1431 yes it's fiction but it sure was a good movie! Hope that the 'crown' didn't force the vax on you. Both our countries are creeping towards full tyranny and they want less 'useless eaters' on both sides.

Totally agree. Jason Isaac's character made me so angry I wanted to throttle him more than once.

he's like a professional asshole LOL

Insanely underrated actor.

yet he is such lovely fella

I thought he was good as Captain Hook. A lesser actor playing Hook couldn't have pulled off the flying bit.

was cornwallis really a villain? or just a soldier

Well he's an actor. That's what he does. He acts.

He really wasn't the villian.

Cornwallis wasn’t really a villain.

cornwallis is just take his orders to be a soldier

Know him do ye Or did you see an interview and tought you know his character. He is an actor after all Judge some by words and leave yourself open to disception

@@liamo6889Must you know a person personally to have a judgement of their character?

He's an actor. 9/10 of actors, journalists, athletes, directors, and show hosts are hateful cunts irl. In order to do this part well all he had to do is either act how he normally would or do an impression of his coworkers and he'd nail it. 🤣

@@liamo6889 Playing a character in any movie/show is a job like any other. Someone has to play the villain. Just as you say, you cannot judge people by their words, you also cannot judge people based on the character(s) they play. To prove my point, I direct you to another movie: Harry Potter and the Order of Phoenix. The character Professor Umbridge was a nasty character that did all manner of terrible things to Hogwarts and its students. Actress Imelda Staunton took that role and when learning the lines, reportedly felt sick to her stomach at some of the terrible things her character would do. She hated it, but performed the role to the best of her abilities.

@@liamo6889 My grandpa worked on this movie as a background militia man and he said Jason Isaac’s was probably the nicest actor he met and interacted with, also said heath ledger was very kind as well.

Best part is it was improvised. Jason Isaacs just added the "why wait?" So Mel answered "soon"

That's great method acting. To respond in character so effortlessly

the iconic Gibson "glare before doing a 180". I think he does that in Braveheart too haha

Well He’s Lucius Abraxas Malfoy

😅😂 yeah, until Voldemort returned. I'm actually glad the Malfoy family got away from the final fight.

I was just gonna say!! 😂😂😂

You guys know I was talking about Mel Gibson, right?

@@brianwebb8136 Sorry It’s just He got overshadowed by Jason Issac

yeah he also did a nice work on batman begins as falcone

Superb actor.

🤔😳 wait he died?!!!

@@jamrock719 Sadly, yes.

​@@mdelaubergine8930takes hat off

He meant what he said

absolute perfection

all American schools should show this movie too kids at least twice per year so The yourtth can appreciate the sacrifice that built this great nation

@@bikeman1x11 And the acts of terror.

@@andrew_owens7680 what acts of terror

Of said?

What me angry enough to throttle Tavington was when he asked Martin, "Did he die, hm?" I'll bet Tavington wouldn't have had to guts to say that if all those Redcoats didn't have his back. 😡

@@ivannechkin3665 I’ll give you this small piece of advice…Just let it go. You’ll drive yourself insane trying to comprehend the grammatical nightmare that is a RU-vid comment section. It started out innocently enough; a misplaced “your” where it clearly shouldn’t have been used in a possessive tense. Then came the complete disregard for when to use “their” or “they’re”. Soon it devolved into a barely coherent, caveman-like gibberish where “then” replaces “than” and “of” is now predominantly considered the correct verbiage over “have” for any conjunction ending in “ve”. Calling out this complete and utter abortion of grammatical rule will only make you the target and result in you getting labeled a “Grammar Nazi” or, ironically, a “looser”[sic]. Again, pointing out their inability to spell on even a remedial level will only draw semi-coherent slurs and jeers from the contently retarded masses of basement dwellers that frequent this forum. It’s best to just chuckle and move along. 😉

shouldn't have.

He FAFO...

Wow, that's a super neat detail.

Living in shithole Ohio duh

Living in Ohio for 1 second is 2 seconds to long.

I’ve lived here for my entire life and it’s been great. Love the laws here.

go blue

@@timothyklemm8696 Nah. We bleed scarlet. Not just because of OSU, but also because this State is very conservative. The only bad places are the ones that are predominantly blue.

Lol

😢😢😅😂

😂

🤣😂😆

Alert to the spoiler alert ! , no he didn't get to be the mayor of Toledo , instead , the historical fact is that Banastre Tarlton survived the war and returned to England and became a member of Parliament. You can see him portrayed in that role in the movie Amazing Grace . 😎👍

Mel was beyond impressed by Heath. Per his own words.

It's a movie. Not a documentary

Mel Gibson hates the English, so he rewrites history to suit himself. Braveheart, for example. /

Yes. Unlike other things, it moved to entertain instead of claiming any historic accuracy.

I highly doubt it claimed to be. It did exactly what it set out to do.

Same goes for Braveheart

Florida too

The funny thing is he wasn't referring to what is known as the state of Ohio today he was referring to the Ohio Valley everything's the south of the Ohio River primarily

"Well it's the meth capital of the country.."

Ohio actually had a lot of fertile land for growing crops. I get that's not of utmost importance to the modern man, but back then, if you controlled great farm or plantation lands, you controlled quite a bit of power.

It is quite historically accurate. I find it amusing that the people who hate the movie have lied about it for so long that the fans of the film just blindly concede the lies as truth. The Patriot is heavily based on real people and events.

@@tgriffin3059the British never locked American citizens in a church and burned it down. That happened to the Irish under Cromwell but never in the colonies

@@Wooster23 Really? Gosh, I seem to recall anecdotes about the British having alliances with the various Indian tribes....You know, come to think about it, it's mentioned in the DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE....so it's not exactly an obscure revelation....Anyway, these tribes were notorious for taking prisoners after fights, and burning them alive....The American Revolution was an 8 year war. And the Indians didn't simply burn people like what happened in the movie. They kept people alive for HOURS while roasting...So the reality of the war was far more sadistic than anything depicted in The Patriot. Anything else you want to explain to ME?

@@Wooster23 The British were allied with the Indian tribes, and they DID burn people...consistently, and with great enthusiasm. Ever heard of the Declaration of Independence? It's cited right there as one of our reasons why we'd NEVER forgive the British. And we were right....

@@Wooster23 British allies often utilized such tactics. This is common knowledge.

Tell me about... Oakland! xD

Well.... they made great American muscles.

It's not inaccurate. It's historical fiction, meaning that it's a story...but virtually all of it is based on things that actually happened.

@tgriffin3059 historical fiction is a long way of saying inaccurate, hahahahahaha. This isn't a college thesis.

@@tommyjames2448 As I said, it is quite historically accurate. What are the two things that get criticized the most for inaccuracy in this movie? The church burning scene, and the part where Tavington shoots the little boy. Liberals whine that nobody got burned in the American Revolution, and that nobody killed children. Well, gosh, turns out people were burned alive THROUGHOUT the war, and little kids were killed throughout the war....and it was an EIGHT YEAR WAR....

@tgriffin3059 sounds like you're conflating my comments with someone else's comments. Like I said, it's very historically inaccurate. Yes, locations and general events occurred but were drastically over dramatized for the film. The English approach and French elements were also drastically egartated for the movie. Either way, it's still a great movie. Just don't watch it and think you know real history.

Dual citizen? Didnt know that

Not really. He was an egotistical maniac and he used his position and the British authority to make him appear to be a better than average leader. More of a pompous and indignant subordinate that was more insubordinate to his Commander than a REAL LEADER Cornwallis reflected how the British perceived their American Cousins, tools and not citizens. He would have been better to have stayed in school and academics rather than the military and caused more travesty to the British had he NOT BEEN THERE. Here is a link for a short read on this incompetent commander shown to be truly incompetent even in life. The FACT that he didn't have the SPINE to properly surrender his own sword shows his lack of respect he had for his betters.

@@scottmartinmackiesykes lotta words for a whole lotta nothing 🤡

@@scottmartinmackiesykes AND HOW HISTORICAL CORRECT IS ALL OF THAT ?

@@geezerp1982 look it up. The EVIDENCE AND FACTS speak about the incompetence of Cornwallis.

It says that this is just a movie

@@Sillysoft “Party pooper.” ~ Adam Sandler

@@Sillysoft man, my thoughts exactly. They went all out. They must think this is a documentary or something.

yep..a long long LONG time ago..lol....look at it now.

Now it become Garden of Hell in America.

And remember,,, when it’s all said and done, a Buckeye is nothing more than a worthless nut!! 🧐😝

In Australia the first landowners were squatters they took the land and shot the natives , their descendants who still own the land and think they are better than the rest of us we call the squatocracy

Cool it with the antisemitic remarks.

​@@AnonYmous-mc5zxthese remarks happen for a reason. Choosen people always involved. Think about your greatest allies - than about uss liberty - and it becomes greatest all lies

@@AnonYmous-mc5zxno… no, I don’t think I will

​@@AnonYmous-mc5zxThis guy gets it.

Based on what? Who’s not giving him enough credit?

No, he does

What a tragedy. He’s also literally underrated, and a genius, and deserves an Oscar.

It's horrendously historically inaccurate

Good entertainment. Historical garbage, like Braveheart.

@@EmpireofSpeedNY both Mel Gibson films too haha

Loved him in Get The Gringo

Well, of course Roland Emmerich's and Mel Gibson's characters aren't exactly Shakespeare, either. Jason Isaacs Col. Tavington, for example, is as much a stereotypical pure-evil villain as they come, with the slight yet entertaining variation that this time the villain is English for a change and not German or Russian.

you do relise that there was NO USA IN 1776 GREAT BRITAIN RULED NORTH ARMERICA

Not just friendship. We are blood.

Mad Max ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-MJ7ovct6x-I.htmlsi=j-99pGUVRPBXa4gl

I agree, great movie and story line but obviously it took creative liberties. If I remember the British wouldn’t attack and kill civilians during a war. They still believed in fighting with honor and respect. If the public back home knew of the “brutal” tactics like the Tavington did they wouldn’t be seen as gentlemen and maybe human

Asterix comics has brilliantly brought out the brits formalities- hot water at 5 pm. And Julius Caesar attacks at 5 pm. Lol

Perhaps, that's why he added the line "Cheeky Fellow" to demonstrate who exactly he had ... and these were people that allegedly hadn't been reported missing yet.

Whos beriah?