His constant cutting over the top and not letting DJ talk, plus being so adamant that the sign says it's private does unfortunately diminish his "Gentleman" status in my view.
He came across a bit aggressive but the instant he saw that there wasn’t a sign he apologized and changed his demeanor. THAT is professional. The immediate aggression is a tactic to establish authority. That he immediately apologized when the sign wasn’t there made him the professional.
I can see their company on Google Earth. These corporate people think they have privacy in public 😂. I am amazed by this security guard didn’t let his ego get the best of him. He admitted he was wrong about the signage. This manager who came out didn’t seem really knowledgeable or frankly not interested in talking. This was the chance for the company to get good press.
I'm always amazed how many people watch a video and never give it a thumbs up. Even if I am not a fan of a video I give it a thumbs up because I can appreciate the effort that has gone into it. Keep up the good work!
If someone is big enough to admit when they are wrong to a complete stranger, you know they are a fair, honest and trustworthy person. From that moment on I knew he was not going to be anything but decent to DJ & PJ. Props to him, nice one mate.
Chris is a cool guy. Good on you and PJ, bigging him up in front of his 'superiors'. Goes a long way being told your role isn't meaningless and unworthy of the odd bit of praise.
I'm glad that DJ is explicitly acknowledging the "social experiment" aspect of what he's doing. It's a more honest approach than some of his earlier videos.
WOW ... DJ & PJ... This just made my day . Just home from hospital , to see this video put a big smile on my face. Let's just say , I actually do a lot of work for this company. If you have a power tool in your home, part of its brains originated here.
Great security. He was humble & professional. Also very smart & engaging after an abrupt start. Made me smile when she said "what we up to?" and "to use for what what EXACTLY?"😂😂😂 Great interaction. Its a shame companies dont use your videos to promote themselves. That should change as more of them are educated. Nice to see you guys again.
Started off a bit rocky but ended up a pleasant interaction, Chris was very nice in the end and the other two were too. Both of your respectful and professional approach goes a long way to create positive reactions.
All the other roads on the estate are adopted but that one is not. Maybe it was adopted at some point and they company applied to have it 'stopped up' to remove the adoption.
15mph speed limit is not enforceable on public roads in the UK, only advisory, so it is a strong indicator that the road is private, as is the no-smoking sign below it, companies cannot fix their own signs to council street furniture. Thousands of companies across the UK utilise standard road markings within their sites, as they can reasonably expect drivers to already be aware of their meaning.
I always love the fact that in the back of my mind I'm also thinking 'why would people find this sort of stuff interesting ' ............ about 400 episodes later including this one.... IM INTERESTED!!!!!!! 😂🤣😂🤣
Just wondering why (in comparison to other auditors - and yourselves in previous videos) you don't make more of an issue about 'implied right of access' at these places? Surely if its got open plan grounds and car-parks, you are within your rights to wander about and film there? At least until they 'trespass' you.... But even then surely you don't HAVE to leave unless you've committed 'aggravated trespass' ?? Or, have I got these points completely wrong? Genuinely interested in how all that works.
@@grantcampbell2832 Implied rights of access do not allow anyone to walk onto private property to do what they feel like. They allow people to approach the lawful occupier of the premises as there is a legitimate reason to do so. The classic being a delivery driver who has been contracted by a third party to deliver something to you. They have an implied right to enter the premises in order to complete that delivery. However, once the delivery is made, their implied right of access is rescinded automatically and they leave. After making the delivery, if they then wanted to park up and have their lunch or take some pictures, they would need to seek the permission from the landowner to do this.
I really enjoyed this video. The security started a little course but was a big enough man to adjust his approach as things progressed and even apologised where necessary. I really feel he deserves credit for his lack of ego and professionalism. The lady and the director also handled themselves really well. I agree that the site was really well kept and gives a great first impression. I think they may actually take on board your suggestion about adding an additional sign too. I also enjoyed the way you explained yourself toward the end. That probably allayed any fears. Thumbs up for this interaction.
Great interaction security guy back down when he was wrong good man the woman ok but wasn't to happy you filming director not much to say he knew he couldn't win this one great job boys as always wonderful footage 👍
I really enjoy your videos... I'm watching from the US (Miami, Florida) you guys are usually so respectful and explain everything you're doing. Keep up the good work!!!
I have to say, what a great audit all around DJ & PJ. The interaction between the company employees and the security guard was great, especially when the security guard apologised for there not being a private sign. Great work gents…Looking forward to the next video. 👍
When people say 'We don't want you filming our site ' etc etc I would answer with 'Well I don't want to me filmed paying for my shopping in Asda' or 'walking thru town' etc
Aren't you ever tempted to ask one of these company employees why they feel that they have the right to simply begin talking whenever they choose even though someone else is in mid-sentence and attempting to make a point? (I know it isn't illegal but is certainly extremely rude!)
Sick of hearing, ''we don't allow, send us an email, it's on our website, this is private property'', as soon as they know, the video will be online, they need to think before they speak, online means available worldwide, the security has obviously been watching auditor videos, no way he was going to embarrass himself and or the company, what an immaculate and impressive site.
The BOC silos are actually VIE ( a very posh thermos flask).There is also a plant there that produces nitrogen from compressed air. Enjoyed the video. 👍
Brilliant audit lads, security was a perfect gentleman, my only negative being the lack of solar panels on such a modern building and considering they make electronics seems quite odd
Nice to see you out and about in the North West DJ Nexperia is one of the sites I visit regularly due to my work ethic. Hopefully I will get the chance to meet you in person someday. Keep up the great work 👍🏻
Heck, the boulevard in front of my house isn’t my property, it’s the city’s. But if it goes unmowed, the city sends a crew to mow it, and i get a bill on my land taxes. Forced free labor😂.
It was nice of him to apologise but there are other indications of their boundary, such as the change in road surface near the end of the junction and the lack of street lighting on the access road. It's very clear to me at 3:17.
It doesn't matter what you are doing when the landowner instructs you to leave the property. When they tell you to leave you must leave. If they tell you that you are trespassing and to leave immediately you must leave immediately.. Please note the deliberate use of language here. They do not have to ask. They instruct. The tell you. They order you off their land. Asking implies you have a choice. You don't. If you then refuse to leave or decide to drag your feet the landowner may then use reasonable force to remove you. Should you then allege that they committed an offence against you, the onus falls on you to prove your claim. And yes, signs and barriers make things a great deal easier for the landowner. Finally, for anyone feeling pedantic, if you have a statutory right of entry it's a different matter than walking about making RU-vid videos.
No company worth their salt will use 'reasonable force' for trespass like this. There's just too much that can go wrong for very little gain, especially when the whole thing is being filmed. Let's say you use reasonable force and the bloke falls over and hits his head. He's brain damaged for life, and then it turns out that your security staff haven't had the right training. What do you think happens here? Incidentally, your 'advice' is quite wrong on several levels. For a start, if you allege that someone commits an offence against you (e.g. assault), then the police are obliged to investigate. There's no need to 'prove' your claim.
@@TheThirdFall You have missed the point and failed to understand the underlying principles of the law. Landowners have exclusivve rights to their property. They decide who they want on their land and what they will be doing. Landowners do not ASK you about that. If you are trespassing they inform you and order you off their land. They have the rights, you don't. If you then get uppity the level of force used aainst you is scaled according to circumstances. Mess around with a dog in a farmer's field in the back of beyond where you are interfering with livestock and you and your dog may and up lawfully shot dead. You also have a very pecuilar idea about how the law works in terms of assault. If you allege a criminal assault the burden of proof lies on you, and then the police and the CPS as the prosecution if they take up your claim. The principle is that all are innocent until proven guilty. It should not be too hard for you to grasp that if you are forcibly removed from land which you were trespassing upon it will be particularly difficult for you to prove that you were assaulted when the defence is that reasonable force was used to remove you as a trespasser.
I visited this sight decades ago when it was operated by Philips. As then I believe today it is still a wafer fabrication plant ie processing wafers to create chips that go offshore (the Far East) to be packaged. It's all high technology with £100 million required for just the processing and test equipment alone.
Frightened to put up signs scaring away potential customers. You can see they're a multi million dollar company, 2 signs I don't think will break the bank. Security guard seemed clued up. Just trying his luck to get you off site. Plus you've then got the law on your side if you walk past private property signs. No signs and an open entrance, you are just asking for trouble.
It's bugga, bugga and bugga again. Another 90 mins going for the keyring and it had already gone. I do with when people get it, they post on here to save others from wasting their time. I'm gonna keep trying. Love the video btw DJ. x
Electronic components in nearly every device! That's a rather bold and unlikely claim for this company to make unless it refers to a specific sector of the industry. It's amazing how many of these big companies we've never heard of. Nexperia's building architecture is really nice. Security guard quite pleasant too. Looks like a good company to work for. I'm curious what they do now and going to Google them!
When it comes to uk electronics components, I always tend to think they work with our most popular chip manufacturer, ARM. And when you consider that ARM produce low energy powered cpu's, you quickly realise that chip is used in many portable electronics, so their claim is highly valid.
@@zigzagtoes I get what you're implying if you take the statement 'in every electronic device' to mean specific devices such as mobile phones and processors like ARM..however even then, you can't say every single smartphone or mobile device has an ARM processor. It's simply not the case. And I maintain my original position that it's extremely unlikely that one electronics company would be providing components used in EVERY electronic device sold, regardless of whether they're speaking about a specific market segment for specific devices or more broadly. It's unlikely for so many reasons. Think about it. That would suggest this company has a market monopoly (at least for one or more components). Think about the amount of electronic devices sold both in the UK and worldwide..for one company to provide components for every single device sold would require an extraordinary large company of immense size to manufacturer and supply that level of volume. It would be a multi-billion pound operation with one of the largest manufacturing plants in the world. However, I've just looked up the companies last financial accounts filed on Companies House. It's a fairly small business in UK terms, with a turnover of around £100 million and a profit of less than £10 million. To put that in context, supermarket chains do way more profit. Tesco (that doesn't even have a monopoly on food items) had over £4.7 billion profit last year. Nexperia with £9.7 million profit looks tiny by comparison. I noticed from Nexperia's annual accounts too that their business is rather specialised and produces semiconductors and other components requiring strict benchmark performance which are used mainly in the automotive industry. Its two main customers are Bosch and Continental. It makes no mention of supplying cpu's to mobile phone manufacturers or even being involved in that industry, let alone supplying components to every single manufacturer of electronic devices.
@@zigzagtoes ARM is certainly a popular cpu's used in smartphones and other mobile devices which has been licensed to 11 major manufacturers of mobile devices and cpu's. However ARM has nothing to do with Nexperia,which is surprising considering their claim of providing 'components in every single electronic device' and being in the semiconductor market themselves. The CPU manufacturing sector is quite a competitive and fragmented market with several large device manufacturers (Apple, Samsung, Huawei) making their own cpu's . Some Chinese manufacturers have also began manufacturing unlicensed ARM architecture cpu's cheaper which are found in many Chinese brand smartphones and mobile devices. There's 6 main non-ARM mobile device cpu manufacturers and many more competing for the smaller brand smartphones and mobile devices market.
@@paullangton-rogers2390 ah, bosch, so cheap chips (experience of their products). Most chip manufacturers have to book time at waver plants for mass production (tiawan, s korea, china), so dont need their own huge plants. So it's likely a small plant here and research with mass processing outsourced. Thanks for doing the research, folk like you help free my time, as I often go looking at what companies do when I first hear of them myself if not preoccupied (too many label companies selling generic china crap - if it's generic, I prefer to wait and order direct from china if the case, can save you a fortune). Wafer*
Nice vid DJ and PJ. Now it may not be a compelling legal challenge whether or not the drive is private, there are double yellow lines painted on it. Who had them painted? Was it the local authority or did the company have them painted? If it is private as he claims, who would enforce them? Not a traffic warden as they have no authority on private propety. I do not believe a company can enforce parking tickets on the general public either. Therefore, having double yellows painted on the drive would suggest that the drive is public!!!!
JUST LOVE IT. PJ & DJ HAVE DONE IT AGAIN .THE SNASY LADY IN THE BLACK DRESS AND WHITE TRAINNERS REALY LOOKED THE PART . AND THEN THE MANAGER DIRECTOR TURN UP . LADY IN BLACK DRESS KEPT GIVING HIM EYES. MUST BE HIS PERSONAL ASSISTANT. BUT A NOTHER GREAT AUDIT. 👍
