Тёмный

Bell V-280 Valor: The US Army's Next-Gen Helicopter of the Future 

DEFENCE CENTRAL
Подписаться 12 тыс.
Просмотров 3,5 тыс.
50% 1

Опубликовано:

 

28 сен 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 63   
@peteranninos2506
@peteranninos2506 26 дней назад
I'm pretty sure it'll fly higher than 6,000 feet!😂
@defencecentral
@defencecentral 26 дней назад
You're absolutely right! The V-280 can indeed fly at an altitude of 15,000 feet. The 6,000 feet we mentioned in the video refers to its maximum service ceiling, which is the altitude where the aircraft, with a normal load, can no longer climb faster than 100 feet per minute under standard air conditions. We apologize for the mistake, and thank you for catching that!
@moriscondo5511
@moriscondo5511 19 дней назад
@@defencecentral thanks for the clarification.
@atownsammiej7223
@atownsammiej7223 Месяц назад
❤❤❤❤❤🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥11 Bravo Infantry, 101 st Air Assault, two deployments to Bagdad Iraq. I love it. I've been out of the Army going on 4 years now and I deployed to Bagdad Iraq two times and the Uh 60 Black Hawk helicopter flu us into combat and came and got us out dead or alive. I love the V 280 Valor, plus self deployable!!!!, Medivac, when designing something you have to be smart I love it, faster than the black hawk, flying up to 6,000 feet 🤟🏋️🤟🤯🤾🤺🏌️🦸🙌 I love it.
@Christopher-li6gg
@Christopher-li6gg Месяц назад
A smaller version of the Osprey...lol. There are those that say the Osprey is dangerous, as any aircraft is dangerous. The highest accident and fatality record goes to the Blackhawk, and no one screams about that. Many aircraft in the inventory have crash records, as there is no guarantee when flying aircraft, things can go wrong. I would say more so it's the training that's a failure. It looks like a Cessna with Osprey wings...lol Budget development among the branches is a joke, not to mention most projects run way over time completion. Recruiting and manufacturing are extremely low, there's nothing good about any of this altogether, it's just a combination of absolute failures from every direction from the top to the very bottom.
@andrewreynolds4949
@andrewreynolds4949 Месяц назад
This project is actually on time and on budget
@Christopher-li6gg
@Christopher-li6gg Месяц назад
@andrewreynolds4949 , ,Of course, it was...lol This flying piece of shit! Everyone screams their head off about the Osprey, and then comes up with a smaller version that looks like absolute shit!...lol These are probably the same guys who want to turn to retool a farming aircraft for strikes to replace the A-10. "Dusty Crophopper... Rolling in hot!!" You can't make this shit up!! Development is a joke, recruiting is a joke. Do you know the definition of insanity?? It's to do incredibly stupid shit, over and over again and expect the same results.
@andrewreynolds4949
@andrewreynolds4949 Месяц назад
@@Christopher-li6gg Do you know how engineering development works? It's an iterative process, building on previous work to improve it. The V-22 is only a 2nd-generation tiltrotor; It has massive performance advantages over existing aircraft capabilities, which is what has driven the hype, but it does have issues. The V-280 is the third generation of tiltrotor aircraft, and they've had plenty of time to examine the problems. Along with fixing the engines in place, the requirements for the V-280 mean they've dispensed with the rotating wing, which I suspect is the root cause for most of the design issues on the V-22. The V-280 still has 6 prototypes to go through before it reaches service production, it's absolutely not ready yet. But the next one starts intensive army testing next year, and I'm very excited to see how it performs. The actual plan to replace the A-10's role is a combination of helicopters like the Apache, and strike drones as seen in Ukraine. The A-10 is outdated enough now that a cropduster wouldn't be that much of a downgrade, but it's not worth actually spending money on...
@Christopher-li6gg
@Christopher-li6gg Месяц назад
@andrewreynolds4949 Yes, I understand engineering, as I don't need your ongoing explanation, as I understand why. I know the position of the V-280 and its development, I just said it looks like a pile of absolute shit!! The Defiant was a much better choice, but as the Pentagon marches on, they choose the worst piece of crap possible, as they always do,. The Pentagon being the biggest joke of all. Pumping out crap, just so they can say, look how cutting edge this is?? lmfao... The F-35 has an extremely poor reliability rate, as aircrews don't have the ability to fix the aircraft when they break. As the F-35 also has technology and hardware issues, in keeping the aircraft upgrades. Oh.... Then let's not forget most pilots aren't even trained in close air support. As far as the A-10, it's still a reliable aircraft, the only reason the Air Force wants it gone is so they can put their money behind the garbage that they are pumping out now. There's also the fact that the Air Force is short by two thousand pilots, I'm sure they will find a way to screw that up as well, and make it worse.
@antonkirov1923
@antonkirov1923 Месяц назад
@@Christopher-li6gg, if you understand engineering, you should understand several reasons why Defiant is very bad idea. Both schemes are bad
@nathanthanatos3743
@nathanthanatos3743 22 дня назад
AI generated trash
@JohnreyBenid-zm4xo
@JohnreyBenid-zm4xo Месяц назад
Wow 👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏I love you America and american people 💛💛💛❤️❤️❤️❤️💪💪💪💪🫰🫰🫰🫰
@진형김-b5t
@진형김-b5t Месяц назад
공격헬기 수송헬기 모두 V280 으로 교체
@johnpennington7107
@johnpennington7107 Месяц назад
You'll never be able to land it in a jungle setting and it seems to be a big target.
@n3v3rforgott3n9
@n3v3rforgott3n9 28 дней назад
It is not much larger than the h60 and can fit in 3 of 4 sides of a box made around the h60. People love to overstate it's size.
@PedroLopez-bj6hq
@PedroLopez-bj6hq 29 дней назад
Needs a tail propeller rotor
@Justin-dy2ib
@Justin-dy2ib 17 дней назад
Why?
@CaptainKedah
@CaptainKedah Месяц назад
too many moving Parts
@n3v3rforgott3n9
@n3v3rforgott3n9 Месяц назад
What do you think Helicopters are...
@antonkirov1923
@antonkirov1923 Месяц назад
Too many moving parts for transferring huge power. V-22 has 10 synchronizing shafts. In V-280 are added two angle gear boxes. 14000 hp for 14 troops🤨
@n3v3rforgott3n9
@n3v3rforgott3n9 Месяц назад
@@antonkirov1923 Double the speed and over double the range...
@antonkirov1923
@antonkirov1923 Месяц назад
@@n3v3rforgott3n9, typical manipulations. Speed - ok. But range of helicopters are very wide. S-92 has around 1000 km against 1600-1700 V-22. And S-92 is very safe and much cheaper. And now the question is - what for we need the range 1700 km?
@n3v3rforgott3n9
@n3v3rforgott3n9 Месяц назад
@@antonkirov1923 You can't even get the numbers correct... not only is the S-92 not a light utility aircraft but the Valor has a ferry range of 3900 KM. Also the S-92 New is 32 mil... Almost like you can do a full combat load into Taiwan from multiple locations or into Korea from Japan and so on. Range is a MASSIVE factor in logistics and troop movement.
Далее
V-280 Valor - The future Black Hawk
16:06
Просмотров 348 тыс.
"Когти льва" Анатолий МАЛЕЦ
53:01
V-280 Valor Helicopter Will Help Defeat China
16:06
Просмотров 695 тыс.
Inside The New Marine One
10:09
Просмотров 756 тыс.
"Когти льва" Анатолий МАЛЕЦ
53:01