Best High Resolution Full-Frame Cameras (Canon EOS R5, Sony a7R IV, Nikon Z7 II, Panasonic S1R) 

Most accurate description I've seen lol

the new Nikon is actually decent for video now ;)

Pretty much spot on

@@CsendesMarkThey have added 4k60p otherwise it is exactly the same as before, no internal Log and limited to 8-bit internal E.g. a very minor upgrade as the pricing and model naming would suggest.

Bought one in December, to replace my 2014 D810 and gotta say; really loving it ! And loved the fact that they kept the ergonomics pretty much the same as older F-mount (you miss a dedicated AF mode selector+button & metering button but you can remap them to FN 1,2 or the record button in stills mode) dSLR's. Made the switch to mirrorless very easy.

Not with these SONY fan boys. So biased its laughable

@@richardgorski23 I would love to jump on to Z system someday. Currently I'm doing most my still work on D750. and use a7III for all video work. I like the HLG from Sony and it seems to color grade better for me. Stills from D750 still have the color and the tone that works better for me most of the time. Perspective from food/portrait photography

I have to wait.... I would love to jump on the Z7II boat but the auto-tracking isn't there yet.

Same

"Ecosystem" or even better "native ecosystem" should be a category for sure. A body isn't useful without glass and it's best served by native glass.

@@IanHobday honestly, some of the non-native Sony glass is better than the native stuff. Same for EF Canon glass. But I mentioned lens variety to include more affordable options because not many people are willing to spend 2k per native mount lens just because that's the only option in a given focal length. Canon's 50mm 1.2 is great but it's not the right choice for most people. They'd be better served by a cheaper, smaller 1.8 or something

@@vikmanphotography7984 By "native" I mean using the native protocols, not reverse engineered. Sony licenses their mount and protocols to Tamron and Sigma which is one of the reasons their E mount lenses are so awesome. The new Sigma 85/1.4 DG DN is a great example, I can't wait for them to bring out more DG DN primes!

@@IanHobday took Sigma a while but they managed to reverse engineer EF protocols really well towards the end. And idk what samyang/rokinon is doing in terms of licensing vs reverse engineering but *everything after their first few AF lenses work great (stay away from the 50 and 35 1.4 lenses)

@@vikmanphotography7984 The difference is that Canon and Nikon actively work against the 3rd party makers and try to break compatibility. This is why you see things like Sigma's USB dock and the USB ports in some lens mounts. They have to be able to upgrade firmware to maintain functionality. It's very anti-consumer for Canon and Nikon to behave like this and such a nice change to see Sony doing licensing deals. Samyang/Rokinon and Viltrox make some interesting stuff but the reliability isn't there yet.

The Sony has been down to $3k us for over 6 months now. Just saying.

Solid trash, that’s true.

As is Z6 II

@@cactus22minus1Solid trash, true. Thumbs up for this :)

@@thomastuorto9929 at that price it's really a no-brainer to go for the Sony. High res cameras are bought mainly for stills, and the Sony blows the competition out of the water.

14-30mm is not that sharp. It's nice and compact and light .

@@richardgorski23 It is very sharp, such a great lens.

I have the 24-70 f4 and I cannot say i´m impressed. My Canon RF 24-105 f4 is sharper. Dont know if its the autofocus of Nikon that isnt really as reliable.

@@bjure8111 My experience is very duodenum Different. My autofocus is very responsive and accurate with the 24-70mm f4 s with corner to corner sharpness.

@@mrsusan893 there may be some difference between copies, maybe I got unlucky this time, nevertheless it's sharp enough if I don't compare them side by side.

Downsample anything greater than 45mp and you get an even sharper image.

If I need to downsample the file I don‘t need it. In my opinion the pics of the Z7II are big, sharp and detaiiled enough. For professional Users the resolution might be important. I‘m Amateur...

@@lkjslkdjfglkjsldkfjl higher pixel count will not play nice with high iso noise.

@@silvere36 You're correct from what I have observed. ACR makes it worse since Nikon and Adobe don't work/talk together. It just means a little more post processing. Or when it matters use NX2 to convert to DNG heading to Lightroom. More than half the time I shoot JPG. Nikon's expeed6 has a great JPG engine. Noise reduction is still a tad too strong/soft on the Z7/Z7II.

And that's not even considering the lenses!

Go out and buy a 5Dm3 or something. Still fantastic cameras for still photography (less so for video) and can be had at great prices nowadays.

@@vikmanphotography7984 bro i even cannot afford a6100 LOL

@@dwisetyoaji5007 Then maybe stop torturing yourself with camera review videos until you can afford something. Practice with your phone in the interim.

@@dwisetyoaji5007 used A7II for around $500 and some vintage primes and you'd be set.

I enjoyed reading your comment.

Great and reassuring comment as a Pro Fuji XT4 user who is waiting for the Z7Ii to arrive any minute!

RIGHT

Yes I was going to say value would be a better proposition.... price of the bodies with a midrange zoom and 35mm prime would have been better IMO

Not just price, but lens availability, roadmap, and particular qualities. You’re not buying a camera, you’re buying a system. But Chris and Jordan know that very well, it’s just a much much harder/longer video to make, we’d probably be here for an hour watching that video 😵

Quality of lenses should also play a role which would swing back to Canon

Right, which really is a win for Sony (currently). The price to quality ratio is generally solid and the amount of third party options is massive. It won't necessarily be that way forever, but I think that's where it stands now.

Same here I got the S1R too!

Do you use its 187mp high res'mode? Does it cope ok when there's any breeze,

Out of interest, how useful is the high-res mode in the real world?

​@davothedon don't own the S1R but anything above 60mp is pushing the limits of what modern lenses can resolve, unless you are printing billboards it's not that useful

Listen to your heart :-)

some times we gotta ignore what heart says .. LOL

Nikon still a little behind the competition. Particularly with lightweight lenses.

Both are deceiving you ... :-)

@@steventhomas231 Nikon Z lenses are above competition. And for portrait photography Nikon Z AF is more than enough. For sports you'll need Sony A9 either way.

My reason would be Nikon because I have old Nikon AI lenses for my Nikon F3

Despite If you want to shoot birds

@@airb1976 Ok I never shoot birds, but I believe you when you say that (and it is not about lack of knowledge).

@@airb1976 no one ever shot birds with mirror less cameras before?

@@richrollin4867 Is it the Panasonic that has the flip out portrait screen ?

i shot 700+ raw with 25% battery remaining on Z6ii, EVF and LCD Mixed

Same. This always confused me. I get 1,500+ on my Z6 and Z6ii.

@@dylanjames2213 i think they have too high expectations with all camera, kind of unrealistic.. eye af, animal tracking.. may be nikon is a step behind than sony, but its just there second generation and sony had years of RnD witj time..

@@everydayfitness6605 I'd disagree as these are getting to the upper echelon of pro-sumer cameras so you have to begin nitpicking on all points. I love Nikon but you're also failing to realise that all the other companies have had time to reverse-engineer Sony's template of success and softwares, while Sony had to do most things from scratch. It would more surprising for brands like Canon and Nikon to not reduce the gap between them and Sony.

This is the same for all cameras though. The CIPA ratings are ridiculous and vastly underrate real world usage. I bought a Canon M6 Mk II for street photography and it's rated at about 320 shots, 250 with the EVF. I consistently get closer to 1600 shots and my record shooting birds in flight was 2106 shots. This is on a 1040mAh battery! So all the cameras tend to get much better battery life than the CIPA ratings.

b-b-but that's cinematic!

Awww.. now be a good boy and give them a BLJ😆

Jokes that only people of Asian descent can make for $200, heh.

@@AshleyPaul for *20$

Unbiased? What review did you watch?

@@richardgorski23 As it says right in my comment, Chris and Jordan's. Tony and Chelsea's review was biased drivel.

What are you shooting? I’m hesitant to go mirrorless as I’m shooting birds/wildlife... D7500 200-500 f/5.6

@@SolamenteVees Landscapes, sometimes casually my friends and my cat. I feel like having the EVF is great, I can zoom in to 100% using the viewfinder and check focus and also see the exposure I'm going to get, or if I disable exposure preview I can get a little better autofocusing performance. Many reviewers haven't mentioned that, but if you disable the exposure preview it gives a boost to af acquisition. Then of course you need to revert back to DSLR style of checking exposure, as you can't use the live histogram in the viewfinder in that mode either.

@@SolamenteVees Here's a sample photo taken at ISO 22800 with Lightroom noise luminance reduction at 30: nikosite.net/i/_NIH4735.jpg This is without reduction: nikosite.net/i/_NIH4735_no_noisereduction.jpg My old D7200 would look absolutely trash at that ISO :D

@@Noksus Thank! Eventually I will be forced to go mirrorless. Appreciate the input.

I don't know where this narrative comes from. Sony has third party support, Canon has the most innovative native lenses. Nikon is mostly offering slow, overpriced primes and with a smaller selection than the competition.

@@youknowwho9247 slow and overpriced? Do you use these lens or what? They are amazing, and you’d understand that if you used them.

@@youknowwho9247 The "narrative" comes from using the Nikon Z system. Nikon now has the Holy Trinity, and the 50/1.2S is superb and fast. The 1.8 primes more than hold their own by being in their own class. No one else comes close. Either you get it or you don't. The Z mount is Nikon's most important feature, and in a review like this, it's not even mentioned.

Yup, their lenses are already better than competition. All their z series lenses completely lack both LOCA and lateral CA

@@ych8312 Yes, not to mention sharpness edge to edge.

The problem with the GFX100 /100S is that literally only one lens (the 110mm) can resolve to match the sensor. All the other lenses are better on the 50MP GFX cameras.

It stands to reason if you are a Nikon guy go for the Nikon, if you are invested in Sony go for the Sony. Reviews bring views on RU-vid and I enjoy them, but just about any high resolution model from the major manufacturers are quite capable and the differences are splitting hairs. I will say the AF system on the R5 is pretty slick if you are into wildlife photography.

How is that a reasonable assessment? Nikon's mirrorless lens line-up is by far the worst of the big three. Sony has third party support, Canon offers great first party options. Nikon has a bunch of overpriced f/1.8 primes - and the worst 50 f/1.2 and worst 70-200.

@@youknowwho9247 "worst 50mm 1.2 and worst 70-200 2.8" Really? Those lenses are nothing short but EXCEPCIONAL, the only 70-200 that is on par with the Nikon y the Panasonic 70-200 f2.8.

You lucky I paid 3600€ whithout grip or 85 :(

panasonic s1r takes s1r good pictures like z 7ii. do you think that. I would like to buy it but i think z7ii is better

I Love that he kept that in! :-)

Yep, That Canon should have been recalled! DPReview are losing credibility here. The Northrups are still pushing the R5 too.. again, credibility issues and I’m wondering just how impartial this really lot are.

@@Spark010 , for canon to win they had to be biased against panasonic.

It is so bad many have returned. It overhears in photo mode also.

Even if you never use the 8k, the canon still has the best video. Oh wait, there is no point in arguing, you probably own a Sony a7III and think its the best thing ever lmao

Well, you can't go wrong with either option. But if you want to save some money. Go back to R6/R5 with the EF-RF adapter, all your EF lens will be very capable.

If you like SONY then these two fanboys are the ones to watch. Their Sony bias is laughable and is causing them to lose credibility.

What I find funny is when people talk about image quality of newer cameras. I bet if you put images side by side printed out I bet you could not really tell a difference. Out 10 photos you may get 4 right.

I'd go for the Fuji any day.

I’ve used the GFX50S for a while in our studio. Mostly fashion and make-up portraits. After a few months I returned to one of our full-frame systems (the A7RIV and now waiting for my Z7II). While the GFX50 has a very good image quality that is comparable to the A7RIV, it is a very different camera. Compared to these newest full-frame mirrorless cameras, it is quite big, heavy (gripped 5D) and a bit clumsy. The AF is very slow esp. in low light and eye-AF is useless. With a moving subject it often lags behind and focuses on eyelashes or cheekbones instead of pupils. I used it with the 32-64 and the 110 lenses, which are both excellent. The GFX works best in a studio or at location on a tripod and with static setups like portraits, product photos or landscape. In that sense it’s very similar to our Hasselblad H6. As said, in image quality the GFX50 can keep up with the A7RIV, but it is not visibly better unless you print man-sized high. For that you need the GFX100. However for general purpose a full-frame mirrorless camera is definitely more flexible and easier to work with. We now use the GFX50 with an 120 macro lens for our product photography (perfume bottles, lipsticks et cetera). For that it’s perfect...

you right, but A1 has very very high price tag comparing to the tested cameras.

Agreed. Some of these are way off. Noooo one likes Sony's ergonomics...

Ergonomics is heavily influenced by personal taste. I find the ergonomics of most mirrorless cameras awful, much prefer my D850. The Z bodies feel quite bad to me, the Panasonics in particular but also the Canons feel much nicer. My wife on the other hand would disagree. She prefers a smaller camera, so she might choose the Nikon. What they're based their decision on is the objective differences that exist beyond personal taste. The Nikon does lack in some of the areas where the cameras which placed higher shine.

My daughter begged me for a Sony. We took it back the very next day...

@@youknowwho9247 I have the D850, Z6, D7500, and a D4 My D850 stays in my hands...

@@LMoProVisualComm It's a fantastic camera, I agree.

Flippy screens satisfy RU-vidrs narcissistic tendencies. They forget that not many photographers or even videographers want to photograph themselves.

That’s why I have a flippy screen camera and a tilt screen. Two different styles completely.

Nikon will probably be out of business by then.

And how did you come to that conclusion? What testing did you do to make such a ridiculous claim? It’s ok to be a fanboy but please don’t be delusional.

@@ILoveFishCuzImAcat I didn't come to that conclusion; the experts who conducted the objective tests did. It's okay to be ignorant, just don't open your mouth and reveal your ignorance.

@@mugdays what experts????? You clearly said they missed a big category which was lenses. So who are the experts who say that Nikon lenses are better than Canon and Sony glass???? Please help with my obvious ignorance.

@@mugdays I'd love to have a citation of those expert opinions. As far as I can see, the consensus among all reputable sources is that Nikon is behind Canon and Sony in terms of their lens line-up. Both of them have more glass to choose from, Canon's is now innovative and Sony's is now economical thanks to third party support. S line glass on the other hand is mostly known for its lack of availability...

@Shah Mohammad Sharafat when you tell the truth your a fanboy??? Lol ok guy