Best Medium Format Cameras? What's yours? Also taking 8 frames on a Fuji 6x9 Camera. 

Thanks everyone for your interesting and educational comments and input to the video. It's great to read what people are shooting especially some cameras I have never heard of before and had to google them! Appreciate it. I think anyone looking to get into Medium Format or looking for a different Medium Format camera there is enough here for them to read. Cheers!

My weapon of choice is a Mamiya 6V, a foldable range finder camera from 1953. It fits into my jacket pocket and it has traveled with me all over the world in the past two years. It's not as cheap as other folders but the image quality of it's Olympus lens is fantastic. My camera has got a new bellows and a service and it still works as good as seventy years ago. I've shot dozens of rolls through it and it never let me down. Somehow I doubt that my new digital camera will work that smooth in 2095...

The Pentax 67 was my first medium-format camera. Later I tried many more things - Hasselblad, Rolleiflex, Fuji 6x9, Mamiya RZ67. But Pentax is one camera to rule the world! The best combination of price, picture quality and ease of use

Back in the 1950s my mother, a photographer, which on her job used large format cameras, took privately 6x6 pics. She made contact prints of them, not having an enlarger, and put them into a photoalbum. I still use medium format, not only because of childhood memories, but because of with digital cameras the barrier of resolution had been raised, and medium format can still keep up with digital. I also love the results of large format 4x5, but the handling is just so cumbersome, and using roll film is more convenient. I use a Rolleiflex, a Yashica Mat, a Fujica 690, a Fuji 645 zi, and a Pentacon Six. Each camera has its virtues, but the 6x9 format is of course the greatest. Just looking at pictures shot with slide film is an experience of its own! I do not use the typical studio cameras -- remember the film "Blow-up" from 1966. He uses the medium format in his studio and walks around with his Nikon 35mm. That's how it was at that time. (Had he used a medium format camera as walk aorund camera, maybe his blown up pics had been given him a better clue on what had happened...)

To me, nothing beats the Pentax 67 😮

I have sold all my 35mm film kit and film. My MF kit is this. 2 x Hassleblad 500 c/ms shared 80, 120 and 150 lenses. 907x with CFV II 50c with 45mm lens,digital that i can use on the 500's 35mm is all covered with Canon R6. Film is FP4+ and Delta 400. I now have a solid and good 6x6 film workflow in my shed. Fun times.

I love the sharpness, the huge negatives, the way it slows you right down.

I have a number of large format cameras. Pentax 67, Rolleiflex D ( I think), lots of folders and a Voigtlander Bessa RF from 1936. Absolutely love the Voigtlander, so small and solid for a 6x9. The Pentax is a beauty but too heavy, same for the Rolleiflex. I had a Fuji 690IiI, lovely but too big. Shoot mostly 35 mm though and mostly Rollei 35 SE. Fabulous, small and trustworthy.

The new Mamiya 6 with the leaf shutter 50mm, 75mm and 150mm lenses.

Hello, I know medium format longer than 35mm film because I took my first photograps with a voigtlaender 6x9 box camera when I was seven years old. Lateron I switched to 35mm, but never forgot 120 film. I use 24x36 for my daily work and 120 format during holudays and weekends to calm down. I do own a collection of several simple folding cameras. I really use a Zeiss Ikon 6x6, a Rolleiflex Automat from 1950, a Hasselblad 500 ELX from 1989 (leading back to the moon cameras from 1969) and a very very slow Voigtlaender "Bergheil" 6,5x9 plate camera with big and dark screen, modified with a rollfilm back 6x9. It takes uo to one hour to take a single photo and it really slows you down. I also own and have used a Yashica Mat 124 G but the pics where not as sharp and accurate as those shot with the older Rolleiflex. Let me add a hint: the Pentacon Six was an east german camera. And if you use Zeiss lenses: after world war II Zeiss was divided up: Carl Zeiss Jena in east germany and Zeiss Oberkochen in west germany.

Just got a FujiFilm GX680… the beast. Fantastic camera, fantastic lenses, front standard movements and accessories for not much money. Keeps you fit too.

My father passed down his Bronica ETRS to me around 1999 or 2000. I still shoot that. I picked up a Pentax 645 n II a couple years ago and I shoot with that as well. Every now and then, I'll shoot the Holga 120n. I do wish I never sold my Yashica Mat 124G.

Thanks for the video. Very well done! I started in photography in 1977 and moved up to my first Yashica Mat 124 around 1984. About 10 years later I worked as an aerial photographer where I was required to shot sites with a Pentax 6X7. I loved that great big camera but also HATED loading film in between sites while flying the airplane.

My tops I own: - Mamiya RZ Pro II - Hasselblad 500CM - Mamiya C33 - Pentacon Six TL - Franka Salida III - Rolleiflex Automat....and some more ;-)

I have been shooting medium format since I was 5-years old. I did not shoot small format until I was a teenager. I was an adult when I started shooting large format. Over the decades, I owned and used the following medium format film cameras: 6x6cm 6x7cm 6x9cm 6x12cm No view finder Optical view finders TLR SLR Rangefinder Folding Ansco Yashica Mamiya (C3, C22, C220) RB67 Fuji (GW670 and GSW690) Diana Holga Kodak Bullet Kodak Brownie Zero Image pinhole I have never shot 645. I have not yet shot medium format digital.

My stuff: - AGFA Isolette II - AGFA Clack - Zeiss Ikon Nettar - Flexaret - Bronica 2Sa - Rolleiflex 3.5 - Pentacon Six - ... Not in order of preference :))

The Rolleiflex SL66 with its Carl Ziess reversible lenses and front tilt make this camera pretty unique in medium format

Generally speaking I'm a 35mm shooter, using exclusively Pentax SLRs from the late 70s. But when I shoot 6x6, I get out my clunky old behemoth Pentacon six TL. Love that thing to bits. And those Car Zeiss Jena MC lenses (of which I have 3) are absolutely fantastic. Tack sharp optics combined with huge negatives give you extremely pleasant results, especially when using slide films...

My favorite for 50 years now is ofcourse de RB67....

Late reply here. I have used my dad's old Yashica 12 since I was a kid, still uses it after he passed some 14 years ago, got it fixed and now it is ready for another 50 plus years. I am also looking to get a Fuji rangefinder, plus one of those old German folders...I love 120 film!

Zeiss Ikon Nettar was also my first medium format camera. A gorgeous piece of kit and a really sweet lens ..

Used quite a few for various projects. Really liked the Rollei 6008, though it’s heavy. Still have my most ergonomic camera, the Bronica RF645 rangefinder. That’s surprisingly compact. Projects on the RF645 were usually shot four shots per sequence, up to a total of sixteen shots per 120 roll.

I use a Mamiya 645 Pro TL with 3 lenses (150, 80, and 55) and 2 backs. I stitch 4 images together for panoramas (4 images gives an almost 100Mb file so it is about the maximum my computer will manage). I shoot mainly Ektar 100, Hp5, and Delta 100. Because of the weight of all the gear I usually use it in locations I can drive to. I develop and scan at home.

Mamiya C3 - love it. I flew over your house on Wednesday on a flight from St John's to Gatwick. I waved. 🙂

I have many medium format cameras, which is not to say I shoot them a lot. Mostly because I'm lazy. And when I do, I do it sparingly to help minimize cost.I have 6 TLRs, the Fuji 6x9, Pentax 6x7, a Bronica etrs, and 4 folders. I love medium format. I'm like you in that I've really come to appreciate the square format.

I currently have 4 cameras in the bag. 2x 6x6, the RolleiCord 1a (FP4) and Seagull 4B (Portra 160) and 2 6x9, both Voightländer, from 1929 (fomapan100) and from about 1950 (Ektar 100). A separate camera with its own atmosphere for every situation.

I have had four all together. Shot my Mamiya RB 67 for years in my portrait studio. I then went to a Hasselblad 503 Cxi for a few years. Now I shoot my 503 CW and I have a Minolta Autocord TLR with a brilliantly sharp 75mm lens. Hands down the Hasselblads are my favorites. I really do not like shooting a TLR I have learned.

Being able to get larger apertures at wider FOVs, for that extra shallow vibe. I do a lot of bokehramas on full frame to get that same look. Essentially emulating a larger sensor, giving you that wider FOV.

I love medium format. My arsenal includes, in order of my favorite first, Bronica GS-1, Zeiss Super Ikonta 531/2 (6x9, 6x4.5), and my Yashica Mat.

I shoot a Kiev 6C and have a full complement of lenses for it. The spectacular Zodiak 30mm f3,5 fisheye, a 45mm wide angle, a 55mm shift lens, the 50mm Zeiss flektogon f4, The standard 80 mm f2.8, the sonnar 180 f2.8 and a meyer orrestor 300mm f4. I like medium format because of the smooth out of focus and the high quality of the negatives and photos. Also it makes me think about the shot I'm about to take instead of the machinegun approach with 35mm or digital. And there is nothing wrong with the Pentacon six, It is a great system with fantastic lenses and still on this side of sanity price wise. Oh and i is an EAST German camera not West.

Have bought a few over the last 10 years or so before film took off again along with the prices. Included in my collection are the Hasselblad 500, Pentax 6x7 (non MLU) Mamiya C330, Mamiya RB67, Yashica 124G, Bronica ETRS and my favourite to shoot with is the Zenza Bronica S2A.

My two favs from my medium format cameras are the Kodak 66 Model III for travel as its only 600g and produces great sharp images, and the beautiful Kiev 88CM which is always a pleasure to shoot with the stunning view through the WLF. I just love the 6x6 format!

I own a Pentax 645n and I love it. It is fun to use, some of the lenses are great, and I like the way the photos look if I do a good job. I also own a whole flock of medium format pinhole cameras and think they are great. Finally, I have a Zeiss Nettar as well. I love the look of those images as well. I keep wanting one of the Fuji 6x9 but have not yet made the leap. I love the boat house photo and it makes me think about buying it again.

I have a Fuji G617, GSW 690III, Hasselblad Super Wide and a few others. The ones I shoot the most, and my favorites are all Holgas.

Yes. I shoot Bronicas. ETRS (6x4.5),SQ-Ai (6x6) and GS-1 (6x7). I use them for whole feeling of doing it slower, more carefully.

My one and only medium format camera: Mamiya C330. Love the images it produces. Love the super stealthy leaf shutter. Love how it slows me down even more than 35mm. My grail camera though would be a Hasselblad 500CM.

Voigtlander Perkeo II . The only 6x6 that will fit in your top pocket!

Glunz-Kamera 6x9 bellows with a Meyer Trioplan. My grandfather liberated it at El Alamein and it still works and fits in any bag I happen to have MPP 4x5 with a 6x12 120 back - 6 beautiful semi panoramic shots with either a 90mm Super Angulon 6.8 or Symmar 135 5.6 - a totally different way of looking at the world C330 - its square and slows your thoughts M645 super - least used but a nice change from 35mm The one that got away Rollei 6008 with a 40mm FLE distagon the sharpest landscapes you will ever take. Sold when I wasn’t using as much as I should have been in the late 90s. May be as a retirement present to myself in a couple of years.

Love my Mamiya 645 Pro and M645. Superb cameras. And, incidentally, with 'blad 6x6 trannies, as an Art Director, almost all shots were masked to either portrait or landscape, wasting lots of the pic. Very rarely could use a square image. That's why 6x4.5 is such a useful format. Use portrait or landscape. And you get a few more pics per roll too!

OK, why I shoot medium format. Really simple... I have a passion for analog film cameras. I have a Nikon F, FA, FE2... also a Zeiss Ikon Contessa. Several years ago, I was able to purchase a Mamiya M645 1000 S and a Mamiya RB67. Each has several lenses. Really fun to take them out from time to time. I also have 2 4x5 cameras. Really enjoy analog take your time cameras. Cheers.

I have a beautiful Rolleicord TLR with different sized frame inserts - thankfully I was able to get it CLA'd last year and it works like a dream. The ground glass is quite bright and once you get used to EV settings its very easy to use.

Having tried all the medium format, i ended up with the ETRS and the Pentak 67. That was back in my film days. All i have now are a couple of Yashicas, a 635, 124g.

I've just done a quick check, and well, there are quite a few cameras! I too really like the (East German!) Pentacon 6TL and I've got a collection of lenses to go with it, including the Arsat fisheye. I've got the older Fujica GL690 with the 65mm and 100mm lenses. And a collection of 6x6 and 6x9 folders, along with an early 1900s Kodak No 2C Autographic that I've (reversibly) modded to take 120 film. The folders are really good as you can carry them around all day.

I own three medium format cameras. I love medium format over 35mm for a few reasons - resolution being the main one, secondly I find it easier to work with as far as developing goes. For some reason I have a lot less troubles loading the film into my spools. I own a like new condition Fuji GS645w and love it - despite it feeling like it is going to implode every time I use it. I have a Bronica EC that took a fair amount of work to get reliable but now that I have everything fixed on it (except the battery light.....grrrr.) I rather enjoy 6x6. The first medium format I bought - and still my favorite though is the original model Pentax 645. For the money, reliability, and image quality it is an amazing camera that I think should be on everyone's list.

I have used personally and professionally: RB67 (sold), Hasselblad 500cm (keep), Rolleiflex 6008 Integral (love), Zenza Bronica SQAi (keep), Fuji GX680iii (love). No one seems to know about the Rollei 6008 Integral and the Fuji GX680iii because they appeared at the tail end of the film era, but they are by far the most technically proficient medium format film packages and a pleasure to use.

For me the allure of MF was the waist level finder that's fairly common. I started with a cheapish TLR camera, which is a great place to start. I myself started with a ikoflex, wich I still hang onto. Nowadays my two babies are the Hasselblad 2003 fcw (main MF-camera), and Rolleiflex 3.5 ( for street/urban). Great little overview video of medium format and the different formats.

Hi. I'm Bill Ward from Glasgow. I have Nettar plus various other medium format stuff, but I highly recommend Mamiya TLR cameras. They focus closer and take interchangeable lenses. A C220 is the best value for money, and slightly lighter in weight.

My absolute favorite is my RB67 Pro S, but I also have the Pentax 67 ( incredible lenses ), and the Mamiya 645 Pro, which is probably the easiest camera I own to shoot and gives great results.

Rollei SLX, the OG, although I love the 6000 series too... 😍

To put a digital perspective on the difference in image quality between medium format and 35mm, consider this. By subjectively comparing the resolution of a 35mm colour image with variously cropped images of the same scene taken on a 36 megapixel digital camera (while using very sharp lenses for both) I concluded that the 35mm format provides the equivalent to around 4 megapixels. This would equate to approximately 2400 x 1600 pixels if it were a digital sensor. Printing this at 200 dots per inch results in a photo which is roughly A4 size and one in which the pixelation or grain are just invisible when viewed at the normal arms length distance. Moving to the 6 x 9 centimetre format (which is actually 84 x 56mm compared with the 35mm's 36 x 24 mm) provides 5.5 times the negative area and hence the equivalent of 22 megapixels. A print or dislay screen size of A2+ is therefore possible before grain is apparent at the same arms-length viewing distance. In the digital camera world, 22 Mp is a professional level of resolution and, when shooting Kodak Gold 200 on a Fujica GL690, that is the way the images look! Compared with even the best of 35mm output, 6 x 9 is a very different ball game for IQ and is worth the extra expense if you want output that is much bigger than photo album-size. And, as you say, the Fujica 6 x 9 cameras, while being almost comically large, are not all that heavy and they are smooth and quiet in operation and the rangefinder focussing is generally dependable and includes automatic parallax compensation in the viewfinder. Also, they are pretty affordable compared with many of the popular alternatives, plus the lenses are top notch. So this is a shout-out for Fuji 6 x 9 since it is rather overlooked.

If you ask me, I have to go with the RB67. It creates somehow a good medium for massive modification like I turn it into a great 35mm panoramic camera with a lot of help with 3d print

Pentax 67 is my queeeeeen.

Absolutely brilliant as usual. I own and prefer the RB67 over the RZ67 no battery to worry about, I use a Sekonic L-28c2 meter again no battery, my RB has the 140mm macro lens with Ilford pan F the results are astonishing. I would have also given a honourable mention to the 1990’s Mamiya 6 and the c220/c330. The Mamiya 7 you featured is a fantastic camera but becoming extremely expensive. I love medium format and your list was as good as it gets👍.

Now that was a great overview! I started medium format when I was a teenager with my father's Rolleiflex 3.5 "Automat" from the 1930ies. It still shoots great photos as long as you do not shoot into the light with the uncoated lense. Currently I mainly use a Bronica S2A from around 1970 with some excellent Nikkor lenses. But this is ridiculously heavy. Therefore, I got me a Voigtländer Perkeo II, which is said to be the smallest medium format folding camera. Fits in your pocket. This one I take with me to the top of the mountains, the Bronica only once.

80% medium format-Hasselblad 501cm , 50/80/100/150 mm. portraits, landscape, still (prints for sale, calendars) 20% 35 mm - Olympus OM1 50, 35 mm . Street B/w film -Ilford (fp4, hp5, delta), fomapan 200, 100 Color (not often) portra160

Great vid as always boss! Quick correction: The Rolleiflex TLRs don't feature interchangeable lenses (the Mamiya C series do). Like the Yashicas you can buy adapters for the Rolleis (I think) but the lens itself is fixed. The f are kinda the most sought after, but you can often get stuff like the 2.8/3.5 C/D/E for a good bit less and the Tessar Rolleiflexe/Rolleicords for a lot less. Still a touch premium but not the 2.8F White Face prices at least. I love and predominantly shoot medium format. Just something about the way it looks when the exposure/development goes well makes me glee. It helps that I find it easier to develop and scan 120 since you don't have such a long roll. Personal recommendation: The best beginner 120 (at least for 6x6) camera is a good condition TLR (a Yashica, Ricoh etc whatever). I like folders but I don't think they teach you composition with the different aspect ratio well at all because those small viewfinders are always a fair bit of guess work so you never truly know where the edges of your frame is. With a TLR or SLR you know exactly what you are including in the image so imo it teaches you better in thinking square. Also when it comes to folders, I personally think the lighter simpler ones may have held up better. My heavy as a brick Super Ikon may be nice but it sure is a pain to use and it's finicky now due to its complexity. I bet most Nettars have held up a touch better. (I think the Mamiya 6 is the perfect combo of weight and features. It is the best 6x6 folder imo) I should make a video someday but here are my off the top format recommendations: 6x4.5: The Mamiya/Pentax 645s as you said and also the Bronica ETRS (which I think is more of a competitor for the Mamiya/Pentax then a Hassy) are reasonable for what you get though the latest AF versions of the Mamiya/Pentax are quite pricey. The Fuji rangefinders are not too overpriced either but a touch more and the AF Fujis are pricey but easy to use. Old folders are super cute but again the viewfinders can be a bit hit and miss. My favorite 6x45 is my Broncia RF645. It is pricey and not great value with a very limited lens collection, but it is easily my most reliable highest quality camera. I always use my RF645 if I just want to shoot film easily (metering etc) and just want the highest likelihood of a good photo. 6x6: The Bronica SQ is a good alternative to the Hassy at like half the price. Not cheap but good value. The older Bronica S series is even better price wise though you exchange the leaf shutter for a curtain so less good flash sync. I think the Kowa Six is also a great value SLR (as long as you don't go for the 2 unicorn lenses on it). Only issue with stuff like the Kowa and to a lesser extent the Bronica is they weren't imported in high numbers so you gotta do that importing yourself now. Not a biggy but higher customs, less availability of certain accessories etc. Funnily enough another alternative to the Hassy are the Rollei SLRs but the SL66 costs as much as a Hassy. The newer more automatic SLX is probably a touch cheaper though it is chonky and needs battery adapters irc. Wish I could justify/afford a Mamiya 6 (the electronic one not the folder). From my understanding it probably has the best 6x6 lenses ever made and is super portable too. That all said I think the best beginner 6x6 is a functioning TLR. Just so much fun too to use one. 6x7: Honestly the priciest format (cough Mamiya 7). Most get a Pentax 67 and the folk with a studio or big muscles such as yourself go RB/RZ. I think the Bronica Gs-1 is great and slightly lighter albeit with less lens variety. I think the most affordable option for someone who wants to dip their toes into 6x7 would be something like the Koni-Omega rangefinders. The 6x7 versions of the Fuji Texas Leicas can work too but it kinda feels like a waste of the big camera haha. I have a love/hate relationship with my Gs-1, but when the photos come out...they really come out. Super optics on that system. 6x8: Not many: just a version of the Texas Leica , the humongous but super versatile Fuji GX680 and also a back for the Mamiya RB. I think for most folk a 6x4.5 camera is a better get but 6x8 is definitely a neat format. 6x9: Even though I like the negative size, I think it is kinda not ideal to go for 6x9 cameras. Beyond the Fuji G690s there aren't many newish 6x9 cameras and the SLRs in this format are extremely esoteric/old. Also if someone uses a darkroom, there aren't many enlargers that do 6x9 (but aren't big enough to do 4x5 too). And in the darkroom you will probably crop the negative (or give it a big border) to fit the common paper sizes too so feels a touch wasteful. I think old 6x9 folders can be incredibly fun though and recommend everyone at least try one. HUGE fan of my Voigtlander Bessa II. It is one of my favorite cameras of all time but it is not cheap. My recommendation: Mamiya Press. It is huge and chonky but not pricey and very versatile. It will let you shoot all the smaller formats too and the lenses are often used in custom cameras and diy projects. 6x12/6x17/6x24: A back for LF cameras or a 3d printed cone camera are semi affordable. I think Chroma camera got some very versatile cameras in these formats. Otherwise the sky is quite literally the limit when you start poking around here. I will say that 6x17 pinholes are extremely neat (but expensive film wise).

My favourite is a Zeiss Ikon Nettar 515/2. I also have a Zeiss Ikon 517/16, a Seagull 4a tlr a couple of box cameras and a Horseman 6x9 back for my Speed Graphic.

I love the softer transition of the DOF that you get with medium format camera's, and still having a real sharp image in the center. My gear Pentacon Six (so I guess im also one of those freaks;) ) Mamiya 6K Pentax 645 Rolleiflex B tessar

I use a Ricoflex tlr camera from the 1960s. £60. The Rikenon 75mm f3.5 lens is really sharp. I have a pair of Rolleinar close up lenses for it.

I use a Fujica G690BL with a 100/3.5 and the Ondu Classic 6x9 pinhole. 8 shots is perfect, the negatives are huge, and using a stainless steel reel is (in my opinion) the best way to go!

I shoot medium format with the Zeis Ikon Nettar based on your recommendation from a long time ago and love it. I love that camera and paid to have it rebuilt, then purchased a second in case mine breaks. It is my goto for medium format.

Shoot Medium Format , on my 4x5 EBONY and Crown Graphic , also in my 2 Rollei's the Wide Rollei 55 mm F4 and MX-EVS 75mm 3.5

My problem is that I’d love to have a medium format camera for the sake of having it, but I absolutely have no justification for actually using it, because I dont need that high of a resolution at all! Still would love to have a nice folder

I had a very nice Bronica s2a with a Zenzanon 100mm f2.4 and I got to use this for a photo shoot of a friend and his dog. I shot on velvia astia 100 five pack and they used one for the book cover and posters. I used a etrs back when I was assistant photographer and the actual photographer himself used a Hasselblad 500cm. Incidentally the etrs can change format but this is only 35mm and 35mm panoramic. I believe there was a Polaroid back to. I tried out a MPP micropress with a 6×9 wista back. That was fun but very heavy to lump about in the countryside. One camera I have always fancied is a Mamiya 23 don't laugh. I know they are old but I like the quirkiness of it with the tilt rear standard. A rangfinder camera but can be used with a focusing screen back. The 6×9 really appeals! I had a work colleague who had a Penacon six and after work i would hang around his house until after dark and at a nearby location along with some firelighters take black and white time exposures of each other. The shots looks really unusual and spooky looking 😅

I have a mamiya c220 with a couple of lenses and a Franka rolfix ii. That is a foldable camera that can do 6x6 and 6x9. The franka is really fun I and it sometimes seems that the simple rodenstock lens is sharper than the mamiya lenses. If you can get it in focus of course that is not easy if you shoot something that is somewhat close. Oh yes and a lomography belair. That really makes massive 12x6 photos or on 35 mm it makes panoramas including the sprockets. That is also a fun play thing.

I have the following Ikonta Pearl ii 645 folding camera ,Moskva v 6x9 soviet made 6x9 folder and a Bronica SQAI kit complete with a motor drive, 3 lenses, a 36mm extension tube, 1.4x teleconvetor, dedicated flash, 4 backs, the electronic cable release for the motor drive, and 3 view finders.

Mines probably either the Voightlander Perkeo I, between the compactness, weight and the lens its a no brainer or the Franka Solida IIIa with the uncoupled rangefinder, got both cheap and both take excellent photos. I managed to pick up the Perkeo boxed which was nice but also bonkers given how old it is, even came with a roll of HP5 to test it!

Loved this,have a 645 Pentax with 4 lenses. Maungaturoto New Zealand.

I started with an Ansco speedex made by agfa haven't used it for a long time I've got five of those cameras. upgraded to the original Pentax 645 I have two of those I purchased each one of them under $300 they are quite heavy with the zoom lenses but I absolutely love them. also have several consumer 620 medium format cameras

First got into medium format with a Zeiss Super Ikonta, unfortunately the automatic film advance system is faulty but the seller offered me a refund and I bought a Rolleiflex 2.8C with Xenotar lens. It was fantastic for black and white but the original screen was very dim and difficult to nail the focus at wider apertures, just got the screen replaced and trying the result. The other one I got, also recent addition, is the Plaubel Makina 67. I always have a soft spot for rangefinders and folding cameras, and the modern optics compliment my Rolleiflex well when it comes to shooting colour. The 80mm focal length is most comfortable and natural to me, and the smaller number of frames per roll really suits me who shoots slowly and occasionally. I have been predominantly shooting medium format on film this year apart from a roll of 35mm which I really struggled to finish and a few occasions where I got a digital Leica on hand. The unusual look of my medium format cameras also helped convincing people to have their portraits taken and they are amazed by the look and the level of details in their images, an advantage I did not expect when I first got the cameras!

I have a Pentax 6x7 mu, a Rollei SL66 a Rollei 6003, all are really excellent cameras. In my view the Pentax lenses are every bit as good as the Carl Zeiss lenses on the Rollei cameras, but the Pentax lenses are much cheaper to buy, should make you think. Overall, I think the Pentax is the nicer camera to use at eye level. I used to use the Pentax for wedding photography and using it regularly, I got very fast at reloading it, however the convenience of the drop in film holders on the Rollei 6003 beats everything, even having six spare backs for the SL66. Most medium format cameras (excluding the cheaper older folders) are capable of stunning results, after all, they were made for professionals. While some of the Bronica lenses may have not been as sharp as they should have been, their last versions were very sharp. I really am not bashing Bronica here, many of their fan base will say the same. If had to pick one camera to keep, it would be the SL66, slower to use than either of the other two, no better picture quality but just so satisfying to play with. However, if I was mad enough to still be doing weddings, and silly enough in this day and age to use film for commercial assignments, then the Rollei 6003 would be the camera of choice. But for taking on holiday with me, then it would be the Pentax, less expensive if it gets damaged, easy to use and a wide range of lenses bought for very reasonable cost. Horses for courses.

Great video, shoot a lot of 35mm but also enjoy 120. I've an RB67 with a couple of lenses when I want a workout carrying it + tripod but the lenses are fantastic. I've also a Mamiya 645E. It's the electronic non-interchangeable anything version which a lot of people mock, but it's actually a very good camera with AE and lenses available are also excellent. Last is a Agfa Isola I antique - only one shutter speed, two apertures and a built in yellow filter and that's it. Got it with a job lot if old Agfa cameras and have to give it a go.

Fun Video! I have had great luck with a Rolleicord because they are lighter and small. The meters on Rollieflex models are okay if they work properly, but with a nice spot meter in hand I can do some creative zone system exposures and get negatives that are fun to print with nice results. It was fun to see your collection of cameras! Thanks!

I'm Team ETRSi. I think it's the best system for the money ($400+ for a kit) - it's the latest (90s-04) and most advanced 645 Bronica, everything is interchangeable across the ETR series, and 645 is the most economical way to shoot medium format.

Its great to see George 😊 I got into medium format and Large format in college I have RZ67, C330, Rollei old Standard, a Rolleicord. A few Nettars and Bessas, Lubritel B and of course Diana's/ Holgas, not forgetting a Box Brownie and the bakelite Brownies and a 120 1/2 frame Bencini Korol S camera, and a Belvue camera

I use a Mamiya 7 , Rolleiflex 3.5 , Mamiya RB 67 pro s and a Holga....fun and versatile collection

I love my two Mamiya 6 (modern edition), and the Fuji 690 iii, Rolleicord 3.5, YashicaMat 124G….

Got handed a Pentax 645 it's a great camera. My first was a Russian tlr. I also do love my koni-omega rapid 6x7. I like the resolution. I shoot mostly landscape but the occasional portrait.

I love medium format. I currently shoot 6x6, 6x7, 6x9 and 6x17! I typically use medium format for landscapes and portraits and I save 35mm for street and travel photography.

Zeiss icon netter, kiev88, Bessa 1.

I didn't know the Rolleiflex had interchangeable lenses... 17:17 Thanks for the heads-up

I shoot medium format, because I want to! . As for cameras, my first one was a Yeshica mat LM that I like the feel of using but the taking lens isn't in the best of conditions. Then I got my Bronica EC which I love but my favorite is a Kodak model 66, easy to use, takes great pictures and isn't like carrying around a brick in your camera bag.😂😂

I have shot only medium format since 1994 when I purchased a Hasselblad 503CX. I now have the 503CX and added to it a Flexbody , 903SWC and 907X. Mainly shot Delta 100 but have discovered a renewed love for FP4+. In addition to the larger negative which provides more information, 120 film has a much lower film base plus fog than 35mm, thus providing a greater dynamic range.

I have used Medium format since the 70's when I shot weddings on a Bronica S2A 6x6, I now have quite a collection of all sorts of different formats. My medium format gear is Pentacon 6 Kiev 60 Kiev 80 Bronica SQAi Mamiya 6x7 Mamiya Automat 6 Pentax 645 Nii Yashicamat 124G Hassleblad 500CM Kodak Junior Kodak Sterling Ensign Selfix Kodak Auto graphic. Zeiss Icon Nettar As well as 5 large format Camera's, I shoot on the all through out the year.

My 120 collection, working: Daiichi Zenobia 645C 75mm f 3.5, a couple of Ikon Nettar 6x6, GW 690ii, Flexaret Va TLR; needing some love: Super Ikonta 6x6, Ikon 6x9 f3.5, pre-war Ikon 645 and 6x9. Canon A-1 bought in '85, digital Canon R50

I have the Fuji GW690iii, RB67, and a Rollieflex 3.5. I probably shoot the fuji the most but have been shooting the RB again lately. I prefer the bigger negatives, less scanning.

I got my hands on a Rolleiflex TLR made in 1954 and still works and it is lovely to look at too.

The one that you have is the best. Go out and snap some photos. If you don’t have one yet, Pentax, Mamiya, Fuji, etc all made great equipment. I prefer 6x9, it allows you crop down if you want.

Folders are the best for me for usability and image quality. I think it is the best deign that was ever done in photogrpahy alongside the barnack.The Agfa Super isollette is easily the best I have used but I am not a fan of 6x6, if they only made a super record......would have been the king of folders. The Bessa II is the only one I currently use. Amazing quality, easy to use, 6x9, and fits right in my pocket.

When the lure of film calls to me I have three cameras I absolutely love and will keep forever. An Ebony SV45 4X5 coupled with a Rodenstock 135mm lens; A Rolleiflex Hy6 Mod2 along with a Schneidner 90mm Makro, Schneider 50mm and Rolliei 80mm lenses. The third is my Fuji GF670 rangefinder. Using these cameras is a total pleasure.

One of my favourite formats, I have a couple of TLRs, a couple of Pentax 6x7s, a couple of 6x9 folders and a Bronica ETRSi. Great for when you want reasonably portability but better quality.

Bronica S2A because it’s a mechanical work of art. Mamiya C220/C330 because they are rugged, reliable and easy to fix.

I have all the film format cameras. Some grom compact 35 mm to 35mm SLR s, Mamiya Super, Pentacon 6, Voigtlander bessa ıı, Mamiya RB67pro SD, Mamiya standart 6x6 back. As a collection. But I shoot film too.

Just getting acquainted with a bronica gs-1, after ahooting film almost exclusively this last year, I said why not go bigger? Love the slower pace of film photovraphy.

i use a Bronica ETRS and Minolta auto cord tlr 6x6 i like using these two if you only want to take a few shots etrs 15 autocord 12 you don't have to take 36 photos on 35mm.

I prefer medium format, it just gives nicer negatives. The bigger the better in my opinion. My most used camera is the Mamiya M645 1000s with the 35, 55, 80, 150 and 210mm lens). I also got - Mamiya M645j - Mamiya C22 and C220 - Yashica 635 - Mamiya Press Super 23 - Fujica GW690 - A whole bunch of medium format bellow camera's like the Zeiss Ikon Nettars an Ikonta's - a lot of medium format box camera's - Rolleicord IV - a few medium format pinhole camera's - and a bunch of simple camera's like the Agfa Click, Clack and some bakelite from various manufacturers. With other words, I've got too many camera's.

Great video. I got into medium format with an Agfa Isolette i with a Medis rangefinder. Cheap and cheerful, but great images.

used to have a voightlander bessa ii, color helia lens. Now have a Mamiya C3

I use a Yashica-Mat LM and occasionally a Holga, but mostly 35mm.

I started with a Bronica ETRSi, and that hooked me on 120. I love the increased resolution and, for me, the fewer shots/roll is a bonus. It takes me forever to get through a roll of 35mm. These days I’ve settled on 6x6 as my format of choice. I use a Mamiya 6 for travel and a bit of street. I’ve got a Hasselblad 501CM for when I’m feeling more artsy and want to do a bit of landscape/urban landscape. And I’ve got a Pentax 6x7 (MLU) because, well, just because. The Mamiya is by far my most used. It’s compact, easy and quick to use, and all three lenses are just magnificent.