A $2k swing in a couple minutes proves significant volatility (i.e., large potential for big wins ....and big losses). You could wipe out fast with the second system.
Holy Grail 2.0 should be much safer with a smaller profit goal ($50 or $100) and than reset. When the bet gets realy high, it will eat your BR one day.
RM, After viewing the (New) Oscar's Grind a couple of times, I had an idea strike me. What if black, odd, 19/36, 3rd dozen and 2nd column are played and start the bets at $20 each with the $10 increase. I just ran it for 7 minutes on the sim and was shocked. I know I'll have to put in a few hours to see if it really bites me in the butt or not. But WOW, how fast it hit my daily modest money goal.
The second system is def High Risk High Reward. I would def reset (or at least half my bets) when close to profit goal if up to a high bet. One way to reduce the risk on the second system is to still bet 19-36 but bet the 2nd dozen instead of 3rd. This will cut the total jackpot numbers from 4 numbers to just 2 but hitting 13-18 will give you some money back instead of a possible total loss. Good job RM
TRM, for the second system by Daniel, you played, '19 to 36' - '3rd 12' and '2nd column'. It's a great system, but I feel that instead of using the '3rd 12', the chances of hitting 'jackpots' are increased if you opt for 'ODD' or 'EVEN'. The '3rd 12' has only 12 numbers, whereas, the 'ODD or EVEN' has 18 numbers, each. All the same, the chances of a total loss are lessened to a considerable degree. Would like to know your opinion, anyone? I tried it out and it worked great! Edit : Though I know that the '3rd 12' has 4 jackpot numbers in it's column and the ODD or EVEN has only 3 in each, the recovery is better all around. Gamble responsibly, guys ✌
Play 3-1 bets and adding an even bet red/black, 1-18 and etc, I noticed its great to win but ultimately the even bets bring DOWN the winnings. It’s like betting on 0 that never comes up. If I see 3 zeros within 15 minutes, but 7? I’m placing bets on 0,00 when I see that happen!! - Johnny Lee
I tried it with one dollar units and let it ride all the way to 1000 negative. I did better with $5 increments. I think my first experiment should have been abandoned on losing the bankroll .
Try this Mad One, 1 unit on 0 plus splits 1-4 7-8 3-6 10-11 14-17 18-21 24-27 26-29 28-31 34-35 32-35 33-36 Increase 1 unit hit or miss until profit target hit 50 units but never bet more than 10 units each. Stay at that max. If you feel it's to much coverage take off 32-35 you can always take another off too.
would have been much better in the end if you didn' t forget to bet before the 33 came...i think it is worth a try that 2nd system there is a possibilty of resetting after reaching a new alltime high or every 5 units profit...as you like and using a european roulette table could be helpful as well great system
If this is supposed to be Oscar’s grind then you should only increase on wins if you’re not in session profit and reset when you get session profit. You may not win as much but I think it’s safer against long losing streaks…
Here's a novel idea for the 2nd system...put a buck on the 0/00, and just increase it the same way. You'll still win money. You're gonna see the zeros if you're playing that long.
I never understand this mentality. The zeroes are no different than any other number. Putting a $1 on them does nothing more than putting money on any other uncovered number.
It's about feeling a sort of comfort, knowing zeros aren't a total disaster when they hit. I played them years ago as a safety net, only to discover, I really didn't need them. Nothing wrong in playing them, the fantasy will wear off.
Zero is just another number there’s nothing special .. he hit 31 (5x) he hit 0 (4x) he hit 00 (3x) he hit 33 (4x) .. a number is just a number .. yeah he could throw a chip on 0/00 but you could do that with any 2 numbers at any time.
'''''''' THE QUOTE OF THE DAY ''''''---------Oh! look at that,,,,that puts us down $ 4,900----- BUT THAT's OKAY,,.....we still have our bankroll of $10,000,,
Bankroll is important. With Bank Buster System Double Fibonacci I would recommend at least a $3-4K bankroll if starting with $10s progression ($10,10,20,30…) With a $2K bankroll conservative protect bankroll would begin with $5 progression ($5,5,10,15…) I would be uncomfortable betting $1420 in bets and still DOWN $430!! At least the extra spins after 15 minutes there was a small recovery, but YIKES! - Johnny Lee
@@CitizenJohnnyLee ......THANK YOU CITIZEN ''' J '''......You always have very good infomation and facts IMO and I PERSONNALY have good luck with your strats......T.Y. JL.
@@creativebubble.7836 Thanks! I’m about to post my results of The Terry 2 step vs. my Double Fibonacci. Heard at 23:55 “…almost for sure, with Fibonacci would have busted by now!” A minute later the 2 step SAFER than Fibonacci system WAS DOWN $800!!! Multiple wins in a row and DOWN $800? Using my Double Fibonacci 12s & Columns starting with $10s (10,10,20,30…) Bank Buster Double Fibonacci DID NOT BUST with $2k bankroll. IT THRIVED! Using same exact numbers and my system, $1,330 was won! Math is hard but 13 times more profitable I consider much better!!! Thank you for reading my comments, if others did more would learn instead of taking two steps back! Ha! I funny.
I always hear the same thing from him, “this system doesn’t usually perform like this”😂 And “all these 0,00 usually doesn’t happen” 😂. Guess what, they do. No thanks hard pass on the second one.
These systems in general dont work on real roulette in the long run , you might sin one day , two days , there day and then you lose everything on the fourth day
Both systems are crap. All you're doing is chasing. If you can't make profit on your first win, or at least bare minimum break even, then the system is garbage.
