Bizarre Rules In Baseball You Never Knew Existed 

🔴 You may also enjoy this video: How Good Was MICKEY MANTLE Actually? ▶ ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-IwpwU7U_2io.html

None of these rules are bizarre or complex. And, you got some of them wrong. You get a D on your thesis.

The word "never" should be removed from the title. These are all pretty well known rules.

Reggie Jackson was the first player to ignore the no-fraternization rule before a game. As an Oakland A, he started talking to a team from the opposing team. The poor player didn't know what to do because he knew he wasn't supposed to talk to Reggie, but Reggie kept chatting. Jackson was fined for it, refused to pay the fine, and continued to ignore the rule. Eventually all players came to ignore it.

The infield fly rule does NOT automatically treat the ball as caught. What it does is declares the batter out regardless of a catch in order to remove the force on the runners, BUT WHETHER IT'S CAUGHT STILL MATTERS as all the rules of tagging up are exactly the same. If the ball is not caught, the batter is still out but the runners don't need to tag up. If it is caught the runners need to tag up or risk getting doubled off.

Are you serious. If any fan is watching and they didn't know every rule you showed,they should stick to knitting

I wish RU-vid didn’t take away my ability to see how many more dislikes there are than likes in this one.

Mound visits are not limited to 1 per inning. They are limited to 1 per pitcher per inning. On the second visit to the same pitcher in the same inning, he has to be removed from the game.

this is kind of like the nascar thing sunday. before it got rained out they were giong to put larson in the 5 even though he wouldn't get the points. well because they were under a red flag apparently the rule is ok but you still have to drop to the back of the longest line on the restart. now this didn't end up being an issue but me and my dad were discussing it and he's like why? i said probably because under caution that's exactly what would happen if you managed to not go a lap down (which at smaller tracks could happen) and i guess this is a fair way of evening it up. then i got thinking............. they don't usually have this happen under a red flag it's usually done under a caution or if desperate enough even ounder green flag conditions. so when was the last time this was done and did somebody have to go get the rule book to find out? i don't mean that to be insulting, but if you haven't' had to enforce rule 23.9a in 40 years, and most of the officials weren't working the last time that rule came up............. i'd have to look it up. i 'm not trying to insult the nascar guys, but i assume they don't have the whole rule book memorized especially for something that may never happen and may never have happened. and nascars been around 75 years. so when was the last time that rule had to be found out? like i said all the driver changes i've seen during a race has been u nder caution. and i've been a fan since the early 80's. i mean i 'd say it's safe to assume that hasn't happened much?

Your Foul Tip rule definition is out of date. It was changed a couple of years ago, and no longer refers to the catcher's hands. The current definition reads: A FOUL TIP is a batted ball that goes sharp and direct from the bat to the catcher and is legally caught. It is not a foul tip unless caught, and any foul tip that is caught is a strike, and the ball is in play. 5.09 a 2 further clarifies what is considered caught, and explains it may first hit the catcher's body or paraphernalia.

Thanks, but way too much style than substance for me.

This video is a joke. For example, only someone who knew nothing about baseball would find the infield fly rule or balk rule, bizarre. They are there for a reason. Why don't you research the reason instead of providing click bait for the rule impaired fans that flood MLB parks every day.

These are all pretty standard rules.

If you are going to present pictures while you are talking - at least have them represent what you are talking about. That was confusing.

It appears this channel is aware of the cash cow rule. Put out a bunch of sloppily written, poorly researched junk to get ad revenue asap.

if you're going to talk about bizarre rules you need to make sure you're getting them right. You're not doing a good job through infield fly and balk.

Nothing strange about those rules. Play a season or two and you'll see most of those occur....aside from the umpires being treated so well.

You've got the catcher's gear rule all messed up. The catcher can catch the ball with either hand or even trap the ball against their body. In other words the ball can definitely hit "any other gears" as you put it. It is only when the catcher intentionally uses the gear on his body to assist in catching or picking up a ball, that is a 3-base award. Usually this is when the catcher has the mask in his hand and the ball is rolling away from him while a play is going on, and he reaches out with the mask to scoop it up or pull it to him. But, he definitely *can* catch the ball with his body or against gear on his body.

Yep, these aren't as bizarre as the title makes them out to be. However, it would have been nice if the video corresponded to the play being explained. It look like only 2 parts actually reflected the explanation. .....and then they forgot to mention the lost ball (Wrigley Field) or inaccessible ball, like the ones getting stuck underneath the fence, etc. Or I guess, that's the part of the ground rule double that they didn't explain. Then again, to me the most bizarre rule is the Catcher's Interference. Boy, that one irks me, especially in fantasy baseball, when a batter is awarded first, and then receives no points in fantasy baseball.

Infield fly rule is a bizarre rule? People never knew it existed? I mean, sure, if this is targeted to rugby fans in New Zealand, then, I suppose this title would be true. And, "3 strikes and you're out" would also qualify. This video is just awful garbage.

One rule, while being somewhat simplistic, at the same time confuses a lot of fans. That is batting out of order. The batter that should have batted, is out. The player after him in the batting order bats next. Truth is it can get a little strange. For instance, a runner on base could be removed and returned to bat again. I'll leave it there.

It would be nice if the video clips you show all actually had something to do with what you're talking about. It would also be nice if you actually know how these rules work.

I think every baseball fan knows these rules

None of this was strange if you have ever played baseball.

WFT u talking about? infield fly rule is not confusing it never has been.

A catcher is allowed to catch the ball with his bare hand. He does not have to catch it in his glove.

Manfred is the worst commissioner ever

I laugh at the Ground Rule double... it's NOT part of the ground rules.. it's actually merely a 2 base award from time of pitch. Ground rules are field/park specific.. that's not. I do know the uncaught 3rd strike comes from the very early days of the sport even before gloves.. it's considered that after strike 3.. it's a live ball.. if you catch it, its just like a line drive.. if you don't, it's treated as if you put it in play...again.. from the early Knickerbocker rules..

Juvenile.

10+ years calling games behind the plate.... no 2 games are the same, and you see some very weird plays. the rulebook covers them all. many rules are so strange that at clinic we have to act out the play so the rookies understand. best game in the world!!!!

Catchers can balk too

Even though only 3 outs are required - I'd like to see a Quadruple Play - where all 3 baserunners are put out, and also the batter.

Nice video. The catcher’s crouch is especially interesting. 4:00 The evolution of catchers’ equipment-from masks, to shin guards, to the mitt-allowed the catcher to move closer and closer to the plate. With modern equipment, a catcher needn’t worry as much about injury, and can frame pitches and allow the umpire a better view. Whereas previously, with small, primitive glove-mitts and later the classic pillow-mitts, he needed two hands to catch. And standing upright and farther back was the only practical way to catch. The invention of shin guards and better chest protectors helped make it easier to block pitches in the dirt and take foul-tips. Yet always an extremely demanding position. If not your hands taking a beating, then your knees. There’s a reason they call it “the tools of ignorance.” The mental aspect is also demanding.

I understand the infield fly rule but why shouldn't the defense take the responsibility for catching the ball. I think that if the infield fly rule is in effect if the fielder misses the catch that the runner should be awarded 1st base and the other runners should get 2 bases. To me that makes more sense than just assuming the batter would be out. Once it is called the fielder must catch the ball.

Regarding a missed or dropped third strike, with 2 outs a batter can attempt to advance on a dropped strike with or without a runner on 1st base.

If the proper batter is on base, he is skipped in the lineup and the next batter becomes the proper batter. This can only happen if the team has gotten away with batting out of order already in the inning.