Black Hole Simulated In Lab! 

Link to the full experiment: bit.ly/3KkiWHj

"created" and "simulated" are two very different things

Black Hole : * Starts growing* Scientists : 💀

"Then it mysteriously started growing," *Last words before disaster*

You never wanna hear a scientist say "oops"

You know you've messed up when darkness glows

Everybody gangsta until the earth doesn’t exist anymore

black hole: *Eating everything in the lab* Scientists: WE HAVE MADE A DISCOVERY!

And they can't turn it off, don't tell anyone

If quantum entanglement really exists why do I only lose one sock in the dryer?

Can’t wait for a scientist to create a black hole that just doesn’t die out after a few seconds that would be super great.

Imagine creating a black hole in a lab and then it keeps growing and you can't stop it. 💀

New fear unlocked: *Lab growing Black Hole*

I hate it when I accidentally create a black hole

"guys congrats we successfully created a Black hole but there's a small problem we're getting sucked into it"

One day there will be no days because of these things.

Scienstists: what could possibly go wrong? "Black hole start eating items around the lab"

It’s unbelievable that Hawking never won a Nobel prize

If we "accedently" create a black hole, welp, bye bye life

Let’s face it, they did NOT create a black hole in a lab

can you imagine how dumb would it be if we got extinct by our own black hole created in a lab? 😂

''Your Scientists Were So Preoccupied With Whether Or Not They Could, They Didn’t Stop To Think If They Should.'' .Dr. Ian Malcom

They simulated the effects of a black hole. But they didn’t created one.

For those who don't understand clearly. It was just "data" / "numbers" showing on a screen. The video clearly explains "simulated". Scientists do this on a super computer or a quantum computer a lot. This doesn't mean it was ACTUALLY created. They put the math in and wait for the results. It simulates and shows data/numbers as the result. Then these numbers are put into an algorithm and a software which decodes to the scientist what actually was simulated. In simpler terms, its SUPER SPREADSHEETS/MS EXCEL

Black hole : *Starts Growing* Napoleon : "there is nothing we can do"

"We made a black hole in a lab." "How'd that work out?" "We don't know, we can't find it."

The power of a singularity, in the palm of my hand.

My brain just learned new information. Yet somehow I feel dumber.

They’ll soon release a backyard kit where you can grow your own black holes.

The one thing that scares me...is the attitude of.. "Let's connect this massive amount of energy to this unknown matter...and see what happens. (What could possibly go wrong?"...could be the last question ever heard on Earth!

Do you think we could stop that before we all end up flying toward it. 😂

bro if they accidentally create a black hole we dead 💀💀

Scientists: What could go wrong? The Black Hole: 😈

black holes: "look at what they need to do to replicate a fragment of our powers"

"mysteriously starts glowing" plasma around most black holes: nah, not me

Black hole starts growing Scientists:So this marks the end of humanity

Imagine being so smart you discover something that's impossible to see but your 100 percent confident it's there

Two questions: why does the title say "created" while the video says "simulated"? I would argue that the distinction is meaningful. Also, how does one simulate an event horizon? We don't even really know what those are, since nobody has ever seen one

Dr. Hank Pym : We think when you went down there, you may have entangled with her. Scott Lang : Hank, I would never do that. I respect you too much. Dr. Hank Pym : *Quantum* entanglement, Scott.

Imagine enjoying your cold beer on a sunny Sunday afternoon and some motherfucker creates a black hole in the lab which starts sucking everything up 💀

There is still debate about what happens at the half-life of a black hole evaporation. This is because every particle of Hawking radiation that escapes is still entangled with the black hole. But at the half-life of the evaporation, the black hole cannot retain all the entangled particles that have escaped.

Antman will be so proud for recreating the quantum realm

I’ve just discovered your channel, and honestly, I’m absolutely mind-blown at how much we know about the universe.. (definitely did not spend the past 2 hours scrolling through all ur shorts and vids 😅)

For those of you saying “growing”, he said “glowing”

Astronomy world covers every science field. Studying the universe is really amazing and fun

Out of all the possible civilizations in our universes history, I wonder how many destroyed themselves by creating a black hole in a lab😂

Jada Pinkett Smith after watching this video: Even black holes need entanglements.

I thought Quantum Entanglements were Star Lord's past relationships 😂

THE UNIVERSE, IS SINGING TO MEEEEE!

Even if they managed to create a real black hole, rather that a computer simulated one, it would be so small it would evaporate due to Hawking radiation almost instantaneously.

Imagine trying to explain to your boss that the reason the lab disappeared is because you accidentally created a black hole in the break room microwave

I hope in the future we find a way to read/move quantum entangled particles. Because then we could use it to read/write binary. Which means we could create LITERAL instant communication devices, even if they were on opposite sides of the universe.

Quantum tunneling is also at work, or at least our current models suggest it is. Not being able to get ANY information from inside an event horizon is so colossally frustrating, right! I mean we can take a picture of a black hole's accretion disk and outflow jets from millions of light years away, but not a single photon once it crosses the boundary. The answer of how to unify or describe physics under those conditions would reveal the answers to our most frustrating physics dilemmas, and would almost certainly raise questions we don't even know to ask today!😢

as you know cameraman never dies

They didn’t make a black hole, they made a simulation on a super computer.

This makes sense because isn’t one of the biggest concerns with hawking radiation the conservation of quantum information? If both particles are entangled then knowing the information contained by the particle on the outside would give the information of the particle inside.

Maybe if we figure out how to make physics work in the black hole, we can uncover many hidden discoveries of the multiverse.

“Quantum Experiments like these can *shit* light” 💀

Boutta create the Gersh Device 💀

For everyone thinking they created a black hole it was in a computer simulation

I thought entanglement had something to do with Jada Smith

I love these reels. Thanks so much!! 👍😁

Such a shame that we'll never probably find out whats inside a black hole...like I understand there's "nothing" but I always wonder what the word "nothing" truly means

Blackhole in a lab? That's the biggest lie in science.

That "entanglement" takes me to a different place.

I love how science just explains spiritually with out even trying

"The test isn't that difficult, stop complaining" The test:

“In a lab” lol I LOVE THE 21ST CENTURY ALWAYS EXAGGERATING REALITY

Wait so you're telling me soulmates are real and a quark can get bitches while I can't

Another universe buys the dust and wins.

Imagine changing the state of an entangled particle at nearly the speed of light, and using that particle's twin to type out a binary message to someone instantaneously on the other side of the galaxy.

Black hole: starts expanding Scientists: oops

It’s 4am for me rn and I heard someone in my room coughing. I’ll update ya later if I survive this.

If we could figure out quantum entanglement, could we find a way to communicate faster than the speed of light?

Relax, students of the Cosmos. He said it started "Glowing," not Growing! HUGE difference. 🌌😂

I think the particles communicate through dimensions, allowing them to be anywhere and still affect one another.

Black hole: *starts glowing* Scientists: "oh sh%t TURN IT OFF!!"

"Our simulations based on our theories proved our theories correct." Let's be careful with this way of thinking, yeah?

Hey I’ve watched Event Horizon and it didn’t end well 😂

So they finally correct it from "Created" to "Simulated"

Glowing:❌️ Growing:✅️

*Jada Pinkett Smith has entered the chat*

"Just hope it won't start expanding".😐💀

Hawking radiation has nothing to do with quantum entanglement. It is a result of Quantum Fluctuation (also known as Vacuum State Fluctuation or just Vacuum Fluctuation), which is caused by the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle. In Quantum Field Theory, every elementary particle can be represented by values in a bunch of fields. These are fields such as the electric and magnetic fields (Electromagnetic force), the W and Z boson fields (Weak force), and the gluon fields (Strong force). These fields each have an amount of energy that they are most stable at, called the zero-point energy - which is non-zero for all fields, because of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle. Since these fields have to have some energy at all times, there are random fluctuations of energy in the field, everywhere in the field. This fluctuations can be modelled as virtual particles, specifically particle-antiparticle pairs, that are popping in and out of existence. If one of these fluctuations occurs at the event horizon of a black hole, it is possible for one virtual particle to come into existence within the event horizon, while its corresponding antiparticle comes into existence outside the event horizon (or vice versa). When this happens, the virtual particle inside the event horizon must go into the black hole because it cannot escape, while other virtual particle is able to be expelled from the black hole if it has sufficient energy to do so. One of the equations of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle states that if a state (i.e. the particle-antiparticle pair) exists for a short period of time, then it cannot have a definite energy - so, there is a probability for the energy of the state to be really high, and this energy would be sufficient to allow a particle to escape the pull of a black hole. With this energy, the virtual particle can escape, AND since this virtual particle cannot come out of existence (because it has no antiparticle to annihilate with), it is no longer a virtual particle and instead just a particle. The overall result is that the black hole emits a particle (or antiparticle), and that particle has a certain amount of mass and energy. This energy has to come from somewhere, so it must be taken from the black hole - this energy could be taken from the blackhole's rotation, or its mass. This causes the black hole to either rotate slower or shrink. This is hawking radiation.

Does it mean string theory is possible?

If it's glowing, it's eating, and growing

Just one thing, guys: Don't do what Dan Simmons worried about in _Hyperion_ and create a black hole that gets out of hand and tears the Earth apart. We've already got enough probability of destroying our habitat without runaway naked singularities. ... Darn! Gotta go. Now I have a drumming gig with the Naked Singularities.

as an alien whom been living on earth for more than 20k years on earth, i can say they did not simulate the curve of the fabric of space correctly, because when you reach the event horizon every direction you choose will be pointing back to the center of the black hole, which results in the blackhole radiating inside. hawking radiation doesn't make blackholes shrink by the way, because the charges inside blackhole are meaningless, it doesn't matter what got inside the blackhole and what escaped.

Pretty sure if any actual black hole was made in a lab we'd all be dead

A black hole is a region of spacetime where gravity is so strong that nothing, including light or other electromagnetic waves, has enough energy to escape its event horizon.[2] The theory of general relativity predicts that a sufficiently compact mass can deform spacetime to form a black hole.[3][4] The boundary of no escape is called the event horizon. Although it has a great effect on the fate and circumstances of an object crossing it, it has no locally detectable features according to general relativity.[5] In many ways, a black hole acts like an ideal black body, as it reflects no light.[6][7] Moreover, quantum field theory in curved spacetime predicts that event horizons emit Hawking radiation, with the same spectrum as a black body of a temperature inversely proportional to its mass. This temperature is of the order of billionths of a kelvin for stellar black holes, making it essentially impossible to observe directly. Blackness of space with black marked as centre of donut of orange and red gases Direct image of a supermassive black hole at the core of Messier 87[1] Animated simulation of a Schwarzschild black hole with a galaxy passing behind. Around the time of alignment, extreme gravitational lensing of the galaxy is observed. Objects whose gravitational fields are too strong for light to escape were first considered in the 18th century by John Michell and Pierre-Simon Laplace.[8] In 1916, Karl Schwarzschild found the first modern solution of general relativity that would characterize a black hole. David Finkelstein, in 1958, first published the interpretation of "black hole" as a region of space from which nothing can escape. Black holes were long considered a mathematical curiosity; it was not until the 1960s that theoretical work showed they were a generic prediction of general relativity. The discovery of neutron stars by Jocelyn Bell Burnell in 1967 sparked interest in gravitationally collapsed compact objects as a possible astrophysical reality. The first black hole known was Cygnus X-1, identified by several researchers independently in 1971.[9][10] Black holes of stellar mass form when massive stars collapse at the end of their life cycle. After a black hole has formed, it can grow by absorbing mass from its surroundings. Supermassive black holes of millions of solar masses (M☉) may form by absorbing other stars and merging with other black holes. There is consensus that supermassive black holes exist in the centres of most galaxies. The presence of a black hole can be inferred through its interaction with other matter and with electromagnetic radiation such as visible light. Any matter that falls onto a black hole can form an external accretion disk heated by friction, forming quasars, some of the brightest objects in the universe. Stars passing too close to a supermassive black hole can be shredded into streamers that shine very brightly before being "swallowed."[11] If other stars are orbiting a black hole, their orbits can be used to determine the black hole's mass and location. Such observations can be used to exclude possible alternatives such as neutron stars. In this way, astronomers have identified numerous stellar black hole candidates in binary systems and established that the radio source known as Sagittarius A*, at the core of the Milky Way galaxy, contains a supermassive black hole of about 4.3 million solar masses.

I have been on the GRIND with space studies, I think I know too much about black holes now 💀

Damn bro wtf... Myke you gave me so much music and new artists to listen to. Appreciate it, man.

So quantum entanglement is basically string theory in play?

There is no "other" side or "inside" of the black hole. The event horizon is a 1st order infinity, it makes no sense to talk about beyond infinity with a flat space description. At most, the black hole could be described as the accumulation of all that matter around the horizon, receding infinitely from us, increasing each particle its mass and relativistically contracting its time as the curvature of space-time around it increases.

Source: "trust me bro"

This blows my mind! And I'm not only talking about the quality of your video but the information as well

GOD....Now I understand why the scientists in Marvel are portrayed as evil

I can bet you my entire monopoly life savings that this experiment was done in Ohio 💀

Dear scientists, Stop it.

Well... Yeah. That's what Hawking radiation is. It's the only way something can radiate out of a black hole, over a long period of time.