BLEACH - Ichigo vs Aizen Part 2 Reaction Mashup 

Dangai Ichigo coulden't defeat Aizen

@@CelVini but he didnt even need to. the goal was to pressure Aizen enough , although he didnt know that. I believe there is no such a form to defeat Aizen with Kyoka Suigetsu , only some tricks like special Kido could defeat him. the master mind Urahara + Dangai strength > Aizen

@@sioframei Well, Dangai wasen't enough to completely make Aizen vunerable, he would just keep evolving and Ichigo knew it. It was necessary, Aizen said he would become God, no way Ichigo could keep up while Aizen evolves as much as he needs to

Repent of your sins and believe on the Adon Jesus the Christ, believe in your heart that He has died for sins and rose from the tomb on the third day and you shall receive the Holy Spirit of God and He shall dwell within you. You shall be saved. Be baptized in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit! - Jesus the Christ loves you, praise YHWH our Elohim - Evidence for Jesus Christ’s existence, crucifixion, and disappearance from the tomb (He rose from it): The Lord Jesus Christ did exist, gathered disciples, and was crucified and went missing from the tomb. To argue about wether He was taken from the grave or rose from it, is an argument a skeptic can make. Because well if you disregard the eye witness testimony of the disciples and there willingness to die for Christ, and humans won’t die for something they know is a lie, when Peter is pinned upside down to that cross, he could have said that it was a fake, but He didn’t because it wasn’t, what care would he have about death in this world if he knew for a fact he had assurance of a life in another, Jesus Christ did rise from the tomb and is the King of Kings and Lord of Lords. Now the evidence for the Lord Jesus Christ’s existence really isn’t hard to find a multitude of non-Christian scholars and historians mention Him within 150 years after the time of His life. One such is Tacitus a Roman historian who reported on emperor nero’s decision to blame the Christians for the fire that had destroyed rome in 64 AD. Tacitus wrote: “Nero fastened the guilt ... on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of ... Pontius Pilatus, and a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judaea, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome…” In this Tacitus makes reference to not only Christians, but Christ calling Him Christus and confirming the Gospels going on to say that He suffered the extreme penalty (crucifixion) under the reign of Tiberius and by the sentence of Pontius Pilate, which like I said confirms the Gospels narrative. Another important source of evidence about Jesus and early Christianity can be found in the letters of Pliny the Younger to Emperor Trajan. Pliny was the Roman governor of Bithynia in Asia Minor. In one of his letters, dated around A.D. 112, he asks Trajan's advice about the appropriate way to conduct legal proceedings against those accused of being Christians. Pliny says that he needed to consult the emperor about this issue because a great multitude of every age, class, and sex stood accused of Christianity. At one point in his letter, Pliny relates some of the information he has learned about these Christians: “They were in the habit of meeting on a certain fixed day before it was light, when they sang in alternate verses a hymn to Christ, as to a god, and bound themselves by a solemn oath, not to any wicked deeds, but never to commit any fraud, theft or adultery, never to falsify their word, nor deny a trust when they should be called upon to deliver it up; after which it was their custom to separate, and then reassemble to partake of food - but food of an ordinary and innocent kind.” This passage provides a number of interesting insights into the beliefs and practices of early Christians. First, we see that Christians regularly met on a certain fixed day for worship. Second, their worship was directed to Christ, demonstrating that they firmly believed in His divinity. Furthermore, one scholar interprets Pliny's statement that hymns were sung to Christ, "as to a god", as a reference to the rather distinctive fact that, "unlike other gods who were worshipped, Christ was a person who had lived on earth." If this interpretation is correct, Pliny understood that Christians were worshipping an actual historical person as God! Of course, this agrees perfectly with the New Testament doctrine that Jesus was both God and man. You may have heard of the scholar Flavius Josephus who mentioned James as being the brother of the Lord Jesus Christ, which matches what Paul said calling James “The Lord’s brother” and there is another document that Josephus may have written which goes: “About this time there lived Jesus, a wise man, if indeed one ought to call him a man. For he ... wrought surprising feats.... He was the Christ. When Pilate ...condemned him to be crucified, those who had . . . come to love him did not give up their affection for him. On the third day he appeared ... restored to life.... And the tribe of Christians ... has ... not disappeared.” Now it’s up to debate wether this is the entirely original document of what Josephus wrote, or if a Christian had edited it. But regardless he wrote about the Lord Jesus Christ. Wether it was negative or positive like the possible document is. Anyways there are many other statements, documents, letters, and writings of all sorts from the ancient world talking about the Lord Jesus Christ and there is not one question if He was a real person or if He was crucified and went missing from the grave. That is clear as day, He is a real person, was crucified, and went missing from the grave. And He did rise from the grave. And for more evidence of the Lord Jesus Christ, there’s the Bible and you see there is no evidence the Bible is corrupted, a lie, created by the Roman government, folktale. It is the recount of the Disciples of the Lord Jesus Christ, now wether you want to believe it is up to you. And what profit was there in spreading Christianity, All the early Christian suffered persecution, beatings, and were killed. Another Scholar reported that James the Lord’s Brother was thrown off a building and then stoned to death for spreading the Gospel in Jerusalem. These people went to great lengths even giving their own lives for the Adon Jesus the Christ. Amen!!!!!!!

@@CelVini Repent of your sins and believe on the Adon Jesus the Christ, believe in your heart that He has died for sins and rose from the tomb on the third day and you shall receive the Holy Spirit of God and He shall dwell within you. You shall be saved. Be baptized in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit! - Jesus the Christ loves you, praise YHWH our Elohim - Evidence for Jesus Christ’s existence, crucifixion, and disappearance from the tomb (He rose from it): The Lord Jesus Christ did exist, gathered disciples, and was crucified and went missing from the tomb. To argue about wether He was taken from the grave or rose from it, is an argument a skeptic can make. Because well if you disregard the eye witness testimony of the disciples and there willingness to die for Christ, and humans won’t die for something they know is a lie, when Peter is pinned upside down to that cross, he could have said that it was a fake, but He didn’t because it wasn’t, what care would he have about death in this world if he knew for a fact he had assurance of a life in another, Jesus Christ did rise from the tomb and is the King of Kings and Lord of Lords. Now the evidence for the Lord Jesus Christ’s existence really isn’t hard to find a multitude of non-Christian scholars and historians mention Him within 150 years after the time of His life. One such is Tacitus a Roman historian who reported on emperor nero’s decision to blame the Christians for the fire that had destroyed rome in 64 AD. Tacitus wrote: “Nero fastened the guilt ... on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of ... Pontius Pilatus, and a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judaea, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome…” In this Tacitus makes reference to not only Christians, but Christ calling Him Christus and confirming the Gospels going on to say that He suffered the extreme penalty (crucifixion) under the reign of Tiberius and by the sentence of Pontius Pilate, which like I said confirms the Gospels narrative. Another important source of evidence about Jesus and early Christianity can be found in the letters of Pliny the Younger to Emperor Trajan. Pliny was the Roman governor of Bithynia in Asia Minor. In one of his letters, dated around A.D. 112, he asks Trajan's advice about the appropriate way to conduct legal proceedings against those accused of being Christians. Pliny says that he needed to consult the emperor about this issue because a great multitude of every age, class, and sex stood accused of Christianity. At one point in his letter, Pliny relates some of the information he has learned about these Christians: “They were in the habit of meeting on a certain fixed day before it was light, when they sang in alternate verses a hymn to Christ, as to a god, and bound themselves by a solemn oath, not to any wicked deeds, but never to commit any fraud, theft or adultery, never to falsify their word, nor deny a trust when they should be called upon to deliver it up; after which it was their custom to separate, and then reassemble to partake of food - but food of an ordinary and innocent kind.” This passage provides a number of interesting insights into the beliefs and practices of early Christians. First, we see that Christians regularly met on a certain fixed day for worship. Second, their worship was directed to Christ, demonstrating that they firmly believed in His divinity. Furthermore, one scholar interprets Pliny's statement that hymns were sung to Christ, "as to a god", as a reference to the rather distinctive fact that, "unlike other gods who were worshipped, Christ was a person who had lived on earth." If this interpretation is correct, Pliny understood that Christians were worshipping an actual historical person as God! Of course, this agrees perfectly with the New Testament doctrine that Jesus was both God and man. You may have heard of the scholar Flavius Josephus who mentioned James as being the brother of the Lord Jesus Christ, which matches what Paul said calling James “The Lord’s brother” and there is another document that Josephus may have written which goes: “About this time there lived Jesus, a wise man, if indeed one ought to call him a man. For he ... wrought surprising feats.... He was the Christ. When Pilate ...condemned him to be crucified, those who had . . . come to love him did not give up their affection for him. On the third day he appeared ... restored to life.... And the tribe of Christians ... has ... not disappeared.” Now it’s up to debate wether this is the entirely original document of what Josephus wrote, or if a Christian had edited it. But regardless he wrote about the Lord Jesus Christ. Wether it was negative or positive like the possible document is. Anyways there are many other statements, documents, letters, and writings of all sorts from the ancient world talking about the Lord Jesus Christ and there is not one question if He was a real person or if He was crucified and went missing from the grave. That is clear as day, He is a real person, was crucified, and went missing from the grave. And He did rise from the grave. And for more evidence of the Lord Jesus Christ, there’s the Bible and you see there is no evidence the Bible is corrupted, a lie, created by the Roman government, folktale. It is the recount of the Disciples of the Lord Jesus Christ, now wether you want to believe it is up to you. And what profit was there in spreading Christianity, All the early Christian suffered persecution, beatings, and were killed. Another Scholar reported that James the Lord’s Brother was thrown off a building and then stoned to death for spreading the Gospel in Jerusalem. These people went to great lengths even giving their own lives for the Adon Jesus the Christ. Amen!!!!!!!

And that is why Urahara is probably the most dangerous man in Soul Society.

Bro urahara with prep time is a diff gravy

ok bro thanks for recommending

Né man ksksks

No, this Ichigo, referred to as Dangai Ichigo, is how strong True Shikai Ichigo is Now, True Bankai Ichigo is stronger, which is what Yhwach was scared of.

@@aether610 true shikai is stronger than dangai

@@aether610 and true zanpakuto ichigo who trains in dangai mid diffs sk ywach

​@@aether610 true shikai is equal or stronger than mugetsu

@@rishabh_12-suthar True shikai with hos maybe is close to dangai,though i am not sure but true bankai is dangai level.True shikai is almost a fodder a bit more powerful than captain class opponents.His reiatsu was sensible after all.Mugetsu is still the strongest form even now.

Aizen owns the 2 of the Best OP weapons in Anime History. ( Kyoka Suigetsu and and the Hogyoku )

@@jhomsubiaga-cabaro5715yhwach enters chat 💀

@@yashmehta4087 true

They would be way more than dead

Except maybe ywatch

The hokyoku idk spelling, is what kept him alive. And ywatch are the only people who could survive being hit by this

@@MistressCheese he's dead and Aizen still alive and didn't even shown his Bankai + he's only getting stronger as time goes by. Aizen>Yhwach

the crazy thing is this is equal to ichigos true shikai so that means ichigo can spam mugetsu 😂😂😂

Well, I've got news for YOU...that's pretty much the bog-standard refrain for EVERY fictional character with an ego..."I-KNOW-BETTER". And yet, every single time, they never reveal how they plan to MAKE things better...because again, all they care about is the prize.

@@TuxedAaron atleast ywach and madara genuinely cared about their worlds even though the methods are fcked up

@@MarkzBaui26 You mean Madara from Naruto? Well, Ywach's concern for how his schemes MIGHT benefit the world was a DISTANT second to his concern for how he KNEW they would benefit HIM. Anyone else he might have helped was strictly a fringe benefit, nothing more.

@@TuxedAaron yeah madara atleast wanted a world with no suffering and i havent read bleach manga so all i know about ywach was that he wants to unite all worlds but it seems that madara cares more since he doesnt want people in his world to die only to not suffer the real life and live in a dream life forever

@@MarkzBaui26 Well, I don't know enough about Madara to comment on what his intentions were. But in Ywach's case, his primary goal was to eliminate death in its entirety. Oh, he CLAIMED it was for everyone's benefit, but at the end of the day, he was really only out to help himself.

309

Ur mid

I am

​@@mailugan921better than the garbage that you likes

​@@mailugan921 stfu...stop calling everything mid .....

Tf??? How were you disappointed, that’s such an L opinion

They didn't stop animating it because it "fell off" there are many shows to this day that "fell off" and are still getting movies and additional sequels. The reason it wasn't animated at the time was because after Fullbring arc Kubo hadn't even made the next arc and Bleach is already almost half filler so it was a wise choice to stop production.

They didnt stop animating bcoz it fell of and it never did....fight was great keep crying....keep hating ... This isnt one piece or dragon ball the correct way to meld all the hype was to finish this fight in one episode

this comment did not age well

Try to watch solo leveling reactions. It was so annoying. Everyone coming up with theory about stuff that was literally explained 2 secs ago. The op mc brainrot not allowing them to comprehend that Jinwoo actually has to work to be strong. Every single fight their like “check your inventory” hoping some random deity was gonna give him a +1m sword. Or when he admitted someone was strong they’re like “he’s just humble”. Or when he fought a D class boss they were like “I thought that was S”. So infuriating that they cannot appreciate the story. Jinwoo is op but it’s not like train for 1 episode now I’m omnipotent, and that’s what they expected.

So True buddy 🤣