Blender 3.2 - Create a Game Ready Character - Timelapse 

Thank you!

Yes also I can see they used quad remesher. That will save you a huge fucking headache. Worth every penny because you don't have to lose your mental momentum as much.

​@@FlyCat1 Hello, I need a job, can you help me make 2 characters? where can i contact you?

Very impressive, focussed and experienced work! I'm an 3d artist too, but you are really really good. I liked the muscle part most. When I try it (I know where the muscles, too) I never find the right smoothing level like you. So I have to rework and rework again. In the end my (from scratch) chars are ok, too, - but with a lot of trial and errors. Seems you are very experienced. Did you have a reference on another screen? How long did this char estimated needed in real time? Plusminus? 👍🏻

@@cbproduction2367 I don’t think he takes requests

Sounds hella useful, cheers.

this is amazing, thank you

what is LOD ? stand for

Level of detail

Thank u sir for sharing ur knowledge with us. Appreciate u

Not to mention all the retopology work. That is always the most grueling part for me

@@Goku-cr2bi i felt the same when i started with blender... i mean i am still a noob but my problem when i "retopoed" stuff was i made the faces waaaaaayyyy to small and i started at one point and tried to finish it all from that beginning point basically.. now i first do all "basic" loops like eyes, mouth, neck, shoulder, torso, arms, ect. and then i just fill up the parts. and if i struggle at one point on where or how to set up a pole i just go somewhere else and come back later... for me personally, this made retopology from beeing tedious and not feeling that good about what i did there to beeing a puzzle and the result is 10x better. i obviously dont know how you do it or how good you are at it but just as general advice maybe also for others: dont be affraid to make big faces you can loop-cut at any time or sub-div afterwards anyway.

this is professsional work. But the woke western companies nowadays only want ugly characters. Good looking characters only show up in Eastern games.

@@howardlam6181 Why is it so ?

@@thanosthegod4406 why did u killed iron man??😡😡

@@abdulsalim9548 because he was in my way

Only 4 years

Only 4 years

@@abdulsalim9548 he doesn’t. Iron man committed suicide by himself

Thank you!

@@FlyCat1 please give me character blend file

@@FlyCat1 Hello, I need a job, can you help me make 2 characters? where can i contact you?

@@QuranBanglatranslation860 lol

SAME. I've been really curious about just how many hours they put into their characters!

Oh... just one more thing sir... How many hours (days/weeks) did it take to achieve that level of expertise?

As game ready, it renders in realtime. It looks like about 10 hours of continuous work. They have done this many times before.

He spend 7 days by creating

I bought the complete video in real time, its a total of 25 hours, which is very little considering the quality of the final model.

Thank you!

@@FlyCat1 how long did it take to be this good?

FlyCat is a modern day Michelangelo. It is raw talent that can't be duplicated or taught.

Thank you!

@@FlyCat1 You're my inspiration! you should make a gumroad or udemy course :D or do you do lessons on your patreon? btw what's this music in the beginning? it goes hard!

Thanks!

23:50 Retopology 25:15 Unwrapping, texturing, baking 42:30 Painting outfit in Substance

@@roteschwert you're a hero

Nice bro :))

Insanely helpful , thank you so much!

Может быть, стоит создать жизнь из бактерий, чтобы все было полностью с нуля?

Thank you!

@@FlyCat1 sir can we have one tutorial please

What kind of shitty language is this?

Thank you!

Perhaps tell that to the people who write the software and create the assets!

@@Diggnuts what's wrong with praising the artist?

@@Mekhel I do not consider this art. The time and effort that went into creating the tools that enable this work are several orders of magnitude more than just using the tool. It's not like it is a simple paintbrush. It is a set of complex tools that make it much much easier to make stuff like this. When the "paintbrush" is more advanced than the painting it was used on, you no longer can talk about art.

​@@Diggnuts That has to be the most irrelevant statement and comment ever. Comparing a single artist work to a software development team with years of development. You admire the devs more, but what has to do with demoting the skill and artistry of the creator? Who cares what You consider art? do you have anything good to show us of what you can create? A poem and a poet is nothing, the pencil did all the writing after all !!! Who cares what you can write in c or python that`s not a creation, writing your own language is the real deal! maybe someone is jealous.

Thank you!

Same here..

Me too 😅

You dont need to model characters just get characters sliders or cc4

Was just passing by. But consider combining regular hair textures with vertex colors. Worked for me in blender and ue4.

1 make particle hair strands 2 make them spline objects 3 place a plane behind the hair 4. use blender natural hair color bdsf 5 bake the hair to the plane texture enjoy a high fedelity hair card

There's a plugin called "Hair Tool for Blender" by Bartosz Styperek that I highly recommend for creating hair cards. It has a ton of features and is well documented. (Lots of video tutorials etc)

They do a retopology of all the clothes/body which lowers the poly count significantly overall

I have been in doubt of buying it - mostly since I do usually prefer to model my assets in a technically-correct-way, precisely because I don't enjoy retopology, but I do love sculpting, if only it can be more directly useful for final in-game-engine without having to manually retopo. Then, I don't know but after seeing it how smooth result it did produced, even while FlyCat used Dyntopo and even added and messed quite a lot of geometry while smashing pieces together to achieve final results. So definitely, I'm totally considering getting it now 😅👍

@@codeFriendlyART Its very worth it. Its great to get a base mesh for retopology as you then only have to modify the mesh where deformation will happen and the rest is already filled with quad remesher.

@@USBEN. Nice, yeah, really appreciate the info as well, but for the record, I know what retopology tools do for you while sculpting (old artist over here) what I'm not certain about is how good Quad Remesher actually is in an actual production modeling like shown in here.

Silly me @USBEN and @Alexander Cooney, for having my doubts about it but well, I guess it is not my fault that their authors are not the type who 'brags about' their stuff!.. However: 👉"an auto-retopologizer from the developer of ZBrush ZRemesher" 👈 - nothing more to say about how 'good' it is! In the past I sometimes opened ZBrush just to be able to use ZRemesher and then close it again 😅🤣 and to think it is from the very same developer... So I'm totally buying a perpetual pro license of it for Blender now. And if still in doubt, well, the Cinema4D version is not available anymore because recently Cinema4D themselves bought rights to have built in into it as well 😅 very nice!

@@codeFriendlyART Haha nice, you will like it.

Thank you! I'm a bit busy to work in freelancing.

@@FlyCat1 are U work in fiverr

Intended art style and especially shading/lighting. Specifically, imagine something like Fortnite or anime styled models: You'd want to model as much as possible, as "realistic lighting" is not the goal, rather "clean" lighting is. Thus, smooth topology that follows intended curves is of higher importance in these styles. With more photorealistic styles, or intended shading (her most recent video at present has an anime styled girl who uses more realistic shading), sculpting is typically faster and easier. While everyone is different, I'd propose that for most, sculpting anatomy is easier than modelling it. It's also usually MUCH faster. Sculpting has the advantage of creating noise and emulating realism, but at the cost of lack of consistency and smoothness, especially regarding curves. Imagine trying to sculpt the lower jaw of a purely anime inspired girl, the tiniest mistake or bump or divet throws everything off. Whereas with this barbarian, you wouldn't even notice such a mistake, as it can easily be an intentional wrinkle or bit of detailing. The cleaner and more uniform the topology needs to be (again, usually decided by how exactly you intend to light and shade the end result) the more merit there is to modelling it vertice by vertice from the get-go, because you can precisely position every vertice to light as you want it to. The more realistic you want it to be, the more merit there is to sculpting it and being able to freely layer in as many details as you want. There are other considerations than just the shading, but I'd say if we exclude an individual's personal comfort with either method, these are the dominant factors that weigh in favor of one method over the other.

It isn't matcap. I use material and viewport render.

Of course, a muscular woman with an ax and war paint on her face is what you want when you forget about your anniversary...

I think all most are made in Maya and Zbrush

@@FlyCat1 Thanks. How long have you been an artist that you've learned how to 3D sculpt?

Thank you. I don't use IDmap because it's more time consuming and troublesome than the way I did it.

@@FlyCat1 Ok, I've been having issues with id maps as well and will try to do it without. Thx

yeah but, you won't always be that way :)

Hi, I'm sharing full process - no time-lapse videos on Patreon

Thank you! I'll consider this.

Thank you!

Ikr? So good

Would be inefficient to always model to body anew. He can basically model a female body once (especially the topology for animation), use it as a template and then adjust it to a different look.