@@stevec6427 there doing this for another purpose that's why it's ironic. She is a scapegoat, a fall-guy (fool-guy), a decoy. She is a black vessel of white dominance/white power. She is positioned to defend the white identity and be paid for doing so. How do you see nations destabilised as not being the victim nations of another? And then what become of the status of the people of those nations destabilised by another? Especially if a whole economy and social structure is developed from this abuse? I could never be guided by most of the minds of white society any way.
@Razer Mantis People in government that tell the facts like her are putting her life at risk, like JFK did when he criticised Israel's refusal to sign the Nuclear Proliferation Treaty and dismantle their nuclear arsenal in 1964-69, assembled at the Dimona power plant.
Critical race theory , collectivism - it's just Marxism with another hat on. The wretch dogma needs to be rooted out of education and state institutions.
Remember when we were kids and playing in the sandpit in pre-school/daycare? We didnt care what colour other kids were, we didnt care if they were fat or thin, short or tall. All we cared about is that we had someone else to build sand pyramids & dig sandpits with... Sometimes we would even make them eat sand too but thats a different story.
Well, i also remember, that kids argued a lot.. :) we are very mean, when we are kids. And we can be very angry, so maybe that this is where it is born.. but its childs play, its up to us, adults, tell them, that this is not something that define you. But when adults are angry between themselvs, kids will adopt it as well.
...lucky you, I remember being called names by other kids, not everyone has these nice memories, becoming aware of race was forced upon many of us as kids in unkind & sometimes quite damaging ways.
Did anyone see the Denzel Washington interview? Huge respect to him and this lady for standing up to the truth. Obviously won’t be show on the corrupt BBC propaganda machine. 👍
@John Smith she is English in culture that's why.... like alot of successful African heritage British born people ..they own themselves and their behaviour alot of them are conservatives not socialists.Alot of them like monarchies and heirarchies. Most have no slavery in their ancestors.They also unlike some newer West Indians value education and achieve alot.
Very well done my black sister. God bless you, black or white we are one. I am a black woman who is leaving in the UK and I have told my children not to believe in this movement. 👍👍♥️
I’ve never had anyone be rascist to me simply because I don’t have that state of mind, I have equal rights as anyone else, there will be nasty people everywhere you go this ain’t gonna stop me from living isit? So no I don’t see colour and will never represent any colour or race we all human
That's not good either? Colors are beautiful, I love the different complexions people have, there's absolutely nothing wrong with seeing colors nor seeing differences. The problem is when someone believes that their color or their way is the best.
Well said , I am reminded every second that am privileged Computers, Cars, Planes, Trains, Electricity, Medicine, Space flight, Yeah we had some really privileged white inventors.
@@declanroberts8934 oh yeah and the 40% of british GDP that was spent in the mid 1800s to end slavery throughout the world, the years of slavery of British people in Africa prior to the British slave trade. All the infrastructure, education, technology and civility Britain brought to the world, ruling over as much as 1/5th of the worlds population as late as the 1920s. The fact that the worlds modern state would be hundreds of years of if Britain's empire didn't do what it did. We had led the world for the good part of 500 years and are still pretty high up even today.
@@francom1499 I can tell you have bought into the misinformation of the Slavery Abolition Act. It came into effect in 1834, at the beginning only slaves below the age of 6 were free. Those above that age were turned into "apprentices" who essentially lived in the same conditions. The East India Company was excluded from the act also. It was only in mid 1840s were slaves actually free but working conditions remained horrific. Do note that this transition was done to ensure profit remained and also note that slaves were only given freedom because the sugar plantations began to make less money. Also slaves began to rebel meaning that the British Government were spending money to ensure the protection of sugar plantations. Note that the 1830s and 40s were a period of huge colonialist wars, battles and uprisings. From Canada to New Zealand conflict was fought again British rule. Slave owners were actually compensated for their loss of slaves. Again noting this was not an act of moral decency they were literally being paid for their "troubles". A righteous man would not be apologetic to a slave owner. Also look into other forms of unofficial slavery like blackbirding. Supported by the Government many members of tribes were coerced into doing labour for British companies. Also the whole British infastructure development thing is a myth. Indias' infastructure was ruined completely. Countries were starved of food and resources in order to fuel the empire's reign. Many people were voided of their culture and their identity. The British empire incited war amongst people in order to control the greater areas. The infastructure you speak of was also done with the blood and sweat of slaves and cheap labour force. This was not a gift it was forced act done only to help the empire.
@@declanroberts8934 i think its important to learn about all areas of history but also to look at everything objectively and with context. Two things that you've failed to do here as you clearly have your own theories and agenda.
THANKYOU for bringing this to the people , I was appalled that my grandson who is 14 was told to write a piece on Blm by his teacher , I told him what it stands for , he didn't know .
Well, Mrs badenoch has only been an MP of the conservative since 2017. She is fairly new in comparison to the ones competing for leadership. We can wonder if that’s due to seniority and experience as a leader. But nevertheless she is quite favourable to win. She is not the only candidate of colour who is favourable to win. So, get that ideas of colour out of your head. We are colour blind over here. We use logic and rationality.
Imagine winning multiple Formula One championships with the support of white mechanics and technicians. Then telling a poor white guy in London that he's oppression .. LEWIS HAMILTON WORTH OVER $100MIL
When they say "diversity" what they actually mean is "non-whiteness". I have never, ever heard of any criticism of any country that is 99% percent 1 race, if its non-white. The mainly-white countries are surely amongst the most racially diverse countries in the world, yet it is only these countries that are being singled out and called upon to have ever-increasingly more racial diversity. Where's the criticism of Pakistan for example. for not having more racial diversity? Wheres the criticism of the African nations? for not having more racial diversity?? I don't see or hear about Inclusion and diversity in these countries, why ??? Because there is none, because if you use this definition those countries are already as non-white as they could possibly be and therefore they arent a "problem"
@@Ezudane It just highlights how absurd this has all become. It is more about persecution than some imaginary justice for the past. This madness is about psychological manipulation.
As much as I don't agree with the statues being taken down how about the Saddam Hussein statue where Blair and bush illegally took it down and invaded a country on false grounds
