Consider putting Keeper of Dragon Magic in this deck. It can spc summon a blue eyes directly from deck, but faced down. As fusion doesn't care about card being face down, that would be no issue. Then keeper can be used as link material to needlefiber if you can. Or xyz summon into queen dragun djinn (with lord of d). Just ideas from me. I am working with my own blue eyes too, and your righty-lefty is so great, I made the true king from thar combo. Haha. Good luck and hope you can find great ideas like your control blue eyes
It works, mmm he play 44 cards and that's too much, what if we don't use The king of D, King of the swamp and Rhapsody, so 44-7=37 and add 3 Keepers of dragon magic? it's really nice because you just discard a blue eyes from your hand, then add a Poly from the main deck and then special summon that or another blue eyes from the graveyard. What do you think?
Loved this profile. I love the pure version of blue-eyes. I still run 1 copy of vanilla blue-eyes ultimate dragon. I don't care if it's bad. The card is my favorite of all time, and it will never leave my deck. :) I have also won games with it as a finisher :D
@@ivanfernandezramirez2629 Yea he's too hard to summon, and his effects are so bad for the resources you have to commit. I wish they made an errata or a retrain of Shining. I mean, they already made 2 reworks of Blue-eyes Ultimate Dragon although they really could have made the artwork better for both of them....Neo is missing his arms and toes, and Alternative Ultimate has too many wart-like blue things that makes him look like some sort of fungus.
@@jimmyha1898 yes, they tried to put too much stuff on the new Blue Eyes Ultimate, the original will always be better looking 👌🏾 And I agree, Shining has a cool effect but not really good considering all you have to give for it
I would love to see a control version. Blue-eyes got me back into the game a couple years ago. Just not the right time to play blue-eyes lol. But a control version I can see working.
I've been testing out the XYZ one and damn is it aggressive.. Like I'll either negate everything my first turn or just OTK with Number 100. Both of these decks are even more broken because it has so much search and special summon power, hand traps don't even matter.
I've been running defusion into my deck. I've had a few test draws where I summon BEAWD, Polymerization to summon BEAUD, De-Fusion. The play can pop at least five cards on top of dealing at least 6000 damage. At my locals this past weekend, I got two BEAUD on my first turn and my opponent scooped.
All dragon decks ought to run Red Eyes Darkness Metal. Its just too good! Also, maybe consider taking out one or two of the super poly targets for a Galaxy-eyes Xyz
Question: Why no "Go Go Bingo Machine"? I personally run 2 because it gives easy access to alternative and you don't need to rely on "lord of D." So much, but still good deck
@@devinwilcox2153 that's true seeing how it gives you access to Chaos form and the big Daddy himself, but I think running a single Bingo machine in pure is still a good choice in my experience at leaat
King 👑 f the swamp is a lot better and easy to get ur fusion but the king of d I put him down to one and it’s a lot better for me having him at 3 I see him way to much and times when I don’t need him or he’s in my way so having him at one makes it better I still he him in games I played cuz I do have a lot of drawing power should give it a try but that’s how I play it that’s y I love yugioh can build ur own way that fits u lol
Indeed. This is more like a tier 3 deck. For people who loves blue eyes, this will bring his/ her deck into stronger strategy, but meta/ competitively speaking, of course no
