@@dnegspoker ... With that level of ability to perceive reality, with your lntellig3nce (don't mind the spelling, it's just that you 're not allowed to use that word on ThisTube) you have a lot to offer even in fields that you don't currently consider. Expand your horizons, become more active. The world needs you.
Also, in this case, it's not even about "lose or win" it's more about making the correct play or not, results be damned. And he did the correct play, but Ivey had one of the few combos that called there.
This stuff is absolutely fascinating. There's no way I can take it all in and deploy it in a game, nowhere near smart enough, but it's amazing to get an insight into the thought process of a top top level player. It's why I'll keep watching this channel. Great content D Negs!
Love how doyal says, poker is easy to learn, life time to master. I’ve been playing for 20 years, since I was 12. And the longer I’ve played, the more things stick in your mind, and stuff comes second nature. Good luck
@Bobby Dillon he literally talks through what he thinks playing live hands on stream in real time, and it's exactly these concepts. But keep believing poker is so simple. Sharks gotta win money off somebody.
@@SoFasT99 Probably a peel for the sizing, but I'm sure he had Daniel on some kind of 5 and Phil could still have KK. On top of that, on the paired board, some of his diamond outs could be dead. That being said, he probably ended up saving $5k anyway because, assuming Daniel still fires the turn, I doubt Doyle can continue.
Dude not only do I think you're great for poker and a great ambassador to the game but I can honestly say I probably learned more from this hand analysis than any other commentary. I never thought of the game in terms of the two black sixes I think that is extremely game-changing for me thank you very much for this analysis
Love hearing the thinking process of his choices. It makes the game of poker look so much more interesting and fun when you learn how in depth and detailed you can get in a game of chance.
@@ItsEverythingElse though I do not disagree there is skill involved in the game, when I say “chance” I’m referring to the hand you are dealt and the cards that get flopped on the table.
Not only is Daniel great with mathematics of poker but, he is a master at reading and understanding players habits and tells, something that rarely speaks to. It's his hole card!
The two GOATs of the game, fierce competitors on the table, yet immensely respectful of each other and great friends off the table. And my two favourite players of all time. DNegs and Ivey are the Fedal of Poker.
the fact that you got doyle to fold the ace of diamonds on that flop is why you are teaching us about this hand. love you dnegs! thank you for your videos!!
HAHAHAHA! Anyone else notice the 2:45 mark and the Picture on Daniel's shelf? The screen above has the back of Phil's bald head that lines up perfectly! :)
I'm a good poker player. I can set down at any poker room outside of Vegas and come out with value. I've studied the game for years and know charts, ranges, etc. like the back of my hand. But when I listen to Daniel it is like I'm listening to a man that has played the game for 100 years and he thinks of the very minor details that don't even cross my mind in certain spots. It's fascinating. There's nothing better than listening to a master discuss his craft and Daniel explains things better than most.
Just when I thought "D-Negs" (Hope I spelled that correctly lol) couldn't get better Daniel shows the hands he losses. Oh man perfect to learn from his failures and not just his successes. Perfect yet again Mr. Negreanu
I love all these breakdowns...and it just goes to show that even the pros get screwed over on what is " most likely"... in the other players hands....that's poker at its finest!!!!
You mentioned that the only draws Phil could have are A10 and Q10 of diamonds. Is there any reason he can't have AQ of diamonds? It turns a gunshot on the turn giving him the right price to call.
I honestly and decisively recommend to all those who want to become a professional poker player to follow all of Daniel's videos carefully. Even I, who today consider myself a relatively good poker player, still enjoy watching Daniel's clips and learn new things. In these clips, you will learn things that if you want to learn it in the casino, it will cost you a million dollars.
I'm just a (no that bad) recreactional, but I can imagine how much potential a pro can extract from his videos. He is doing to the whole poker community a big gift that noone else at his level is doing. This channel is free gold for all. Viva DNegs
I love these break downs as it give us as fans some insight on the 4d chess you are playing. In my humble opinion if you're going to rep quads you have to really sell it and go all in.
I initially hated the size but Daniel's right, hes way overbluffing this river with a jam. Have also recently seen Ivey fold flush draws ott. Solid analysis, mostly good reads.
This is a great hand breakdown and appreciate the thought process. Wonder how the hand plays out if call, c/r turn repping stronger 5s?? Guess that challenge *could* be, turn checks through but obv it wouldn’t as Phil picked up so much equity for his actual hand as well as range. Wtf knows ;-). Love this breakdown though!
Great video. Few combos Daniel left out are all or atleast some of the broadway JxDD hands that Phil would continue with (if he is calling QTs OTF he sure is calling QJs, AJs and probably JTs).
Dear Daniel, my favourite player! Imho the problem here was the jack on the turn, it created the back door for Phil with a possible straight. Do hope to see you in Amsterdam at the WPT next month!
Well thought out, my only issue is that you have much worse hands u could take that line with, especially one that block the overall board better as opposed to just the trips, something with a diamond like Ad 6s this would also give you a better chance of improving on your flop bluff and then you would end up blocking diamonds on the river and you would be blocking some of Ivey’s Kx combos, doing it with 66 and all worse hands with good blockers could be a bit too much, in which case you would be better off over betting at least the turn, also the assumption Doyle folded diamonds I had an issue with, I think it’s more likely(although he did have diamonds) that he had a pocket pair 66 thru possible 1010 or even a weak K like K9 or K10 suited especially if Ivey was playing snug, I do like the approach tho, I’m always a fan of trying to figure any possible way to take down the pot, also if you have any in the archives can you do some hand breakdowns for some mixed games please, we just got online poker here in Michigan and now have an opportunity to play some mixed games, it’s MICOOP time and I’ll be playing razz this evening for the first time, would be cool to get some mixed game insight especially since it’s your forté
I'm from the UK and I absolutely love your hand break downs and analysing what the other players range is. Helps me but unfortunately I'm not playing pro's 🤣😃
Hi Daniel. You are, and continue to be, my favorite player of all time going back to the early days of the WPT. I really appreciate these hand breakdowns. I've been out of the poker scene for a little while. I reached a point of burnout but now I'm feeling reinvigorated and ready to start again. Might not be such a bad idea to make a video about burnout, how to deal with downswings, and the psychology behind that if you don't already have a video about that topic. Take care!
Daniel Negreanu is the Sickest poker player I’ve ever had the privilege of watching💯😎👍🏼 & I have The Daniel Negreanu Master Class & highly recommend it to everyone who loves the game of poker💯
This is amazing stuff. I studied your first two small ball poker books, and played accordingly. I watch, read, and listen to many people on poker, yet I understand your mindset more than anyone else. I love your style of play and comprehend your style of play. This has helped me immensely. I’ve been a fan for at least 15 years DNegs. 🤙🏻
Never bothered much with what the players that folded could've had. The fact that you actually thought about Doyle's hand too is amazing. Learning so much here. Keep it up please
You’re a role model of poker btw. Pure humility win or lose. You’re the reason I’ve started watching Poker semi-full-time. Much respect from Scotland! 🏴
Great video. I don’t think I’ve seen any videos of a complex hand where both players break down their thoughts together and discuss - this might be super interesting.
Lol at Dwan being absolutely baffled Brunson just mucked nut flush draw to this super small check raise right on flop. I was absolutely shocked too to be truly honest, how does he not peel 5k more?
I like the play, I was a bit confused by the sizing vs. a pot sized bet at the end. But your breakdown makes sense. Also asking what you want to get called by vs. what bluffs he has. Doyle's fold was way to tight. 9 10 diamonds maybe folds there but nut flush draw ?. Weird. Going back to your play. What about a smaller bet like a 1/3 pot. In those spots seems to make sense because he likely won't raise without a boat and a K will just call. And if he does go crazy and raise you can easily get away.
Another brilliant video Daniel. These have all been excellent. I actually commented on the last one how it would be interesting to see a hand you perhaps lost, and it proved so. It's a great lesson for any aspiring poker player to learn. Poker is not about winning hands, it's about playing every hand perfectly, or at least as perfectly as you can anyway, haha. Again, great videos, they've been great.
Damn, completely understand every decision/move made now. Clear insight into your thinking for this hand. Added bonus of understanding players 'range' a little bit more. Cheers for sharing your knowledge🤙
That was so fascinating, thanks Daniel. What boggles my mind is that you're able to think like this in the moment, with all the pressure and time constraints. Does all of this logic actually run through your brain during that time (i.e. you talk to yourself with this logic), or do you kind of "know" what to do based on experience and study and don't actually need to run through this every time?
As is the case with anything, experience and hours logged makes what may appear to be an overly complicated thought process much easier and doable in real time.
Really appreciate you breaking down the hands and can't thank you enough for what you have contributed to the community. It would be more interesting if you could also do some solver analysis along with hand breakdown. I think that overbetting river with boats+ might be solver approved.
Thank you for your insight and great breakdown of the hand. I personally love to bet that river hard because you have all 5x and flushes so Kx that’s not KK a lot of the time is frozen and put in a tough spot. Great read imo. 100.
@2:13 because he was playing so... (what was the word right after that?) also, what was the payoff from Phil to Doyle before the flop when Doyle said “you heard me didn’t you?”
i've been a fan of daniel since he was hanging out with the asians in high school and his intricate understanding of the game now has far exceeded even his own expectations
@Daniel Negreanu enjoy your great post hand analysis. I can appreciate your analysis of two black 66 blocking the 5’s. And how being in BB, you can’t rep KK, JJ, 88 for the boat. My question: why not? And I understand your “range” from big blind is xx, but w that said, why don’t start playing hands that way as “reverse psych”? Basically slow play/trap, and play post flop and score huge pot or make big lay down? So Ivey open UTG, Doyle calls MP, your BB last to act ensures if you’re playing (KK, JJ, 88) 3-handed. Now if an over card shows, you can maybe call 1 street and re-eval. But imagine holding those pocket pairs, the post flop betting would be exactly the same, but you stack Ivey cuz so hidden?
I was thinking would it be a better move if you check the river instead. As both of you guys are deep, and if you put Phil on a king or better, you could lead him to do a value bet. When he does that you could then check raise him, wrapping a full house that is setting a trap. The tricky part to this play is that since both of you has a lot history, Phil certainly knows you are capable of pulling a move like this and it actually makes sense that you are so strong by the river and since the flush gets there, you are wrapping a full house that wants a flush to bet there so you could then reraise him.
Enjoyed this commentary because I assumed it was a clip of Neg actually winning a bluff. I believe more often then not the best analysis and learning comes from LOST hands, not won hands.
9:42 - On the river, I feel like a sneaky check from Negreanu might've got Ivey to bluff and then back over to Negreanu.... he *could* shove and it may get a fold. It's possible that Ivey calls, but I still think it's the better play when just holding 66 using that board.
I agree with DNegs saying that Ivey will not have a naked flush draw when he calls on the turn, and will only have combo draws of QT and AT of diamonds, but will Ivey's calling range also include paired flush draws (AJ, QJ, JT, of diamonds)? Making more of Ivey's hands getting there on the river?
Nice analysis. Only problem is that Ivey also has AQd, Jx of d and maybe Q9d T9d, so he has more flushes than you expect. But overall I really liked how you played the hand, in your shoes i would have betted 1/3 on the river so i could still have a 5 as a value bet/blockbet, but still as I sad nice hand!
Sometimes I'll chuck the small bet after the turn even if I feel I'm beaten just to gain more confidence in my read of the opponent. (Only if I'm pretty deep stacked) Sometimes a decent lesson has a price worth paying.
Loving the detailed hand breakdown and thought process behind a hand you lost. Great poker, one day I hope to be able to incorporate such high level strategy into my game on the fly. Blessed dneggs
Superb breakdown. However, I think 88 actually does make sense. If you can play 66 this way, you can play 88 this way. I still wouldn't overbet on the river.
So dinner within Danny's choise,, winner buys. Ivey can peel off a couple no sweat, dinner for both of them. Any table with both Ivey/Danny involved, rest assured it will be adventurous,, also very funny at times. They know how to liven up the deck.
