BMW M5 CS | HOT LAP Nordschleife 7.29,57 min | sport auto Supertest 

Panamera fast₽)) heavy bmw loss

@@porschepanameraofficial5500 Pan turbo s is just a better vehicle overall

Pretty sure it even does it in less time than the newest R8 available. Audis have always been behind in pretty much everything except for Le Mans. Only thing they're good at was straight line speed in the quarter mile.

@@ronaldoromi1022 in dtm audi kills bmw

@@MrZoranbebek the millenium Falk kills Audi in the kessel run by atleast 2 parsecs

@@MrZoranbebek depends. Single wins yes. Champion wins = BMW is superior.

@@MrZoranbebek BMW as a brand is way more prestigious, competitive and they make way better cars overall. With an untouchable feeling when driven. Volkswagen/Audi can only dream of getting the piece of cake that BMW and Mercedes have.

but this lap wasn't thaat fast

You know where BMW's heart and soul are with this car, that's why I fucking LOVE it.

The driver is adjusting the seatbelt all the time lol...I think it could be at least 1 second faster.

bmw quality

@@madnick5194 Let me guess, ur a Mercedes Fanboy?

@@user-gt8dh7qj3w No , you are bmw car boy "f90" , i prefer 90´s cars ,not plastic boxes .

@@madnick5194 The box opened because of the cables you idiot ...

@@madnick5194 Alright

Still saddens me BMW hasnt made an amg gtr killer 😢

Performance of M-sedan, looks of i8

@@GokuTheHusky All they've done is an m8 and all that's achieved is the 'big m8' meme

@@GokuTheHusky m5 cs kills it in a straight line tho

@@GokuTheHusky our family car destroys the AMG GTR

Mercedes GT-63s - 7.27.800 m,in

@@speedcrave5230 they’re not accurate

@@kunalmore5212 ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-yR5WC9Y3SYo.html

Camaro zl1 7:29 Zl1 1le 7:16 und da sagen viele Amis fahren nur gerade aus

How is the RS6 8:09.00 when the Audi RSQ8 has 7:42.253 😁

he didnt even wore gloves ruining the alcantara steeringwheel

But BMW fanboys are saying this guy can't drive because he failed to break a record

9⁹

Impressive by both car and driver !!.. do you think Fiat panda could do this?? Without a good performance car the best driver can't make a hot lap anyway ...

@@jenGD3 yeah put hamilton in a panda against massa in a m3

@@dukeofspeed2072 hehe ja schon seltsam irgendwie😅

Und was lernen wir darauf, Freunde? Jeder guter Rennfahrer braucht 'n GRID-Girl auf dem Beifahrersitz - die mit ihren nackten Knien das HSF zudrückt ...

@@Freddy2TakeOff amen😂

180.000 Euro Grundpreis die spinnen doch bei BMW.

@@mustafa-kemal3499 da geb ich dir Recht

This time big and heavy Porsche Panamera 😂😂😂 bmw shit 🤮🤮🤮 Mercedes amg gt 4 door time 7.25)))

Do you have the link?

@@dbaa1855 TURN IT UP LOUD !!!

This time big and heavy Porsche Panamera 😂😂😂 bmw shit 🤮🤮🤮

the way he overcompensate the car at that split its very impressive for me as a 5 series owner knowing how heavy the car his you have no chance for error if either dont correct it or overcorrect it the forces will have no mercy. very cool as we all always playing with the understearing.... and how fast he send it almost not braking as we had major downforce and of course this car is very big and heavy.

Keep calm bro, This car has potential to beat the gt63s with the right tires

I'm a Bmwguy, but agree with that one. Gt63S can't be touched on the ring. Would still choose the M5 tho

Totally agree dude :)

For this diff yes

@@boostkiller *those diffs... It's AWD. But the diffs aren't limiting it. It has an 8 speed auto with plenty of overdrive. it's electronically limited to 305 kph.

@@fabianrudzewski9027 i know this, and kmh*

@@boostkiller didn't seem so, as you referred to the diff. Google "kilometers per hour" and watch it return you "kph" as an abbreviation.

@@fabianrudzewski9027 on every car it is kmh not kph 🤦🏻

hab ich was verpasst 🥲

@@franzbeckenbauer7490bir ara torpidosu kendisi açıldı

This time big and heavy Porsche Panamera 😂😂😂 bmw shit 🤮🤮🤮 Mercedes Benz amg gt 4 door time 7.25))))

Findest Du?

@@1q2w3e4r5t6zism Doch schon. Wenn man bedenkt dass ein 991.1 GT3 ein 7:32 min gefahren ist, ist das doch schon ziemlich gut. Auf der anderen Seite ist Walter Roehrl schon 2004 im Carrera GT eine 7:28 min gefahren. Dagegen scheint die Zeit etwas langsam zu sein.

@@Kaipeternicolas ja aber ich habe mehr erwartet der jaguar sv project 8 ist ja 10 sekunden schneller wenn ich mich nicht täusche? 10 sek!

Considering the GT 63 S was released 3 years ago and the weight difference I‘m not impressed at all about the performance of the M5 CS. And I guess, you ment 2 sec.

@@roespeloes yea the m5 was meant to compete with the e63s not the gt63.the gt63 main competitor is the m8 competition gran coupe,if mercedes want to have a car to compete with the m5 cs then they should Made a e63r

@@roespeloes Not only that, GT63s lap was done on a very wet track.

No, Sport Auto laptimes is for 20.6 km layout. You have to add 4-5 s for comparison with official laptiming

@@muhammadhaekalhakim6402 what about the E63s Edition 1?

@@Legotechs yes it is porsche fanboy

The Carrera GT is close to be 20 years old. The E39 M5 was the M5 of that time. Compare it to that one and see the minute difference between those two. I mean you could also say the M5 F90 is faster than a Formula 1 Car of the 50s. Lol

I remember when the CGT did the 7:27, it was all over the news. A production car lap record, until the Zonda F broke it by a few tenths, if my memory serves me well. Almost 20 years later, and a 2 ton sports saloon can match it, such is progress!

@@markusplotz2259 I think he was talking strictly from an evolutionary point of view.

Sport Auto only does two laps. One warm up and one timed lap, that’s their SOP, so yeah if Gerhard could have multiple laps to try for a best time I am sure he could do better.

Habe das Öffenen der Klappe das letzte mal mit einem 600ps Evo und DogBox Getriebe von 2-3. Gang geschafft .... hihihihihhhi einfach herrlich!

Auto ist nicht schwer. Der hatte vollgetankt nur 1859 Kg ohne Fahrer. Die zeit war schlecht mit gemessene 676 PS.

pretty obvious with these big cables in it.

@@juliusperseus8612 make sense😂

It was the curb before brunchenn one - it makes sense its the most surface area of any curb on the track and everybody leans on it

Bmw e36 - 210km/h @ SK

@@r129r16pfl sicherlich aber nicht Stock 😂

Mercedes GT63 AMGs: 7.27,80 🤫 The Mercedes GT73 AMGs is coming this year 😉

lack of knowledge by the benz rider it seems

@@Raptile07 this isn’t on semi slicks. The Merc was! Not a fair comparison! 🤫

@@arnorobberechts7596 I found out that on the shorter route that the BMW apparently also drove (20.6 km), the Mercedes drove a time that is significantly better than the BMW's. The Mercedes drove the shorter distance in 7.23.01, so the BMW has no chance even with semi-slicks 🤫

@@Raptile07 you will say everything to defend youre mercedes. That BMW with semi slicks on is faster. It has just as mutch power. It is 250 kg lighter. Its just simply physics. That BMW drove the same route. The difference is smaller that 1.8 seconds. Shut up you lying fanboy!

It opened up way before that I think it was after eschbach the curb of brunchenn 1 did it in...

Shook his head after lol

I think it would be around 7.20-7.25 with Michelin Cup2's

Faster thaan gt63s

@@Radiation580 The GT63 S did it in damp conditions, there's scope for improvement.✌🏻

Aren't you the guy who once claimed the GT 63 was based on the AMG GT R's transaxle platform?... Then it doesn't surprise me that you believe a set of off-the-counter Cup 2s would be better for the M5 CS than it's OE tyres (ironic thing is, THEN it really wouldn't be a fair fight, since the GT 63's tailor-made Cup 2s are most definitely better than what you can buy from store)... Then again, you probably don't even have an idea what an OE tyre set is, and why it's important...

The bmw is 300 kg lighter and faster in a straight line than an amg gt63s and still lost, that says a lot even a camaro zl 1 is as fast as the bmw and that isn’t a track focused car and isn’t tested and developed on the Nürburgring.

Usually manufacture times are 10s faster because they go tits out insane. If it crashes there is no problem. Autosport test the GT63 had a 7:34, so the M5 is quicker

@@pcpedroariel that doesn't make any sense, the 2018 GT63s did 7:26 on the 20.6KM.

@@pcpedroariel Christian set the AMG GT R's RWD lap record in 2016 during a Supertest, his AMG GT R Pro lap time was just a little off Maro Engel's factory effort... If a manufacturer doesn't cheat, then it's lap times should be repeatable.

@@jakes2814 manufacturers’ own attempt can ensure the conditions are perfect with the car in a perfect non stock set up, sport auto laps are done by same driver, different conditions but stock set ups. So this means M5 CS is actually the faster car in customer hands than what GT63S would be

@@CarToneHK "... manufacturers’ own attempt can ensure the conditions are perfect..." LMAO, either you are pulling a massive troll, are a zealous BMW fanboy who haven't even bothered to check the GT 63 S' record lap to see the treacherous conditions it was set in, or the realization that the new M5 CS still isn't anywhere close to being faster sent you in a state of shock, and this spewing of utter nonsense is your coping mechanism...

Amg gt63s is 200kg heavier and is still faster

@@ode1854 You forgot to mention the extra 150 NM of torque that more than compensates.

@@Mzwandile_Makhowane they are just stupid amg fanboys

Straigth forward to the workshop. 😂 Simply the best my arse.

@@boostkiller no, bmw fanboys are literally the worst😂

The guy who squeezed all the cables in there deserves an award

I don’t think that had anything to do with build quality, and was just the number of wires that had to be coming out of the glove box, impeding it’s ability to close

ждем ответов по поводу того, что это все отговорки))

А может просто признать что бнв села в лужу говна со своим супермегаседаном которого они готовили 5 лет,не? Ты думаешь когда спецы бмв тестировали эту машину они не посмотрели на что она способна? Они просто поняли что делать официальный заезд смысла нет,потому что это будет позором для них и для вам бмвдрочеров тоже😂

What did BMW do with the M8 competition and M5 competition

@@gnarby3046 what????

@@UchihaM23 laptimes

@@gnarby3046 not revealed yet

@@gnarby3046 The same driver (Christian Gebhardt) did it in 7min35,90s with the m5 comp and 7min32,79s with the m8 comp. But it's still behind the Mercedes GT 63 S record...

Still the official lap time from BMW is not released I am sure it can do faster

You can't compare company claimed laptime to sport auto's. The company's own will always be quicker. And with the fact that this car is only about 2 seconds behind company claimed amg gt63s 4door laptime shows that this car is most likely faster than the AMG. As you might have known, the gap between claimed laptime and sport auto's is rather huge. Guaranteed to be more than just 2 seconds.

@@morepanicboy7120 I did a quick online search with regards to fastest lap times on the Nurburgring. I looked at what lap times Christian Gebhardt did and what lap times manufactures did with the same car. And i ageee you are right. The M4 GTS Sports Auto 7min37 BMW 7min27, Porsche 911 GT2 RS (991.2) Sports Auto 6min58 Porsche 6min47, Porsche 911 GT3 RS (991.2) Sports Auto 7min05 Porsche 6min56. On average Sports Auto is about 10 seconds a lap slower than manufactureres. So maybe if BMW could do a lap with the M5 CS it could be a 7min19 lap time.

@@morepanicboy7120 AMG did laptime in the wet, there still some more headroom on that laptime.

@@morepanicboy7120 Mercedes GT63s lap time is not claimed, it was recorded live.

@@morepanicboy7120 gt63s laptime without t13 ist 7.23.007 so there ist a 6 sec gap. And the gt63s lapped the ring when it was wet

Der M5-CS hatte gemessene 676 PS.

@@mustafa-kemal3499 ja also knapp 100ps mehr als der GTR

@@pacpacpacpacpac Wie viel gemessene Leistung hatte der GTR damals?

@@mustafa-kemal3499Mit 550ps waren die angegeben...streuten ganz leicht navh oben, vielleicht maximal 570 oder 580 aber mehr auch nicht.

@@pacpacpacpacpac Mk3 war ab Januar 2012 mit 550 PS angegeben. MK1 war 485 PS. MK2 war 530 PS. MK3 war 550 PS.

I can tell you with great certainty that it WON'T be any quicker on of-the-counter Cup 2s, since these P Zero Corsas were tailor-made for the M5 CS. The Tyre Reviews RU-vid channel did an excellent video on the difference between the OE Michelin 4S and off-the-counter 4S tyres for the new M3, I highly recommend you check it out.

@@bosshunterman Cup 2R or Trofeo R are one step above these Corsas...

@@JerainJezza Should we really be putting R-compound tyres on family sedans though?... And I'm still not 100% sure that it would be any faster on, what is essentially off-the-counter threaded racing tyres, as that kind of rubber requiers the car to generate proper heat into it in a very specific way in order to work properly, and even then, the wet weather performance is still usually horrible on those...

@@bosshunterman I watched the video, but that's about the difference on the same brand. I ask the question because the new M3 and M4 are delivered in the UK Pirelli Zero. In Europe main land on Michelins. Joe Achilles changed them immediatly to Michelin PS4s tyres, because he didn't find the P Zero's that good. Even Shmee150 was talking about to change the tyres on his M3 the Michelin CUP 2, because he didn't found the confidence in the Pirelli's. That's what got me wondering what would it do on Michelin CUP 2. I'm not a tyres expert, but what I have seen over the years is that cars standard equipt with Pirelli's P Zero perform better when they are equipt with Michelin. It's even happening by Porsche, many Porsche are delivered on Conti's as standard. But many of Porsche owners change them to Michelin, because it works better. I'm sorry if my Englisch isn't that good, it's not my original language, because that's Dutch.

@@TjibbeVieberink "... I have seen over the years is that cars standard equipt with Pirelli's P Zero perform better when they are equipt with Michelin..." - That's a deliberately deceptive statement, and you know it. YOU CANNOT compare across the product portfolio of a base brand vs base brand like that! (did your dealer deliver your car on genric P Zeros that were never tailor-made for it and you replaced them with Cup2s? Well, OF COURSE you're gonna feel an improvement...). Also, cars from the dealer that MIGHT NOT arrive with the exact tyres that were tailor-made for them (could be down to many reasons) =/= press cars reserved for the magazines to test, that NOT ONLY are always equiped with them, but often also aided by extra technical support from factory technicians. Also, testimonials from puplic personalities =/= conclusions derived from through performance testing. I challenge you to find somebody who sets better lap times than Randy Pobst with off-the-counter Michelins in any the non-GT3 992 911s so far that ALL come with P Zeros from factory.

Just watched GT63s driver, and no comparison with the BMW driver, sorry to say that.

Its 6 seconds slower than a GT63 which had a wet track. Where did you even get that number?

GT63s did a 7:27 on a damp track with much colder ambient temperatures with their official run.

The Mercedes is faster on this track 🤦🏻‍♂️

@@jpracing893 Mercedes-Benz did, the other test showed that GT63S is slower.

Этот журналист бывший гонщик,он северную петлю с закрытыми глазами проедет,или ты реально думаешь что любой чел сев за руль спортивной машины покажет такой результат?

@@TM-ot2yd я считаю, что одна попытка одного человека (пусть даже того, кто много катался по этой трассе) не является показательным результатом

С тех пор что тест пилот м подразделения проехал за то же время) самая мощная быстрая бмв в истории отсосала у тяжелых бизнес седанов панамера и амг гт 😂😂😂😂

they have already. the gt63s has an 7:23-time!

@@user-yo4tu5su6o no!only AMG did this time,no one else!we want to see Sport Auto doing 7.23 or 7.27 like did AMG...without slick tires,without manufacturer driver...like did BMW with all M models...why when GT63s was drived by others test drivers,on diferents tracks with same street tires,it was always beaten by the M8 GC/coupe competition?😉

@@facemoukredone4093 wrong, M8 GC hasn't made official runs on any race track. And GT63s won against M8 competition coupe on some tracks. Here👇 1.Motortrend Figure-8 2.VIRGEC 3.Circuit de Nevers Magny-Cours Club 4.Inta 5.Nürburgring Nordschleife 6. Hockenheim GP

@@keagan8911 im wrong?🤔 Auto bild Sachsenring M8 GC : 1.32.9 pirelli street T GT63s : 1.32.5 CUP2 (shame) M8 : 1.31.7 pirelli street T SPORT AUTO HOCKENEIM GT63s : 1.53.4 michelin street T M8 coupe :1.53.1 pirelli street T Auto bild Lausitzring GT63s: 1.33.2 michelin street T M8 GC : 1.32.9 pirelli street T M5CS : 1.31.8 pirelli street T Thats the results when AMG let others test drivers doing fair test..

@@facemoukredone4093 or rather should I say your information is irrelevant, you are using the Best times on the M8 but on GT63s you are not using the best times GT63s on hockenheim GP did 1:52:80 driven by Uwe Sener, the same driver who was driving the M8 coupe. Nevertheless, what about those other 6 tracks the GT63s beaten the M8?🤷‍♂️

This time big and heavy Porsche Panamera 😂😂😂 bmw shit 🤮🤮🤮 Mercedes Benz amg gt 4 door time 7.25))))

@@porschepanameraofficial5500 But the BMW is more exclusive than the Panamera. The BMW beats the Panamera by a couple of miliseconds

@@porschepanameraofficial5500 plus you are comparing a Executive liftback to a sports saloon. The rival for this car is the Mercedes AMG E63s. Which is slower than this. The car to the comparison of the Merc is the BMW M8 Gran Coupe

@@porschepanameraofficial5500 Also if all the cars have the same tyres the comparison can be fair

@@abayamangali E63 S is not at all the rival for the M5 CS, the M5 Competition is rival for the E63 S. There have no laptimes done with the E63 S sedan to compare with that of the M5 Competition's, so one cannot say the E63 S is slower on this track. The M8 GC & M5 are the same car with different roof styling and the CS is lighter than the M8 GC Competition and the GT63 S, and priced close to the GT63 S, so makes sense to compare the M5 CS with the GT63 S and not the E63 S.

6 seconds faster*** GT63s- 7.23,00 M5 CS - 7.29,57

@@gnarby3046 On a smaller track, P0 to PS4s/SC2s are like a 2-4s difference...

@@gnarby3046 no its not it was 20.6km time 6:23...6:,27 was on 20.8km like m5 CS did

@@bartbart6545incorrect, M5 CS was on 20.6KM. There's no record of any BMW on the 20.8KM Yet

@@keagan8911 the time BMW and gt63 was on the same lenght of track simply.Second-merc had a half slick tyres plus more areodynamic things and AMG test driver.

that horse powers is on the paper , in realy on the dyno HP number is different . m5 f90 comp has around 700 hp And 800 nm on dyno. Amg gt 63 has~ 670 hp and 850 nm .

Wait for the m4 manual or comp. or club sport...

@@theraggededgeonboardfastes8461 the M4 is too heavy

@@theraggededgeonboardfastes8461 the M4 is not a true sports car. It's a sporty coupé. The M1 was a real sports car for example.

@@markusplotz2259 this m4 is going to be different...the cs will be lapping closer to the m8 than ever before

Корса гавно по сравнению с кап2, на кап 2 результат явно лучше был бы

Perhaps it was the tyres?

It's AWD and people fail to realize that AWD cars do understeer a bit.

This time big and heavy Porsche Panamera 😂😂😂 bmw shit 🤮🤮🤮 Mercedes Benz amg gt 4 door time 7.25))))

Man sollte es einführen unlimitierte gt3 Renner auf Zeitenjagt auf die Schleife zu schicken.

Normally the OEM time is at least 5 seconds faster than Sport auto time. What's the Sport Auto laptime of GT63s?

@@jamisonz3365 Not on sport auto. The officially measured and notary-certified values are: 7:23,009 min for the 20.6-kilometre-long version (without straight-line measurement for track section T13) and 7:27,800 min for the 20.832-kilometre-long complete track (with straight-line measurement for track section T13). Exactly this variant and this lap time is officially listed by Nürburgring GmbH on their homepage. And I believe Sports Auto does for the 20.832KM.

@@gnarby3046 so the M5 CS is as fast as the GT63s on the 20.8 km layout ?

@@gnarby3046 No this was the 20.6km Layout

@@duran-qr3mm how do you know its the 20.6?