Bob Prechter on Thomas Nashe Part 1 

This is so exiting to me, to hear! Most of the discussion of "voices" is new to me, and the information that Bob Pretcher gives,answers so many questions about how the Earl of Oxford "became" Shakespeare! DeVere really almost gives himself away. Thanks to all the scholars digging for the facts!

Super Presentation - And Agreed, One Must Keep an Open Mind ❤ Thank you !

Thank you Shakespeare Authorship Roundtable for allowing this and hopefully future presentations of Prechter’s wonderful research! I thoroughly agree with your opening remarks that one must maintain an open and educated mind. Although there are some … or one, Oxfordian who apoplectically contests all things Bob Prechter, I find his work very compelling and convincing and I think his extensive research may open up whole new avenues of discovery. Exciting times ahead!

Thank you very much for hosting such a variety of unusually talented thinkers on the topic of who wrote as Shakespeare

What characterized Thomas Looney that is continued here by Robert Prechter are investigative procedures that remind the listener of police procedurals. After the investigator has eliminated all of the obvious perpetrators, the remaining suspects have plausible evidence against them. At one point in his monumental book "Oxford's Voices" Prechter literally quotes a Sherlock Holmes story with a chapter on the dogs who did not bark. The Shakespeare Authorship question is truly a great mystery.

Shakespeare: "tiger’s heart wrapp’d in a woman’s hide" Henry VI 3 Robert Greene "tiger’s heart wrapped in a player’s hide " Groatsworth of VVitt Thomas Nashe "ape's heart with a Lion's case" Terrors of the Night

A very powerful case! I have long thought that Robert Greene might have been a "persona" for Oxford due, partially, to the name! Greene (French" vert", and Robert being a Christian name of previous Earls of Oxford). Also Greene is supposed to have died around the time that Shake-speare is introduced to print....although he has an uncanny posthumous existence! But perhaps Oxford had SEVERAL pseudonyms? It would certainly fit in with Shakespeare's mischievous sense of humour. I often wonder whether this activity crossed over to the other talents of Oxford deemed unsuitable for noblemen to pursue...especially music? As far as I know this has not been deeply explored.

The name 'Thomas' means 'twin', as does the word/name 'Didymus'. The million dollar question is, Whose twin was Thomas Nashe?

The word "nash" is an old word in English that means to gnash or grind one's teeth, often in anger or frustration. Thomas Nashe's name can be seen as an apt pun, given his biting wit and satirical style, his tendency to 'bite' with his words. This kind of wordplay was common in Elizabethan times and could very well be part of the double meanings you're exploring. Also, Doubting "Thomas", is from the Bible. Perhaps how the pen name was created?

10:33 Thomas Dekker almost picks up where Nashe left off, in his style, against Nashes enemies. Weve been positing that Nashe became Dekker (or if you like, the pen name persona changed) Thomas means "twin" Literally right when Nashe exits stage Dekker appears writing tons of plays for Henslowe, with lots of linguistic crossover.

🎉😂❤

Physics pedantic, 5:25 - Time can't go backwards, it's an emergent property from causality. And it's not quantum physics either that suggest it might do in special circumstances, it's relativity equations taken past the extreme i.e. at a "black hole" "singularity", if that exists.

14:03

Thomas Nash writes a tribute to Sir Philip Sydney, a person he was too young and probably too poor to know except by his poetry ..... However, Oxford may have had reason to leave these cold lines of praise that fall well short of generous...Sydney "knewst what belonged to a scholar, what pains,what toil" "well couldst thou give every Vertue his encouragement " Ever y Ver tue

I would love to see videos about John Florio and not just about the usual candidates, thank you and I hope you will accept my invitation

Despite all the literary evidence, I'm skeptical that the elusive Thoman Nashe and William Shakespeare were the same persons. Nashe simply dropped out of sight, whereas Shakespeare lived on, past well past Nashe's disappearance, past Marlowe's murder, to emerge as one of the most brilliant figures in world literature. The Seventh Earl of Oxford claim isn't credible to my mind either, mainly because Shakespeare was well known in his day. He was married with children. known to Ben Johnson, known to dozens of actors and playwrights, at least two of whom he'd collaborated with in plays performed on the English stage--with consideration to Middleton and Kyd--notwithstanding his association to/with Marlowe. The identity of William Shakespeare as the preeminent literary figure isn't in doubt here.

Nashe was one of Francis Bacon's pennames. Sorry Oxfordians wishing doesn't make a thing true.