Bobby Fischer's Greatest Kingside Attack! 

Why magnus did not take knight on his first game..ruy lopez.. against petrov in fide rapid and blitz games..and petrov used his uncle defense petrov defense...i like ruy lopez of your uncle RJ.. bobby Fisher..He always reminds me.

Tf u talking about​@@teddymagcawas1332

Computers find half second 19:Rook f6! Fischer vs Benko! Morphy Tal Alekhine Kasparov had More beautiful games than Fischer! And these games computers tough longer than Fischer moves!

Morphy Tal Alekhine Kasparov had More beautiful games than Fischer! Fischer beat the weakest chess World champion Boris Spassky only 17 wins 10 losses! Capablanca would beat Spassky easily 8 wins 6 draws zero losses! Carlsen would beat Spassky easily 6 wins 6 draws zero losses! The highest tournament elo rating score is Fabiano Caruana 8,5/10 StLouis elo 3080! Karpov 11/13 Linares 1994 elo score 3040! Alekhine in San Remo 1930 elo score 3040! Fischer his best tournament score only 2990! Karpov has won over 160 super grand Master tournaments! Fischer won zero! Fischer was Second in Santa Monica 1966 behind blunder maker Spassky! Fischer did not won Havanna 1965! Fischer won only interzonals 1962 1970!

@@RaineriHakkarainen, Spassky isn't weak. He has an even record against Kasparov at 2 wins and 4 draws each, and they didn't even start to play until Spassk was no longer in his prime and not playing nearly as strong as he did in the 60s and mid-70s. However, Kasparov was in his prime, so calling Spassky weak doesn't make sense. Spassky was just as strong as any of them, even Fischer. The only reason Fischer won is he prepared harder than anyone else in the history of the game.

Nd7 would be met by R:d7 and game over.

I had to look that word up, lol. I'm afraid it is not.

Well, seeing as Bobby pretty much opened with 1.e4 until the 70s, I'm not sure you're correct at all lol

@@Rspknlikeab0ssxd Well, fan fact: The name Benko Gambit also was created in the 70s (after the book written by Benko). It is also named as the Volga Gambit. My comment was not about e4 od d4 moves. It was a joke.

@@michalziober I knew of there being a Benko Gambit (I think in the Benoni?) but cool info. Sorry for the woosh. Was just defending Bobby 😂

16

“Fischer is the greatest genius to descend from the chessic heavens.” -Mikhail Tal Fischer was afraid of nothing.

@@gooddognigel9992 Well, Fischer didn’t play Karpov, where he could have if he had wanted to. In my opinion, Fischer was afraid of Karpov, which he should: my guess is, Fischer would have lost that match.

@@paulbloemen7256Fischer had nothing else to prove, that’s why he quit. The idea that he was afraid of Karpov is simply absurd

@@banzaiburger9589 Oh, but here you are wrong. Karpov was the upcoming star with a totally different style, the talk of the chess town, all the more because Fischer didn’t play at all. Of course, Fischer, as the current world champion, had to prove he could beat Karpov. He just chickened out with quite irrelevant arguments.

​@@paulbloemen7256Bobby argued his whole life with tournament organizers and officials, and would withdraw when his conditions were not met. As the well-deserved champion of the world, I think it's especially fair to hear out his demands. He wanted the match to be like the first world chess championship- Steinitz Zukertort. So, he wanted it to be first to 10 wins, draws not counting. The original match had a stipulation that a 9-9 score would be a draw. Fischer wanted the prize money to be split at a 9-9 score, but he'd retain his title. To me, that seems somewhat like a fair way to treat the situation. For Bobby was already world champion, Karpov not so. Neither were Steinitz and Zukertort before that match, so neither had claim to have or retain the crown at 9-9. Since Fischer was already world champ, I don't see it as crazy to request he remain champ at such a score. As for if Bobby was afraid of Karpov, the truth is we'll probably never know. Bobby's psychology was unreal, he could have had no worries at all, or been paranoid beyond believe he'd lose. But the fact is that Karpov was still developing, and despite his strength, I think it's highly unlikely young Karpov could have enough positional ability to beat against Bobby, who was just as positionally strong as Karpov, and probably stronger in most other senses then

Stockfischer! 😀

I loved postal chess!! I lived in a rural area where there were no other players. I played in the 77 Golden Knights tourney. It took 7 years to finish but I made it through all 4 rounds of 6 simultaneous games, and ended up in the top 30 or so out of thousands who started.