Тёмный

Bonavito v. Harvard: The Greatest Pro Se Victory in 50 Years, Part 1 

Robert A. Bonavito, CPA
Подписаться 8 тыс.
Просмотров 3,9 тыс.
50% 1

Pro se is Latin for 'in one's own behalf'. The right to appear pro se in a civil case in Federal Court is defined by statute 28 U.S.C. § 1654.
⭐ The court system has a reputation of disrespecting Pro se litigants, but there are many hardworking Judges and support staff trying to treat them fairly.
This video goes into some detail about an article that appeared throughout the country discussing one of the greatest Pro Se victories over a powerful and well-funded defendant.
➡️ One of the most successful Pro se litigation matters in the United States involved one of the most powerful institutions in the country, Harvard University. I will use this complex case to help you get a better understanding of what you will face as a Pro se litigant.
📌 First some background:
Why would someone want to represent themselves in court?
1. To better understand the legal system
2. Lawyers are too expensive
3. Lawyers do not always deliver quality services
4. The case is complex, and lawyers may not fully understand the critical issues
5. If a lawyer won’t take the case because they risk alienating other potential clients
6. The case is simple and a Pro se litigant can do it themselves
➡️ The reason this case was pro se was because many lawyers refused to take the knowing would lose Harvard as a potential client and many of the other elite universities in the State of Massachusetts. In addition, in the State of Massachusetts many judges are alumni and have extensive interactions with Harvard. Studies have also proven that there is a cognitive bias against pro se litigants in the court system which was is proven in a study in 2020 by the American psychological Association. These factors meant that it was impossible to have a quality law firm take on the case.
➡️ The plaintiff entered Harvard in late 2016 after passing the required exams and paying the required fees. As can be seen in the official Harvard transcript clearly all of the requirements for the degree were obtained and this fact is not in dispute. However, the student was denied his degree based on emails from the admission department that indicated that Harvard was denying the degree based on the plaintiff’s age, gender and ethnicity. While this is perfectly okay to do in the United States if you are not accepting billions of dollars of aid from the federal, state and local governments. This is the case with Harvard, they do accept billions of dollars in aid with the understanding they will not discriminate.
With these facts established many law firms did not want to take on the case because it was clear-cut.
📌 Goal of this litigation:
✔️Stop discrimination at elite institutions by age, gender or ethnicity. This was the most important case involving education since Brown vs. The Board of Education of Topeka, which stopped racial segregation in the public school system.
✔️ Obtain the degree that was earned.
✔️ Stop elite educational institutions by admitting students primarily based on students’ family net income rather than their performance within the University’s classrooms.
➡️ The most important aspect of the litigation for Harvard was to move the court case up to Massachusetts so that it could be dismissed by friendly judges. From the plaintiff’s standpoint the most important aspect was to get to discovery, keep the case within the state of New Jersey and have a jury trial.
➡️ As someone who is not a lawyer the most important thing you can do is purchase a service such as Lexis Nexus and learn how to use case law which is critical to the judges. In order to do this the plaintiff took a Harvard legal course on law and how to research, write briefs and use case law. There are also many books and publications that can be found online and videos utilizing RU-vid
➡️The opponent was one of the most powerful institutions not only in Massachusetts but the country. They had connections with attorneys, law firms, the court system and judges throughout Massachusetts and a $50 billion war chest.
👉 For more information contact me below or visit our website: www.rabcpafirm...
Robert A. Bonavito, CPA
1812 Front St.
Scotch Plains, NJ 07076
908-322-7719

Опубликовано:

 

18 сен 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 37   
@Don-sx5xv
@Don-sx5xv 2 месяца назад
Thank-You for sharing your story Robert, truly remarkable. You need to write a book " How to navigate America's illegal legal system.
@Rabcpafirm
@Rabcpafirm 2 месяца назад
Thanks Don, glad you enjoyed the video
@broken2bones
@broken2bones 14 дней назад
I appeared pro se in several civil cases against me, brought by the state of Alaska and city of Juneau. Through motion practice I was able to get the suits dismissed. One of the cases was appealed and I’m waiting on the ruling
@Rabcpafirm
@Rabcpafirm 12 дней назад
You can get a good outcome if you have an independent judge who rules based on the pleads. Unfortunately, the judge I had was not independent and did not base his ruling on the pleadings.
@evansjohnarek2271
@evansjohnarek2271 7 месяцев назад
Good job my brother. Though Harvard is my best school, am happy you won.
@Rabcpafirm
@Rabcpafirm 7 месяцев назад
Thanks Evan
@codranine6054
@codranine6054 Год назад
I did time in the military and I can attest that in these federal entities that when the top tells the bottom to do something. Progressively from the top down everyone will drag their feet more and more. Then use every loop hole to do the exact opposite of what was demanded. So if the top court say look favorably upon pro se they will treat it with disgust and make it a uphill battle.
@Rabcpafirm
@Rabcpafirm Год назад
It is sad to think that there is a handful of District Court judges who have so little respect for themselves, their colleagues, and the Constitution that they would accept false documents and lie in court to protect their alma mater.
@codranine6054
@codranine6054 Год назад
@@Rabcpafirm yea it’s a tough one. I’ve pursued many different paths but I kind of want to pursue constitutional law.
@Bmerciful
@Bmerciful 19 дней назад
Great job
@Rabcpafirm
@Rabcpafirm 12 дней назад
Thanks
@williamhague2768
@williamhague2768 4 дня назад
Well done!
@Rabcpafirm
@Rabcpafirm 4 дня назад
Thanks
@Rabcpafirm
@Rabcpafirm 4 дня назад
Thanks
@Rabcpafirm
@Rabcpafirm 4 дня назад
Thanks
@Rabcpafirm
@Rabcpafirm 4 дня назад
Thanks
@Rabcpafirm
@Rabcpafirm 4 дня назад
Thanks
@healersofhumanity
@healersofhumanity 24 дня назад
Thank you- I’m in the middle of something similar
@Rabcpafirm
@Rabcpafirm 12 дней назад
Hope the video was useful for your matter
@ljbbenson3762
@ljbbenson3762 Год назад
Congrats... "If we change nothing nothing will change.....
@Rabcpafirm
@Rabcpafirm Год назад
Thanks, JB. This case changed the world. Now, individuals who can complete the course requirements at elite universities will have that opportunity. Technology vastly expands the number of students who will have the chance to participate in an elite University on a hybrid basis; there is no reason for anybody with the ability not to receive a degree from an elite university.
@QuizmasterLaw
@QuizmasterLaw Год назад
YOU were the plaintiff?!? Ok now I get it...
@Rabcpafirm
@Rabcpafirm Год назад
Yes
@QuizmasterLaw
@QuizmasterLaw Год назад
@@Rabcpafirm idk what really happened why the extension school wouldn't let you register for the masters, though you did have a closely related m.a. so i Guess that's why alternatively you uncovered some illegality by a corrupt alumnus? i am sure there is more and less to this than you've said so far. but what?
@Rabcpafirm
@Rabcpafirm Год назад
The big picture of this litigation was to open up elite institutions to any student, regardless of age or gender, who can pass the classes. Remember, this is not the 1970s or 1980s when the student capacities of these institutions were limited by geography, now, with hybrid learning the ability to serve students has been greatly expanded.
@southside9417
@southside9417 Год назад
Help😭 why would it Cost so much??
@Rabcpafirm
@Rabcpafirm Год назад
There are many benefits to being Pro Se; the main one is that you are not forced to settle due to unavoidable legal fees. High legal fees even cause Fortune 500 companies to settle. If I was not Pro Se, I would’ve been forced to settle or drop my legal battle rather than see it through to its final conclusion. My case is not in the court system because a Federal District Court judge, a Harvard alumnus, relied on knowingly false documents to dismiss my case. However, my litigation took place over six years and required a lot of research databases, outside experts, and consultants. I’m confident that most Pro Se fees will be much lower than mine; you must manage costs closely.
@bmmcwhorter
@bmmcwhorter Месяц назад
I need help
@Rabcpafirm
@Rabcpafirm Месяц назад
with what
@colleendeis928
@colleendeis928 10 месяцев назад
I was forced to take my own case after an uninsured driver totaled my car and he didn’t have insurance. I tried to find a lawyer but they all declined to take my case. And I get that. But that left me with only one option. So I filed it in small claims since there is supposed to be relaxed standards. Long story short I was railroaded by the judge. Rushed. And couldn’t find the sheet of paper proving I’d served the defendant. He didn’t answer. Didn’t show on the day of court. And I still lost. If I had the money to pay for legal representation I would have won in court. Hands down. But because I was a pro se litigant the judge already didn’t like me.
@Rabcpafirm
@Rabcpafirm 10 месяцев назад
That’s the interesting thing with my case: I beat Harvard and their high-powered attorneys twice before two federal judges. The only time I lost was when I appeared before Judge William Young, a Harvard undergraduate and Harvard law school graduate. There was a 92% chance I would have won if my case went to trial, but somehow, the case was assigned to a District Court judge who was a Harvard alumnus.
Далее
Ames Moot Court Competition 2023
1:30:44
Просмотров 699 тыс.
С чего всё началось?
00:42
Просмотров 116 тыс.
Common Mistakes that Self-Represented LItigants make
8:42
Pro Se Party Information
3:06
Просмотров 4,6 тыс.
Network Security - Deep Dive Replay
3:08:19
Просмотров 155 тыс.
A day in the life of... a forensic accountant
4:52
Просмотров 37 тыс.
Representing Yourself in Court
23:10
Просмотров 101 тыс.
Burdens of proof in a civil lawsuit
7:10
Просмотров 162 тыс.
How Legal Hearings Work: Part 1
12:26
Просмотров 209
С чего всё началось?
00:42
Просмотров 116 тыс.