I will say bootstrap has always been a safer choice as mudblazor is by comparison super new, but I'm glad you're giving mudblazor a chance as I do personally believe it's got potential to be that next staple library for blazor
@@justblazorprogramming I find that they have accomplished quite a lot already. And not having to deal with javascript issues linked to Bootstrap is a blessing. I wish they had more theming options and some items are really not customisable like the inputFields. It's a pain to change colours of that object for example
I used blazorized, matblazor and mudblazor and when the time I know how this library works I tried to recreate it on my own, It is awesome at first because I have my own library to use but when I'm using it I encountered bugs everytime thats why I stop using and developing my own library and because no one uses it haha thats why I choose to go to syncfusion blazor
I am newby on MudBlazor. The fact is I dont know how to read its doc and I am getting confused. There is any link, youtube video or whatever, apart its doc, that show how to work with its? Can any one help me please. ?
@@justblazorprogramming Deploy any where possible,no local. Azure, Firrbase Digital O. Or somewhere else cheap as it is for practice. The project is running localy on my IIS. Some friends advice me to deploy some where IIS is supported. Any way I hope you doing better woth you stuff.
@LuisSanchez did you completed your project using mudblazor? How is the performance and any issues faced so far? We are starting a new project and I am stuck between using bootstrap or mudblazor? MudBlazor looks more convincing and I want to go ahead with it but littlest skeptical about its reliability ( considering its quite new)
Why not both? Mudblazor is great. But bootstrap brings some components to the table mudblazor doesn't have and are a pain to implement vanilla like bootstrap scrollspy.
Im not saying you cant, i just dont like having two third party libraries that fundamentally do the same thing in the same project cause you can get weird interactions
Ive used a few third party grids before and most of them dont have this out of the box, you can have a checkbox but its up to you to hook up whatever functionality you want from it.
