BotR Exclusive! Swiss 10.4mm G150 subsonic precision rifle for the P-26 stay behind organisation 

Damn I was going to say that :-) Bloke go on admit it you want it don't you, your fondling give you away...

Well could be weapons on the forgotten bloke range. Where Ian goes to a British pub and finds out what dodgy historical firearms are hidden in bags and for sale

@@ste887 That sounds better :D

Jesus on the Range

Gun St. Peter?

@@kristiangustafson4130 Gun-helm Tell ?

Gun St. Paul

Except this has nothing to do with Gladio or what it did.

@@FortuneZer0 how would you know ?

@@jonathangriffiths2499 Because Titus Meier managed to be the first uninvolved person to get the clearence for the files and studied this subject. I read his whole work on it. ISBN 978-3-03810-332-5 / ISBN 977-3-03810-397-4 E-BOOK. He also did a presentation on the topic. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-E5gcnIMUHDQ.html

probably to visually break up the shape or silhouette of the gun.

@@kam_iko Looks like the same colours as the "Berlin Camo" used by the British for urban environments.

@sman7290 Thanks folks, I had never seen this type of breakup camo before, makes sense though, now how can we use this to break up facial recognition!?

roadpanzir the kind of face paint that death metal people wear in their album covers and concerts.

@@roadpanzir Print out stickers with eyes and lips and stuff on them and stick them to your own face near the thing they look like, so the features it uses to recognize faces are confounded.

That's the great thing about Europe. Bubba tends to be well educated and knows what he's doing. Unlike the idiots I've saved a few SMLE'S from.

@@gnarshread Nothing contained within this comment is true. The average European knows virtually nothing about firearms and uneducated, semi-literate, low IQ rurals even less so which makes it all the more concerning as they're the ones most likely to privately own firearms. The only reason you don't see more bubba-jobbed rifles because it's literally prohibited by law.. Stop talking out of your ass, you Europhilic trash. Source: I live in fucking Europe.

@@The_Crimson_Fucker Shut up you just live in a shit place of europe.

Absolutely nobody was ever assassinated with this rifle or any like it. *Wink

Firstly, recoil for follow-up shots is less important for a bolt action, cos you disturb your position to work the bolt. It is important for watching the impact though. And it just so happens that B+T have made a very similar-looking (and clearly derivative) rifle in 300 BLK ;)

Doubt it. And likely it's got a much tighter twist cos that's a looooooong bullet. But no chance to find out.

a silent shotgun slug accurate to 200m. perfect for sentries and guard dogs.

Yes. Might not feed though.

Never heard of a "private museum"?

Well, it might be a good thing geopolitical, or not, but it's certainly not a "good thing" for the people who are getting tortured and killed....

@@Laotzu.Goldbug Well that's fucking ironic for you to say, given your username

Tell that to Hiram Maxim, who invented the first one and called it a silencer ;)

@@BlokeontheRange tell that to the world of arms as it's known as a suppressor, it suppresses the the sound not silence it ,just cause one person calls it a silencer don't make it right ,look up the definition in arms books ,or wiki or any world info about the matter ,if your on a range calling it a silencer and people look at you thinking like I do your the only one who says silencer ,it's like this ,it's I have a lada and call it a lambourghini, what does the rest of the world call it ,a lambourghini because I said it is or what the rest of the world knows it as being a lada .there is a clear definition on suppressor / silencer and just cause you say it is something it's not don't make it right ,your on a range ,you should know it's not a f silencer ,when people call it a silencer then people who know think it's suppressor you dumb ass amateur ,when fired does it make it completely inaudible? How would you know cause you've only handled one and not heard it fire live rounds by your own admission

OK, let's test your contention by looking at some literature. Smith and Smith, Small Arms of the World, 10th Edition, P.263 (an American book) says "silencer". The British Military uses the term "silencer" also (see, for instance, Laidler, The Sten Machine Carbine, ch.8, which cites War Department documents which designate the STEN Mk.II(S) as "silent" and provided with a "silencer". In any case, the British legal term from the Firearms Acts is a "moderator", not a suppressor. And a moderator which renders the firearm practically silent deserves the term "silencer" (I have reliable second-hand info that the G150 is indeed practically silent). But if you want to waste your time arguing on the internet that of the three commonly-used terms only 1 is correct due to some strange recent social marker thing amongst gun people in the US, you crack on son ;)

@@BlokeontheRange o am sorry ,yeah we call a car bonnet a hood do we ,a boot a trunk maybe ,what language do we speak , English ,not American English ,your referring to American reference, they can't say aluminium like we do ,if I listened to an American I could forgive his different way of calling things ,here we say suppressor or as you picked up the other name is a moderator, I wonder if putting in a search rifle silencer it has a definition that corrects it to suppressor, silencer is an old reference and you will find it even in old English references of arms manufacturers but we live in modern times and as it doesn't make it truely inaudible it's has the tittle of suppressor, any decent hunter in this country will automatically correct you to your reference of a silencer as we find it irritating to not call things by its modern reference, here's an example, someone goes to buy a H beam from a builders ,doesn't get one and returns back to the job ,upon being asked where's the beam the guy replied they don't sell H Beams ,bricklayer says I asked for an I beam so why did you ask for something they don't sell ,guy replies that's what an old guy said it was ,who's right ? The guys H beam or as everyone in the business knows it as an I beam

Seriously? You are seriously arguing that it's just old usage that is now incorrect? LOL. Here's some 2019 publications of patents using the term "silencer" to describe moderators. worldwide.espacenet.com/searchResults?ST=singleline&locale=en_EP&submitted=true&DB=&query=f41+silencer+firearm+2019 This is as silly as all of the other terminological social signalling. But whatever makes you feel superior to some idiot who puts himself out there on the Intartubes, eh? :D

No, it wasn't manufactured during WW2. How on earth could you watch that video, listen to the words, and come to the conclusion that it was? Also, the receiver and butt are both steel...

You could also just shut up and let the man speak the way he wants. Junky mouth noises? wtf..

To be honest, I had absolutely no idea what that comment was trying to say, so I ignored it. I still don't understand it... And I just speak with my normal speaking voice, with a little projection so it's more clear and avoids mumbling.

@@BlokeontheRange Lip smacking, tongue clacking to start a sentence or on specific consonants like "m", "p" etc. The old news drunks were slobbering and sucking the spit from their mouths.

Nope, I still have no idea what you're going on about.

@@BlokeontheRange Ego. It convinces us we've fooled em. It lends our brains to the idea that we look or sound like someone. Group thinking. A strange occurrence is the thought that you need to smack your mouth at the beginning of a sentence, and pay more attention to that than being real, in order to be perceived as intelligent human being. Fake it till you make it is bullshit

You do realise that there's a standard vocabulary and methodology for describing this stuff? Ian didn't invent it... Get yourself an old copy of Smith and Smith "Small Arms of the World" for instance and you'll see exactly where this method of description comes from.

Or, indeed the Textbook of Small Arms 1904 for an even earlier example of the written form of it: drive.google.com/open?id=1aF2QVPLsAm1z_HjYORaTSEwdB1EF2rlw

I know this is old and probably a troll but lol

I would give my eye teeth to shoot it... Highly unlikely to ever happen though...

@@BlokeontheRange If you start talking funny I expect a range video of it.

@@BlokeontheRange I expect at least a collab with Inrange where we see a mudtest with the G150 🤣😅

Build something on the cartridge, 10,3x68 400 grain bullets and a 10,3 barrel and cases and a huge suppy.

@@BlokeontheRange I think we should start a petition for you to shoot it. Allowing you to hold it without shooting it is cruel and I admire your stiff upperlipness in the face of such taunting.

Gun jesus would have shot it :(

Cool, where can I find some info about this? Would love to see this.

....saw the rifle today in Reuenthal.... Very intersting.

Made for destroying helmets, buttons, belt buckles etc

I must’ve misheard him, (I do that), because my ear picked up, "…anti matter" purposes. Like grey matter?🤯😉

Hey, if it's your family and neighbours who'll get shot in reprisals, you may want to stick to only sabotage and espionage. Bloke is right, this is way overpowered for anti personnel.

If its about antennas and such those might well not be guarded at all. Here in switzerland, the mountainous parts at least, you need relay antennas on mountain ridges to communicate with nearby valleys. Those probably wouldnt be guarded at all or just very lightly (at least until a bunch of them got taken out). Also the reprisals would most likely follow assasinations of generals and such, not some lone private guarding some antenna.

​@@Soff1859 I wouldn't count on the Red Army tolerating even the lowest ranked soldier being shot at. It's hard to understand this contradiction, how the Red Army could on the one had do so little to protect their soldiers due to things like gas masks that contained asbestos yet they would care about lowly conscripts being sniped. The distinction is that the Red Army's propaganda can cover up that there's asbestos in the gas masks, they can cover up meningitis outbreaks, they can't cover up that soldiers are being shot in broad daylight and they'll be afraid to even walk outside. The whole point of snipers shooting at soldiers it to reduce the combat effectiveness of such infantry units, it forces them to do less effective soldiering. So this is why such armies will order reprisals in response to rank-and-file riflemen being sniped. It's a way to stop the sniping attacks by hurting what the snipers care about. The commanders who order these massacres are only trying to stop a mutiny by their men who refuse to stand at a guard position due to fear of sniper attacks. And the soldiers who have seen their colleagues be shot "in cold blood" will be hopped up wanting revenge on a scapegoat. The UK had similar stay-behind units and they had trained sharpshooters/snipers but apparently their main target was not any German or Axis soldiers. Their task was to assassinate collaborators. This was something that was not calculated to cause reprisals because these totalitarian regimes weren't assumed to be particularly riled up by "foreigners" (as they saw it) being killed. And equipment loss... come on, a conscript isn't going to be furious and want revenge over mere metal being destroyed. They won't be afraid of equipment being destroyed when they often don't even know what the equipment does. They will want revenge over seeing a 19 year old fellow soldier get their head blown off by a sniper who attacked suddenly and sneakily with no chance for anyone to fight back.

I want to say that the US rifle was a Ruger M77/44, which is a micro Mauser type action with rotary magazine, chambered in .44 Magnum.

The US for a short time had a shortened 458 win mag as a silent sniper (458x1.5 Barnes iirc)

I was wondering how they came up with a relatively uncommon US revolver cartridge for this thing. Your statement explains it to me.

@@oldesertguy9616 That and the 10.4 vetterli experience. When the swiss adopt a caliber they tested it. The STG 90 and GP 90 developpement was a ten millions of cartridges fired kind of deal. They had very good data on the 10.4 vetterli but wanted a straight case, smokeless powder and a bit more oomph. The .41 magnum was an easy choice.

Richard Thorpe That’s hilarious!🤣 Well said...can I use it?!

B. Frew feel free. Have a great day

Interesting, thanks! I'd just presumed that the .41 case was used cos it was available if obscure.

Look up gladio and p-2 lodge. Basically an org of secret nazis kept on NATO’s payroll to do crime and prevent any kind of organized resistance to capitalism

Because they were a treasonous bunch of weirdos who thought they were above the law. Working for Nato while pretending to belong to a neutral country. They should be prosecuted.

Witty, but no. See above discourse about wanting confused Russians, not vengeful Russians. Odin's trousers, I'm having unpleasant deja vu.