BR Ambedkar on Islam and Islamic Society - An Excerpt from his book "Pakistan or Partition of India" 

true . "Worshipping one's ancestors as god , is a good thing and far better than worshipping a foreign tribal god , worshipping one ancestor as god , forms the psychologicalbasis of nationality " BR Ambedkar in thoughts on Pakistan.

Edit this he made reservation because he didn't wanted them to leave Hindu

Scheduled caste of other religion also gets reservation... your logic is wrong

You rocked my mind

STILL THOSE WHO CONVERT TO CHRISTIANITY GET SC ST RESERVATION IN INDIA.

Sir you have beautifully explained the dark side of that religion with Dr BRA and his insightful views on islam and it's basic mentality. This attitude of Dar-ul-salam and dar-ul Harb all world people are witnessing daily all across the world . + terrorism, bigotry, jihadism all are seeing it every day!? 😮 Dr. BRA 's views are correct in the light of practical experience by rest of world community!? 😮

Can you suggest me a book which will tell me about Ambedkar's ideology

@@haftavasuli7162 dr Ambedkar written 32 books in which 10 are incomplete ....many books about caste system in Our society and some about Pakistan and partition of India and also on Radical Islam and their followers in the world

@@sunilnayak5567 bhai what about jai bheem jai mim.... Or do you call it jai bheem jai sree ram

@@Raj-gc2rc jai bheem jai meem sirf dikhawa hai......ek musalman sirf dusre dusre musalman ko hi apna bhai manta hai .....caste system ki buraiyan hindu samaj mein hain lekin iska matlab yeh nai hai ki apne ghar ke jhagde Mein hum kisi aur ko ghusne de especially mullon ko

@@sunilnayak5567 agar tumhare gharwale janbujhke tumhare upar atyachar kareh to tum kya karoge, batao vai

Ambedkar delivering a speech during a mass conversion ceremony. Ambedkar considered converting to Sikhism, which encouraged opposition to oppression and so appealed to leaders of scheduled castes. But after meeting with Sikh leaders, he concluded that he might get "second-rate" Sikh status. Instead, around 1950, he began devoting his attention to Buddhism and travelled to Ceylon (now Sri Lanka) to attend a meeting of the World Fellowship of Buddhists. While dedicating a new Buddhist vihara near Pune, Ambedkar announced he was writing a book on Buddhism, and that when it was finished, he would formally convert to Buddhism. He twice visited Burma in 1954; the second time to attend the third conference of the World Fellowship of Buddhists in Rangoon. In 1955, he founded the Bharatiya Bauddha Mahasabha, or the Buddhist Society of India. In 1956, he completed his final work, The Buddha and His Dhamma, which was published posthumously. After meetings with the Sri Lankan Buddhist monk Hammalawa Saddhatissa, Ambedkar organised a formal public ceremony for himself and his supporters in Nagpur on 14 October 1956. Accepting the Three Refuges and Five Precepts from a Buddhist monk in the traditional manner, Ambedkar completed his own conversion, along with his wife. He then proceeded to convert some 500,000 of his supporters who were gathered around him. He prescribed the 22 Vows for these converts, after the Three Jewels and Five Precepts. He then travelled to Kathmandu, Nepal to attend the Fourth World Buddhist Conference. His work on The Buddha or Karl Marx and "Revolution and counter-revolution in ancient India" remained incomplete. Views *Hinduism* *"I was born a Hindu because I had no control over this, but I shall not die a Hindu"* - B. R. Ambedkar *Ambedkar called the Hindus as the everlasting mortal enemy and unremorseful depraved oppressor of the Dalits. He argued that there was no hope for Untouchables to live a respected life within Hinduism. When Gandhi asked Ambedkar to endorse the Temple Entry Bill, he refused and said that he was disgusted by Hinduism and Hinduism's followers because they hold false ideals and live in a false social life. In 1935, he declared that, despite being born as a Hindu, he would not die as a Hindu. While speaking about the Hindu Raj, he said that Hinduism is a threat to freedom, equality, and community, regardless of what Hindus claim. On October 14, 1956, while converting to Buddhism, he stated that he was rejecting Hinduism for which it represented inequality and oppression. He also criticized the High caste Hindus of having captured the state with their monopoly of education and wealth and excluding the lower caste Hindus from power, education and wealth and doing this as their goal in life. He also said that the High caste Hindus also intend to exclude Muslims from power as they did to lower caste Hindus.* *Hindutva and Hindu Rashtra* *Ambedkar's writings showed that he was opposed to the concept of Hindu Rashtra. In 1946, he labelled the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) as a dangerous entity. From his writing, Pakistan or Partition of India, he frequently commented on Hindu communal politics which statments such as the 'menace' of 'Hindu Raj'. In his book, What Congress and Gandhi have done to the untouchables, Ambedkar claims that organisations such as the Hindu Mahasabha were useless to deal with the social issue of caste and untouchability and their only purpose was to fight Muslims in Indian politics. He was consistent in his criticism against the Hindu nationalist organisations of their counterproductive tactics and sectarian politics. Hindutva organisations, according to Ambedkar's newspapers, had a habit of deliberately ignoring Dalit issues in order to keep going with Hindu unanimity. Ambedkar's newspaper Janata, pointed out in one of it's commentary that the Hindu nationalist politics are founded on sectarian ideals of "Brahminism" and anti-Muslim politics. In his 1945 book, Pakistan or Partition of India, he said that if "Hindu Raj becomes a reality, it would undoubtedly be the greatest calamity for this nation". He also said that Hindu Raj must be stopped at all costs.* *Aryan Invasion Theory* Ambedkar viewed the Shudras as Aryan and adamantly rejected the Aryan invasion theory, describing it as "so absurd that it ought to have been dead long ago" in his 1946 book Who Were the Shudras?. Ambedkar viewed Shudras as originally being "part of the Kshatriya Varna in the Indo-Aryan society", but became socially degraded after they inflicted many tyrannies on Brahmins. According to Arvind Sharma, Ambedkar noticed certain flaws in the Aryan invasion theory that were later acknowledged by western scholarship. For example, scholars now acknowledge anās in Rig Veda 5.29.10 refers to speech rather than the shape of the nose. Ambedkar anticipated this modern view by stating: The term Anasa occurs in Rig Veda V.29.10. What does the word mean? There are two interpretations. One is by Prof. Max Muller. The other is by Sayanacharya. According to Prof. Max Muller, it means 'one without nose' or 'one with a flat nose' and has as such been relied upon as a piece of evidence in support of the view that the Aryans were a separate race from the Dasyus. Sayanacharya says that it means 'mouthless,' i.e., devoid of good speech. This difference of meaning is due to difference in the correct reading of the word Anasa. Sayanacharya reads it as an-asa while Prof. Max Muller reads it as a-nasa. As read by Prof. Max Muller, it means 'without nose.' Question is : which of the two readings is the correct one? There is no reason to hold that Sayana's reading is wrong. On the other hand there is everything to suggest that it is right. In the first place, it does not make non-sense of the word. Secondly, as there is no other place where the Dasyus are described as noseless, there is no reason why the word should be read in such a manner as to give it an altogether new sense. It is only fair to read it as a synonym of Mridhravak. There is therefore no evidence in support of the conclusion that the Dasyus belonged to a different race. *Ambedkar disputed various hypotheses of the Aryan homeland being outside India*, and concluded the Aryan homeland was India itself. According to Ambedkar, the Rig Veda says Aryans, Dāsa and Dasyus were competing religious groups, not different peoples. *Communism* Ambedkar's views on Communism were expressed in his essay "Buddhism and Communism." He accepted the Marxist theory that the privileged few's exploitation the masses perpetuated poverty and its issues. However, he did not see this exploitation as purely economic, theorizing that the cultural aspects of exploitation are as bad or worse than economic exploitation. In addition, he did not see economic relationships as the only important aspect of human life. He also saw Communists as willing to resort to any means to achieve proletarian revolution, including violence, while he himself saw democratic and peaceful measures as the best option for change. Ambedkar also opposed the Marxist idea of controlling all the means of production and private ownership of property: seeing the latter measure as not able to fix the problems of society. In addition, rather than advocating for the eventual annihilation of the state as Marxism does, Ambedkar believed in a classless society, but also believed the state would exist as long as society and that it should be active in development. • Still extreme sycophants of anti-Islam/Muslims party (rss n bjpees) hate M.K. (Mahatma) Gandhi [Father of the nation] n love B.R Ambedkar esp. in Karnataka.🤦‍♂️😅🤣

BR Ambedhkar got failed in all elections in hindu majority area then he realized muslims only help him to win election, then he decided to represent the muslim Majority area then he got elected then he made indian constitution.. Hindus failed him in election due to he was dalit..just research about this matter.. Ambedhkar in his late days of life he was so much thankful to islam and muslims, he added muslim rights to indian constitution such as polygamy, Triple Talaq, Wealth dividing after death, Ambedhkar added muslim rights in judiciary laws, constitutional laws, which still you can see in indian laws.. If this statement have anything wrong correct me. Thank you

Bhagat Singh ( apke father aae h )

@@shreypadauni5041 politician*

What about Savarkar?

Why this bhramin is not talking about manutharma sasthra

Yyy

@@oiitsmeraffic2407 those are gone days there is no Aryan invasion theory

मराठी ✋

@@Shivakshay205 yes I agree even marathi too. But there more number 1diots in West Bengal and Kerala, they definitely need it. Maharashtra is much better 👍

Vi Tan you are true sanatani

@@ghumakkad8974 i dont know but if standing for equality aginst,manusmruti that is sanatan

@@vitan8994 Manusmriti is nowhere described as a law book for eternity. Whatever its laws may have been, were relevant for that period. That's the beauty of Sanatan Dharma. Laws are not made by some all-controlling God, but by man, acceptable to all. With time, these laws are subject to change.

@@SamvedIyer it was law book and was use in time of so many king tell pashwa in pune so learn more and ya law should be changed as time so burn manusmrti,shriaya for islam

@@SamvedIyer even in anytime the most law of manusmriti was ba, 1st its clam that is come from god and then it allow every one to be slave

@alpha blaze Caste System

@@ravneetsingh1107 ur father islam and Brahmins brought this for..thier benefits

@@motivationdrugs6670 why are u saying this to me?

@@motivationdrugs6670 NO YADAVS DID IT😂😂

Right

Because we are not addicted to religion

@@iamvkabhinav25 rather we love our religion/culture and want it to adapt to the changing times. The only reason why our dharma is sanatan is because we have never been static.

Abrahamics can't reform Abrahamics are false religions but they can't accept it Music is ban cinema is ban in Islam but still they have t.v. in every Muslim countries and Muslim families listening 🎧 and they Ganja pite he drugs pite he 🤣🤣

BR Ambedhkar got failed in all elections in hindu majority area then he realized muslims only help him to win election, then he decided to represent the muslim Majority area then he got elected then he made indian constitution.. Hindus failed him in election due to he was dalit..just research about this matter.. Ambedhkar in his late days of life he was so much thankful to islam and muslims, he added muslim rights to indian constitution such as polygamy, Triple Talaq, Wealth dividing after death, Ambedhkar added muslim rights in judiciary laws, constitutional laws, which still you can see in indian laws.. If this statement have anything wrong correct me. Thank you...

Same things he said about Hindus dear.Moral of the story is the followers of any religion will find there way to oppres and rule by justification that religion demands them to rule by which they construct weird analogies to fool the masses or by presenting the solution of complicated problems in mono tone simple manner.

@@attiqurrehman728 here we are talking about Ambedkar on Islam. And everyone knows that he was against Hindusim.

@@roggamer3449 comment was about Muslims we can't stereotype everyone under same logic

@@roggamer3449 because of untouchability and cast issues Ambethkar deals with in childhood

@@roggamer3449 what about burma and since when bhuddist got certificate of being smart.for your kind info when you think u r smart it shows how foolish u r.

Piyush Khandelwal soon or later India will realise him

Read Gandhi, and you will realise that where Ambedkar followed trend of d times, Gandhi could see decades ahead . Gandhi knew very well about muslims' loyalties towards India, that's why he was against partition, thus giving away our land to jihadis. He knew they will never be satisfied with just one part.

If someone admire him or keep a photograph at his home, vehicle or workplace invariably he will be a dalit. In fear of this a non dalit will not do the same as others will think he is a dalit. This is caste system which is invented by the cruel inhuman people of India, which is not seen in any other part of the world. He is the only Genius in our politics who loved the common people.

@@stanleygeorge8639 Stanley birth bsed caste system is a natural reaction to human insecurity...if someone successful...he would most likely want his generation to follow footsteps...fortunately the reform of caste system is happening within us... as insecurities go and society prospers...caste system will go too.. I haven't lost hope...

True, if he had been a Brahmin, there would have been competition to erect a monument bigger than Sardaar Patel.

Which caste are you?

Wohi hii jo aap samjh rhe ho.

Waise constitution to pura copy Kiya gya hii hamara . Samjh nhi aata why he is father of constitution ?

Logon ko ek karne ke bajaye bant diya . constitution ka hawala deke minority,sc,St, obc ke bich ek line khich dii hamesha hamesha ke liye.log kabhi ek ho hii nhi paye aaj tak . reservation jaruri hii I completely agree lekin aisa execution nhi .jo reservations leke samriddh ho gye hii kya wo apne niche ke lower cast ka help karte hii kya ? Nhi wo apne ko unse better manne lagte hii bas aur khud hi unse alag ho jate hii .insan main insaniyat ka bhao hona chahiye jo sirf wo ek insan hii isiliye uski help ke liye tyar rahe .paisa kama ke sirf apna future bana lena humanity nhi .apne niche ke logo ko help karna hii .

@@rps7564 ary ghochu ab bolega rocket copy kiye hai, mobile copy, calculator copy, computer, cycle, bike, car etc etc jo universal chiz hoti jo achi hoti usko duniya apnati hai smjha🤦🏻 after all sbka constitution unke country ke hissab se hai or india constitution india ke region, public ke hissab se managed hai or jarurt padne par amendment hoti rehti hai Phele bta Padha bhi hai Indian constitution or other countries ke constitution ? ary Andhbhakt thoda to dimag ka istemal bhi kiya kr jo sun suna ke ajate ho or robot jaise atak ke pura chutiyapa failate rehte ho🤦🏻 He was head/chairman of drafting committee of Indian Constitution Reservation ka rona ro maat ye bta is caste based reservation ki jrurt akhir padi hi ku ? Tere Hindu dharma ne Caste basis pe insaano ko upper-lower bana ke itna bata hai ki uske hissab se sbko reservation alot karna pda Thoda to soch smjh ke bola kro yrrr

It is terrorism, no religion. World slowly coming to understand and good people also leaving Islam silently.

Absolutely right.

We should aware from this and should spread awareness among other hindus .

The problem is they (rational or moderate if any) never come forward in defiance or protest of all the wrong doings of their faith.

Bhai..... It is true because you see.... Hindus don't accept the muslim beards, they don't accept their language, they don't accept their clothing.... How are they supposed to be feel loved......... You need to allow them to practice faith and still be social.....

We thats is how it is whenever we read great people.

I am a dalit. Only people who can write these things are one who read Ambedkar books. None other

Contra Bodhi please rejoin with Sanatan roots

@@xxxzz8413 Dalits converted to Buddhism but do not follow Buddhism principles. I think most are hard core non vegetarians and do not show kindness to animal while eating.

@@dhananjayajayaram2485 did you ask every dalits? Like by your logic every brahmin doesn't eat bird meat like chicken, i have 3 close brahmin friends, we all ate chicken biryanis, i don't know how many times!!

He didn't choose Jainism or Sikhism because casteism was prevalent among Jains and Sikhs in those times.

Sandeep Kumar ji, pls provide the those articles or links to them, I too would like to circulate them.🙏

Sir please kya aap humko page number aur lines ka address de sakte hain Please sir, request

Spread love not hate, instead

Great service to Sanatan dharma, thanks

Great work and keep doing it.

A Common Indian...

Kaval Shah I deliberately chose the word Hindu as Hindu chooses to remain ignorant. Secondly, Indian is not a Bhartiya nomenclature. Thirdly, Anand is specifically pointing whether Muslims would accept to be ruled by a Hindu ruler. So, I preferred to consciously choose the word Hindu as also not to be apologetic by being an Hindu.

@@sunilsachdeva1839 i agree with you, but i think every swadeshi Muslim, Sikhs should be considered as Indian and they should also hear and understand Islam as told by ambedkar ji... The Sikhs have right to be called Indians as well...

@@sunilsachdeva1839 Any one Who Follows and understands Sanatan Dharma will never do anything to be Apologetic off... So Lo Ram Naam, Karo Ache Kaam... Jai Jawan, Jai Kisan...

Kaval Shah Sikhs, Jains and Buddhists are are of Hindu lineage and essentially Hindus. I never consider them separate from me, a Hindu. Secondly, almost all Muslims in Bharat are also of Hindu origin too. And, till a few years back I considered them also as one of us only. But, the more I know about them from learned people like Anand, Rajiv Malhotra and others and also from Muslims themselves, I'm inclined to believe that Islam and Christianity are not same as Sanatan Dharm ( Hinduism). These religions do not lead to the same goal as Hinduism. Also, their exclusivism makes them aggressive and violent in many ways, and that's scary also

Well they aren't happy in places where they are in minority they aren't happy in places where they are in majority

@@nikhilhembrom8952 true 👍

I think He studied muslim scholard more vigrously than actual Islamic texts which Is Quran and hadiths with the understanding of 1st 3 generations since Prophet Muhammad PBUH.

He was factual acurate and never in denial. But subsequently we lived in denial. The root cause that brings peace and harmony must be debated not fought .

When he criticise Hinduism then u guys are happy when it comes to islam then ur opinion changes​@@sameerahmad9482

I’m surprised you haven’t heard of Dr Anand Ranganathan.

@@IdkIdk-dd9go ive read "Pakistan or the partition of India" written by Dr. B R Ambedkar. Have you?

@@amitabhakassap7339 unfortunately not yet, but I’ve read snippets of Ambedkar’s views on Islam if that’s what you want to clarify. Also, just to clarify, I wasn’t intending to be derisive when I expressed surprise at the fact that you haven’t heard of Anand Ranganathan, it’s merely a surprise considering he’s quite active in debates and on Twitter. The fact that you’re watching a video on this channel and still didn’t know him just added to my surprise.

@@IdkIdk-dd9go swarajyamag.com/ideas/dismantling-sainthood-ambedkar-on-gandhi Please go through this snippet and know more about those contemporary politicians.

Ambedkar delivering a speech during a mass conversion ceremony. Ambedkar considered converting to Sikhism, which encouraged opposition to oppression and so appealed to leaders of scheduled castes. But after meeting with Sikh leaders, he concluded that he might get "second-rate" Sikh status. Instead, around 1950, he began devoting his attention to Buddhism and travelled to Ceylon (now Sri Lanka) to attend a meeting of the World Fellowship of Buddhists. While dedicating a new Buddhist vihara near Pune, Ambedkar announced he was writing a book on Buddhism, and that when it was finished, he would formally convert to Buddhism. He twice visited Burma in 1954; the second time to attend the third conference of the World Fellowship of Buddhists in Rangoon. In 1955, he founded the Bharatiya Bauddha Mahasabha, or the Buddhist Society of India. In 1956, he completed his final work, The Buddha and His Dhamma, which was published posthumously. After meetings with the Sri Lankan Buddhist monk Hammalawa Saddhatissa, Ambedkar organised a formal public ceremony for himself and his supporters in Nagpur on 14 October 1956. Accepting the Three Refuges and Five Precepts from a Buddhist monk in the traditional manner, Ambedkar completed his own conversion, along with his wife. He then proceeded to convert some 500,000 of his supporters who were gathered around him. He prescribed the 22 Vows for these converts, after the Three Jewels and Five Precepts. He then travelled to Kathmandu, Nepal to attend the Fourth World Buddhist Conference. His work on The Buddha or Karl Marx and "Revolution and counter-revolution in ancient India" remained incomplete. Views *Hinduism* *"I was born a Hindu because I had no control over this, but I shall not die a Hindu"* - B. R. Ambedkar *Ambedkar called the Hindus as the everlasting mortal enemy and unremorseful depraved oppressor of the Dalits. He argued that there was no hope for Untouchables to live a respected life within Hinduism. When Gandhi asked Ambedkar to endorse the Temple Entry Bill, he refused and said that he was disgusted by Hinduism and Hinduism's followers because they hold false ideals and live in a false social life. In 1935, he declared that, despite being born as a Hindu, he would not die as a Hindu. While speaking about the Hindu Raj, he said that Hinduism is a threat to freedom, equality, and community, regardless of what Hindus claim. On October 14, 1956, while converting to Buddhism, he stated that he was rejecting Hinduism for which it represented inequality and oppression. He also criticized the High caste Hindus of having captured the state with their monopoly of education and wealth and excluding the lower caste Hindus from power, education and wealth and doing this as their goal in life. He also said that the High caste Hindus also intend to exclude Muslims from power as they did to lower caste Hindus.* *Hindutva and Hindu Rashtra* *Ambedkar's writings showed that he was opposed to the concept of Hindu Rashtra. In 1946, he labelled the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) as a dangerous entity. From his writing, Pakistan or Partition of India, he frequently commented on Hindu communal politics which statments such as the 'menace' of 'Hindu Raj'. In his book, What Congress and Gandhi have done to the untouchables, Ambedkar claims that organisations such as the Hindu Mahasabha were useless to deal with the social issue of caste and untouchability and their only purpose was to fight Muslims in Indian politics. He was consistent in his criticism against the Hindu nationalist organisations of their counterproductive tactics and sectarian politics. Hindutva organisations, according to Ambedkar's newspapers, had a habit of deliberately ignoring Dalit issues in order to keep going with Hindu unanimity. Ambedkar's newspaper Janata, pointed out in one of it's commentary that the Hindu nationalist politics are founded on sectarian ideals of "Brahminism" and anti-Muslim politics. In his 1945 book, Pakistan or Partition of India, he said that if "Hindu Raj becomes a reality, it would undoubtedly be the greatest calamity for this nation". He also said that Hindu Raj must be stopped at all costs.* *Aryan Invasion Theory* Ambedkar viewed the Shudras as Aryan and adamantly rejected the Aryan invasion theory, describing it as "so absurd that it ought to have been dead long ago" in his 1946 book Who Were the Shudras?. Ambedkar viewed Shudras as originally being "part of the Kshatriya Varna in the Indo-Aryan society", but became socially degraded after they inflicted many tyrannies on Brahmins. According to Arvind Sharma, Ambedkar noticed certain flaws in the Aryan invasion theory that were later acknowledged by western scholarship. For example, scholars now acknowledge anās in Rig Veda 5.29.10 refers to speech rather than the shape of the nose. Ambedkar anticipated this modern view by stating: The term Anasa occurs in Rig Veda V.29.10. What does the word mean? There are two interpretations. One is by Prof. Max Muller. The other is by Sayanacharya. According to Prof. Max Muller, it means 'one without nose' or 'one with a flat nose' and has as such been relied upon as a piece of evidence in support of the view that the Aryans were a separate race from the Dasyus. Sayanacharya says that it means 'mouthless,' i.e., devoid of good speech. This difference of meaning is due to difference in the correct reading of the word Anasa. Sayanacharya reads it as an-asa while Prof. Max Muller reads it as a-nasa. As read by Prof. Max Muller, it means 'without nose.' Question is : which of the two readings is the correct one? There is no reason to hold that Sayana's reading is wrong. On the other hand there is everything to suggest that it is right. In the first place, it does not make non-sense of the word. Secondly, as there is no other place where the Dasyus are described as noseless, there is no reason why the word should be read in such a manner as to give it an altogether new sense. It is only fair to read it as a synonym of Mridhravak. There is therefore no evidence in support of the conclusion that the Dasyus belonged to a different race. *Ambedkar disputed various hypotheses of the Aryan homeland being outside India*, and concluded the Aryan homeland was India itself. According to Ambedkar, the Rig Veda says Aryans, Dāsa and Dasyus were competing religious groups, not different peoples. *Communism* Ambedkar's views on Communism were expressed in his essay "Buddhism and Communism." He accepted the Marxist theory that the privileged few's exploitation the masses perpetuated poverty and its issues. However, he did not see this exploitation as purely economic, theorizing that the cultural aspects of exploitation are as bad or worse than economic exploitation. In addition, he did not see economic relationships as the only important aspect of human life. He also saw Communists as willing to resort to any means to achieve proletarian revolution, including violence, while he himself saw democratic and peaceful measures as the best option for change. Ambedkar also opposed the Marxist idea of controlling all the means of production and private ownership of property: seeing the latter measure as not able to fix the problems of society. In addition, rather than advocating for the eventual annihilation of the state as Marxism does, Ambedkar believed in a classless society, but also believed the state would exist as long as society and that it should be active in development. • Still extreme sycophants of anti-Islam/Muslims party (rss n bjpees) hate M.K. (Mahatma) Gandhi [Father of the nation] n love B.R Ambedkar esp. in Karnataka.🤦‍♂️😅🤣

He is already Father of Modern India

@@riyashah7486 Yep 😀

Haha, father of India, please i hate that term

Subhash channdra bose

Please call him Father of Modern India. An 150 year human cannot be the father of a country with thousands of years of history

Same thoughts. Brother These mullahs want to make india a Islamic nation

@Sai krishna Christianity is not a Indian religion. Christianity is helping Jihadi Islam against Hindus today.

Small correction not india globe

@@Indusxstan atlst they wont theow bombs like jihadists

I am a Syrian Christian from Kerala who are proud of our Hindu ancestory. Personally, I have an issue with our Christian missionaries who facilitate conversion by giving incentives to poor people. My Jesus would have hated them. As Christians, we are only happy that Portuguese, Dutch and British went from Bharat. Guys, you dont know how much destruction they brought to Kerala Christianity. I hate St. Francis when I got to know the real history. Till then I had no idea of Portuguese in Goa. Jai Bharat!

Ambedkar was far, far more learned than either Gandhi or Nehru.

@@SamvedIyer true 🙏

@@navinasimoes Yeah, if we read his biography many answers to our problems will be answered. 🌟

Don't cry when I'm gone netaji too was great leader.....

@@poulomimajumder2889 yes guy was not a Nazi he just wanted his country free

@alpha blaze nothing wrong with Hinduism as long as you are happy with basing your life on mythology as opposed to reality

@alpha blaze Exactly

@alpha blaze Haha. We're in the 21st century and still there's no shortage of fools like you in this day and age that still believe the god brahma has 4 heads and the 4 vedas are his heads. The penis god Lord shiva is worshipped and milk is poured around it. Belief in millions of gods, 33 crore. Religion of animal worship like the cow, monkeys, rats. Religion that divides humanity into 4 castes and the low caste dalits having been suffering for thousands of years by the high castes. I can go on and on. And you say 'whats wrong with hinduism' ? Shame on you. There's a saying that, its easy to fool people but hard to convince them that they have been fooled. It seems you are one of those. Listen to ambedkar and get your life together

@alpha blaze not the greatest civilisation but a dated civilisation that brought nothing but devastation and segregation to the lower castes dalits. People like you still in denial even when the truth stares at you in face. Really sad. I'm done with you...will never learn.

@alpha blaze castism

Yes.....But his limitation was that he chose be a Messiah for one group and blamed entirely on the other groups for their disheveled status..... he was great fighter for justice and had the full backing of his group.......Where as GANDHI was all inclusive and tried to bridge the groups as against the will of the group that he belongs which is more herculean task than the former....It's easy to fight or divide but very difficult to unite and create harmony among the warring groups...So mahatma stood and shall stand taller than any leader not only the country but the world has seen or to be seen....

@@manjeshnarayan5617 gadhi was a fucking racist and what not

@@manjeshnarayan5617 if that's the case why didn't Gandhi agreed to the idea proposed by ambedkar that caste system shud be banned in India. But he rejected saying caste system is an integral part of Hinduism and can't be seperated

@mother land joke of the century

Ambedkar delivering a speech during a mass conversion ceremony. Ambedkar considered converting to Sikhism, which encouraged opposition to oppression and so appealed to leaders of scheduled castes. But after meeting with Sikh leaders, he concluded that he might get "second-rate" Sikh status. Instead, around 1950, he began devoting his attention to Buddhism and travelled to Ceylon (now Sri Lanka) to attend a meeting of the World Fellowship of Buddhists. While dedicating a new Buddhist vihara near Pune, Ambedkar announced he was writing a book on Buddhism, and that when it was finished, he would formally convert to Buddhism. He twice visited Burma in 1954; the second time to attend the third conference of the World Fellowship of Buddhists in Rangoon. In 1955, he founded the Bharatiya Bauddha Mahasabha, or the Buddhist Society of India. In 1956, he completed his final work, The Buddha and His Dhamma, which was published posthumously. After meetings with the Sri Lankan Buddhist monk Hammalawa Saddhatissa, Ambedkar organised a formal public ceremony for himself and his supporters in Nagpur on 14 October 1956. Accepting the Three Refuges and Five Precepts from a Buddhist monk in the traditional manner, Ambedkar completed his own conversion, along with his wife. He then proceeded to convert some 500,000 of his supporters who were gathered around him. He prescribed the 22 Vows for these converts, after the Three Jewels and Five Precepts. He then travelled to Kathmandu, Nepal to attend the Fourth World Buddhist Conference. His work on The Buddha or Karl Marx and "Revolution and counter-revolution in ancient India" remained incomplete. Views *Hinduism* *"I was born a Hindu because I had no control over this, but I shall not die a Hindu"* - B. R. Ambedkar *Ambedkar called the Hindus as the everlasting mortal enemy and unremorseful depraved oppressor of the Dalits. He argued that there was no hope for Untouchables to live a respected life within Hinduism. When Gandhi asked Ambedkar to endorse the Temple Entry Bill, he refused and said that he was disgusted by Hinduism and Hinduism's followers because they hold false ideals and live in a false social life. In 1935, he declared that, despite being born as a Hindu, he would not die as a Hindu. While speaking about the Hindu Raj, he said that Hinduism is a threat to freedom, equality, and community, regardless of what Hindus claim. On October 14, 1956, while converting to Buddhism, he stated that he was rejecting Hinduism for which it represented inequality and oppression. He also criticized the High caste Hindus of having captured the state with their monopoly of education and wealth and excluding the lower caste Hindus from power, education and wealth and doing this as their goal in life. He also said that the High caste Hindus also intend to exclude Muslims from power as they did to lower caste Hindus.* *Hindutva and Hindu Rashtra* *Ambedkar's writings showed that he was opposed to the concept of Hindu Rashtra. In 1946, he labelled the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) as a dangerous entity. From his writing, Pakistan or Partition of India, he frequently commented on Hindu communal politics which statments such as the 'menace' of 'Hindu Raj'. In his book, What Congress and Gandhi have done to the untouchables, Ambedkar claims that organisations such as the Hindu Mahasabha were useless to deal with the social issue of caste and untouchability and their only purpose was to fight Muslims in Indian politics. He was consistent in his criticism against the Hindu nationalist organisations of their counterproductive tactics and sectarian politics. Hindutva organisations, according to Ambedkar's newspapers, had a habit of deliberately ignoring Dalit issues in order to keep going with Hindu unanimity. Ambedkar's newspaper Janata, pointed out in one of it's commentary that the Hindu nationalist politics are founded on sectarian ideals of "Brahminism" and anti-Muslim politics. In his 1945 book, Pakistan or Partition of India, he said that if "Hindu Raj becomes a reality, it would undoubtedly be the greatest calamity for this nation". He also said that Hindu Raj must be stopped at all costs.* *Aryan Invasion Theory* Ambedkar viewed the Shudras as Aryan and adamantly rejected the Aryan invasion theory, describing it as "so absurd that it ought to have been dead long ago" in his 1946 book Who Were the Shudras?. Ambedkar viewed Shudras as originally being "part of the Kshatriya Varna in the Indo-Aryan society", but became socially degraded after they inflicted many tyrannies on Brahmins. According to Arvind Sharma, Ambedkar noticed certain flaws in the Aryan invasion theory that were later acknowledged by western scholarship. For example, scholars now acknowledge anās in Rig Veda 5.29.10 refers to speech rather than the shape of the nose. Ambedkar anticipated this modern view by stating: The term Anasa occurs in Rig Veda V.29.10. What does the word mean? There are two interpretations. One is by Prof. Max Muller. The other is by Sayanacharya. According to Prof. Max Muller, it means 'one without nose' or 'one with a flat nose' and has as such been relied upon as a piece of evidence in support of the view that the Aryans were a separate race from the Dasyus. Sayanacharya says that it means 'mouthless,' i.e., devoid of good speech. This difference of meaning is due to difference in the correct reading of the word Anasa. Sayanacharya reads it as an-asa while Prof. Max Muller reads it as a-nasa. As read by Prof. Max Muller, it means 'without nose.' Question is : which of the two readings is the correct one? There is no reason to hold that Sayana's reading is wrong. On the other hand there is everything to suggest that it is right. In the first place, it does not make non-sense of the word. Secondly, as there is no other place where the Dasyus are described as noseless, there is no reason why the word should be read in such a manner as to give it an altogether new sense. It is only fair to read it as a synonym of Mridhravak. There is therefore no evidence in support of the conclusion that the Dasyus belonged to a different race. *Ambedkar disputed various hypotheses of the Aryan homeland being outside India*, and concluded the Aryan homeland was India itself. According to Ambedkar, the Rig Veda says Aryans, Dāsa and Dasyus were competing religious groups, not different peoples. *Communism* Ambedkar's views on Communism were expressed in his essay "Buddhism and Communism." He accepted the Marxist theory that the privileged few's exploitation the masses perpetuated poverty and its issues. However, he did not see this exploitation as purely economic, theorizing that the cultural aspects of exploitation are as bad or worse than economic exploitation. In addition, he did not see economic relationships as the only important aspect of human life. He also saw Communists as willing to resort to any means to achieve proletarian revolution, including violence, while he himself saw democratic and peaceful measures as the best option for change. Ambedkar also opposed the Marxist idea of controlling all the means of production and private ownership of property: seeing the latter measure as not able to fix the problems of society. In addition, rather than advocating for the eventual annihilation of the state as Marxism does, Ambedkar believed in a classless society, but also believed the state would exist as long as society and that it should be active in development. • Still extreme sycophants of anti-Islam/Muslims party (rss n bjpees) hate M.K. (Mahatma) Gandhi [Father of the nation] n love B.R Ambedkar esp. in Karnataka.🤦‍♂️😅🤣

@@uzayrkuzey1105 Gandhi is your baap but not nation 😅🤣

But u r not in ur time! A person, who was above of all complexions but u r making him a pride for marathi n hindutva! How funny pride would be!

@@alenachoudhury1190 I said pride of Maharashtra means a specific region and never said here about Hindutva. Yes I know it ll good if I said pride of India .

... Exactly..

All these things you just mentioned are itself hinduism

What Savarkar did for country? Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar has the main role to develop and change the mentality of orthodox India.

@@sujitsalvi7621 म्हणून बाबासाहेब म्हणतात, " शिका, अभ्यास करा."

@@saiecorp5646 teri tumhi shiklat nahi.

@@sujitsalvi7621 बरोबर आहे. धन्यवाद

@@sujitsalvi7621 what was the contribution of ambedkr in freedom movement....

I am also sending these kind of stuffs to Communist people. But they can not understand. They are completely biased.

@@ashishkumardas6696 they are not biased they have been brainwashed by left lobby

I am almost a communist. I agree, left is not doing enough to expose Islam. Islam is bad.

@Citizen Kolar nice joke. Then why ambedkar wrote Jai shree ram on first page of constitution.

citizen kolar respect for muhummed the pedophile who fcked masoom Aisha ha ha

It should be guided by the views of swami vivekanand

Ambedkar actually prefered ISLAM for daliths to choose... He know Only islam gives Equality to ALL... Even jewish historians writes ISLAM protected jews for more than 800 years and the golden age of jewish is during islamic ruling

@@arc-qh1uq stop spamming that is completely false just shut up dude

@@arc-qh1uq jews have been persecuted by Muslims all over the world for years. Dont lie

@@arc-qh1uq yiu are a moron

So better leave islam if you can't think the way islam wants you to think

@@himdude9637 your argument is illogical. There will always be differences among people. Each person has his/her own thought process. There will always be extremist and liberal in every society. Hindu also have a fair share of extremists.

@@abymani1 so you don't have balls to do jehad?

@@himdude9637 what 😂 You are making no sense at all.

@@abymani1 you are right. islam quran and hadis make no sense today. Better leave islam

There are few unanswered questions in the Quran. You can forward to Zakir Naik if you do not know the answer in case. As per Islam this human life is a test to enter into jannath. When God conducts a final test like this, it should be fair. A fair test is when you keep all the conditions constant. But the conditions of humans who are born on this earth are not same: some are mentally retarted (whose brain is not developed to understand this world only ..forget about God), some both deaf (deprived of privilege to listen to Quran and become perfect) and dumb (deprived of privilege to do prayers and become perfect) and some even born in a tribal forest and no connection with even Muslims to allow them to convert atleast. Why is this partially by God? If you say that God decides based on the effort made by people, where is the question of effort in the case of mentally retarted and tribal people who have not heart of word Islam only? If God is allowing prematurely dead babies to Jannath, what is the value of the test? If it is the will of God or mercy of God, it means even ignorant souls like babies have a chance (not fair test) to enter Jannath. If you say that prematurely dead babies are pure in heart, it is actually due to their brain not yet developed and they are not in the position to distinguish between good and bad. The answer for all this is present in Hinduism. Reincarnation is the answer.

@@31VS God has no form. Allah exist in every where. Allah is beyond imagination. We don't worship any idol. Why people aren't concern about Hindu,Christian etc? Why always muslim? Because it is simple. Muslim are the most devoted person in the world.

@@shafiqsha9875 don't take seriously bro. But this video is soread more hate towards indians.

@@shafiqsha9875 according to Quran driving a car by women is haram..

@@shafiqsha9875 why allah is creating this mess.. muslim and non muslim .if he does like it ...then he likes leela ....which a part of Hinduism...why can't he come on earth why he so incapable...

I agree with you. Even Christians in the west are fighting for this same islamic devils.

But why

@@ravishekharchoudhary2262 have seen the video... Still do you have doubt.

@@JessicaHooks28 Lol, still Islam is the fast growing relegion in the world!!

@orange k yet Christians are only 1 percent of the total population in India!! Sc/St ko Vote ke time Hindu aur baaki time Dalit aur Adhivasi bolne waale log ho tum

@Akon Ali Thank you, now Hindus will return the favour by reforming your peaceful religion. Triple Talaq, Hijab and burqa, Nikah Halala, all your Sharia law will now be banned slowly as return gift.. 😂😂

@@KS-jr3ko inshaallah

He wrote this in 1940 book in United India about the Satanic Ideology of Muslim league , which had self proclaimed itself as the voice of all Muslims . Book is called Pakistan or Partition of India . In 1940s congress failed to see this ideology leading them to be unprepared for 1947 catastrophe . Now fanatics will use this statements as a response to all current Indian Muslims .

Why muslims calls hindus as kafirs and killing them is advocated in Qur'an?

Idiot! Allama Iqbal got PhD doctorate in philosophy before Ambedkar

@@mdsahadathossen6160 year ?

1907 on philosophy in Germany

Gaikwad is not maratha but he is Mahar .....There ia no such a thing known as maratha asa cast ......Just you all farmers and harami jamindars how are castist try to promote yourselves in the using name as maratha ..... maratha is liguatics word used to marathi speaking people

nandu1f In Baroda sansthan there was a scheme to help the pupils for education. The Maharaja of Baroda helped so many people for education. Do you know the names of such people except BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR. It is incorrect to say that BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR worked in the Maharaja service. Because of the untouchability BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR was driven out from the office of the Maharaja Sayaji Gaikawad. This Maharaja was unable to support BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR. In 1932 at England in the Round Table Conference BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR was present along with this Maharaja. I have seen in Vyara district place in the civil line there are huge statues of Babasaheb Ambedkar and this Maharaja. Both statues are in front of each. " KHUD HI KO KAR ITNA BULAND. KHUD ALLAHA BANDESE PUCHE BATA TERI RAZA KYA HAI. " This is not fortunate that this Maharaja of Baroda is now knowing because of Babasaheb Ambedkar ?

@@Chillu7 Why this Ajlaf rajput shitting in the comment section? Now what? you want to invite Ashraf Ghani to do jihad in India..

Hence I hereby say that Jai mim Jai bhim ..... Joker mulnivasi... Idiots

Bhudhism is part of Hinduism, check definition of Hindu in constitution

@@chetanbandekar6854... lol.. Chutiye read Buddhism.. It is all about atheism..

@@musicalnote9584 Buddham Sharnam Gachhami - Sanskrit hi hai na. Kya Bhagavan Buddha Hindu nahi the. China Japan main Budha temple main Ganesh / Sarsvati aur aur bhi Hindu devatoaoki murthy nahi hai kya. Ajanta Kailasa aur bhi caves dekho jake. Real History padho - Communist aur Western wali nahi. Atheusm Hindu ko apply nahi hota. Kabhi Hinduo ne hamala kiya hai so called Buddhism pe. Tum logonko Chutiya banaya ja raha hai.

@@musicalnote9584 In the Constitution of India, the word "Hindu" has been used in some places to denote persons professing any of these religions: Hinduism, Jainism, Buddhism or Sikhism.

And what are Hindus doing to prevent this?

Why should we become nationalist?

@@AbdulKhader-786 coz musalman means mussalam Imaan, which mean pure honesty towards your land first.

Mohammed Abdul Khader We should be nationalist to make our nation stronger and powerful . Outside world knows us by our country name (Indian)only.

He wrote this in 1940 book in United India about the Satanic Ideology of Muslim league , which had self proclaimed itself as the voice of all Muslims . Book is called Pakistan or Partition of India . In 1940s congress failed to see this ideology leading them to be unprepared for 1947 catastrophe . Now fanatics will use this statements as a response to all current Indian Muslims .

Those uncouth creatures are not "Liberals" ..... they are 'tyrants' who know only power not freedom.

@@religionofpeace782 Stop smoking man. Pathetic attempt at villifying somebody's character.

@Michael Jack Stop it u fcuktard You are ready to believe some American documents than your country? You ignorant fool don't deserve to live here. Gtfo from India

He wrote this in 1940 book in United India about the Satanic Ideology of Muslim league , which had self proclaimed itself as the voice of all Muslims . Book is called Pakistan or Partition of India . In 1940s congress failed to see this ideology leading them to be unprepared for 1947 catastrophe . Now fanatics will use this statements as a response to all current Indian Muslims .

he is not talking about hindus n muslims...he is quoting ambedkar's views on islam n indian politics.

@@sachair2701 Exactly he is exposing on selective feeding that we have been fed for years though I knew most of the things about Dr.B.R. Ambedkar due to a lot of books and people around me who talk without bias.thank u all my relatives P.S. I mean the things Dr.Anand has pointed about Babasaheb.

Islam is a threat whole world.

@@sureshab3852 True Bro

@Digvijay Singh Rathore correct. That's why Islam is banned in many countries.

Bhim banega mim said by Asaduddin Owaissi

Ambedkar did not rely on mass support. Gandhi's confidence stemmed from the millions of blind devotees he had. Ambedkar's confidence stemmed from his ability to speak his mind and stand alone if necessary.

@@SamvedIyer truth comes out even after 100 years .. public now realising the greatness of Ambedkar ji.... & Gandhi ji biased attitude

Social difference is still there in the rural and even to some extent in urban Hindi belt, it is also there in Tamil Nadu and Andhra. There is Shadow casteism in everywhere. Immigrants have also taken it abroad.

Venk tesh He was a polymath,infact the last great polymath that this great land has produced.Got his phd from LSE in economics(monetary economics,if i am not mistaken), turned a social commentator,a politician,a legal luminary and last,but most importantly,our constitution drafter. We need to study him better.

"99 % can't afford" ? Where does that figure come from ? Neighbours are "noisy" ? We in India are used to it ! Definitely then you are not an Indian. I am sorry. The wealth gap is a truth but the rest of it is not. I myself am an example coming from lower middle income family. We lived in the smallest of the smallest rooms possible and still do. Even houses in Dharavi are much bigger than ours... Coming to the point, "most" skilled workers (many of my uncles and aunts being one) have good incomes. They started from radio repairing to keeping electronic shops (emphasis here) : " DUE TO HELP AND ASSISTANCE OF ENTIRE LOCAL COMMUNITY". I hope you heard that well. In our homes, when my Grandmother was at her deathbed, there used to be "Bhais" (who are called 'maid-servants' by westerners) whom we call "HELPERS". They were treated part of our house and our family got it ? They have dined and taken food at our home. My Grandmother and Mother used to spend hours at the kitchen along with them. Autorickshaw people you said ? Or Electricians/Plumbers ? All of those known to us had prospered and set up shops in their hometowns and in major cities like Mumbai. Nothing, we used to give coffee/tea and food, they used to refuse. But we ensured they get business by referring them to everybody else in our locality. Everyone of these electricians, plumbers, watchmen and many more are considered as family in Bharat. Many have built homes due to our "combined" contributions. This one would never understand unless you visit the societies. Middle - income families support the poor like anything. Those same Bhais who didn't have a home now have built 2 storey homes with computers given to them by us. Their wards got educated and married also a contribution from our behalf. Perhaps you haven't stayed in Societies and close - knit neighbourhoods in Navi Mumbai or any where near the city outskirts or in Villages where we worship the auto drivers till date who helped us and known to us. It takes time and effort to know these things especially if you are not grown up or have been only in large localities with filthy rich mansions. You must come down to the local level and see how things are. Finally..... those from the West like yourself mostly just "empty" your pockets for no reason. You give them money once and these will flock the area to get more from you. You are creating problems for your neighbours whom themselves must be working hard to survive. Not everyone in public is safe. Your neighbours knew that and that's about it. We in India love to share and care. After coming to India many years later even local Indians forget their own home country. Atleast if you don't wish to appreciate Bharat do not spread your "viewpoints" as truth. Most of social media spread info. is trash. Don't form your opinions on it. This is for everyone.

Well Hinduism is not a religion It literally means the one who lives in Hind! So we need dharma, for moral values And karma for good actions Where as FAMOUS DALIT NETA LIKE RAWAN ARE SHOUTING JAI MEEM JAI BHEEM WHY?

@@djworldx536 shut off

Don't need . I only removed your communist manifesto .

What sacrifice ritual?

Abe main wahi eklavya hoon jiska tumne angutha kat liya phir bhi main HINDU hoon Main wahi danveer hoon jisko tumhare bhagwaan parsuram ne sharp de diya tha phir bhi main HINDU hoon Main wahi KARN hu jiske saath jeevan bhar bhed bhav kiya phir bhi main HINDU hoon Main wahi hu jisne 5000 Sal Tak nali saaf kiya phir main HINDU hoon Main wahi hu jisne 5000 sal tak lash jayalya phir bhi main HINDU hoon Abe BJP aaj aaya hai tb tum "KATTAR HINDU" ban gye ho DALIT 5000 saal se "KATTAR HINDU" hai Dalit se bara na koi hindu paida liya hai nahi paida lega THE NEXT GENERATION WILL BE PROUD OF WHAT DALIT HAS DONE TO YOUR RELIGION

@@alok9307 lol caste system was came in portugese rule

@@darklegend7127 how?

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-1KrJvpD0nNM.html

Read the Quran minutely

No truth in earth being flat.

Meanwhile owaisi : jai bhim jai meme🤡

True. We Muslims aren’t Heathen.

Correct.

read amnedkars book, it's in Hindi also

Jehadi ve been preaching us secularism is biggest fraud

@@pyadav8373 Ambedkar delivering a speech during a mass conversion ceremony. Ambedkar considered converting to Sikhism, which encouraged opposition to oppression and so appealed to leaders of scheduled castes. But after meeting with Sikh leaders, he concluded that he might get "second-rate" Sikh status. Instead, around 1950, he began devoting his attention to Buddhism and travelled to Ceylon (now Sri Lanka) to attend a meeting of the World Fellowship of Buddhists. While dedicating a new Buddhist vihara near Pune, Ambedkar announced he was writing a book on Buddhism, and that when it was finished, he would formally convert to Buddhism. He twice visited Burma in 1954; the second time to attend the third conference of the World Fellowship of Buddhists in Rangoon. In 1955, he founded the Bharatiya Bauddha Mahasabha, or the Buddhist Society of India. In 1956, he completed his final work, The Buddha and His Dhamma, which was published posthumously. After meetings with the Sri Lankan Buddhist monk Hammalawa Saddhatissa, Ambedkar organised a formal public ceremony for himself and his supporters in Nagpur on 14 October 1956. Accepting the Three Refuges and Five Precepts from a Buddhist monk in the traditional manner, Ambedkar completed his own conversion, along with his wife. He then proceeded to convert some 500,000 of his supporters who were gathered around him. He prescribed the 22 Vows for these converts, after the Three Jewels and Five Precepts. He then travelled to Kathmandu, Nepal to attend the Fourth World Buddhist Conference. His work on The Buddha or Karl Marx and "Revolution and counter-revolution in ancient India" remained incomplete. Views *Hinduism* *"I was born a Hindu because I had no control over this, but I shall not die a Hindu"* - B. R. Ambedkar *Ambedkar called the Hindus as the everlasting mortal enemy and unremorseful depraved oppressor of the Dalits. He argued that there was no hope for Untouchables to live a respected life within Hinduism. When Gandhi asked Ambedkar to endorse the Temple Entry Bill, he refused and said that he was disgusted by Hinduism and Hinduism's followers because they hold false ideals and live in a false social life. In 1935, he declared that, despite being born as a Hindu, he would not die as a Hindu. While speaking about the Hindu Raj, he said that Hinduism is a threat to freedom, equality, and community, regardless of what Hindus claim. On October 14, 1956, while converting to Buddhism, he stated that he was rejecting Hinduism for which it represented inequality and oppression. He also criticized the High caste Hindus of having captured the state with their monopoly of education and wealth and excluding the lower caste Hindus from power, education and wealth and doing this as their goal in life. He also said that the High caste Hindus also intend to exclude Muslims from power as they did to lower caste Hindus.* *Hindutva and Hindu Rashtra* *Ambedkar's writings showed that he was opposed to the concept of Hindu Rashtra. In 1946, he labelled the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) as a dangerous entity. From his writing, Pakistan or Partition of India, he frequently commented on Hindu communal politics which statments such as the 'menace' of 'Hindu Raj'. In his book, What Congress and Gandhi have done to the untouchables, Ambedkar claims that organisations such as the Hindu Mahasabha were useless to deal with the social issue of caste and untouchability and their only purpose was to fight Muslims in Indian politics. He was consistent in his criticism against the Hindu nationalist organisations of their counterproductive tactics and sectarian politics. Hindutva organisations, according to Ambedkar's newspapers, had a habit of deliberately ignoring Dalit issues in order to keep going with Hindu unanimity. Ambedkar's newspaper Janata, pointed out in one of it's commentary that the Hindu nationalist politics are founded on sectarian ideals of "Brahminism" and anti-Muslim politics. In his 1945 book, Pakistan or Partition of India, he said that if "Hindu Raj becomes a reality, it would undoubtedly be the greatest calamity for this nation". He also said that Hindu Raj must be stopped at all costs.* *Aryan Invasion Theory* Ambedkar viewed the Shudras as Aryan and adamantly rejected the Aryan invasion theory, describing it as "so absurd that it ought to have been dead long ago" in his 1946 book Who Were the Shudras?. Ambedkar viewed Shudras as originally being "part of the Kshatriya Varna in the Indo-Aryan society", but became socially degraded after they inflicted many tyrannies on Brahmins. According to Arvind Sharma, Ambedkar noticed certain flaws in the Aryan invasion theory that were later acknowledged by western scholarship. For example, scholars now acknowledge anās in Rig Veda 5.29.10 refers to speech rather than the shape of the nose. Ambedkar anticipated this modern view by stating: The term Anasa occurs in Rig Veda V.29.10. What does the word mean? There are two interpretations. One is by Prof. Max Muller. The other is by Sayanacharya. According to Prof. Max Muller, it means 'one without nose' or 'one with a flat nose' and has as such been relied upon as a piece of evidence in support of the view that the Aryans were a separate race from the Dasyus. Sayanacharya says that it means 'mouthless,' i.e., devoid of good speech. This difference of meaning is due to difference in the correct reading of the word Anasa. Sayanacharya reads it as an-asa while Prof. Max Muller reads it as a-nasa. As read by Prof. Max Muller, it means 'without nose.' Question is : which of the two readings is the correct one? There is no reason to hold that Sayana's reading is wrong. On the other hand there is everything to suggest that it is right. In the first place, it does not make non-sense of the word. Secondly, as there is no other place where the Dasyus are described as noseless, there is no reason why the word should be read in such a manner as to give it an altogether new sense. It is only fair to read it as a synonym of Mridhravak. There is therefore no evidence in support of the conclusion that the Dasyus belonged to a different race. *Ambedkar disputed various hypotheses of the Aryan homeland being outside India*, and concluded the Aryan homeland was India itself. According to Ambedkar, the Rig Veda says Aryans, Dāsa and Dasyus were competing religious groups, not different peoples. *Communism* Ambedkar's views on Communism were expressed in his essay "Buddhism and Communism." He accepted the Marxist theory that the privileged few's exploitation the masses perpetuated poverty and its issues. However, he did not see this exploitation as purely economic, theorizing that the cultural aspects of exploitation are as bad or worse than economic exploitation. In addition, he did not see economic relationships as the only important aspect of human life. He also saw Communists as willing to resort to any means to achieve proletarian revolution, including violence, while he himself saw democratic and peaceful measures as the best option for change. Ambedkar also opposed the Marxist idea of controlling all the means of production and private ownership of property: seeing the latter measure as not able to fix the problems of society. In addition, rather than advocating for the eventual annihilation of the state as Marxism does, Ambedkar believed in a classless society, but also believed the state would exist as long as society and that it should be active in development. • Still extreme sycophants of anti-Islam/Muslims party (rss n bjpees) hate M.K. (Mahatma) Gandhi [Father of the nation] n love B.R Ambedkar esp. in Karnataka.🤦‍♂️😅🤣

I don't see that possible... Believe it or not we Hindus are inherently racists, classists, castists & linguists. As it is, Sanathana Dharma is a very classical and truest essence of south asian civilization. Hinduism as we call it today is a very skewed version of it and hence it will eventually fail

@@engadge Say the same thing about Islam purposely and let's test who is more open and tolerant. I mean let's actually see who is tolerant and open minded here

Assassin's creed brotherhood

@@engadge Hinduism will NEVER Fail. That is why it is called Sanatan Dharma. It is Eternal Truth and Truth can Never fail!

I think Hinduism will evolve and revert back towards the True Sanatan Dharma and the younger generations will shed all the rituals and adharmic and false practices that have crept into Sanatan Dharma. I also think that it will be practiced all over the world by all cultures which will create a peace loving world community but it has a long way to go, although it has already started.

Exactly

He studied all religions and chosed Buddhism finally if he criticises islam u need to retrospect it is islam divide world into darul harab and darul islam