Is trash movie se 100× times better Hai, SHAKTIMAAN धारावाहिक thi 👌👌🔥 Quality with Quantity Geeta Vishwash ka Top Level Acting Usme bhi Love Story thi Par is Cringe movie jaisi nhi 😑 quality 0 quantity 400 Cr👎
“Ranbir Kapoor’s refusal to commit to an archetype”? You lost me there. Nearly all his movies he plays the archetype of confused manchild finding purpose in life in a coming of age story. Which he once again does in Brahmāstra. Sure his movies may be different genres, but that’s due to the director. Ranbir more or less is playing a similar type of character in nearly all his films.
Exactly!! I was like wait, for real though?? Everyone seems to be in denial that he's becoming a rather less impressive actor with every movie and script choice for the past decade or so. His best work remains in his earlier movies.
The day they decided to put dialogues like "kaun ho tum ? kya ho tum?" in the trailer...I knew this is not going to work. I wish Isha(Parvati) had some powers other than "love". 😬
When will Bollywood understand that huge budgets, big production houses and a great cast still can't compensate for the lack of a good script/ screenplay. Brahmastra suffers a lot due to weak direction, bad dialogues and a non engaging screenplay which keeps testing your patience. Sucharita's review is so on point.
I didn't find a single dull scene in the movie.THe story is not great but it is quite engaging and a good film. Even other films are not without its defect.
@@sumeetkumar1040 that's the irony here that Brahmastra had thr potential to be anything but generic. The story is so intriguing about the Astras but unfortunately it was reduced only to a half baked, almost lame love story rather than having the Astra story as its prime focus.. it was engaging in places but overall effect was quite Meh!!
@@annashrestha3452 it was a visual treat, no doubt, but it could have been an experience of another level had the screenplay did not linger too much to come to the point.. it was rather stretched to a point that it makes audience almost cringe and uncomfortable
@@haroonkhan4433 it was not perfect. But without a doubt was something bollywood has never offered. Ayan has managed to create a universe. I am not just speaking in terms of visuals but he story was enjoyable. Except for few glitches in the second half, I wanted to know what happened next. I have seen a lot of average movie in hall and this is not one of them. It is good but it's not great. Some of the seems were spectacular.
@@elva136 Then you have to make hundred of movies on Islam because it's really bad down there. Also you will not able save director from getting killed as happened with cartoonist in France just with kamlesh tiwari in india. Talking about this movie then what happened to freedom of speech nd if you don't like something in it then avoid but don't expect them to make it according to you which will never happen.
Despite the gargantuan scale, effort, talent and money Bollywood has, the one main problem that hinders them from achieving the audience's undivided attention is the lack of detailing in films. I've noticed this in the recent Hindi movies from the past 2-3 years. Their conceptualisation is fantastic, but the lack of attention to detail is jarring. This movie seems to have a lot of this issue from the few reviews I've watched. Will have to manage my expectations before I step into the theatres to watch it this weekend. (Yes, I'll still watch it because I'll root for Hindi films despite all odds).
Spot on. Lack of nuance and refinement is there in Hindi movies. It has become more prevalent in recent times due to fast paced production and general lack of depth in day to day life of creative people. It shows in the work. I didn't 100% like Baahubali Hindi version either...despite its success it lacks layers and refinement in language. Scale is not guarantee of immersion of senses. I still watch old DD TV shows and movies because their stories are meaningful...
Movie's name is "Brahmastra" and criticising it for too much Hinduism does feel misplaced. It's like saying Percy Jackson is too much Greek mythology 🤷🏻♀️ But a pinch of Hindu phobia does make a person look cool. Great review regardless 👍🏼
It has become a fashion to throw the term "Hinduphobia" these days 😂😂 From cringe inducing, it has now become so laughable. 😂 A pinch of "Majoritarian victimhood" makes you feel "heard" I guess 👍😂
@@amusingwordplay7298 It has also become a fashion to throw the term "Islamophobic" these days 🤣🤣🤣🤣 From cringe including, it has now become laughable. 🤣
@@amusingwordplay7298 to hate on hinduism and call others bhakt has also become so cool and fashion nowadays 🤣🤣🤣🤣 that at this point it's just shows your stupidity
First time I felt that Alia and Ranbir were wrong casting. It was like looking for a chemistry forcefully because they are a couple irl. The feel of a magnanimous hero was missing from Ranbir's character, and Alia's is a waste of her talent. Dialogues were too at places, quite cringy. Mouni Roy stood out the most, best performance of the movie! Overall a good watch for a great theatrical attempt by bollywood, but cant help notice the misses.
"Is drowning in noise the same as 'Immersive experience'????" "Not bored, but are you moved??" Deep sigh. Damn. Okay I'm prepared to walk into the film with these thoughts.
The movie is not going overboard with Hinduism. It is the essence of the story and it has to be present throughout the film. This film caters specifically to Indian audience and the people who have knowledge of Indian culture/mythology.
Yes exactly! Why is it a problem when our culture is openly shown? The movie about the Astra's taken from the Hindu Mythology right? And you have a problem with that. There is nothing wrong in showing our culture. I don't see people saying this about other religions. I wonder why.
The love story was extremely cringe and uncooked ! Story in rush and continuity is wierd. The graphics are really good ! Amitabh bachan , SRK , Naga , even mouni's role was good . But Ranbir's acting was bad !
I would actually give it 2/5. I gave Bollywood a benefit of doubt. I will try to give the review without spoilers. Please don't see the review if you have already decided to watch the movie. Getting into the movie, the first 10 min felt good hyping up but could have been a better display of astra being used rather than preaching what the astra does or what he is. This brought in mixed feelings for the action sequence. The development of the relationship between Ranbir and Alia could have been better. Things felt rushed and way too shallow. The understanding could have been made better and deep between them so that the impact of the climax is felt. The romantic scenes that build up the relationship were always abruptly interrupted by the main story. For me the real hype moment was with Nagarjuna rather than the ending which was a lot predictable like many other moments in the movie and again was preachy(please leave it to the audience to understand rather than explaining everything that is happening). The movie felt like more of Astraverse in a love story rather than love story in the Astraverse. The scene where they captured the good guys felt weird and less. Like why Alia was left untied? You can understand why Ranbir couldn't be captured or Ranbir could get free, but how come they gave all their astras to Ranbir and Alia to put in the car before villains entered? Like why? The moment they say you need a "turn on" to use an astra rather than invoking the deity indicates that they had no knowledge of how astras work and was a complete turn off. The good things about the movies were the display of a few astras, actors, action scenes and the background score. What I feel could have been done better are.. The background story of the astras felt a bit premature and lacked understanding of the Hindu culture which if done right could have done wonders with the storytelling of the movie. Justice was not done to every wielder of the astras. The owner of the astra of "light" could have done much more given his state (you will understand once you watch the movie). The love story and development of connection between Alia and Ranbir could have been made much deeper through a few scenes in the script to feel the impact of the climax. A few things can't be explained unless you see the movie but logic was missing on why Alia was seen in Ranbir's dream with a surprise attack rather than the obvious thing that he is connected to the fire astra and through that he could see her like he did in the rest of the movie. The connection with fire astra could have been revealed in the second part which would have made the movie much more hype leaving the identity of the main villain in question and this movie would have focused on why Ranbir is worthy of being the astra and many more things. Bollywood needs to understand the logic and concepts behind the Hindu culture and stop their stupid propaganda. Every time it felt like they wanted to show love above anything else. If so, why do you need part 2 when love already won the battle? What for? And what is love here? What did Ranbir love about Alia at first sight? Just physical beauty? If there is a much deeper connection with Alia which made him love as soon as he sees her, it could have been much better. Like a previous life connection which is an integral part of Hindu culture. If this movie has shown why Ranbir is worthy of being an Agni Astra rather than showing Alia as a turn on it would have done much better. By adding the turn on element they did not make the movie a drag but according to their own logic by which they explained the astras at the start, they are mocking the Rishis who did tapasya for the astras. The movie was predictable and lacked the element of surprise which is a key in making sequels. Again it felt more like an Astraverse in a love story rather than a love story in an Astraverse. Thanks
The movie is called 'Shiva' and is based on Hindu mythology. What is the problem if there is Hinduism in every frame? What is the problem with Sanskrit chants? Seeing the love Black Panther got, i thought people would not have a problem with movies focusing on any particular community. The movie has a lot of flaws, but "too much hinduism" should not be one of them.
@@lego7315 no she doesn't mean that. You people yag every random man and women Islamophobic but cnt see who is being hinduphobic. Bahan kya milega ye sab karne se??
Gosh isn't it amazing most Indians have no problem with too much Christianity(Mallu movies) or Islam but too much Hinduism is something we should all crack down on. Its comparable to how Nazis used to talk about Jews and Judaism back in the day.
I don't think Islam allows you to depict Allah and Mohammad and what would Jesus or Moses be doing in a film entitled Brahmastra? They could've called it Light Weapon and made it secular for you?
It's really disgusting and sad to see this mindset of trolling Hinduism.( No religion was even insulted in the movie) Because that's a new cool it seems and defaming your own roots is seen as progressive unfortunately. People trashing movie because it showed Hinduism is unnecessary and idiotic comment. Respecting other religions should be seen as progressive not altering history to force fit narratives (of any religion for that matter). We don't demand to force fit Hindus in Islamic literature then why here. These people will also complain that no person from other religion is shown even in a film on Ramayan. Sad to see how Hindus themselves have not read or understand the philosophies and essence of Hinduism themselves but find it cool to trash it just for the sake of it like spitting on your own roots just so to please the western minds and get acceptance from them. And there obsession to fit the social structures and laws of the west blindly on Indian society without even understanding the backgrounds to the problems which led to those social transformations in the respective countries. Its like it is a crime to make/get inspiration from these ancients stories from india on screen anymore in INDIA itself 🙄🤦🏻♂️ it's sad to see such mindset is considered secular nowadays.
@@elva136 Well Hinduism and passion for it precedes BJP (2014). But the expression for that may be new. I think Hindus prior to 2014 did not feel the need to show this as faith was seen as personal.
So true! It was really unnecessary to bring it up… how did the thought even cross her mind? Most Indian movies did not have Muslim characters…. Also, there were movies that were “Muslim-based” (Chaudvin ka chaand, Mere huzoor etc.) where all characters were Muslims…. Never complained… All religions are allowed to be assertive, but, Hindu… who should always be subdued…
I love how she just blatant says the movie is too Hindu. I mean I don’t know what she expected, I actually would be more offended if Christianity was shown in the movie and then we learn that Hindu scriptures are turning true in the movie, wouldn’t it imply the other religions are fake in the movie? Also I would be pretty shocked if the movie wasn’t too Hindu, it’s name if the epitome of Hindu scriptures, imagine an Arabic tune played in the background of it. What is sucharita thinking ?
The movie should have been secular !! I mean it's based on hindu mythology, thats why it is what it is . End of discussion ! Why to single out religion here . Could have been on any other religion as well. What's so alarming .
@@766979 do you think a movie based on the Hindu religious weapons and powers can be secular? In that logic shouldn’t the birth of Christ be secular? It makes no sense.
Now I'm feeling Ayan should release the animated version (probably their story board) which was presented during his promotional videos, those also looked spectacular and might not go the romantic way 😮💨
@@jaykrishnan235 yes he has a vision but he is not experienced or skilled enough as a director. Astra verse is a massive undertaking, maybe he needs to team up with SLB for visuals and Mani Retnam for Dialogue and subtlety and come up with a masterpiece.
I am still not able to understand, you praise films that have characters being out and out muslims, calling them brave but then have problems with films which have hindu iconography, why?? Still did not get the glaring problem you were talking about I mean this is not a rant but genuine question, what was the problem??
Definitely its a worth a watch . But it would have been an absolutely masterpiece if that luv story had handled carefully. That love story build up felt like the elaichi in biryani .
What’s so wrong with hindu elements throughout the movie?? South Indian cinema has been using it successfully from decades, and it seems to work just fine. Why are we hindus hell bent on being offended by our own religion.
This film is only hindu in aesthetic. Yes, there's temples, om signs, Sanskrit chants etc., but the deities and gods mentioned have no coherence or hierarchy, no loyalty to any hindu epic or trope, most astras are not explained as being linked to any god. Nothing substantive about it is truly hindu, it's just a makeover.
I liked the scale n vision of the movie . Definitely should be watched on big screen. But I disagree with the Hinduism part , although it is called Brhamastra but it didn't do justice with the whole concept of Astras their origin and many points were misrepresented. Also wanted to add the whole movie is about Brahmastra so obviously it will be about hindusim . If a movie didn't demonise other religions but shows their culture history myth with good story what's the problem
Reminds me of what Joey (from Friends) told about actors, if there is no chemistry on stage then there is chemistry off stage 😂😂guess it’s true in Ranbir-Alia s case
The opening scene of a certain Professor Mohan raised my expectations so did the portion of Nag Sir but the second half really didn’t work for me. Mouni Roy tried hard but she being the main antagonist required someone more seasoned. Alia Bhatt’s role was the most weakest and baffled me bcoz Ayan worked on this for almost 10 years but there are things to admire for sure but alas it could have been so much more and the core lacked emotional depth
Movie Nuances are not not there. When Shahrukh Khan distracts those zor and cheeta, Shahrukh is virtually swearing , film makers could have used some dialogues from the mysterious past of the astraverse to intensify the suspense. The same goes every other scene with unnecessary dialogues
They shamelessly applied a Hindu skin on a generic action movie sometime in the middle when they realized the ongoing climate in the country. It’s so evident because the Hindu theme is only at a surface level and there is absolutely no detailing showing that any sort of effort went in to explore or incorporate Hindu lore. Like the “brahmansh” is described in Hindu terms like ashram and guruji but the real thing visually looks like a Scientology cult meeting. It’s so corporate driven and soulless it’s frankly disgusting to behold.
There is no Hinduism there, not a pinch of gravity of Hinduism, they were just pretending. The movie is shallow. Not a single research behind it. Rumi se inspired they toh wohi banate, why this dhong?
Why do contemporary Hindi film actors act so wooden and disconnected, why don’t they get into character or have problems in the script? What is missing? Maybe there needs to be a complete change!
Ranbir Kapoor has caught the SRK bug. They both only pick films where they can play a glorified lead, with no room for other solid characters with depth.
Agar Ramayan pe movie banaoge to ye bolegi ismai dusre religion kyo nai hai. Movie was not good but seriously?… too much Hindu? Matlab tum Hinduism pe movie hi nai bana sakte? I don’t care what Hollywood is making. They can do their own ****. Now art also needs to be sickuler? Unpadh gawar!!! Hindu hate is real!
I've been reading many tweets and reviews the whole every single one of them stated this film with a surface level words like " mixed" or " mind-blowing " or " trash"........and baaam sucharita explains everything in her own way....luv the review
You said There is only one religion in this movie and that Hinduism. Of what part of the word Brahmastra you didn't understand before going to watch this movie. The whole essence of this movie is connected to Hinduism and its symbols. Man , your are like those extra Woke and psudo feminist person who can has silly problems with word Hinduism 🙄
Like you, Sucharita, I had been waiting for this movie for years! And while there is a lot to like about it, it wasn’t the cathartic experience I was hoping it’ll be. I am a sucker for a good love story in the context of other themes that threaten to be larger and fantastical. And I am all for the ‘Love is bigger than anything in its way’ narrative (e.g. Interatellar). But it felt a little forced here. We needed to live the love story and other character motivations more before buying into it. It is a grand and noble attempt nonetheless. And Ayan definitely deserves credit for his vision and venturing into making a film of this type and scale. I am definitely here for part 2 and 3. I just hope they turn the volume down to 50% and let the story and visuals take over. My favorite part of the movie came right after the Intermission leading up to and including the Deva Deva song sequence.
I hope the movie, despite its flaws, works since the theme appeals to a wide spectrum of audiences, esp kids and teens. The VFX itself is so epic that quite a few folks would like to watch the spectacle on big screen esp in 3D format. Perhaps the makers are smart enough to know that in a movie like this, the VFX will make up for what the narratives might lack. That’s the reason it vacillate between overwhelming and underwhelming as mentioned by Sucharita. I guess making a movie of this scale is always fraught with both overestimating and underestimating the audience expectations, which is why we probably will never watch a perfect movie.
**SPOILERS** Can smash through a speeding truck without a scratch, dies because of bullets 🙄 Also, how did villagers in a remote village in Himachal get hold of AK47 overnight?
The movie is not even a surface level attempt at understanding the various concepts associated with shastras or sanathan dharma. But you couldn't even accept that. And to add to it is your "genuine concern" regarding lack of inclusion of other religions. If this isn't hinduphobia then what is?
A book released in 2019, called Brahmāstra Chronicles, written by an independent author. Support a big budget movie, but also support independent writers. Also, the focus is more on storiyaa and world building rather than a sappy love storiyaa.
Why are dance sequences required in a movie such as this? What purpose do they serve other than to frustrate and annoy the audience who have made time in their schedules to watch the movie? I’m all for music and dance being used as promotional material. Everyone has watched the dance numbers on tv already, listened to the songs on Spotify and whatnot, so unless they serve anything towards the plot, why include in final cut? Why can’t Indian cinema find a way to move away from this tradition of dance in movies? If you’re so enthusiastic about them, put them in post credit of even pre credit is fine. At least the audience has a choice to wait and watch or leave.
If the same character of alia was written by some other director who is not related to dharma or big production house you would have said this is the dumbest heroine character you have ever seen. But with the big production house you wont.
The dialogues are so CRINGE throughout the movie. Looks like they spent so many years to write the most cringe dialogues of indian cinema. A visual spectacle though.
Yes, it has it flaws and some dialogues needed work, but it's a big screen spectacle and one that pushing Indian and especially Hindi cinema forward. Wonderful performances and very engaging, and you don't feel the run time.
i watched yesterday. I felt lagged so much. Especially in 2nd half begin when rabir wakes up from nightmare and quickly goes to boat and calls alia. entire theatre cracked up. 🤣
I feel like alia is like a really high quality painting canvas. The director should be really talented to use and bring out her acting talents to the screen.
No back story hollow characters, cameo u dnt conenct to cheesy dialogs too much romance, till interval no story development…. Got bored jst vfx are good
I used to like your reviews, but now I think they're more about making an impression about yourself with your English. It's great that you have a strong command of the language, but please keep in mind that you are reaching out to a large audience out here, and not everyone understands such complicated words and sentences. Please simplify and make your reviews more understandable. Personally, I lost interest in this one because I was trying to piece together what you were saying rather than understanding your views on the film.
Perfectly summed up . Great review, @Sucharita. While the concept is novel and the visuals are top notch.. I increasingly feel that the script loses its depth as the scale heightens. Dialogues become juvenile and the impact then only relies on the scale and not the soul of the movie. I will still urge everyone to give this a chance. This might be one of the instances where an able director ( love Ayan mukherjee for having made wake up sid ) has dedicated his blood and sweat for something he believes in. :)
@@Yoko4797 I loved it personally. Maybe because I do not have better benchmarks to pit it against since I have not watched a lot of contemporary movies from across the world against which it is being constantly compared.. also, in Bollywood it is first of its kind, i think? I felt the dialogue department was very kiddish though.
Mr. India and Krrish were far better superhero movies than this BS Brahmastra! Can’t even imagine comparing Mogambo with the Naagin Mouni Roy🐍…..Ewwwwwww…..♾️….. and beyond…! 😂😝🤣
Love-storyian + Naggin serial + Avenger type lazer light VFX + poor story/scripting + guest appearance of stars = Brahmastra,. my opinion does not qualify for ONE-time watch. Better reserve money for Vikram-vedha and PS-1
Just watched the movie. I really don't know apart from the amateur dialogues this movie has everything for an entertaining blockbuster. Infact, the plot and setup for the part 2 does feels like it's a work that took 10 years. I think, people nowadays go for a Bollywood movie with a predetermined mindset to find out flaws and highlight them and be part of the community that criticizes Bollywood. As, it has become a fashion these days and everyone wants to trend. But, the same audience goes for other movies with a completely blank mind expecting something new. This should change, every movie should be approached with a completely blank mind and you should just get dissolved in that world for 2 to 3 hours. Only then you'll enjoy a sci-fi movie. You can't go to such movie with a realistic world approach. I am absolutely sure that Brahamastra series is definitely going to be successful and will take Bollywood's standard in sci-fi genre much much high.
6:58 love your frustrations about Hindu elements in a film based on Hindu mythology. What other religions do you expect here for balancing? The makers of this movie are self conscious. They know what they are making and have learnt from previous experience. This time, they didn't choose to mock/bash Hindu religion, in comparison to other religions. This was just a Bollywood love story with Hindu mythology as background. Seems like, this didn't sit well with you.
they just jumped on the majoritarian bandwagon, the movie suffers bcz the director thought lets paint every frame in the brahmanical color with some cool ass VFX and that will work. Good that it did not work, such films should never work whose sole purpose is to appeal the senseless overly proud majority.
Unsubscribed just by her juvenile comments on Hinduism. Have she ever questioned why there are no religion in MCU? Totally unnecessary to bring this part. Shows the ulterior motive of the critique here. Yes, I am judging and don't label me bhakt or a troll as you people seems to do. Thanks
Chemistry thing you pointed out between them is literally what I always found weird between this two. I never saw one. Hopefully they have some real chemistry in real life. Cause they definitely don't look good.
I didn't have any issue with the voiceover of Abhitabh Bachan in the beginning. Voiceovers like that helps set-up the story. It reminded me of Galadriel's voiceover in LOTR which served an important purpose
Other than Visual displays, I am not able to identify the reason of watching the movie. Sorry I cannot spend my time just for that because rest seems sub standard
Yogi baba production was right all along. But back then the overwhelming support of audience trolled them in the comment section. Suddenly the same audience is boycotting them because he ate beef or something. I will never understand Indian audience. Also i noticed the marketing team were constantly invoking hindu pride to titilate the majority population. Support this film to support hindu culture - - something like that. But I think that has backfired. There's nothing wrong with representation in hindu mythology in cinema. We have had great works in hindu mythology on TV. Mahadev of lifeok and mahabharat of star plus were few of my favourites. But they had great storytelling and nuances. Without nuance its not representation. Its shallow cultural appropriation.
I mean seriously so much effort put into the visual appeal of the film which is quite spectacular tbh but story was 404 for all practical purposes and my word the guy who wrote dialogues stunk up the movie MONUMENTALLY! How does a 400 CRORES product gets out with such dialogues!?
The love story was the weakest part of the film. Rushed, cringeworthy and disingenuous. They spent so long unravelling the love story yet it still felt unnecessary and rushed. Had they swapped the love story with more back story or character development it would be been far more successful. In fact I’d go as far as saying, take Alia Bhatt out of this film and it would have made no difference to the story.
Ranbir Kapoor looks too old for this kind of story. I'm not saying this in a disrespectful way, this is just how I feel. Somebody like Siddhant Chaturvedi or Ishan Khattar would have looked the part I guess. (I'm sorry, I watched KWK last night, and I'm still in that zone! 😂)
Younger ones are bad. Ishan might be a good actor but his presence itself gets on your nerves. He has zero charisma. Sidhant looks so ordinary it’s difficult to imagine him as a flagbearer of religious epiphany. He suits roles of lower middle class people well coz he doesn’t look that heroic tbh. He acts well too. Sid Malhotra looks young for his age , is very good at acting too. Other younger actors are not good enough. Hrithik was the one till a few years back .
Brahmastra’s name should be Premastra. Unable to match the hype. Unique movie concept suppressed due to overdose of LOVE STORY. 1. Prime focus on love story and no focus on presenting rich hindu culture as promised in interviews and all. 2. Worst dialogues. No goosebumps scene. 3. Alia bhatt acting lol 😂 she knows acting???😂 4. Bgm good. 5. VFX Visuals good but seems like a laser show. 6. Story and screenplay very confusing, complex and slow. 7. Can’t connect with common man. 8. No thrilling experience 9. Climax = Torture 😂maza kirkira kar diya pura Karan Johar ki aag Ayan Mukerji k dimAg ki khurafat 10. SRK bhai cameo mind blowing unbelievable ❤❤❤ 11. Mouni Roy doesn’t suit in her role. It looks like we’re watching naagin on TV. 12. Cringe and torturing chemistry between Ranbir and Alia on screen. No enchanting and sizzling love story. 13. Camera work above average 14. Songs also not well placed in movie. 15. Above Average 3D visuals 16. Heavy budget spent on movie but not showcased and utilised properly on screen. 17. First half engaging and bit entertaining but second half is pure torture. 18. No cultural history and superhero concept developed because sole focus was on Love story by lover wood. 19. No emotional touch so movie unable to connect with audience. 20. Post credit scene not good. No proper revelation. 21. No research on hindu mythology and rich ancient culture. Sole focus on love story😡 22. Grand vision but poor execution. 23. Action scenes choreography very poor. 24. Shastras and background regarding the same not developed. 25. All actors overall very dull.
This might be a good attempt for a cinema but I really wish that the acceptance of this film would not encourage lobbying and groupism in the industry which is the source of all these issues like boycott trend, nepotism, internal politics...honestly bollywood cannot afford another black mark like Sushant's incident
@@artislife456 absolutely, they favor the people they like....but actions have consequences, there are lobbyists that sometimes bring an order, structure and balance to the industry, whether its good or bad...say Amazon in e-commerce...they bring the people the like into their business like retailers, employees etc, but at the same time they make sure those alliances are competent and skilled enough...that is where bollywood suffers, the priority to hire/partner always within a closely guarded community which starts from Madh to colaba that too within selected families irrespective of skill/talent...they started giving failures so bad that the industry was belittled, artists were boycotted and influx from south was encouraged...to the point where the script changes mentioned by Vijayendra Prasad/Rajamouli's dad had to be implemented for a movie that was being made for the past 10 years...now it's a success...does it lead to a reform? Or does the industry stick to its old ways is the riddle
@@SucharitaTyagi the critique, the sarcasm, the references all are on point which we don't see in a lot of other reviews. It must take alot of time to write that but still earlier than alot of other reviews who put half as much thought in their writings. ❤️
