@@IamAWESOME3980no, we got rid of Donald Trump so there's no more Sweet deals for China. No more Trump begging that block Chinese companies be unblocked And what was it, $70 million of interest income he declared in China?. Finally producing our own microprocessors in America, very little chance of what you're saying happening now. Thank God
Why does the US support Israel so much? Because Wall Street Journal and other presstitutes take their marching orders from the disgraceful Murdoch family.
So many people totally underestimate what our armed forces are really capable of. Millions of underwater autonomous drones, all with missles that can be fired at the flip of a switch. Badass.
I love watching videos on the rich people's network showing me where my tax dollars go and what they do with the money they consistently inflate out of my meager savings via deficit spending (a not so hidden tax). At least WSJ is honest - war is about money and they cover money stories so it's very appropriate they are the leaders in this reporting genre 💰
@@aldrinmilespartosa1578 true, no one wants to fight America so that's pretty worth it. Plus if a more expensive piece of equipment can save the lives of soldiers then it's obviously worth it....also people vastly overestimate the value of our collective taxes. Most defense spending isn't coming from personal taxes.
what technology bro ?? wake up sir ,,until today date and this moment at NOW ,USA and its allies plus Euro western Countries until this moment couldn't reach hypervelocity with huge failure on hypersonic projectiles projects which Russia advanced by far , Chinese Space science , and Iran drones, ballistic vehicles and aerodynamics. wake up Sir, u r very late this time of history that u r well know industrial manufacturing methods on very nice looking & most expensive just like those Sea Drones study took years and cost billions over became the nice looking solar panels fitted on most expensive non-advanced controlling board that loosing sat signal beside US's navy still recovering those drones without its original installed cameras which stolen by Iranian's IRG after hijacked them from Pers gulf and red sea shows u that IRGC wasn't interested with drones technology it appears they interested more with its cameras and recordings 😂 lol
Very problematic I'd say, that even could not guarantee the enemy not knowing your stuff. No worth the effort, I guess that's the reason nobody have done such.
The military industrial complex being the benefactor of this expense to the U.S. taxpayer. In actuality the U.S. is spending money we print out of thin air.
a limerick. A stealthy boat called the Triton Could sail and submerge like Poseidon. Though cheap to attrit, Its sensors were lit, Giving intel that sailors would write on.
There once was boat from Kilkenny That could run underwater like a blenny Now this boat wasn't cheap Its price was quite steep But it could sink Russian boats aplenty.
@BorisPerc I know you're proud of it but it's a fantasy... Just like the Ruskie Mir and the fantasy of the "unstoppable Russian military" (see profile picture for how well those have turned out)
It's interesting, but there is so much sales language in here that I expect the script was modified and approved by marketing from the companies. There is a lot of...not technically wrong, but objectove/misleading stuff...good, but...too much corporate sales language
Very much spot on, it is a profit driven industry. "Oh it is so cheap, it cost only 2-3 gazzillion dollars, oh no problem we just print more money". Well, good luck with that 🤡🤡🤡
Agreed. A lot of things are misleading, like the talk of thermobarics, we have thermobaric handgrenades its not that special. Or how ukranian helicopters had soviet dumb rocket that work just like the hydra rockets but the "expert" acts like area of effect is a new capability. And most of the video was not about the title just US MIC sales propaganda.
It's not like the Ukraine is buying weaponry from the U.S. but the U.S. is just continuing the military action we started in 2014. There are few if any Ukrainian fighting age men left alive.
@@mattk8810 I looked them up and this is what I got, Ghost Shark and Manta Ray are the names of prototype uncrewed underwater vehicles - UUVs or drones - introduced recently by Australia and the United States respectively. I'm digging deeper because I want to see one or both of these in their own environment. Thanks for the tip.
33:38 It was pretty good but they straight b******* at us about the 155 production because guess what during World War One and World War II we were out producing today's numbers by an order of magnitude but we didn't have any CNC machines back then.... they're simply bullshiting people
The US has been using thermobaric weapons since the Vietnam War. In recent years they have conveniently renamed them as "novel explosive" to avoid bad PR. Hundreds of thermobaric Hellfire missiles have been used in Iraq, Afghanistan and Syria - often in urban areas with little regard for civilian casualties.
That Triton, if equipped properly, could be an excellent tool for oceanographic research! It could observe marine mammals, track birds, and observe physical parameters like currents, water temperature, etc. I can't wait to see what marine biologists do with this!
Before you say the Triton is too expensive, consider the costs, it requires a dozen bag of bushings worth 90 thousand dollars and comes fitted with that state of the art 10k toilet seat.
It is so good to see a topic, or croup of topics done so well and in depth. The work is displayed well and explained well. It presents the topic well enough to see its benefits and the possible dangers of the system, Well done and I look forward to the next video.
It wont ... individuals like You will help about "arteficial" ... whether like or not ... that could be problematic there goes explination that you should confront .... Go Try That :))))
After seeing what is happening in the Ukraine I don't think the M10 Booker would last very long on the modern battlefield. More armor, and/or better defensive weapons against ultralight drones are needed to survive today.
@@001vern The reason that Russia and Ukraine have been losing a very large amount of equipment to drones is because they lack any defense systems against small UAVs and neither side has air superiority. The U.S. currently has anti UAV weapons at its disposal and is currently producing many of them to use so it would be different circumstances.
No it’s not! Are you a troll or an adversary? Talk like that is insane. Maybe US 🇺🇸 should disband the Military? Borders are open and inflation is growing. Guess we need not attempt defense else Contractors are blamed for promoting War? PATHETIC!
Letmegetthisright. Russia fires 20-30,000 shells Per Day and the US went into this mess producing only 14,000 shells per Month ? Half a day's supply. And it will only reach a three day supply/Month in Two Years ( while Russia will again have increased its production over that time). Meanwhile the Ukrainian ground forces advance WW1 style into this baffling barrage WITH NO AIR SUPPORT. 47:00 Humanitary Concerns ? Lets give Ukr. Cluster Munitions that drop indiscriminate landmines covering Donbas. eg: "Some 4 million to 6 million land mines and other unexploded munitions are estimated to have littered Cambodia's countryside" WSJ: Where is your Adult Assessment of the current US Administration ?
Yemen in 3 days? The United States spent a billion dollars on the combat operations of its aircraft carrier squadron in the Red Sea, but lost the naval war to the Yemeni Navy. The Houthis' success rate is relatively low given the number of munitions deployed, but they have succeeded it hitting around 30 merchant ships. With traffic through the Red Sea having declined by about 60-70%, the inflationary impacts will be felt in the global economy. Western navies are really really concerned over the "high" number of munitions houthis use…especially when the western munitions in Cyprus are nearly exhausted after more than 6 months of trying to kill houthi children with multi million pound missiles.
full of BS- GLSDB don't work... these are old statements from US Gov. they have since acknowledged it was rushed into service untested. We need to do better.
Basically, technology like drones, guided glide bombs, and constant surveillance capabilities means armour is useless now. It goes to show how hopeless it is for infantry and armoured personnel in a modern conflict. You are sitting ducks to people in computer rooms far away from the front lines. Nothing but meat shields.
You obviously have no idea about landwarfare. Yeah go let a fpv destroy fortifications, deep trenches, bunkers, hold ground, occupy land, act in urban warfare
The problem with GLSDB is that it was rushed into production and wasn't ready yet. Ukrainians have not used it much because they found that the Russians GPS jammers were taking it off course. They were missing and that is a problem. Russian EW is good despite having a horrible army in general.
'Horrible army'? 😂😂😂 Now if you said horrible logistics then you would have a point. Russia's army is one of its strongest points. It's crazy that they've used conscripts and felons who have taken multiple cities. 80% of their army is still in the mainland. But I get it, you're a Russophobe who has to say negative things about Russia to make yourself feel better😃 I mean they've ran out of weapons and they're now using shovels too right? If only they fought against Vietnamese rice farmers maybe they would've done better😂
The MIC taking the concept of "cheap drones" and getting cost up to 3 million dollars is why the U.S. will get pantsed the moment it has to engage an actual peer in war lol.
_Russia is now one twentieth of one percent larger than it was in 2022, and all it cost them is half a million lives, and the respect of most of the world._ 😨 ⚒ - j q t -
To 'future proof' the hardwired interconnect, I suggest horizontal drilling, leaving an armor casing and running the fiber/copper, then pressurize the segments for fault detection. Upgrades simply require removal / replacement of the data links. (No more real estate issues.)
1. Russia is saying they will use nuclear weapons first if NATO countries attacks them directly 2. Putin is scared of NATO conventional superiority 3. Russia focuses more on Nukes Everyone knows - none of the sides wants to use nukes, because that exchange will kill all of us. Conventional weapons are defensive and offensive, while nukes are considered only as repellent (for enemy to think twice of gambling) Russia is showing weakness in conventional war and the West still call them aggressive? Conventional superiority is sign of aggression, while NUCLEAR THREAT is saying clear words - STEP BACK..
Normies don't want to use nukes but leaders don't give a f a out it, they have their multi-million bunkers that can keep them alive for years if not decades.
Ukraine is proving Tanks to be obsolete. The Booker will be no different. If you wish for troops to have mobility, create long range electric Mountain Bikes.
So in Ukraine the drone war is getting scary. The soldiers getting attacked by those drones don't always see them. Sometimes they go about their business and even looked right at the drone above there head and didn't even notice. Then when not having designated targets. They go out on hunts with drones 24x7. Day and night. Then the scary parts is seeing drones do circles soldiers trying to get away from and trying to hit with sticks. But the drone operator is toying with them because he could have already hit the button to kill him. Then goes in for the kill and target eliminated. Or other footage i seen where a guy hides from a drond behind a tree but doesn't see the drone behind him. Other things i seen on different media is how they also use land drones to go bomb them in foxholes or land drones to sometimes recover aircraft drones by hooking up and hauling them back. Ukraine is a lot more experienced with the smaller civilian sized drones for combat than we are. Then add Russia is always on the hunt for drones. You sometimes hear them but can't pinpoint exactly where they are and you hope they don't see you. Other things i seen is that sometimes when Ukraine launches drones into Russia then they get jammed. Keep going and then sometimes unjam after they are outside of jamming range and regain control. And if you see one drone there is usually several around. They fly in buildings with blown out windows or opened doors or blown out ealls and everything else to hit there targets such as men on foot. Oddly the drones have been fairly accurate and most of the time hitting their targets. I see at least one that managed to fly the drone in the tank hatch itself. I seen other footage where another drone swings around. Stops for a second then darts at a Russian tank and the turret blows off. Sometimes they are strapping old RPG style grenades to them for the tanks. Drone Still light enough to carry and blow up a Russian tank. They only need the explosive part of the rpg. When jammed they send more drones out while sitting in a bunker and keep trying. The video feed usually gets jammed first. They use one drone that not dji brand. That has the target tracking and stuff some consumer drones have. Usually they replace optics with better optics. Infrared or whatever. I been watching a lot of the journalist videos that came out recently. Like Darwin's war from scripps news. It's about Ukraine's ace fpv pilot. And several other journalist shows about drones on the front lines in Ukraine that all came out within the last month or 2. I forgot to add. When jammed they keep sending more out until successful. Then maybe the first few came up short but they only need one to make it to the target. So after a few drones or so they got the target despite the jamming.
>Oddly the drones have been fairly accurate and most of the time hitting their targets. Because you see only succesfull strikes? Even if 90 out of 100 are jammed/missed/downed you'll see 10 videos and say "wow, all of them reached targets".
The M10 does not appear to be built to counter what will be its nemesis, the FPV drone. Back to the drawing board. The design requirement is not so much to move infantry forward as to move one's own FPV drone controllers forward through mined areas to bring more enemy targets into FPV range, which appears to generally exceed the effective range of a tank gun, and to provide protection for that crew through electronic and other counter measures to thwart the enemy's FPV drones and mines. Think of it as a sort of aircraft carrier on land. The unit could involve more vehicles as does a carrier task force. Many vehicles would be almost purely for defense against enemy drones. They could launch balloons or quiet gliders to acoustically acquire enemy drones. They could forward fire land-based, networked listening devices in a role similar to the sonobuoy. Land assault is now a smaller version of the carrier task force rather than battleships (tanks). The idea is for the number and variety of one's own drones and control points to outnumber the enemy drones and control points. Mechanized artillery is still relevant because its range generally exceeds drone range, the naval analogy being missiles launched out of VLS's.
I pray to God to give you a lot of beautiful days and you know God loves us so much,So where are you originally from? I am David originally from Spain but currently living.
Nuclear detonation underwater doesn't create tsunami per se. On the other hand if it tiggers massive underwater landslide and displacement .... well. But that severly limits targeting options and is hardly precise or reliable.
So does this mean that the stryker failed when they have a variant of a 105 mm canon? The makers of the booker are thinking of a war way back in the Gulf War. Havent they learned anything in the ukraine-russia war?
Can we all agree that in the current age, nuclear bombers are effectively obsolete compared to the the other options? Bombers capable of delivering nuclear weapons on the other hand are extremely effective with more conventional bombs and missiles. Just not for dropping a nuclear weapon.
TOS1A Thermobaric is illegal to use in civilian areas? NATO used thermobarics to destroy at least one Libyan city. Blew the walls right off high rise apartments and cooked everyone inside.
Regarding the booker Tank platform. Good idea compared with a Abrams but was not the STRIKER system invisioned to do that job what now is planed for the Booker? What happened to the STRIKER project?
@@pogo1140 i am not convinced that is necessary to avoid the worst here described effects and i don't mean necessarily the initial explosion phase. Helmet with its own flexible O2, that would be activated when a rappid pressure change occurs or when manual activaded in case of biological or chemical threats. Similar to a airback system, just then creating airtightness around the neck.
@pogo1140 i guess there might be safty limits, but could one produce *sufficient* counterpressure within the helmet? Not necessarily equal to the outside, but enough to soften the blow and prevent fatalities. Biggest issue i thought would be to create an airtight area around the neck at least for a short time, indefinetly ofcause could be better, but for the duration of such an attack would at least prevent the worst there then. Gels put under pressure,chemical quick foam for one time use, something like that. The supersonic debris, there a full body armor might be needed indeed, but how far away are we with current moddels that are reinforcing vital areas? Weight is also a constant concern if you don't want an exoskellets that need motors/actuators.
@@pogo1140, a MJOLNIR armor comparable suit would be about the only thing that would have a chance of withstanding that impact and that doesn’t exist in our current day & age/reality for that matter:
Russian Vacuum boms are bad when they use it. But israel and the US will use white phosphorus with impunity in residential areas when ever they see fit. The hypocracy these days is insane
not all tanks are hit critically while driving or engaging, it is at last a possibility that the crew abandons the vehicle for other reasons (e.g. tack fails), before the kill-shot is carried out. but yes, generally you are correct.
