Breaking Some Hypercars By Removing All Their Power - Forza Motorsport 

The system has no idea what cars its measuring, it only has weight,grip, center of mass, earodynamics,power,mass momentum, moment of inertia etc. For all its worth Alex is driving a 2003 clio with a huge wing and tyres on it. Its pretty impressive how well it balances considering how many factors there are

​@@robertjusic9097its honestly pretty cool seing a normal m3 fighting a chiron

​@@mattias1191and a ford sierra doing its best red bull impression

This kind of exists in WRL GTO. There are actual GT4 cars racing with homebrew E46s, Miatas, etc.

I know your point, but the Chiron test drive videos always remark on their nimbleness and handling. People think they're a big car, but they around the same size as a 911, just heavy.

@@swordmonkey6635 And "weight is the enemy of performance" is something I heard somewhere. Yeah I know it's a big step up in handling from the Veyron, but still compared to other hypercars it's a boat. That's why I think the Chiron is like in a category of its own, like a "hyper grand tourer", it's not really comparable to anything else. It's way way more luxurious than a Koenigsegg Agera RS or Jesko, but the Koenigseggs will slaughter it in both acceleration and cornering.

@@warkus123 The weight is there to keep it on the ground. If "weight is the enemy of performance" then aerodynamic downforce wouldn't exist on high performance cars. Downforce causing hundreds of pounds of extra weight as the car accelerates is required to keep them on the ground. Bugatti engineers found that in order for their car to be stable at speeds above 250 mph without making it look like a spaceship, they would need it to be heavy so that stability could be achieved. The real saying is: Cheap. Fast. Light. You can only pick two.

@@swordmonkey6635 You trying to tell me that adding 500kg to my car is gonna make it turn better? There's a reason why people do weight reduction in race cars and not pour concrete in them... The more mass you have, the more momentum you also have that's trying to keep moving straight forward when you turn the steering wheel. That's why a Chiron needs super wide tires, while a 600kg Caterham can take a corner at the same speed with 215-225mm wide tires, because it has less than 1/3 of the weight to change the direction of momentum on... Sure a Caterham has way less total grip than a Chiron, but it also needs way less grip because it weighs so much less.

@@warkus123 Turn better at speed. Yes. That's why all race cars have aerodynamic downforce, it shoves the car to the ground allowing for better grip. Downforce= better handling. Downforce= weight produced by are passing over an airfoil or through venturi tunnels. It's fundamental race engineering. Take aero effects off your light sports car and then ask it to turn at high speeds and see what happens. Bugatti was concerned about the car handling and stability at above 200 MPH. And also wanted it to be stable at +250 MPH. Weight is required to keep the car stable at those speeds. The Bugatti Chiron proves their engineering worked. The Divo refined the idea of handling. The 300 + SS refined the idea of top speed handling.

Does Ninetails still like ‘800 hp and bike tires’ like he did in FH4? I haven’t watched rail race in a number of years.

It’s goofy, it’s fun and it doesn’t break the game in no way. The last time this was a thing was fm4 I believe and it’s usually regarded as the best in the series. I’m hoping it’s just an extension of things you can play around with. This beats having trucks and limos any day

@@michaelnight9162 As Alex/Failrace has shown, true hypercar racing in video games often has the field spread out and uninteresting (ignoring GTA custom races). This bug/feature lets you see interesting racing with hypercars that don't normally create interesting racing.

You need an engine swap that has an aspiration swap and one that doesn't Use an engine that does have one and apply the turbo/sc Very quickly do a swap to an engine that doesn't have that option (one already turboed, for example) It might take a few tries, but at some point you should have the aspiration swap option on an engine that doesn't normally have one. You'll see once you go there your power will drop

The main thing is to have an engine swap that has an aspiration convertion (like 6.2 V8). Swap to that engine and select it. Then check that the aspiration conversion is on "naturally aspirated". Then quickly swap to an engine that has a turbo (can be a stock engine or a turbo rally swap) and if you're quick enough you should have the "aspiration conversion" option there too. Select aspiration conversion, don't move the cursor and press A. This will remove the turbo from an engine, even when this is not an option - for example the Turbo Rally I4 swap.

​@AlexeyBeganov Thank you! Similar to the old aspiration removal glitch. Was looking around how to do it this time and it worked like a charm!

There are also just a very select few cars that get very low horse power motor swaps, and combined with aero and ballast usually drop down to mid B to high B class, I’ve only found 2 that do it

??? It's incredibly powerful, what are you smoking?

If anything it's probably overdone

It's not

Eh, it will die down in a week or two so no worries.

hey, that's me!

Or just add a limiter like they have in basically every single racing game except forza. Wether it’s through a restrict or plate or an ecu it needs to be percentage based.

@@BenFilley why not both?

@@FearlessLeader2001 im fine with both. just saying a percentage based limiter would be a good addition also, and would solve the need if they chose not to make removing forced induction an option

U are a boomer

Some might even call it death grip.