I think another couple of good comparisons would be with Marseille and Carnot (which, combined with Henri IV reflects most of Brennus' playstyle, IMO). Brennus sacrifices utility/survivability for some pretty reliable guns (very good reload, much better than even Defence) and normal cruiser dispersion. I wouldn't mind getting this bote, though the 60k price tag does not leave me very enthusiastic.
@@Arthionto be fair, Carnot’s entire gimmick is raw speed and one heavy broadside. It’s faster and harder hitting than any other t9 Cruiser. Obviously that’s comes with low DPM and being a MASSIVE target.
@@joshmostposhwith AP maybe, but her HE salvo is worse than Azuma's and her DPM for AP is the worst at the tier for 305/310mm CBs and her HE is only 5k better than Agir's. Carnot is a trash ship lol. She's outperformed by basically every other CB at the tier.
Yamato had HE loaded to shoot at your shima that was being spotted and killed by their Black while you farmed the Yamato lol. I bet your shima was pissed and reasonably so...
A big difference your missed between Brennus and Henri : The ballistics on this thing seem god-like ! So much easier to hit big AP hits at a distance !
I was waiting for the RB ship to come out before deciding to pull the trigger on the Silicia. Your video helped me decide. I have the Henry, so Silica it is. Thank you. Kiwibandit NA
torpilles a six heures. btw, what is the right pronounciation of that ship orkan? orkan, like the storm in german, or the turkish name orkan, like erkan^^ rl goes first
You could add your most emblematic catch phrase to these reviews. For instance either at the start of the video, or when you showcase the battle, you could say "Ok then, lets see how brooooken is (insert ship name here)".
