Тёмный

Brian Sewell - Punished by the Establishment for supporting Anthony Blunt (73/90) 

Web of Stories - Life Stories of Remarkable People
Подписаться 57 тыс.
Просмотров 11 тыс.
50% 1

To listen to more of Brian Sewell’s stories, go to the playlist: • Brian Sewell - John Si...
Born in Britain, art critic Brian Sewell (1931-2015) wrote for the "London Evening Standard" and made numerous television appearances throughout his distinguished media career. He was known for his outspoken and erudite reviews of art. [Listener: Christopher Sykes]
TRANSCRIPT: Well, Anthony had done a great deal for me, and the least I could do when this crisis occurred in the late autumn of 1979 was an old-fashioned thing: stand by my friend. Anthony needed to escape from his flat in… near Marble Arch, because the journalists were already gathering outside like wolves, and I did get him out and I drove him to stay with another friend, and his instruction to me was, diversionary tactics.
And I have to say that diversionary tactics cost me a great deal. They were physically draining, they were emotionally draining, they went on for months, having to deal with angry journalists, having to fend off accusations which were manifestly untrue and so on and so on. And what was most difficult was that, almost without exception, the American museums for which I had been working, withdrew their employment. That’s partly due, not to the directors and curatorial staff of the museums, but almost entirely due to the fact that they have boards of trustees and they have committees which are in charge of the American system of buying things from museums that you, a rich man, might say, well, I will buy that. I know the museum wants it and it hasn’t got the money. I will buy it. And you might keep it until your death, but at your death it will then revert to the museum. So everybody’s happy. But it means that people who sat on boards and committees were extraordinarily generous, and were expected to be generous. They were also very largely extremely conservative. And the whiff of communism, that by association was attached to me, they could not tolerate. So one by one by one, I was getting the letters or the telephone calls saying, you know, drop out for a year or two. Well, you can’t drop out for a year or two. If you do that, somebody else takes over, and then you can’t push them out because you want to come back. And in any case, what are you going to do in the year or two, when there is no job and there is therefore no money?
It didn’t matter to the few German museums for which I was working. It didn’t matter for the Swiss museums. It certainly didn’t matter for the people in South Africa, for whom I was working, but the final straw was the American authorities withdrawing my visa. Because you then had to have a visa to go to America, and I was going five times a year, and suddenly couldn’t go at all. And so part of my life, a very large part of my life was suddenly wiped out. And I didn’t know… you know, it was another… I was that much older than I had been when I left Christie’s. There was no question of saying, well, I’ll go back to my scholarship and write my thesis now. I didn’t have the money to sustain myself. I couldn’t think of any alternative career. There was no way of joining a firm. I was soiled goods, you know. If, in the extremely unlikely circumstance of being taken on as an advisor or whatever to a London dealer, it might have ruined that London dealer’s reputation, or at least affected it seriously for a year or two. So nobody was going to do that.
And then suddenly I had a letter from… oh God, I can’t remember her name. The newly appointed editor of a magazine called “Tatler”. And she asked me to become their art critic. And I was to write ten columns a year and be paid £100. And I said, 'Yes'. And my first experience as “Tatler’s” art critic was to go to the Tate Gallery’s exhibition devoted to Salvador Dalí. And the normal thing if you go to a gallery exhibition is that the gallery gives you the catalogue, and I asked for a copy of the catalogue and I was told that I was not important enough to be given one.

Развлечения

Опубликовано:

 

19 сен 2017

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 12   
@williamevans9426
@williamevans9426 4 года назад
Whatever one thinks of Blunt, at least Sewell remained a loyal friend even to the extent of losing employment himself.
@brooke4627
@brooke4627 2 месяца назад
Sewell was a class act. As a young poet I took the antithesis of Sewell's views of aesthetics. I was a postmodernist poet influenced by the anti traditional point of view. Seeing this raises my view of Sewell considerably. To think that a man of his level of knowledge could be alienated for staying loyal to his teacher and mentor makes me sad. Sewell was essentially punished for the sins of Blunt - most unfair.
@jennyhughes4474
@jennyhughes4474 4 года назад
I like listening to Mr Sewell talking, he's eloquent and has had many very interesting experiences and adventures; having to have lived as gay (but having to hide it) during so long when it was criminal must have been truly terrible, thanks to many brave people this has changed in the UK but (I think?) many other countries still haven't made homosexuality legal - they must and fast. Thank you for putting these clips up here.
@kevynekicklighter7960
@kevynekicklighter7960 4 года назад
Blunt was the interesting "4th man" in the Cambridge Soviet spy ring. Man of privilege (his mother not only wrote to the Queen mother, she got her hand me downs, being a wife to a poor church rector). But he betrayed so many people, and to hear Sewell talk about loyalty to Blunt, when Blunt betrayed his friends (like Victor Rothschild even -- the guy who loaned Blunt the money for his Poussin painting; and who he rented his apartment from), and by extension his own Queen (who his mom was friends too) is damning and sickening. Sewell deserved that punishment even. Spies don't care what lives they can ruin. When Blunt asked why he did it, he said "Cowboys and Indians". That callousness is WHAT is so damning about spies. Sewell was clueless, and any punishment he faced is to prevent other reputations being ruined by association.
@peterc9153
@peterc9153 5 лет назад
No matter how charming Blunt may have appeared, even to those who knew him personally. he was a fundamentally evil man who supported a regime and an ideology that has murdered over 100 million people since the beginning of the 20th century. And, as a spy, he supported the USSR to the deliberate intended cost of the well being of tens of millions of British citizens. Quite abhorrent.
@hexonatapeloop
@hexonatapeloop 5 лет назад
yeah thanks
@aalexjohna
@aalexjohna 4 года назад
Blunt was a hero
@blackmore4
@blackmore4 4 года назад
@@aalexjohna Why d'you think he was a hero?
@stephenclues2948
@stephenclues2948 3 года назад
Blunt was a traitor and recruited other traitors working under cover of MI5, MI6 and the Foreign Office. The information they passed to the Soviet Union caused the deaths of thousands of brave Poles, Czechs, Ukrainians, Hungarians etc.who tried to free their countries but whose family and friends were arrested, tortured and executed during and after the murderous regime of Stalin. Blunt and the other Cambridge spies knew their information was used for this purpose. There is simply no excuse.
@robkeeleycomposer
@robkeeleycomposer 3 года назад
Another display of Mr Sewell's breathtaking naivety and rather surprisingly, self-pity . Sad, I have long had a lot of time for him as an art critic, seeing through the pretensions of the modern art world, so he's never lacked guts.
Далее
Brian Sewell - Always the outsider (74/90)
3:28
Просмотров 4,1 тыс.
Базовый iPhone 16
00:38
Просмотров 377 тыс.
Lamport on discovering the Bakery Algorithm
3:57
Просмотров 36 тыс.
Knuth  on the origins of TeX
5:53
Просмотров 2,7 тыс.
Как без этого..😂
0:15
Просмотров 1,2 млн
200 IQ рабочий😳
0:28
Просмотров 2,9 млн
Spot The Fake Animal For $10,000
0:40
Просмотров 157 млн