Brick Healing Session - Vermont 

LOL

To be fair the first iteration released wasn't great - 14ish detect, no special heal (80s reload, 10% citadel heal instead of the 40s reload and 50% citadel heal), no improved acceleration and no 50mm plating. Only thing better was that the shells had better flight time and pen but it wasn't really enough to make it popular

Yeah then they over buffed it to be one of the best in the game

Granted it was still capable of smashing things even then, but it was very hard to do so. Now its way easier to pull off. The 28km cross-map smashes were easier back then so it was trade i guess?

When it came out it was

*Laughs in Anhalt* German dispersion + tiny guns= probably one of if not truly the worst ship in the game. That or Sun Yat Sen, ugh that thing is terrible.

the only streamer it seems that is ok with other people getting kills.

Ayy, me too!

This ship has made me want to move to Vermont

@@SJB117 I live in the Vermont. Second turret to the left

Gk these days is worse than angled Minotaur.

When you assemble a captain for her it becomes; Brisk is love, Brisk is life.

nobody should accept a nerf to anything they paid for, fk that completely, why do people accept this shit, they can test retest triple test anything before it going for sale, once it does any nerf is fkg stupid and a rip off

The irony of it is that its side-profile is by far the largest thing around as far as BBs are concerned. I think only the American Hybrid BBs or CVs in general come close to showing as much side as this thing, and at least they can be excused for having boxy flight-decks on top. Even the Yamato-hulled ships in the game have a lower profile than it but somehow have over 2 kms worse concealment than it.... HOW!?

@@vtr0104 what does BB stand for? and CV? Battleship and carrier obviously, what is the BB/ CV for?

@@scotty5166 The double letters were started in the 20's by the Navy when they realized that so many ship types were being built that their old system of using one letter and a number was making hull identification confusing. The new system allowed for some manner of variation. BB designated a traditional battleship (battleship-battleship), differentiated from other nations's versions of it, such as the British or German BCs (battleship-cruiser) of the recently concluded WWI. Same went for destroyer-destroyer or submarine-submarine. The only abnormality was carriers recieving CV (carrier vessel) when, at the time, CL (cruiser-light) and CA (cruiser-armored) were being used. If one didn't know better, they'd think a CV was some new cruiser type (which is ironic, considering some Cleveland-class CL hulls were actually converted in WWII to light carriers, resulting in a new class of CVL's: carrier vessel-light in which the C no longer stood for "cruiser"). Like with any bureaucratic thing, it didn't remain stable for very long, and there's a bunch of stuff on Google if you want to learn more about it (like how the designations changed after WWII going into the Cold War). Hope this helps.

I just unlocked the Minnesota after grinding with Kansas in ranked. No way am I gonna play that ship. Kansas was too painful already. Gonna collect fxp to jump to BRICK

Just skip to Vermont, Kansas and Minnie are hot garbage

@@DarthLinpaws Skipped both of them with free XP. Love their unique appearance but after everything i did see from them i knew that its worth to save some Credits and dump some of my free XP stack here.

Ignore the folk who say Kansas and Minnesota are bad, they're good if you abuse the hell outta that turn circle, plus they can still easily dev strike anything off the map. Still weird the Kearsarge has a better broadside than Minnesota with 4 seconds less reload...

@@WindIsCalm I would agree. Kansas ad Minnesota are alright, although not as good as Vermont tier for tier. Kearsarge's better broadside with 4 sec off the reload + planes is certainly game balance.

Brick is love.

A lot of that is to do with the fact that Vermont sit at close range, while the Bungo will just get overmatched and explode.

I’d say it gets 12 480s with funny dispersion button.

@@droidmotorola3884 satsuma button... God help us all

@@droidmotorola3884 Or with a burst fire with a reload of 120 seconds Xd

@@jakubslavik5595 🤣🤣 burst fire and 120 second reload would be ridiculous

BFK

I'd base my decision on how much you enjoy the lower ships of the line, personally the Cherbourg and Melons play substantially like the Marseille (and having 8 all forward guns even puts the Hooters above the Marseille in some scenarios) while with the US fattleships the Kansas was fine since she's rather compacts, has that RN DD acceleration built in and undisputedly the heaviest alpha at T8. The Ovalsota? not so compact, shell traps galore, faces Condes, Satsumas and etc. pretty regularly and not even the heaviest broadside at T9 within the USN since the Kearsarge is a ship that exists.

@@alphax4785 I didn't really play the preceeding ships on PTS, because I play on PTS only to try out TX ships which helps determine which ship is worth the grind. Anyways, why I'm really confused between the ships is because both of them are truly good for their own ship type. Marseille is agile, carries the French gimmicks and one of the best super cruiser concealment. Vermont on the other hand has one of the best BB concealment for the gun caliber! Why is this so difficult to decide lol😂

Personally, I would get Vermont first since it’s a lesser grind to Marseille. At the end of the day, do what you think would let you have more fun.

@@atpyro7920 I'm super confused. I enjoyed both, but Marseille was more fun, so I guess I'll get Marseille first

@@sameerkharade7750 There you go then

In-game settings

@@Conquest2... yeah but which one? i cant seem to find it or smth

@@Jonnesdeknostmaybe camera height?

It's 'cause it's so slow. If it had a concealment that would make sense for a ship its size, it'd be constantly spotted, and wouldn't really have good battle impact. It (somewhat) made her balanced. Upping her detection range a bit wouldn't hurt though.