The concept that truly baffles me is how some people can be so dismissive or even suspicious of the validity of sciences they've never bothered studying.
Humans are conspiratorial by nature it seems. Even in ancient times we have recorded examples of what they called skeptics then, you would probably call conspiracy theorists today.
What's a conspiracy theorist? I think you mean conspiracy realist. The people who don't simply believe what they're told to believe. The people don't take their entire worldview on pure faith.
@@grahvis Nope. We have a higher standard for evidence. "I read it in a book," or "everybody knows that" doesn't cut it for us. We seek direct observation and experience.
"How do we know?" Put simply, maths and observation. We have incredibly powerful telescopes in space. These allow us to see vast distances. We can track the movements of interstellar bodies and calculate their distances. All of this, plus millions of man-hours over thousands of years of study, has allowed us to plot all of these interstellar bodies with accuracy. Astronomy is humanity's oldest science. When we say the "observable universe," we mean that literally. All of those various bodies contained within the observable universe have been observed and plotted. These methods have held up to scrutiny and these are, in fact, facts. Edit: you can also figure out how many grains of sand there are on earth by using math
It's hard to explain to people. I truly understood the size of the universe when I started taking astronomy courses to support my major. People rightly question how they make such statements, but in taking these classes, I learned that these statistics aren't just pulled out of their asses. It is grounded in math, telescopes, and radiotelescope data etc., But still always always ask questions. It's the only way to learn more.
@@GeographRick agreed. Hopefully my comment came across matter-of-factly rather than patronizing. I'm only looking to help and would encourage anyone to ask such questions. For anyone curious, NASA has loads of information for free online that further explains how we know what we know about the universe. More than a few US universities have loads of free resources for these types of things too. Most are available online, and any public university will allow access to their libraries for study. You can't take anything with you if you're not a student, but nothing's stopping anyone from reading through their catalogues.
You literally pulling something out of your ass and say it science without any proof or evidence. It just math and calculations. And assumptions, and our imagination. So I take this as grain of salt and as guesses. Not actually proof. You don’t fully know what out there and we won’t know until decade to come. Same with how many grain of sand on earth, even tho we don’t fully know, again it just assumption and guesses, we using math as a excuse and use math as evidence. Which is stupid.
@@nuavecmoi I mean, science branched off from philosophy because it was trying to prove things beyond people just saying they were true.. Your skepticism of science is unscientific, but that's okay. Science doesn't need believers and followers to be true :).
@@cypheraxis Exactly. The thing with science as we understand it is that science, facts, remains true no matter if you believe it or not. If you still say it's wrong because you haven't seen it, then you're just ignorant if you think you know better. There is a difference between being skeptical and thickheaded. We shouldn't waste time on getting through to those who just refute grounded science, because their opinions are already made up, and we can't change that. I accept that. I also accept that such people are idiots.
it amazes me how dumb people are becuase scientists say it's this big and that far with this many 0's is utter nonesens you'd litteraly belive anything they spoonfeed you
@@plnkfloydian7814 or they don’t just focus on science or space. Like how you nerd are. Like alway science nerd insult someone just because they don’t know space or what out there. Typical
Tell Aiden to pick up a book once in awhile. He'll learn how gravity works, how light red shifts, about the hubble and now the James Webb telescopes and much more. You're never too old to learn, and it keeps you from believing in conspiracy theories😊
I've also noticed this about Daz and the other folks here on this channel after watching several of their vids, ESPECIALLY with Daz and Aidan. They seem to hold very strong opinions or are quick to dismiss/reject information about topics that they hold very little knowledge on or have very little experience with. This also happens with the other types of reactions that they have NOT just the science-related vids. Not only is this a dangerous mindset to have, but it also becomes extremely irritating to listen to after a while.
@@dnice2304 Yeah I have noticed it with the space themed videos on the office blokes channel too, mainly with Daz, comments like "who cares" or similar. It isnt that surprising that his son thinks quite similarly
"There's NO WAY anyone know that!" There's no way you haven't heard of the Hubble or James Webb telescopes lol "if there's a number, it has to end sometime!" Uhm.. numbers are literally infinite... jeez, so many face palms in this one 😂
@@louisrobitaille5810 you just gave examples of characters that represent numbers that are infinite in physics though.. so you kinda contradicted yourself... Also, I was talking about the context he was speaking about. All he said was if the universe has a number saying how big it is, it has to end somewhere. Which isn't true. We can debate the mathematics/physics around my comment, but in this specific context I'm right.
@@johncostello6006 I don't think the guy even registered the words "cosmic inflation" while (or after) he saw the video. He probably thought the narrator was speaking to him in some dead language.
@@johncostello6006 Well as physics major studying astronomy, I find it unlikely that the universe is infinite at least in the in terms of it's overall volume. My reasoning for this is that the universe was once in a state of infinite density and at a point single point when it expanded outwards. Meaning it has to have a finite boundary, however it is likely that even if you could travel fast enough to reach the end edge of the expanding region I don't believe you would find a boundary. I think the universe probably has a glassine curvature and is an enclosed structure, similar to the skin of a ball, were if you run far enough you will only loop back on yourself. This is just a hypothesis on my part so take it with a grain of salt, and while current measurements show neither positives or negative curvature, this may simply be because the universe is so large that we do not detect it, like how we do not notice the Earth is round because we are so small.
What reaction? Half of the video is them staring at the video saying nothing. I love a reaction video, but I *hate* when the person/people literally doesn’t say anything for like half of the video.
Literally same, I get so triggered when people act like they know more than science and ignore it. I don't believe everything thing is a fact but there have been research and studies about this for decades, it's not like someone is telling a fairy tail. Just because you don't learn and keep up with these things doesn't make it fake.
They know how big the milky way is because of science lol, The Hubble Space Telescope and the James Webb Space Telescope can see things outside of our galaxy, Hubble has found millions of galaxies, and JWST has found even more beyond that.
@@karazor-el9596 Incorrect, the images are a combination of spectral light (aka, infrared, x-ray, etc). Thats what we usually get. The picture of the Black Hole and the extrasolar planet, those are full on real.
It is ancient light that has travelled the distance which is then measurable, when it reaches the “lens” of a space telescope like like the James Webb or Hubble. This is not even that advanced mathematics but people just don’t pay attention to it because well it is not necessary to survive
The video states the term "observable universe" meaning everything humans are able to see with optical telescopes, infrared and X-ray detectors and other scientific instruments.
What it really means is everything within the distance light could have traveled since the Big Bang and still reach Earth. Though it's more complicated than literally the speed of light multiplied by time because space itself has expanded. The universe may well be infinite. It also may be much smaller than it appears if it's finite in volume but without unbounded, meaning it might "wrap around" and that what seems to be distant galaxies are actually closer galaxies that are "repeated", including the Milky Way. I think this is considered unlikely but it's not been disproven and is difficult to disprove (or prove).
The math that calculates the distances in this video is incredibly simple. Also, "How do we know" what else is out there? Telescopes. Radio Telescopes. Infrared Telescopes, Visual Telescopes. Really complicated machinery.
I don't understand how people can't know that telescopes and math are what makes us able to see and know all of this. How is this lost on so many still in the 2020's? I understand poor areas with bad education systems not knowing it, like certain war torn countries in Africa for example, but first world countries? Come on. It really isn't that hard to understand how we can know these things thanks to the scientists who work hard to find these things out for us. Anyone who doubts it, shouldn't even argue about it in the first place. They are wrong and will only embarass themselves. This young man in this video is not smart or a visionary for denying the existence of extraterrestrial civilisations. He isn't critical thinking, he isn't skeptical to a healthy degree. He's just arrogant and narrowminded, firm in the belief that he already knows what is in the universe. To him, the universe is obviously an empty unihabited place with dead rocks floating around in space, and the only things that could exist there are small microscopic lifeforms, and he said he didn't even think things like bugs could exist, and no other civilisation could exist elsewhere, anywhere, but here on Earth. It is obvious he's been ridiculed about entertaining the idea to his friends(or class mates or whatnot), and that's likely why he has these opinions on the possibility and likelihood of extraterrestrial civlisations. That is not smart at all. It is simply mathematically impossible for us to be the ONLY civilisation in the entire universe, let alone the observable universe. It is even less likely that we are alone in the entirety of the multiverse, if the multiverse does in fact exist(something I believe it does). I'd go so far as to say that it is equally mathematically impossible that we're the only civilisation in this galaxy even. For example, one study theorize, while not firmly proven yet, that in our galaxy alone, there could be as many as 30-something civilisations, based on probability, age of the planets, their proximity to their parent star/s, and the right conditions. People who are quick to dismiss alien life of all forms, even the super advanced civilisations, or tribal or those socities equal to our own, obviously don't consider the habitable zones, JUST because they haven't seen them land here. How shortsighted can you get??
And also, he obviously doesn't know about the US Navy coming out with seeing UAP's lately, or he does but refuse to consider them to be aliens. I am not going to say they really are alien crafts for sure, even though I do consider the possibility to be quite high, but to me, it just seems likely, given the reports from these high profile individuals coming forward with the information that the government are hiding stuff about aliens, and the pilots such as David Fravor and Ryan Graves, who said the crafts they saw, could not have been human crafts, and David Grusch, the whistleblower, who says the government are hiding non-human, possibly alien organic remains and crafts even. It's even in the news, the congress are taking it seriously, the government have partially revealed stuff about UFO's which they previously, not long ago, just shoved under the rug, not willing to share with the general public. And not all vids of alleged alien crafts look like they are filmed with a potato. There was even a filming of some huge craft above a military station in the Nevada desert I believe. Yet aliens can't according to the laws of physics, possibly be here? ''I won't fall for it.'' Some people are just too dense. David Fravor and Ryan Graves aren't even the only pilots who see these things. Many pilots in the Air Force and the Navy are reporting these sightings, both out of their planes from the hangar ships and from land, mainland and coastal areas, and in flight. They just don't feel comfortable about coming out with it due to the fear of ridicule, and also because of the government taking action in various ways, such as threatening the whistleblowers(according to Grusch), either indirectly by having them killed or wounded(unofficially of course), or just by firing them, or in other ways. The stigma thwarts more hearings than we already have in the last two months. The Army does see things too, and other countries are reporting these sightings all across. Even Russia has. Ukraine has. China has. Even countries in the Middle East, Iran I believe have claimed it. Now, not all of these are necessarily aliens, but I can imagine that some of them are, especially if they just outpace the fastest airborn crafts known to man, the stealth bombers and fighter jets of the US, the most powerful nation on Earth who have the resources to outmatch any other nation on Earth and still not catch these things, then I don't know who it could be except aliens. This rant wasn't even so much about the aliens themselves but more about this guy being so arrogant that this guy thinks he already knows all there is to know about the universe without having proof of his lack of belief in the possibility of extraterrestrials, both animals and advanced civilisations, and he's content with that. That's fine. But then he also has to accept that he is a moron and that he isn't smart for doubting the existence of aliens based purely on principle and his outrageous claims that all vids available are of potato quality(not true at all), because that's arrogance. Arrogance does not equal intelligence. Previously the government was pretty quiet about that, and most of the time, UFO's didn't show up in the news, and were never brought up or discussed in congress, considering them to be the fabrications and delusions of loonies. But now they do, and take them very seriously. Almost constantly. What changed? Why now, after all these decades of previous silence on UFO's? I have a dream, that all people who still ridicule genuine people coming out with extraterrestrial sightings, to just stop doing that, and just consider many of them to be true. I also want to add, that it really is easy to get poor quality of things you want to film, if you try to capture something really far away, especially high up, even with the most advanced touch phones, to this day. They have become really good at taking clear images. But they will still fall short of capturing undisputable images, even in videos. You have to have state of the art video cameras to get undisputed footage of crafts that look tiny far away moving at high speeds. Proving aliens exist this way isn't easy at all, even with modern cell phones.
@@EMD1028 It's a gamechanger for infrared, but that's about it. Anything radiowave-related has a MUCH bigger telescope: the Event Horizon Telescope. It's literally the size of the Earth.
@@louisrobitaille5810 I agree 👍🏽. I was comparing it to what was used for decades (The Hubble). James Webb Space Telescope much improved how far and clear we can look into space. But that is just an improvement on technology like everything else.
Imagine saying there might not be anything outside the milky way when the James web telescope and even the Hubble telescope have photographed and recorded thousands of other galaxies, of which you can go look at right now.
Facts. Science. Math. Years of study and observation have told us what we know so far. I don’t think it ever ends. If it ends, what’s on the other side of the end? And seems possible that there’s other forms of intelligent life out there, since the universe never ends.
The kid who probably hasn't finished high school or undergrad college yet is asking how people WAAAAY OLDER and WAAAAY SMARTER than he'll most likely ever be, How astronomers (people who's LITERAL LIFELONG CAREER it is to know about space) could possibly know all these things😂
Way smarter? So people shouldn’t question? You’re peddling blind acceptance just because someone has a degree. Your entire comment smacks of intellectual discrimination.
@@nuavecmoi asking questions is fine, making idiotic comments on subjects you dont understand arnt. Aiden wasnt asking a question he was throwing out an opinion on a subject he know little of. so when it comes to "this" subject matter yes "way smarter" is fine use of the words.
@@aiden5star5 It is your opinion they’re “idiotic”. Subjectivity at its worst. That comment of your is itself idiotic because his reaction didn’t live up to your standards of what it should be. But it is HIS reaction. If it bothers you, then instead of posting dumbass comments trashing him, move along.
He is exhibiting what is called “projection”. Since he himself doesn’t know or understand these things, he is extrapolating that no one else knows or understands either. And he couldn’t be any more wrong.
People like this have a favorite emoji: 🤔🤔🤔🤔 whenever I see the thinking man emoji 75% of the time it's part of a comment that is tremendously stupid and arrogant.
Just saying that this is exactly what most atheists claim when they say "there is no God". Just because you don't know doesn't mean no one knows if there is one or not
@@dragieultra6603 there’s a difference between the scientific consensus on something, and your religious dogma. One is backed up by science, and is known, the other is not. No one knows if there is a god, there is no science behind that. Stop pretending these are the same situation, it’s clearly not.
Aiden - The thing about "it might not even exist when we get there" is referring to the speed of light. We can percieve something based on the time it takes for light to reach our eyes. For example, if you were on a planet 65 million light years away, and you had some crazy telescope where you could see earth...you wouldn't see earth as it exists today, you'd see it from 65 million light years ago. You wouldn't see humans, you'd see dinosaurs..
Aiden kills me sometimes with his often confident ignorance. I dont think he means to, but as soon as he cant fully understand something, he thinks people are just making it up
We know what's outside of the Milway due to radio telescopes. They read light and energy waves that follow certain rules. For example, infrared light is travelling away from us and ultraviolet light is travelling toward us. Both are travelling at the constant speed of light. By measuring the various wave lenghts of light associated with points of light, we can measure how far a source of light is and whether it is getting closer or further away from us. By comparing those wave lenghts we can pinpoint where in space certain thigns are. Additionally, light wave lengths tell us what sort of materials the stuff out there is made of. If a wave length is of a certain frequency, we can also tell how old it is. So location, materials, speed, and age can all be determined by radio telescopes.
@@karazor-el9596 do...do you think radio is just sound waves moving through air? Think about it. We would all hear music and voices everywhere we go. Why would radios with speakers even exist?
To be fair is good to questioning ,and if they are ignorant about that ,why not correcting them or providing them some materials or link them to some RU-vid video that they can react that could teach them about it , some of the people in here have been insulting them which in my opinion is pretty sad ,not everyone knows about space or science and that’s okay but I’m sure the people that are commenting in here also are ignorant in many fields too .
@@Omar-kl3xp Nonsense. Being ignorant is one thing but his dismissive and arrogant attitude is a whole another thing. For example, him saying "there's no way you can know how many grains of sand there are on earth!!!" like it's a matter of fact is both ignorant and arrogant. Just because he can't comprehend how they work it out in his little mind it must be impossible to him. That was his attitude the entire video. Plain ignorance would just be him asking how they work out how many grains of sand there are on earth. Which I'm sure people would be more respectful when answering.
Please don't let your lack of knowledge substitute for the truth. It's fine to be skeptical and question information but only if it results in you seeking knowledge to answer those questions.
A ton of math and background radiation are the main reasons how we know. But there's also been some pretty clever techniques developed over the years to measure Non-Visible light that we've only recently been able to capitalize on. Like we see with James Webb (JWST) and its whole infrared suite of instruments.
The answers to 'how we know' are rather easy to obtain these days. Just remember we have several types of telescopes and now we have gravity wave observatories as well. We can plot the distances around the tens of billions of miles of the Solar System, some of the same techniques can be used with far more distant stars.
Something I've noticed about this channel - Sophie and Gaynor will softly and politely suggest something. Aiden will say a countering statement that makes no sense, but he'll say it with certainty. And then Sophie and Gaynor will just nod and agree. It's OK to stand your ground ladies. Because usually the 2 of you are correct. Hint hint.
@@frenchy1987 really its cuz they are all so focused and commenting or adding an anecdote that they often miss the very information they are confused about and are now asking each other. the number of times ive yelled at the screen "they just f*cking explained that!" and they never google anything. the power of humanity's collected knowledge at their fingertips yet they would rather remain ignorant. sad really
The plague of the internet is the Dunning-Kruger effect in combo with Brandolini's law. Aiden is a perfect example of this 😓. DK effect (ish): people with little knowledge on a topic tend to overestimate their knowledge **and** are overly confident despite their ignorance, sometimes to the point of being arrogant and/or condescending. Brandolini's law: "the amount of energy needed to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude bigger than that needed to produce it." Source: Wikipedia/Nature Real DK effect: "people with low ability, expertise, or experience regarding a certain type of task or area of knowledge tend to overestimate their ability or knowledge." Basically what I said above, minus the overconfidence/condescending aspect. Source: Wikipedia
The crazy thing is, 100 million light years away from Earth, when we're seeing light from these stars and galaxies, that light left those places 100 million years ago, so if we can see them it doesn't mean that they exist or that they exist in those exact places, it means that they existed in those places 100 million years ago.
The yellow dot they showed is how far our own radio signals have traveled, not how far we can see. We've only been broadcasting radio for roughly 100 years, and radio waves move at the speed of light in a vacuum so it's a very simple, straightforward calculation to know how far out they've gone. "There's no way anyone knows that." And I thought the US education system was bad. Do they teach science and math in the UK at all?
'Knows that? '.... IT'S CALLED ASTRONOMY, PHYSICS, MATHS,SCIENCE....WE OBSERVE, WE CALCULATE. The same way you don't have to be above the land to draw maps,borders,coasts. We can also calculate the grains of sand in a cube of measurement and then calculate the volume of sand on the beaches,the land and at the bottom of the sea. Maybe watch more science videos in how they measure and make things.
They were not referring to how far we can see when they referred to the tiny yellow dot, they were referring to out radio signals we can send and receive using radio waves, but we can see a lot further than that with telescopes.
Aidan, bro, please watch some videos or documentaries about space, telescopes, and the science behind this stuff. Some of the stuff you're talking about has already been discovered or proven over 1000 years ago by Greeks with mathematics or equations. There's a lot of stuff we don't actually need to see to know its there or real lol.
Aiden listen to the ladies because they are right most of the time.Stop shutting them down & ladies stand your ground DONT agree with him when he disagrees cause he’s wrong
since Aidan is asking all these questions that he should have learned in school, or he could easily google, y'all should call this channel (2 Dimes and a Dumb Ass) if dime isn't part of your slang, it means in the scale of 1 to 10 you are a 10, it's mostly meant for women.
I don't understand why dude was so offended by this lol I seen in real time his pride and ego take a dent when being told we have an "observable" universe
You don't have to actually count the grains of sand on the earth to get a good approximation. You don't need to know the exact number down to the single grain. There's a ton of mathematical tricks people use.
As a simple explanation for Aidan: How to I know that there is a building 2km away from me even though I've never been there? Well, I took out my binoculars and looked.
While it's ok to be skeptical, it isn't ok to make assumptions without doing research. A couple of suggestions for you. Turn off auto-play and you can pause/resume videos by pressing the space bar on your keyboard.
There are countless photos of other galaxies outside of the Milky Way. Look up the James Webb Telescope photos. Literally every shiny celestial body you see in those photos is a galaxy.
they know because they can see it. you don't have to travel somewhere to know it is there. you can see the sun without going to it. The light from these places has traveled to us to be captured by massive telescopes.
They know the speed of light and sound (it’s been measured). The light you see from space took time to see….A measured speed…..Then you understand the light you witness was emitted millions/billions years before that light reached your eyes.
What's even more depressing to think about is that even if humans exist for 165 million years, like dinosaurs did, (spoiler: we won't) by the time of our inevitable extinction, the earth and the universe will continue to exist billions of years after us, making our entire existence nothing more than a tiny blip in the grand history of the universe. Even if we achieve regular space travel, our sphere of influence will still be microscopic in comparison to the size of the universe. It's funny to think about all the people who believe we're so important and significant, when we're no different from the microorganisms you can only see through a microscope
I think it makes life more special. There is a very narrow window for life as we know it to exist within the lifespan of the universe. It's less than the blink of an eye relative to the lifespan of the universe. We might be living in the only time where life exists, and it's possible there isn't any advanced life anywhere else. That means this brief moment in time may be the only time in the history of the universe where life could thrive. I think that's beautiful and makes our lives much more significant in the grand scheme of things.
I think the universe must be infinite and humans are just not capable of understanding that concept. It would actually be weirder if there was an end to it, if you think about it. Like some weird imaginary wall. What's on the other side of that wall? Nothing? What is nothing? *puffs on joint* Btw it takes about 7 months to get to Mars at its closest distance and based on our current propulsion technology.
We don't know the answer afik but the answer partly depends on what the geometry of space is. But that begs the question, what is the geometry of space?
All of this is beyond me, but the numbers are calculated with a series of telescopes with PHD level physicists. These are the same people that put a rover on Mars with their mind numbing math. It's above my pay grade
Crazy how people need science in some instances or when it suits them , like when they need medicine...or simply electricity..etc but just decide to doubt science when they aren't personally inconvenienced. 😅
Deep space telescopes are what they used to find distant galaxies like the James Webb that was just launched last year. They can see incredibly far. The most powerful of these telescopes is in China and is a mile wide.
The observable universe is definitely real, a pretty cheap telescope can have you seeing other galaxies really easily. There are plenty of amateur astronomers snapping shots of the cosmos out there.
To answer the question of how they know what's out there is two fold. 1- We have powerful telescopes, both on Earth and in Obit (Hubble and Webb among others) that can pick up light from stars, planets and galaxies millions of light years away. 2- We have Radio Telescopes that can see further into the depths of space via frequencies beyond the human perception of sight and sound. I feel bad for Aiden because he clearly isn't well read or been exposed to science at any literal level, at least that's how it appears to be.
When I see videos like these about the size of the universe my chest tightens and my head feels like it’s going to explode. My goodness it is both amazing and terrifying at the same time but more amazing to me. Carl Sagan I miss you so much.
We have this stuff called math. The circle represents how far radio broadcasts sent from earth would have traveled since they were broadcast. Radio signals have longer wavelengths and lower frequencies than light waves, but still travels at the speed of light. In truth, we haven’t sent a probe far enough away from our galaxy to show an actual picture of the Milky Way. So from the observations of other galaxies from orbiting satellite telescopes we’ve deduced an approximation of what the Milky Way looks like. The mass of the Milky Way is determined by observations of our relative speed to other galaxies through multiple techniques including red shift and other methods.👍🏽
Actually, radio waves are also on the electromagnetic spectrum, and therefore they also travel at the speed of light. SOUND travels at the speed of sound, but radio waves travel at the speed of light.
Have you all never heard of the Hubble telescope or any of the other telescopes orbiting earth or on the ground? Or even heard of the newest and most powerful James Web Telescope? I feel like a lot of the questions their asking here are like grade 5 knowledge stuff.
Carl Sagans Cosmos series is so great. I used it to pull myself out of being depressed and inactive a decade ago. Id put it on and do my workouts or runs.
@@kevincinnamontoast3669 LOL...Kevin, it's not hard to know the speed, and capabilities of our current spacecraft, and the distance to Mars at its closest orbit to Earth....LOL
was about to say something rude... but checked myself in time, I was pretty dumb and unaware of this until a few years back... and am most probably pretty dumb about almost everything in this world... just shows the importance of not just having knowledge, but also the significance of being humble enough to realize that irrespective of how much we know or learn, we still don't know anything in relation to truth... so I will instead say enjoy your journey to learning and discovering newer information...
Poor Aidan. He is just struggling so hard to envision a reality larger than himself and what he thinks real. Aidan, unless we discount scientific research and the work of Astronomy, what you have just heard is in line with what is. We can see a lot of this through the Hubble Telescope, and not the James Webb Telescope, along with all of the telescopes around the globe, etc. And, some of it is calculation based on mathematical calculation. Gaynor, I think that you have the right attitude about this. I am right there with you. And, I can't wait until we learn more, an hopefully, meet our galactic siblings. Peace
