British Monster Tanks of World War I & World War II 

Homemade Thingies, with a new fuel injectors engine with 700 hp!

You mean a WW1 tank, or a early 1970's Lincoln?

You could build the model. There is a great one from Tamiya that I am building at the moment.

Possibly some dicknosed company tried to claim they owned the music you were using?

***** no, there was no copyright notice but the video was permanently set to private - i thought it was a glitch or something so i re-uploaded it

jmantime Huh, strange.

Anthony guy Gypsy Merchants rob Romanian man outside of London Airport

jmantime man where do you dig this antique out of earth? feeling like kinda of watching museum video. music is awesome by the way.

Caernarvon is post ww2 , black prince is a downgrade from Mk VIII , Centurion is also post ww2

How is the Black Prince a down grade from the Mk VIII, the Mk VIII wa a 95mm howitzer armed close support version while the Black Prince was a 17pdr armed gun tank with better armour anD capabilities than the 75mm MV gun armed Mk VII. Centurion Mk 1 just missed the fighting in Europe by one week, WW 2 was still going on though as Japan did not surrender for several more months. Now it did not see combat durig WW2 but neither did tanks like the US M6 or British Covenanter - both designed and built during WW2 but never saw combat (athough a few Covenanters were used as AVLB's out of over 1500 built).

jmantime the centurion was developed in WW2 but it never saw action

Franke Foerstner TOGGED

The hardest part of all the tanks was the tracks. They were the only parts that were made from hardened steel by the carburisation method which made them black and rust free.

I think he already did not sure doe

Pictures of anything but the rear view of French armor is hard to find!!! ;^D

Mark A-D are medium tanks. This video claims to only feature heavy tanks - but misses the Churchill variants you rightly mentioned, and many more

As an American, here is how I see it. It was your gun in our Sherman that made it (IMO) the best Sherman in WWII and your powerplant in our plane that made the twice as good without it. Great teamwork i'd say.

As a dumb American, i say: big guns+ bigger engines+ heavier armor+ larger treads= dead enemies.

alganhar1 firefly shit on tigers

The Churchill tank was born out of a British WW1 specification as a mud bogging infantry support platform designed to slowly advance through heavily defended (fortified) terrain, similar to what the Matilda Mk.I and Mk.II were designed for. The only difference between the two tank models is that the Churchill was able to adapt a much larger gun mount than the Matilda could, which was only able to house the 2-pounder gun. As an actual main battle tank the Churchill was garbage, which is why the British decided to give up their failed philosophy of "cruiser" and "infantry support" tank doctrines. The Sherman Firefly (also known in British service as the Sherman IC, or more commonly Sherman VC - depending on the base Sherman chassis used for the upgrade. Sherman IC was based on the M4A2 with a 17-pounder, and the Sherman VC was based on the M4A3 with a 17-pounder) was a great tank destroyer. It's only drawbacks were very low accuracy and low rate of fire because the turret was too small to house such a large gun. Despite all of this it was a highly respected panzer killer due to it's gun mount. The Cromwell was a decent tank overall, but in 1944 (when they actually saw service) they were not much better than a Panzer IVH or Panzer IVJ in terms of protection and fire power. The Comet was the best Brit design of the war but never saw any combat except for a victory march through Berlin in 1945 when the war was over. Either way it had a short barreled 17-pounder with the same armor as a Mk.IV Cromwell. Nothing special. Good thing British finally made a decent tank, calling it the Challenger II after all these years.

I don't believe any Centurions were fitted with the 32 pounder 94mm gun as far as I've read. The Centurion had the 105mm L7 which was generally more powerful and versatile than the 32 pounder.

wheres*

Trevor Philips TOGGED

Dude watch the whole fucking video

They have. Numerous types.

Nathan Peterson Really?? I had no idea! I saw one at a show once but it was too small and had a van engine.Not quite what I had in mind!

David Baker I believe they have a running replica Mk IV Tank at Bovington

waynester71 It was built for a film with running gear from a modern excavator.😣

David Baker Was it? I wasn't aware how accurate a replica it was.. I just knew they had one that they trundled out now and again.

Mohammed Shaheen there is no pictures of those tanks because they never even made it to prototype stage, the tortoise is the only one that did.

+King Zelee he wot too much lol

Wonder why he only mentions AT series vehicles that are featured in WoT lmao

Not as much, modern tanks are proven in combat. This is why tanks today are so similar only a revolutionary new weapon will bring about change, its the same with rifles.

wiggles877 Conquerer was postwar

Assault Tanks/SPGs

maybe spanish monster tanks of wwl and wwll?

again i would ask for covering the ( National China) Kuomintang Army from 1937 - 1945

Maybe Tank Prototypes after 1945.

american jets and tanks from the Korean war

Jasonlamcar - it's was came after the war aka 1946

it was glitched to private and no one was seeing it so i re-uploaded it

up your ass ..

Thick shit .. You Russians soon cried like little babies and begged the Western allies to save your ass by giving you masses of our equipment .. cos yours was so shit

@@kittyhawk9707 im not rusian! !!!! and u are idiot!!!!

Hero Down - Kevin MacLeod - ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-4HwicoPeUWw.html Time Stops - Silent Partner - ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-spy33cjJTzY.html Time Passing By - Audionautix - ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-nczikJRVevE.html

Absolute nonsense.

Martin Sigsworth the song at 4 mins in is called (time stops by silent partner) thats the only one i know

thanks

Think I saw 'Lincon Company' on the side which I think was the producer of the first world war tanks. Probably thought they were on to something again.

Tog 2 was designed for namandy as a heavy amphibious tank but never made the cut poor TOG 😭

The TOG (The Old Gang) was very good. The total stuff-ups in the design were decisions made by the British Army and, even at the beginning of the war was quite happy to use WWI designs!!!!!!!!

@@kittyhawk9707

@@KRAMPUS_G60_16V Only good German tanks were burned out ones ..

@@kittyhawk9707 LOL

laugh

We Invented the tank. The highest chance of death in a chieftain was if one of the gauges broke because it contained radioactive material, yes the tank was that good. Churchill tanks could stand up to Tigers and win. Either a salty German who's mad that they started a war they didn't have the balls to finish or just a fuckwit

WW1: We were basically the only nation to successfully use tanks on a large scale as we invented them, no contest. WW2: There were definitely some bad tanks mid war (early Churchills, every cruiser until late Cromwell/Comet); but the Matilda was one of the best tanks in the world at the start of the war, and by the end of the war we had already designed Centurion which I would say was the best in the world at that time. They were certainly better than the American Pershing and the IS-3/T-34-85/T-44 with which they were contemporary. Cold-war to present: We have later model Centurions, Conqueror, Chieftain, and Challenger 1/2; all world class in their day.