People forget that Rosa literally got screamed at by her boss for 40 minutes just to fix a problem in his marriage. I know she doesn't really care about getting screamed at, but she does care about their relationship.
Mastery of acting and character expression is knowing what makes them behave off-character. This was perfect delivery, you knew he was going to explode the moment he wasnt using his monotone.
Having studied mathematics as an undergraduate, I can attest that this clip expresses the deeper, more satisfying truth about the Monty Hall Problem, which is that you really don't care that much about it after you and your partner have had a good boning.
Background stuff like is part of what makes the show still so funny on re-watch. It's still got the great humour of course, but it's hilarious when you keep noticing new things like that.
"HHHHHHAAOOWWW... *Dare you, Detective Diaz,* I am YOUR SUPERIOR OFFICER!!!" *"BOOOOOONNNE!!!!!!!!!"* "What happens in my bedroom, Detective, is none of your buisiness!!" *"BOOOOOOOO-OOOOOOOOOOONE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!??!!!!!?????????!?"* "Don't Ever. Speak to me like that again."
hugh464 thanks for this comment I’m laughing so hard, I don’t speak English so I had no clue what they were saying until you typed out their exact lines in a comment
You know what makes B99 so good to watch? The subtle reactions in the background! Rosa's laugh when Santiago got fired by Holt, Holt's what did you say,. Amy's reaction to Rosa when she said Bone.. Tiny details that makes the whole scene super memorable
B99 deserves an Emmy just for this entire clip. You can have never watched the entire series and get every character from this clip. The subtle character tics are all on point showing how much they've truly grasped their characters.
*amy:* WHAT? grOSS! Rosa, these are our dads! I mean, that’s not what I think... *captain dad is just my boss* *rosa:* wow. *amy:* nEVER MIND! I’m tEAcHiNG fATHER THE MATH ... *WHATEVER ROSA*
Okay I know this is just a humourous show and I love it but I'm also a maths nerd so I have to say this When this problem was first solved, there were heaps of very well-regarded mathematicians who rejected the solution - however, all of them eventually realised their error. Because Kevin and Amy's solution does make sense; the game is just constructed in a way that is inherently confusing. Say a robot with no biases plays the show, and say, for simplicity's sake, the correct door is door 1. (Of course, this can be repeated with the other two doors each being the correct; I'm sure we can all agree that they will have the same result) Here is a probability tree. Line 1: choice A. Line 2: opened (no prize) door. Line 3: choice B. 1. 2. 3. / \ | | 2. 3. 3. 2. / \ / \ / \ / \ 1. 3. 1. 2. 1. 2. 1. 3. In all of these, your original chance of picking the correct door is 1/3. If you originally chose door 1 and you switch, you lose. If you originally chose either of the other two and you switch, you win. It is the fact that the same action gives the same result in two cases but gives a different result in one that skews the probability.
I love how Santiago dies a little more every second it goes on, till she's crying while he yells "BONE!". Meanwhile, Rosa's just sitting there waiting for him to get it out because she knows she's right XD
I've watched the entire show 4 times and never understood why Kevin was right. Now that I am seeing this clip for at least the fifth time I realize what makes Kevin correct. There is a 1/3 chance the car is behind the door you chose and a 2/3 chance that it isn't. When you eliminate the 2nd door, the 2/3 all consolidates on the 3rd door, meaning there is a 1/3 chance the car is behind door 1 and a 2/3 chance it's behind door 3.
@@mag-narwhal You are operating from the idea that all possibilities are equal when your initial choice always has a 2/3 chance of being wrong. once the host eliminates one of the other two options it is statistically advantageous to switch. this is because if you chose wrong initially (which as previously stated is most likely) the host is forced to pick the only empty door of the two you didn't pick.
@@MythBoy99 if you chose right initially the host is still gonna let you try and pick an empty door theres no guarantee the new one is right plus if you win you'll feel 100 times better cause you got it first try
@@mag-narwhal Of course there is a chance you were right the first time, a 1 in 3 chance. which is why switching gives you a 2 in 3 chance of success. And the satisfaction you claim you would get from being correct first try is exactly the psychological element that prevents people from solving this more often.
I love this show because it shows two Cuban females, who somehow get along so well and so badly at the say time, and are so different, just their reactions like Amy was freaking out even though it wasn't her in trouble and Rosa was casually looking at her nails while her boss was shouting at her for 40 minutes straight. 😂
Amy: So the fight with Kevin is over? Holt: Yep Amy: Because you understand the math now? Holt: Nope Rosa: Because you guys.... Holt: Yep Just gold! 😂😂😂
I watched this episode with my best friend and we literally had to pause it for a good half hour to argue over this problem. The Monty Hall problem ruins lives...
The reason it's not 50/50 is because the player picks a door first and the host cannot eliminate the door the player selects. When the player selects a door the probability of it being the winning door is 1/3. The player then chooses to either stay with their original pick at 1/3 odds, or switch to the better of the other two doors, which have a combined probability of 2/3. If the host could eliminate either of the 2 losing doors, the probability would be 50/50. The way the game is presented obscures the odds. Instead think of both the player and host choosing a door to "protect". The player randomly chooses a door to "protect" that has 1/3 odds of being the winning door. The host then chooses to "protect" one of the other two doors and MUST "protect" the prize door. The "unprotected" door is then eliminated, which cannot be the prize because the host had to "protect" the prize. The player is then given to choice to either stay with their initial door that they randomly chose at 1/3 odds, or to switch to BOTH the other doors of which the host has already "protected" the prize if it were behind one of those two.
Amy losing her shit and having Vietnam flashbacks as Holt screams *BONNNNEEE* is something I definitely never thought I would need to watch at 1:03 AM.
Kevin is right, this a known problem. The best way to understand why changing give you 67% winrate is this: if you keep, you think you have selected the winning door, which was 33% at the time. If you change, that mean you had selected a losing door, which was 67% at the time. So by changing, it means you aimed for a losing door on your first choice, and aiming for a losing door is the right move since it has 67% of being correct.
i remember my maths teacher telling me about this problem, in year 12 and spending ages after school until i finally got the right answer, kevin is right
@@619NJ No, when you pick the first door, you're odds of picking the winning door are locked in at 1 in 3, meaning that the odds that the winning door is one of the other two doors is 2 in 3. By switching you are choosing both of the other two doors, and since one of them has already been eliminated as a losing door, by switching you automatically win the prize if it was behind either of the two doors you didn't initially pick.
The extras in the BONE scene are what complete the comedy gold. They're listening, in fascinating but with sober faces, because the captain's rant is that terrifying.
In case anyone isn't following the logic / math involved. Let's say you're asked to pick a card from a 52-card deck, and only one card actually gives you the prize. After you had picked a card, someone tosses out 50 cards from the deck, leaving just one that you can switch your choice to. Would you switch?
I never got this escalation. Or the 100 doors one. I don't see why adding more bad choices makes more sense to some people. If I were stuck on the 50-50 mindset, I'd just ignore the numbers and go straight to the end line with 2 cards/doors left, no matter how many were revealed, and go "it's 50-50".
Because it's more obvious. Most would realise that there's a higher chance that the winning door was among the remaining 51 than definitely the one they picked first. For some reason at two doors it's two easy to forget.
