Not sure what made this pop up in my list, but figured it was worth a quick watch. I always want to listen to someone who can articulate a position that I disagree with. It's VERY hard to do these days, because no one wants to have actual discussions. Then, I started watching and realized I don't disagree with you at all, at least in a theoretical sense. 2 years of econ grad school decades ago still rattles around in my brain, and I believe that any artificial constructs, including movement among borders, leads to inefficiencies. So, the world, as a whole, is better off with complete freedom of movement. An equilibrium will eventually take place. I get that. But, I think people (and maybe you?) will conflate that argument with what is happening today at the border, saying the huge influx done outside of the normal process is acceptable or that it is the same as the open border solution you propose. It absolutely is not. The problem is that the current system has a self-selection mechanism that filters what type of people come in. And, I think any border proposal, in the way you refer to it, must still have some order. Countries need to have some idea who is in their country. So, I'm not sure what my point is other than curious whether you are using your argument for open borders to argue that the current situation is acceptable?
