😅 yeah, who was the interviewer here? Bryan Magee is the one who is a lot closer to Schopenhauer's worldview, though, while Coppleston seems more of a medieval philosopher after Thomas Aquinas.
I do not quite understand how Schopenhauer passes from the proposition "My body is objectified Will", or "my body is the appearece of which Will is the reality" to the proposition "All objects in thr world (including inanimate objects) are objectified Will. It also is not clear to me how Schoenhauer arrives at the conclusion that whatever is not Representation must therefore be will only by identifying willing as the proper activity of the self.