@@Venum-007 Как, като ги избият ли. И не може ли всяка страна да избира своята посока. Не мога да разбера как българите могат да са такива уруди. Дано тази нация измре по скоро. Дано да нямаш деца а ако имаш не ги погребеш както украинците сега погребват техните.
А така! Европейските медии лъжат, Американските лъжат, Ал Джазира лъже, Индийските и Африканските също, Австралийските също... Само Руските медии казват истината... Всички тези Украинци, дето се изказват, са също подставени лица! Така доволен ли си, братушка? Т'ва достоверно ли го представих?
NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg, who is in charge of Washington, told a security conference in Munich on February 19 that "if the Kremlin's goal is to have less NATO on its borders, it will only get more NATO." He said NATO would increase the strength of "the whole alliance" in NATO countries along Russia's borders. This is a highly aggressive response to Russia's concerns about missile bases near its borders. Frankly speaking, Stoltenberg called on Russia to attack him before new missile bases appeared near its borders. And as if that weren't enough, at a time when Russia is already worried about the West's unwillingness to abide by any agreements, treaties and international law, the President of Ukraine told the Munich Security Conference that Ukraine was on the brink of surrender. the Budapest Treaty. A memorandum in which Ukraine agreed to give up nuclear weapons in exchange for its independence from Russia. Since Ukraine has already violated the Minsk agreements, there is no point in joining the Budapest Memorandum. That is why Russia turns to the US and NATO and frankly tells them: “You are hindering us by placing our missile bases near our borders and making plans to join Ukraine. With this we cannot agree. Here is our offer. for mutual security. And the answer of the US and NATO is the further military expansion of NATO and the development of nuclear weapons by Ukraine. Negotiations between Russia and Ukraine never stood a chance of success because Ukraine is not a sovereign state and cannot make its own decisions. Ukraine is a pawn of Washington, which is used to create problems for Russia. Russia did it alone, standing on the sidelines when Washington toppled the elected Ukrainian government and replaced it with a puppet government. Biden, Blincon, Stoltenberg and the rest of the team made it clear that they did not intend to make the situation safer for Russia. There is no risk in the West, because the Russians will only complain and want further negotiations. Washington trapped Russia in a failed trial in response to accusations against Washington. Perhaps Biden, Blincon and Stoltenberg are right. But, on the other hand, what would you do if you were the government of a huge country allied with China and an army that could go through any force NATO could muster as if it were a wet paper bag? Will you sit back and waste time and energy on negotiations that will only make things worse as your enemies build up forces at your borders and Ukraine gets nuclear weapons? You will only do this if you are very stupid. I don't know what Putin learned, but I've known for a long time that the previous Russian and Soviet governments were right when they realized that Russia's security required "buffer zones." There are good reasons why Ukraine, Belarus, Georgia and Central Asia were integral parts of Russia and the Soviet Union. The Soviet government created the Warsaw Pact (with the countries of Eastern Europe) as a "buffer" against NATO, which was created first. The weak Yeltsin government, by agreeing to deprive Russia of its "buffer zones", created instability that Putin sought to resolve peacefully. Biden, Blincon, Stoltenberg and Inc. have made it clear that there will be no peace deal unless the Kremlin recognizes Washington's authority. As I wrote a few years ago, Russia has a choice: surrender or fight. I still believe that peace is achievable, but only after Russia demonstrates a reasonable solution. The West needs to understand what Russia means by this, and that is enough. What could be an example of a reasonable decision? Maybe this. - The Kremlin accepts the decision of Russians from Donbass to return to Russia, as was the case with Crimea. This will put an end to the violence in Ukraine, because even Ukrainian neo-Nazis are not stupid enough to attack Russia. - The Kremlin says there is no threat to Ukraine from Russia unless Ukraine becomes a member of NATO, agrees to accept US missile bases, or develops nuclear weapons. Otherwise, Ukraine will be destroyed. - US missile bases in Poland and Romania will be withdrawn or withdrawn from Russia. - There will be no further strengthening of NATO forces in NATO countries bordering Russia. All such forces, if deployed, will be destroyed as soon as they arrive. So all red lines will be clear. If the West cuts them off, then the West will be responsible for the violence. If Washington does none of this and continues to put pressure on Russia, it will be forced to take much more decisive action, leading to a much greater likelihood of nuclear war. Judging by Washington's negative response to Russia's request to resolve security issues, negotiations are pointless. Washington controls the Western media, and these media present the narrative in a way that satisfies Washington. For Russia, the resumption of negotiations simply brings new disappointments. It is difficult for the Kremlin to act in the interests of Russia because of the fifth pillar of Russia, consisting of Atlantic integrators. These are influential people and organizations that are more interested in being part of the West than in strengthening Russian sovereignty. Globalism is everywhere, including in the Russian government and in the economic elite. Western colleagues hinted to Russian economists that Russia needs foreign currency to develop the Russian economy. Therefore, they believe that the sale of energy in Europe should be paid in dollars or euros. But this strengthens only the dollar and the euro, not the ruble. It is not pleasant when a country's economists recommend a policy of strengthening the opponent's currency, and not their own. Washington relies on Atlantic integrators and Western-funded NGOs that the Russian government foolishly allows to work inside and against Russia to make it harder for Putin to achieve the goals and objectives Washington has set for himself to weaken and destabilize Russia. Russia cannot negotiate or eliminate the need for an enemy's US military intelligence complex that cannot justify its power and budget or Washington's desire for world domination. This is the reality that Putin faces. Putin and Lavrov are still trying to rely on reason and facts, but reason and facts have lost their influence in the West. The Western world has replaced reason and facts with stories. Stories are official explanations that, however false, bear the stamp of truth. Fighting them can be life-threatening. We have not yet been "shot in the back of the head" from the Lubyanka. Instead, we were declared "domestic terrorists", "Russian agents", "disinformers", "enemies of democracy". We are denied information, we are fired, our medical licenses are revoked, we are arrested, our property is confiscated because of protesting these stories, as is happening now with the protesters in Canada. Independent scientists with the highest reputation have proven that the stories about Covid are not true, that mRNA vaccines are more dangerous for most people than Covid itself. However, scientific facts cannot correct this story. On the contrary, the narrative itself reverses the facts. How can Putin and Lavrov rely on negotiations with a culture where reason and facts do not exist? Isn't the reality they faced too big to accept immediately, unlike the fake world of negotiation?
A кога нашият под прикритие социалистически/комунистически военен министър ще си подаде оставката за липсата на ясна позиция по руската агресия в Украйна??? Война ли е или не и така нататак...
Ква е тая резолюция 360p o_0 ... в 8ми клас преди 20 години имах телефон дето снимаше с 360p. Не че качеството беше лошо... Ся моя коментар може да не е особено адекватен или човечен, но се състои в "Какво ли е станало с пълният брадат народно-защитник интервюиран на 22ри ~около 24 до настоящето...?" Имам и други коментари, надявам се далеч по-неадекватни, но все още не ми се ще да ги ~коментирам, тези коментари.
Къде е репортерчето Тотев?Ами Рада Домусчиева ?Те първи бяха да отразяват войната в Украйна 2015г .Бесерабските българи които разказваха колко много са избити от украйнската армия .Или сега не помните ?
И интервютата на Елена Йончева с лидерите на Майдана. Сега си ги ,,излюпват" историйките по усмотрение, за Изборите нищо. Войната не идва сама. Има подготовка за нея. 🌿
