Instrumental here: • Buddy Holly - Jazz Ins... Instrumental made by me from scratch. Frank Sinatra AI made with RVC (crepe format) Fun little experiment, might do more... idk
Instrumental is here for those that wanted it: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-hTgYC4edm2s.html I appreciate the nice comments and the constructive criticism, thanks guys!
Holy shit the instrumental is amazing, never knew how good this could sound laid back and jazzy. The Frank Sinatra AI is pretty funny to, loved how you added little bits of character like when he says "One more time." near the end. I wonder how well The Sweater Song would work like this, maybe you could even do a buddy holly for that one.
You can definitely hear where AI falls short of emulation, which means that it'll never replace original artists, but it's still impressive what our technology can actually do nowadays.
@@iancsc I've been using Photoshop for two decades now and it's been around for about three decades total. Everything "Photoshopped" still looks "Photoshopped." Every technology plateaus. It's the nature of everything in life. Nothing improves infinitely. Everything has its limits and its own lane. Thus why no technology can ever truly replace human skill and ingenuity. Also, today's "AI" isn't even truly "AI." Machine Learning (ML) is a related field in the world of "AI," but there's truly no such thing as true "AI," yet--if truly ever. True AI is a promise of true artificial autonomy, if not, attempts at artificial consciousness itself. Machine Learning is more like a fancy mirror of what humans already create. ML is not even new--it's been around for decades. We just have better machines and new interest in marketing now. Just like the hype around "cloud computing." Old concept, new buzzword.
@@ganglians Nah, they said the same thing about procedural generation. Most people talking about "AI" truly have no idea what they're talking about. Just secondhand guessing and fearmongering. Real programmers know that there are inherent limitations to even the best programming. While the novelty of generative AI was mind-blowing to many at first, people are already getting used to spotting "that AI look." Similar to how I just pointed out how I can tell this song was "AI" but it's a decent emulation. That's all it takes. As technology improves, humans adapt to recognizing it. Same way we can now point out something as "Photoshopped," even 30 years later. All technology hits that certain plateau and "AI" won't be exempt.
Definitely do more, i didn't subscribe for nothin'! With stuff like this, so you sing the song, and then add the voice profile? Sounds really good! Great instrumental track also!
Thank you! That's exactly the way to do it; kinda like putting on a rubber glove, the AI 'flexes' over the original voice. Here's the instrumental if you wanted to listen to that on it's own: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-hTgYC4edm2s.html Thank you for the nice comment :D
I think if you went lower with the "ooh wee ooh" 's, more Sinatra style, it would be better. Less Sinatra trying to sound like Weezer and more like Sinatra being Sinatra. More "loungey". He sounds more like David Byrne from talking heads
Yeah... I'm not a vocalist so I tried my best to match the tone and autotune it a bit but judging by the comments I didn't do a very good job. Ig I'll just stick to the instrumental part :(
