Original,Hmar ah Biate ho in Kum 1450 hnu chho te atang tawh a anlo chinchhuah Biate Lam anlo tih thin niin,Zohnahthlak thisenzawm te ah alodarh ta a,tlem tihdan te lotidanglam a Copy siin tunhnu ah tidanglam neiin in,mahni tawng theuhin kanlo uarta ani,Sailo paihte te pawh kum 1600 hnh kanlo thlangtlak hma daihtawh in,Original chu Hmar ah Hmar Biate ho lamdan hi ani e,Kan MIZO pipu tin ten Biate lam anlo ti thin,original ah chuan Chituh lam,Biate traditional dance ani e,Thudik thangthar ten kan hriatloh a ,aralloh nan kalo coment ani e,engpawh nise ,anthiam hlemai Mimbung YMA te❤👍👍👍
The claim that Buh Tuh Lam, a harvest dance showcasing the cultural heritage of the Paite tribe, originally belongs to the Biate Hmar tribe is indeed controversial and requires careful consideration of historical and cultural evidence.Lack of Historical Evidence: There is no substantial historical evidence to support the notion that the Biate Hmar tribe originated the Buh Tuh Lam dance in the 1400s. If this were the case, there would likely be documented historical records and widespread recognition of the dance within Biate Hmar traditions. The absence of such evidence raises questions about this claim.Cultural Practices: The Biate Hmar tribe does not traditionally perform the Buh Tuh Lam dance, further challenging the claim of its origin. Cultural practices are usually well-documented and preserved within a community, and the absence of this dance in Biate Hmar traditions suggests it is not originally theirs.Geographical Considerations: Historically, the Biate Hmar and Paite tribes were not demographically close to each other. This geographical separation makes it less likely that one tribe would adopt and preserve a dance form from the other without significant cultural exchange.Debatability of Imitation Claims: The assertion that the Paite tribe imitated the Biate Hmar dance form is highly debatable. Cultural traditions, especially those as significant as harvest dances, are deeply rooted in the community’s own history and experiences. Without substantial evidence, it is difficult to support claims of imitation.Proper Nomenclature: The Paite tribe is officially recognized as PAITE, and calling them by any other name, such as "Paihte," is a major sign of disrespect. Proper names are a crucial part of cultural identity, and it is important to use them correctly to show respect for each community.In summary, while it’s essential to respect and acknowledge the rich cultural heritage of all tribes, the claim that the Buh Tuh Lam dance originated with the Biate Hmar tribe lacks substantial historical and cultural evidence. The Paite tribe’s association with the Buh Tuh Lam dance is well-documented and recognized, and any claims to the contrary should be supported by robust evidence and historical documentation. Additionally, using the correct and officially recognized names for tribes is crucial in maintaining respect and accuracy in cultural discussions.
Hmar te kha Kuki te tawh ki bang sim hive ucin aw maw? Mi panpihna lah poimoh.. mi teng amau sah niam zaw or amau nuai ah assimilate som… ka pau na theih keh, kenle na pau ka thei tuan kei.. nou sang in ka neu zaw tuan kei uh!! Proud to be Paite-Zomi
@@riziengaihte1665 adiak a hiai pan a kum te a gelh zat2 dan khong ka nuih a zalua. Ei zosuan ten history sim theih a ineih kha british records a kipan incin huai le 1600 a kipan chouh, adng le chu ana om sam in ka thei hilele hucilom2 a laktak kholoh, azoh aman 1450 khong hon gelh zazat, bng chik kum a i copy a chih khong hong gelh zat2. Nak thulakhuai lo petmah. Zuau pumlum a gelh chih a chiang kasa lua.
