Тёмный

Build you own 4:1 BALUN with coax (045) 

Electronics for the Inquisitive Experimenter
Подписаться 10 тыс.
Просмотров 32 тыс.
50% 1

In this video I am going to show you how to build a 4:1 BALUN using nothing but a length of coaxial cable.
I will work through the process of design and construction one step at a time with many pictures to show you how I did it.
More than that! I am going to explain WHY it works.
I sourced a number of books and the Internet looking for this answer and I was amazed at how little there was out there. Well, not so here. I give you the explanation plain and simple with simple math.
** IMPORTANT NOTE **
At 14:30 I state that 28.79 inches = 78.13 cm.
REALITY:
28.79 inches = 73.13 cm
Ooops! Well, a 3 does look a lot like an 8. :-/
**Thanks to a viewer for the observant correction!**
PROMISED SPEED OF LIGHT NUMBERS:
C(in/sec) = 11802852677 in/sec
C(cm/sec) = 29979245800 cm/sec
Time Markers for Your Convenience
----------------------------
00:05 Introductory Comments
01:08 The Basic Design
02:32 How does it work
07:37 Designing One
07:37 Gathering needed Information
09:14 Our Design - Information Gathered
11:12 Deciding on a Configuration
13:38 Our choice of configuration
13:57 Calculate the actual length of coax
14:42 Deciding on final Pigtail length
15:03 The Actual Build
15:10 Cutting the BALUN coax to length
15:25 Procuring a feedline
15:37 Cutting the Pigtails
16:07 Stripping the coax and pigtails
16:50 Tinning ALL conductors
17:07 Procure #24AWG wire for BALUN assembly
17:29 Arrange the coax for assembly
18:01 Connecting the shields together with wire
18:20 Soldering the shield connections
19:04 Connect the feedline to the BALUN coax
19:38 Adding the pigtails
19:41 The feedline/BALUN coax pigtail
19:56 The BALUN coax pigtail
20:04 Final Inspection before test
20:27 Testing & Adjustment
20:31 Initial Test with results
21:37 Weatherize your BALUN
22:02 Adjustment
23:20 FINAL TEST RESULTS
23:59 Lessons Learned: Experiment Debriefing
25:45 Final Comments and toodle-oots
-----------------------------

Опубликовано:

 

28 май 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 128   
@robertw1719
@robertw1719 Год назад
I just stumbled onto your channel and have watched a few videos. Very impressive and informative! As an RF engineer just getting back into Amateur radio I am sure many of your videos will be helpful. And, by the way, your drawings and video editing are top notch! 73s and God bless!
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex
Thank you for the great encouragement! Welcome back to the hobby! 🙂 Now that your getting back into amateur radio, my next video (which I am currently in the process of editing) might be of interest for you: "HF Operations for You" The whole point is bringing folks who are either new to ham radio or who have been away from it for a while up to speed on equipment, operating dos and don'ts, frequencies and their use and more. My plan is to have it out next Wednesday. My next *planned* video after that is a folded dipole for 2M & (possible) 70cm.
@W1RMD
@W1RMD Год назад
First of all, Liked and subscribed! This is the best explanation I've heard on this subject. The ARRL Handbooks and Antenna books don't explain this well at all in their hundreds of pages. I never understood why my beam never worked right until now. The pigtail length works the OPPOSITE of the stub section. I have to wrap my head around the fact that longer pigtails RAISES the frequency. I did see that number three of your tests worked the best because the 50 ohm coax likes a connection closer to ground and the half of the stub that hooks to the 200 ohm impedance likes the lager gap between the center conductor and ground. Thanks for saving me a ton of time and slobber (solder)! Excellent job on the audio and video quality! 73's
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex
You are very welcome, Ryan! Rule of thumb ... R.F. is just magic! LOL 🙂
@Sky1
@Sky1 5 месяцев назад
I feel like I am back in college but I can understand this instructor
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex 5 месяцев назад
Thanks, man! 🙂
@dennisqwertyuiop
@dennisqwertyuiop Год назад
great video,hanks for sharing
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex
Thanks, Dennis! BTW, I discovered the mic issue. Check out the community tab for my channel. Mind blowing discovery.
@PhilipChandler
@PhilipChandler Год назад
Excellent explanation, thank you.
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex
You are welcome! 🙂
@terrybailey2769
@terrybailey2769 Год назад
A nice well paced explanation, thank you. I have used these before and never understood how they worked, I now do.
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex
Glad it turned on the light bulb for you! :-) It was amazing how many places I had to look before putting this puzzle together.
@iamhe999
@iamhe999 4 месяца назад
Great explainer...Kudos... Well Done... we need to hear more from you..
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex 4 месяца назад
Thank, man! I'll keep 'em rolling out! 🙂
@user-fo3vj5xq7y
@user-fo3vj5xq7y 11 месяцев назад
Superb
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex 11 месяцев назад
Thank you! 🙂
@margaqrt
@margaqrt Год назад
A coax stub matching transformer is an interesting video topic. However, at HF the physical length of the 1/2 wavelength section could be quite long. Also, at 2 meter operation I'd be more inclined to employ a resonant dipole or j-pole. Nonetheless, a very detailed presentation including the math to back up the theory. Very few amateur radio RU-vid authors delve into the math. Thank you.
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex
Thank you for the encouragement! 🙂 Surprisingly, the ARRL antenna handbook had nothing in the way of explanation. 😞 I have a few videos on coax stub matching. It is in the "Stub Match" playlist, among others. Here is one application for this BALUN ... I built a folded dipole tuned to the 2m band and fed it with this kind of BALUN. Because 70 cm is 3x the frequency of 2m, the antenna works well on both bands. It now hangs in my attic as my indoor antenna for bad weather.
@W1RMD
@W1RMD Год назад
@@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex Good to know!
@Duke-William
@Duke-William 11 месяцев назад
@@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex Excuse me, this should work for 70cm associated frequency when added to 2m dipole, but what other frequency (band) should it work for? 🤔 Adding 70cm+200cm should affect the 2m halfwave your dipole was originally designed for.
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex 11 месяцев назад
@@Duke-William Well, this is a complicated question kind of. Antennas generally will work on every odd harmonic (1, 3, 5, 7...) So an antenna cut for 148 MHz should be reasonably functional on 444 MHz. With that said, in my practical experience, they do not work as well on the 3rd and even less on the 5th and so on. The 4:1 coaxial balun should work on every harmonic as it is based on being 1/2 wavelength long. But, again, in practical terms, it doesn't work as well on harmonic multiples as it does at its design frequency. So, my folded dipole that I create in this video ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-atnIMwMrLp0.html works great on 2m and OK on 70 cm at the top of the band. Hope this helps 🙂
@Duke-William
@Duke-William 11 месяцев назад
@@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex Thank you , for the explanation. Love this channel!!!
@dannywhittle4245
@dannywhittle4245 Год назад
Think Ill just buy one :D
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex
Be careful, my friend! Pay attention to the frequency range. For HF and the like, purchased ones are probably the way to go. For VHF and above ... You *COULD* do the same thing with a stub match as I demonstrate in this video: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-LY4GysxSEa0.html
@cerberus333dog
@cerberus333dog 2 месяца назад
good info presented very well!
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex 2 месяца назад
Thanks! 🙂
@nova5t872
@nova5t872 Год назад
Thank you
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex
You are very welcome! :-)
@Timberfist
@Timberfist 5 месяцев назад
What a wonderful video and what a wonderful channel. This is the first of your videos that I’ve seen and it’s an instant subscribe for me.
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex 5 месяцев назад
Thanks! I am so glad that you found this video helpful! Welcome to the "family". 🙂
@ericpilboue3276
@ericpilboue3276 Месяц назад
Thanks a lot, sure i will be indicatived soon.
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex Месяц назад
You are welcome! 🙂
@antenaseinterfacescb
@antenaseinterfacescb Год назад
Great explanation about 4:1 coax. I will try this fer 11 meters band to use a Delta Loop. Tks fer nice video. 7351.
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex
You are very welcome! Let me know how this works for your project.
@antenaseinterfacescb
@antenaseinterfacescb Год назад
@@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex I will. 7351.
@moosehead4497
@moosehead4497 Год назад
You are awesome! Love to see someone build a balun based on FIRST PRINCIPLES and not just following someone elses design they read on the internet
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex
Thanks, man!😁
@user-wb5wv8rn5t
@user-wb5wv8rn5t 10 месяцев назад
Thank
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex 10 месяцев назад
You are very welcome!😀
@thomasfink2385
@thomasfink2385 4 месяца назад
Fantastic! Exemplary!
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex 4 месяца назад
Thank you! 🙂
@izzzzzz6
@izzzzzz6 Год назад
I'm thinking this is better than a transforming balun regarding heat loss and performance on fixed bands. I would be tempted to use a common mode choke at the feedpoint such as ferrite beads or ugly choke and perform the bal to unbal or whichever type of transforming with coax matching / transforming. I'm guessing this is a similar approach to when you want to add or subtract a piece of extra coax when you want to slew an antenna array. In a simple co-phase array you can delay slightly the signal at one antenna or the other to steer the radiation angle left or right. Using a short version of this transformer (or a combo of a slightly shorter and a slightly longer 1/2 wave coax transformers) could achieve this. if your array also has reflectors and directors you can also switch in and out small inductor windings on the reflectors and directors to switch their roles, With the combination of both you have front to back and left to right options. Just one question. Is this actually a balun, an un-un or both? It would also have been nice to hear pros and cons between this technique compared to ferrite transformers with a touch of info on choking common mode across the two options. I would love to see a discussion or talk regarding adding a coax transformer like this at the tuner when using open wire rather than fitting a regular 4:1 ferrite balun at or in the tuner. There is so much work that can be done on the feedline, adding bandpass stubs, changing coax lengths depending on frequencies used and different ratio transforming. It would be nice to see you go deeper into this, for example how would you create a 2:1 or a 49:1 with coax why is there usually such a big jump to these higher ratios when choosing baluns etc. Is it possible to get more than one band by adding another coax loop in parallel or different lengths back from the feedpoint, how would you combine the two of them (or more coax baluns) to find the correct lengths for each and positioning along the feedline. The visual on the vna makes experimenting possible without trying to get into complicated math, if you play for a few weeks with a few hundred meters of coax you can literally see what is happening on the vna, either way, can be quite mind numbing work. It would be nice to see some standards for options all printed up tried in practice and back-checked by the community. One thing i would like to see more of on youtube is good real world comparisons vs different methods or with and without. Often it is hard to tell what works well in practice vs what doesn't when side by side comparisons are not always captured on film. PS. If your up-cycling moulded connectors you never know if there is some sort of matching / filtering or transforming built into that moulded connector!
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex
To answer your question ... yes, it is actually a BALUN as the grounded/return portion of the coax never actually connects to anything but itself. These sorts of BALUNs are practical for VHF and above, but get real cumbersome real fast as we descend in frequency. Conversely, the typical BALUN we see in use for HF won't work for beans at the higher frequencies.
@arconeagain
@arconeagain 5 месяцев назад
I used this on my 11m J Pole and it was most effective at removing the CMC issue I had.
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex 5 месяцев назад
Now *that's* cool! I've never heard of a balun used with a J-pole.:-)
@arconeagain
@arconeagain 5 месяцев назад
@@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex in my opinion, there's no better use for this balun... apart from a folded dipole. J Poles are shocking for CMC, and I was having trouble with the SWR, or SWR readings going up when I elevated it. I employed the half wave coaxial balun, and it completely stabilised it. These antennas are supposed to trail behind a Zeppelin. I even used a quarter wave radial to decouple the pole, the antenna was not insulated from the pole for static discharge. This radial or stub runs parallel with the pole, fixed a quarter wave down from the bottom of the antenna/tuning section. It was the most effective vertical I ever ran.
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex 5 месяцев назад
@@arconeagain I just learned something! I *never* knew that about the ubiquitous J-pole! Thank you! That was soooo cool! 😀
@terryboyle
@terryboyle Год назад
This was perfect for the way I look at the process. We are doing a group build in our club for dipoles for 4 or 5 members. You mentioned testing the the velocity factor of the specific cable you were working with and we will definitely need to do that. What tool did you use to do this?
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex
Thanks for the encouragement! Measure Velocity Factor? Well ... you can do this any one of several ways. You can use the venerable nanoVNA or an Antenna Analyzer or use the TDR method which requires a scope and a signal generator. I prefer to use the VNA, myself. I outline all of these methods in my various videos on the subject. Check out my "Velocity Factor" playlist. 🙂
@chachotapia
@chachotapia Год назад
I would like to see you build one for CB frequency with coax using a dipole antenna
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex
Well ... these sorts of BALUNs are really only convenient at the higher frequencies. The CB band is starting to get really cumbersome because 1/2 wavelength is somewhere around 18 feet (5-1/2 meters) long. The other thing is that you wouldn't need one for a regular dipole because its impedance is 50 to 75 Ohms. A 4:1 BALUN would have in input impedance of 10-12 Ohms, no match for any normal transmitter.
@Duke-William
@Duke-William 11 месяцев назад
This is excellent! I am planning to use this for decoupling my antenna for analog UHF TV receiving (if possible today). It is a DIY antenna that I made myself. V-shaped straight dipole elements and the plane of the V are aligned horizontally to the ground. Element material is 0.5 cm diameter aluminium tubes. And length of each element is around 30cm (which I made for around 500-600mhz average frequency capture) The antenna is mounted around 8m above ground (in a wood pole, so is not grounded). The receiver cable (in to signal booster) impedance is 75 ohms. I don't know the impedance of the antenna and have no tools or knowledge to calculate impedance either. Can it be a 300-ohms antenna? I just want to know if this balun is suitable for that? I am grateful for an answer. Thanks.
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex 11 месяцев назад
What you describe here sounds like a “Yagi”-style antenna. I cannot speak to its impedance explicitly, but a lot of yagi antennas have an impedance in the 30 ohm range. You could model the antenna in the FREE 4NEC2 antenna modeling program and it will give you an idea what it’s actual impedance might be. I have a series of videos on the topic to give you a leg up on how to do this. Hope this helps. 😀
@salahjuma
@salahjuma 21 день назад
Thank you for a great i built 4-1 coaxial balun for a Yagi Antenna the swr 1.0x across the board from below 144mhz to 150 mhz. I have 2 questions i could use a hand with. 1- after building the balun and add 2 pieces of wire to use for trimming, now the question in the video you have mentioned by trimming you pulled the sweet point down from 150 to 146mhz, what i understood from building antennas and have been doing it for over 30 years , if you shortened the length the sweet point moves up not the other way. On the dr element that is. Now with coax balun is the other way around i just need to reconfirm the point on the video shorter pulls the sweet point to lower frequency? 2- when using a yagi with a loop dr element full wave, does the balun calculation works the same? Thank you by the way it is my first time using coaxial balun, normally just use a gamma match or coils balun. Best regards Salah 9K2SJ
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex 20 дней назад
Wow! I'm so glad that this worked for you! You ask two good questions ... 1. Making the BALUN coax *longer* lowers the sweet spot. But making the pigtails longer raises it. Counter intuitive, isn't it. Conversely, shortening the pigtail length drops the sweet spot frequency (in a non-linear fashion). Two things change at the junction between the end of the coax and the pigtails: [1] The velocity factor of the medium and [2] The characteristic impedance of the medium. These two factors along with the length of the pigtails and the impedance transformation in the BALUN coax work together to create our counterintuitive experience. Almost makes me want to break out my Smith chart! 2. If you need a 4:1 BALUN to match to an antenna of any configuration, the BALUN calculations should remain the same. I do not know why they wouldn't.🙂
@la6yja
@la6yja 10 месяцев назад
John 3:16. I love it :-)
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex 10 месяцев назад
Praise Him for His grace and love!
@la6yja
@la6yja 10 месяцев назад
@@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex Amen!
@cesarastiz9691
@cesarastiz9691 Год назад
Hi Ralph, this is the first video I watched from you and founded very instructive. I just wonder if the pigtails lenth will be as critical on the HF as it is on VHF. Although the balun line may be too long for low band, I prefer this balun to a wide band coiled 4:1 balun for my center fed 5/8 vertical 15m antenna.
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex
As frequency increases, all measurements get more critical because they are based on the wavelength of the frequencies involve. So, at lower frequencies things get a LOT easier, but a lot bigger, too. :-)
@acestudioscouk-Ace-G0ACE
@acestudioscouk-Ace-G0ACE 5 месяцев назад
I revisited this video and was grateful for the explanation behind the "how to". Knowing why we need to do something helps me learn and retain much more easily. Thank-you. 73 G0ACE
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex 5 месяцев назад
I'm in the same boat as you! I *need* to know the "why" behind things. Without that it is impossible to extrapolate what I am learning to new applications. 🙂
@stanholmes4293
@stanholmes4293 10 месяцев назад
Thanks for your interesting videos. With the coax balun is it possible to design a 49:1 balun?
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex 10 месяцев назад
You are welcome! 🙂 No, this style of BALUN is strictly going to be a 4:1 BALUN because of the principle behind it.
@TheMrDrMs
@TheMrDrMs Год назад
If I'm not mistaken this is a voltage balun, not a current balun, which is fine for VHF, but might not hold up so well on higher duty cycle modes on HF if someone were considering that.
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex
Yup, you have that 100% correct. 🙂
@stephennelson-smith3312
@stephennelson-smith3312 Год назад
This was brilliant - I really enjoyed your presentation style and from first principles approach, thank you! It always makes me chuckle to see "imperial" measurements decimalised... 0.021 of an inch? If you're going to do that, why not just use metric measurements in the first place? A more serious point/question concerns the accuracy of measurements/cutting. You measured using a tape measure, marked in 1/8th increments... yet your target length was at a target accuracy of about 1/50th of an inch. Whenever I try to measure and cut coax (or any wire for antennas) I find that my accuracy is also thrown off by the fact that the wire doesn't sit dead straight (nor did yours in the video). All of this makes we wonder why we're using the speed of light to more than ten significant figures. Seems to me like your inaccuracies in cutting and measuring are going to huge compared to the accuracies of the initial calculation, right? I wonder whether we can be a lot more "rule of thumb"? Given you can maybe eyeball a millimetre... half a mm is getting close to your ability to cut that accuracy, and given the comparatively huge margin for error with the initial measurements of the coax, I wonder how far off you'd be with a more finger in the air starting point, since you're going to adjust with the pig tails anyway? Thanks for a great video, liked, and subscribed, and I look forward to watching more of your content.
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex
First, I have been burned (badly) in the past by rounding off too early in my calculations, so I always carry a lot of decimal places right up to the end, then round the final result. It is amazing how quickly early rounding can magnify into major differences in results. As far as inches vs mm ... well, I am much more comfortable with inches. I agree, the metric system is so very much superior, but I grew up in the Imperial world. I have learned to use my "calibrated eyeball" to accommodate. Then, in the end, knowing that no matter how accurate my calculations or my ability to precisely cut wire and coax, nothing *ever* comes out perfectly. The old adage of "cut long and trim to tune" comes into play. I can always make it shorter, I cannot make it longer.
@stephennelson-smith3312
@stephennelson-smith3312 Год назад
@@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex I agree; Today I did some sample calculations with early rounding, and it's surprising how quickly the inaccuracies multiply. Thanks - I learned from this conversation. I'm going to watch your ones about measuring velocity factor now, as I have a need to do this! You may well see me pop up in the comments to those videos too!
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex
@@stephennelson-smith3312 Enjoy enjoy! 🙂
@ornithopterindia
@ornithopterindia 7 месяцев назад
👍
@W1RMD
@W1RMD 9 месяцев назад
Okay, another question. Did you settle for feeding the folded dipole with 50 ohms and 200 ohms out of the stub and it was "good enough" being 100 ohms off, or did you use 75 ohm coax to try to get it right? I tried using my MFJ 259b analyzer with 75 ohm coax and a 300 ohm resistor and I got results not usable for any accurate testing purposes. I don't know how good the MFJ analyzers are with 75 ohm systems and dealing with complex impedance as they're based on a 50 ohm system. Might be okay for dipoles fed with 75 ohm coax but gets too confusing for it when dealing with multiple impedances, especially at vhf. Thanks.
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex 9 месяцев назад
You already know that a dipole *in free space* has an impedance around 75 Ohms. But, when mounted "near" the ground, its impedance drops approximating 50 Ohms. Thus, the ubiquitous 50 Ohm systems for antennas. The same sort of thing applies to a folded dipole. The exact impedance of the folded dipole will depend on environment it finds itself in. So, my folded dipole may very well be closer to 200 Ohms if it finds itself near grounded stuff, like a mast. Because my coax feed was to be 50 Ohms, I used 200 Ohms. You can see the folded dipole that I intended this 4:1 BALUN for in this video: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-atnIMwMrLp0.html The results are pretty good overall. One last note on the MFJ-259B which I have significant experience with (the club owns a B and I have the C). It is just "OK" for a relatively narrow band of applications. Measuring impedance is NOT in that small subset of applications. I compare the results of a nanoVNA to the MFJ-259 here in this video: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-Pti8Erw_Kkg.html For the convenience, the MFJ-259 is easy and fast. If you want real truth, then the nanoVNA or similar is the way to go. With the nanoVNA you can actually calibrate it with a 75 Ohm standard and use it to measure a 75 Ohm system even though it is technically a 50 Ohm device!
@W1RMD
@W1RMD 9 месяцев назад
@@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex Thanks. I would imagine that mounting the folded dipole as a driven element to a vhf beam would also lower the impedance. Yes a Nano vna and Tiny sa are on my Christmas list. I appreciate all of the help. 73's!
@peterfardell9267
@peterfardell9267 Год назад
But if that is only for one frequency (half wavelength) this must be of very little use. I need to tune a G5RV antenna with a 300 ohm balanced feeder into the usual 50 ohm unbalanced feed to my transceiver. The antenna covers all hf bands and needs a regular atu but must incorporate a balun. Would your coax valin help me here?
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex
It should work for all frequencies in which the balun coax is some multiple of 1/2 wavelength long. So, if it were cut for 3.5 MHz, then it would (should) also work for 7.0, 10.5, 14 and so on. With that said, a balun of this sort to be used on HF frequencies would require a LONG piece of coax. If it were cut for 3.5 MHz, the the balun coax would be somewhere around 93 feet long (assuming 0.66 velocity factor). This type of balun is far better suited for maybe 6m and above.
@sarandeepsingh921
@sarandeepsingh921 5 месяцев назад
hi man i want to make log periodic dipole antenna which can work on 3g,4g and 5g bands frequency from 600-6000mhz so can you help something about it ? I have made once Logperiodic dipole antenna which works on 698-2700mhz very good
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex 5 месяцев назад
Well ... I can truthfully say that I know nothing of designing log-periodic antennas. Sorry, no help here. 😞
@qutips33
@qutips33 9 месяцев назад
can you make a 4:1 unun on a ferrite ring?? otherwise a good video
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex 9 месяцев назад
You *might* be able to. They make 4:1 BALUNs that way. But I honestly cannot say for sure. Never did it myself. 🙂
@aarongriffin81
@aarongriffin81 11 месяцев назад
Can you make a 2:1 balun using this method? If so, where can I find instructions?
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex 11 месяцев назад
Sorry .. this method will only provide a 4:1 BALUN. Thanks for asking! 🙂
@victoryfirst2878
@victoryfirst2878 8 месяцев назад
I am wondering how you could make a BALUN for TV antennas Ralph ??
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex 8 месяцев назад
Well...it depends on the antenna. If of the folded variety, then this one would work for a particular band of TV frequencies. These are pretty spread out so this frequency-sensitive 4:1 BALUN wouldn't give you all of them done well. If you are talking about a YAGI (beam)-type, the impedance is generally around 30 Ohms and the input impedance of most TV antenna inputs are 75 Ohms. There are various forms of impedance matching schemes you can use. One simple one is to simply connect the feedline further out on the driven element. This is a *BIG* subject in its greater context. 🙂
@victoryfirst2878
@victoryfirst2878 8 месяцев назад
SO antanas of different type have different Ohms value that are used in TV reception ?? Would you tell me where I can look to read up on the subject matter ?? Thanks much for helping me understand Sir. Peace. vf @@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex 8 месяцев назад
@@victoryfirst2878 An antenna is an antenna, regardless of what you are receiving. The same principles apply to all antennas. One does not need a special antenna for digital signals that is different from analog signals. At that level, all of the signals are analog in their electromagnetic nature. The impedance of the antenna depends on the style/configuration of the antenna. All antennas need to be *physically* tuned for the specific frequencies they are supposed to operate on. The commercially manufactured TV antennas actually have more than one section in order to cover the very divergent frequency bands used for TV transmission (VHF LOW 54-88 MHz, VHF HIGH 174-216 MHz, UHF 470-806 MHz). The whole topic of antennas is a HUGE topic and there are MANY texts on the subject. Here is a good reference for you: www.amazon.com/ARRL-Antenna-Book-Radio-Communications-dp-1625951116/dp/1625951116/ref=dp_ob_title_bk Yes, it is aimed at amateur radio antennas, but, like I said, an antenna is an antenna and all the same principles apply. I did an Internet search for "building a TV antenna" and found several articles. How good they actually are .... I cannot speak to that.🙂
@victoryfirst2878
@victoryfirst2878 8 месяцев назад
Thanks for the information Raleph. Much appreciated Sir. @@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex
@davidpanetta5492
@davidpanetta5492 2 месяца назад
just one question, what antenna did you use that needed a 4:1 banun at two meters 146MHz?
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex 2 месяца назад
I was planning on my video for the folded dipole antenna for 2 Meters (see the video: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-atnIMwMrLp0.html) which has a characteristic impedance of 200-300 Ohms. I knew I'd need a 4:1 BALUN for it, so this video was born. 🙂
@reubengeorge220
@reubengeorge220 8 месяцев назад
Need to explain what the length. Equally what a wave length in measurement is
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex 8 месяцев назад
The length of the BALUN coax has to be 1/2 wavelength long, electrically. RF travels more slowly through coax than it does in free space, so a piece of 1/2 wavelength coax is going to be shorter than a 1/2 wavelength in free space. Here is a brief explanation ... The wavelength of a given frequency in free space is the speed of light divided by the frequency {Wavelength = (speed of light)/(Frequency)}. Now, when we are talking about coax, or any transmission line for that matter, the Velocity Factor is how many times the RF slows down when traveling through it. So, for RG58 with a velocity factor of 0.66, the RF travels down the coax at 0.66 * the speed of light. So, a wavelength long piece of this coax is {0.66* speed of light/frequency}. I explain all of this in detail in my introductory video on Velocity factor which you will find here: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-GxyqvHrT6mE.html I hope this helps. 🙂
@clauslauridsen4373
@clauslauridsen4373 4 месяца назад
many baluns if you want 160m to 10m ?
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex 4 месяца назад
Well, this is a frequency dependent BALUN as it relies on the electrical length of the "loop" of coax. If you want a broadband HF BALUN as you describe, then you will require a more traditional BALUN which sports a TORIOD or ROD ferrite. 🙂
@daveengstrom9250
@daveengstrom9250 2 месяца назад
I can understand the need for a 4:1 balun. I don' t understand the need for a 1:1 balun. Can you explain?
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex 2 месяца назад
Good question! BALUN stands for BALanced to UNbalanced. While, yes, a BALUN can be used for impedance transformation like the 4:1 BALUN, its primary purpose in life is to take the unbalanced feed (coax) and turn it into a balanced feed (antenna). Antennas like to be driven with a balanced feed, which means that one side is driven high while the other is driven low. Coaxial feed is unbalanced. The braid/shield/screen is ground. It, for the most part, isn't moving in potential. The center is changing in voltage level. With all of this said, the braid likes to see the same impedance as the center conductor, thus we can feed a dipole or inverted vee directly with coax. The load is balanced, but the feed method is not. A secondary benefit to using a BALUN is a reduction in common mode currents coming back at the operating station. Not all BALUNs are good at this; some are better than others. A Current BALUN is great for driving antennas with somewhat unsymmetrical impedances. That is to say, the environment of one leg of an antenna is different than the other, so its impedance is going to be different. A Current BALUN is designed to drive the same amount of current into each side of the antenna irrespective of its impedance. A Voltage BALUN is designed to apply the same amount of voltage to each side irrespective of impedance. Hope all of this helps. 🙂
@daveengstrom9250
@daveengstrom9250 2 месяца назад
@@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex Thank you. I was unaware there were different types of baluns (current and voltage).
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex 2 месяца назад
@@daveengstrom9250You are welcome! 🙂
@vicsorianochannel4278
@vicsorianochannel4278 Год назад
Good day sir I'm from Philippines I have a project for my 13 elements I want to know how to do making a balun for my 13 elements for 145.000MHz thank you in advance for your reply sir God bless
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex
I am assuming that you are talking about a 13 element YAGI antenna. If this is the case, then a BALUN probably isn't what you are looking for. The feed impedance for a YAGI antenna is generally lower than 50 Ohms, in the vicinity of 30 Ohms. There are a number of methods that are used to connect your feeline to this antenna. Our first thought is to connect our feedline at the very inside end of the driven element. The simplest way to choose a feedpoint where the impedance is higher is to move this point of feedline attachment out a little ways on the driven element on both sides. The further out you go, the higher the feedpoint impedance, as I understand it. I am no expert on yagi antennas. I hope this little bit of help is useful.
@vicsorianochannel4278
@vicsorianochannel4278 Год назад
The antenna build was the 13b2 of cushcraft sir I don't know how they make balun for there 13b2 they gave the lenght of elements but I have no idea how to make balun actually I made balun like yours bu I can reach swr to 1:1.1
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex
@@vicsorianochannel4278 If you purchased the Cushcraft 13b2, 13 element yagi antenna, it comes with its own "UltraMatch BALUN." Adding anything beyond that is unnecessary. The feedline connects directly to the supplied matching box.
@PaulaBean
@PaulaBean Год назад
17:12 Are you sure? Those old telephone wires might be worn out by the millions of telephone calls they have carried 🤪🤪🤪
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex
LOL
@NamasenITN
@NamasenITN Год назад
Is it 4:1 or 3:16??
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex
It is a 4:1 balun. The "John 3:16" is the reference to a Bible verse which is the wallpaper on my computer.
@needhelp2453
@needhelp2453 Год назад
Why did you need a 4:1 balun for 2 meters?
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex
Well, suppose I were to build/create a folded dipole antenna for two meters. These would be those "bow tie" looking antennas that you see. These have 200 to 300 Ohm impedance depending on thier environment. Then you would need some fashion of a 4:1 BALUN to use it with a standard transceiver. In fact, I created one such antenna with a 4:1 BALUN like this one which I use all of the time. Because the 440 band (70cm) is 3x the frequency of the 2M band, this antenna works well for both.
@Michel-N2MTM
@Michel-N2MTM Год назад
To match a 200 ohms impedance to a 50 ohms so the SWR will be 1:1 ratio. N2MTM
@user-ig9bl1sx2m
@user-ig9bl1sx2m 9 месяцев назад
in video 14:30 you write 28,79 inches = 78,13 CM my calculator says 28,79×2,54=73,1266
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex 9 месяцев назад
WOW!!!! You are soooo right! Now THAT's a real oopsie! I cannot fix the video itself without permanently deleting it, but I can add a note in the comments correcting that problem. Thank you so much for pointing that out.
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex 9 месяцев назад
Note added to the description. Thanks again for the sanity check! 🙂
@cyrilpontilla5769
@cyrilpontilla5769 Месяц назад
Very nice explanation, but how about if 144MHZ , so what is cutting of Balum
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex Месяц назад
The procedure is the same. Instead of using 146 MHz as the frequency in the calculations, you use 144 MHz, which will mean the BALUN coax would be about 1.4% longer. 🙂
@cyrilpontilla5769
@cyrilpontilla5769 Месяц назад
@@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex what is the 1.4% ? Im planing to make a 7 element 2 stock yagi antiina with Balon , Can you give me also the Diagram of 7 element @ 144MHZ ?
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex Месяц назад
@@cyrilpontilla5769For the YAGI diagram, I will point you to the same place that I would have to go: the A.R.R.L. Antenna Book. As far as the BALUN is concerned, it is dependent on the velocity factor of your coax and other factors as I laid out in the video. So, no, I cannot give you the dimensions for your BALUN. You will just have to follow the directions that I have provided in this video and determine them for yourself. 🙂
@jerryKB2GCG
@jerryKB2GCG Год назад
yikes, 1/2 wavelength at 40M…about 60 feet!
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex
Well ... yes...and...no. Yes, it is long. But, the velocity factor of the coax (e.g. 0.66) will reduce the overall length significantly. A quick calculation puts the average coax at about 45.4 feet for the center of the 40 meter band. Obviously, this is still way long and that is why these types of 4:1 BALUNs are generally used at much higher frequencies, though there is no reason you couldn't use one on 40 meters if you don;t mind the huge length of coax to do so.
@PaulaBean
@PaulaBean Год назад
@@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex Could you roll up those 45ft coax baluns? Or would that introduce unwanted capacitive effects?
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex
@@PaulaBean While "what happens inside coax stays inside coax" on a theoretic level, if it were me I'd roll it that way I want to roll it and then remeasure the electrical length. Rolling changes the physical parameters of coax to some degree in the practical world.
@PaulaBean
@PaulaBean Год назад
@@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex Yeah that would be an interesting experiment: 16 ft of coax stretched out, measuring its capacitance, then rolling it up, and measure the capacitance again. If the braid is part of the system, the two measurements might differ. But how much?
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex
@@PaulaBean But...for this 4:1 Balun, we are not talking capacitance. We are talking electrical length. Different animals.
@peterfardell9267
@peterfardell9267 Год назад
The main function of a balun is to prevent or reduce common mode currents in the feeder. Impedance matching is of secondary importance.
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex
Aaaah, then a common mode choke would be a better choice. See my videos on the subject. There is one specifically on common mode chokes (ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-s_JHPDA7k5Y.html)
@arconeagain
@arconeagain 5 месяцев назад
This worked very well for CMC for me. I read an explanation as to why on Ham Stack Exchange.
@XwpisONOMA
@XwpisONOMA 8 месяцев назад
Unnecessarily long video 😕👎
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex
@electronicsfortheinquisitiveex 8 месяцев назад
I am sorry that you feel that way. I have a particular philosophy regarding the production of my videos. I do not assume that my viewers have know this or that. I try to supply *all* of the answers so that even the neophyte can have success. This makes my videos longer, but very much complete. I got tired of videos that assumed that I know things & then jump over needed facts assuming knowledge on the part of the viewers that they do not necessarily have. As a result, my videos are longer, but I attempt to be complete with everything even the total neophyte might need.
Далее
HF Operations for You (047)
52:19
Просмотров 1,4 тыс.
Cosa è stato messo nel suo zaino?
00:37
Просмотров 3,8 млн
1❤️
00:20
Просмотров 31 млн
Common Mode Current, How do these Chokes work? (013c)
14:30
DIY SMA  50 ohm RF Attenuators
10:35
Просмотров 542
#480 NANOVNA Made Simple
18:39
Просмотров 206 тыс.
Analyzing Guanella Impedance Transformers
18:14
Просмотров 4 тыс.
Cosa è stato messo nel suo zaino?
00:37
Просмотров 3,8 млн